“Sapienza” University of Rome Ministero dell’InternoPolizia di Stato ICARUS Project Showbiz Inc. ICARUS Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Is it time to revisit the problem young driver? Mrs Bridie Scott-Parker (PhD candidate-under-examination) 1.
Advertisements

IDAHO 2014 Valletta Dennis van der Veur. 2 Contents: 1.Key findings presented in In-depth analysis i.Country patterns ii.Age iii.Experiences of.
The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference.
OBJECTIVE TO CREATE AWARENESS AMONGST STUDENTS AND MOTIVATE THEM TO ADOPT SAFE ROAD BEHAVIOURS A Social Initiative of Supported By Kurnool Police Department.
1 INFLUENCE OF HUMAN FACTOR ON ROAD TRAFFIC SAFETY IN LATVIA Aldis Lāma  Accident database expert of Road Traffic Safety Directorate,  Road safety expert.
Overview of program TAC has adopted an aggressive approach to public education by addressing the key causes of road accidents - the attitudes and behaviours.
Drink-Driving in the European Union SMART Czech Republic Ministry of Transport, Prague Thursday 7 th May 2015 January 2015, Brussels Antonio Avenoso ETSC.
Erasmus Thematic Network Sanne Hirs, Project coordinator Faculty of Law, Utrecht University.
Co-funded by the PROGRESS Programme of the European Union Equinet AGM EU priorities on equality and non-discrimination and the contribution of equality.
FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC SCIENCES FINLAND – JOENSUU MEP 2013.
SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES IN PROFILING WELLNESS TOURISTS Ana Težak Damijanić Pavlo Ružić Institute of Agriculture and Tourism.
Confronting “Death on Wheels” Making Roads Safe in the Europe and Central Asia Region (ECA) (May 12, 2010)
Brussels, 2 February 2010 “Curbing alcohol-related deaths on European roads” Antonio Avenoso Executive Director.
Brussels, 22 June 2010 “Reducing alcohol-related deaths on European roads: an NGO perspective” Vojtech EKSLER Policy Analyst.
Drive Right You are the Driver
Effective Environmental Strategies for the Prevention of Alcohol Abuse amond Adolescents in Europe An overview of AAA-prevent.
BAD HABITS WHILE DRIVING CYNTHIA GEORGE PA10016 NASYRAH FAHADA BT ABDUL RAZAK PB10090 MUHD NAIF HILMI BIN ADNAN CD10065.
Political Disengagemen t and Trust in Europe. 1 Do patterns of engagement and trust differ across countries? And what about between different generations?
Y OUNG C YPRIOT I NTERNET USERS : A QUANTITATIVE SURVEY IN THE CONTEXT OF EU K IDS O NLINE (Co-authors: Tatjana Taraszow & Yiannis Laouris) May 2008.
You are part of a system Your Driving Task Your Driving Responsibilities Your Driver’s License.
1 Third Joint EC – OECD Workshop on Business and Consumer Tendency Surveys Brussels, November 2007 Session 7 OUTCOMES OF OECD SURVEY ON CURRENT NATIONAL.
Strider Road Safety Seminar Bristol, 19 May 2015 Ellen Townsend, Policy Director.
LOGO Factors influencing the use of cellular (mobile) phone during driving and hazards while using it Leena Pöysti, Sirpa Rajalin, Heikki Summala Accident.
Country Patterns of Labour Market Entry and Early Career Péter Róbert TARKI Social Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary Paper prepared for the DECOWE.
CRICOS No J When Non-Significance Maybe Significant: Lessons Learned from a Study into the Development, Implementation and Evaluation of a Risk Assessment.
Main results of the “Comparative Report”: an overview of the educational systems in five EU countries and theirs training offer in agricultural machinery.
1. Highway Transportation System (HTS) The purpose of the HTS is to move people, and cargo from one place to another in a safe, efficient and economical.
THE EUROPEAN UNION. HISTORY 28 European states after the second world war in 1951 head office: Brussels 24 different languages Austria joined 1995.
Using the Alternative Five Factor Personality Model to Explain Driving Anger Expression Paul Sârbescu¹ ’ ², Iuliana Costea¹, Silvia Rusu¹ Abstract ¹West.
GM Technology Ethical and moral dimensions Dr Bernie Jones AMASA 9 12/11/13.
CAST Project funded by the European Commission, Directorate-General Energy & Transport, under the 6th RTD Framework Programme.
CAF Resource Centre at EIPA Open Days Patrick Staes Senior Expert European Institute of Public Administration THE COMMON ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK.
Vulnerable road users: Pedestrians & Motorcycle and bicycle riders.
1 Individual and contextual factors contributing in geographical variations in risk-behaviour among young adults in Norway. Sveinung Eiksund Research fellow,
CEA activities and initiatives in road safety. Contents European Road Safety Action Programme & its progress the EU Agenda CEA & road safety Young drivers.
INFLUENCE OF DRIVER'S ATTITUDES ON INTENTION TO SPEED IN THE URBAN AREA MSc Boško Matović MSc Spasoje Mićić PhD Todor Bačkalić.
Cooperation between Data Archives and National Statistical Institutes: recent changes and future perspectives Tomaz Smrekar / Statistical Office of the.
THE INFLUENCE OF RISK PERCEPTION AND SELF-ASSESSED DRIVING ABILITIES ON THE BEHAVIOR OF YOUNG DRIVERS PhD Dragan Jvanović PhD Predrag Stanojević MSc Dragana.
Drink-Driving in the European Union SMART United Kingdom European Commission Representation, London Wednesday 14 th of October 2015 January 2015, Brussels.
Time line By: Shirley Lin. The story of European Union
Information Security Systems Cost Effective Authenticity & Integrity in CEN/FISCALIS eInvoicing Good Practice Guidelines Nick Pope – Principal Consultant,
ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety AUSTRIA.
E-notes European NGOs Observatory on Trafficking, Exploitation and Slavery Brussels, 20 October
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Maintenance Workshop June 9, FAA Perspective on Part 145 Repair Stations in Europe Presentation to: Europe/U.S.
European Commission EU Action to reduce alcohol related harm: recent developments and next steps Ceri Thompson Team Leader: Alcohol and Drugs DG Health.
Comparing Britain with other nations: problems of measuring if and how we differ Roger Jowell, City University Director, European Social Survey Gresham.
Grouping and ranking the EU27 countries by their sustainability performance measured by the Eurostat sustainability indicators Francesca Allievi and Juha.
PROBLEM STATEMENT This matter discusses reasons for opposing direct sex instruction towards teenager’s social lifestyle. Sex education would be isolated.
FROM GAPS TO CAPS Risk Management Capability Based on Gaps Identification in the BSR Project Lead Partner: Fire and Rescue Department under the Ministry.
5 Project funded by the Euro- Mediterranean Regional Programme for Local Water Management of the European Union DEVELOPMENT OF TOOLS AND GUIDELINES FOR.
Characteristics and predictors of self-mutilation among adolescents in out of home group care in Taiwan Yu-Wen Chen Paper presented at the 2008 Association.
Pre-Driving Adolescent Attitudes: Can They Change? Helen Mann, Heriot-Watt University.
February 08th, 2013 SafeTREC, ITS, University of California, Berkeley.
European Innovation Scoreboard European Commission Enterprise and Industry DG EPG DGs meeting, May 2008.
Liver cirrhosis mortality in European countries II Working Meeting on Adult Premature Mortality in European Union Warsaw, October 2006.
DOVILE ADMINAITE European Transport Safety Council.
Ana Martí-Belda, Luis Montoro & Javier Roca
YOUTH and Road Safety in Europe
#YDF2017.
INFLUENCE OF HUMAN FACTOR ON ROAD TRAFFIC SAFETY IN LATVIA
ETSC_PIN_Talk_Estonia_2010_21_May
EUROS Identification Austria - Belgium - Cyprus - Estonia - Finland - France - Germany - Greece - Ireland - Italy - Latvia Lithuania - Luxembourg - Malta.
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Parliament – voice of the people
Adult Education Survey
Statistics on crime and criminal justice, Task Force meeting on victimisation, 4–5 June 2009, Luxemburg Review of the current situation in respect of the.
Safety Tips for Truck and Bus Drivers.
European Union Membership
Right click on image Select ‘Change Picture’
Agenda item 6.1 MID-TERM REPORT OF THE EU 2020 BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY
Presentation transcript:

“Sapienza” University of Rome Ministero dell’InternoPolizia di Stato ICARUS Project Showbiz Inc. ICARUS Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety TREN/SUB/ Preliminary results of the research on risk factors of young drivers “Sapienza” University of Rome 14 Supporter Countries - Meeting in Ljubljana, November 10th and 11th, 2010

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Within the ICARUS Project, it will be developed, for the first time, a training model to be shared with the EU Countries. The training model will be grounded on a research aimed at detecting the main risk factors in road safety.

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety 1. Identifying main Risk Factors involved in road safety. 2. Developing a shared European Training model starting from and taking into account research results. Aims of the Project

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety The main steps: 1)to identify a European Network of road safety training agencies; 2)to conduct an analysis on the driving style and habits of young drivers in different EU countries; 3)to define a set of guidelines to approach the issue “road safety” in relation to young drivers on a European scale; 4)to prepare a Manual with a CD-ROM to perform the training for prevention of road accidents.

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety The intervention areas will be developed in 11 steps along a period of 30 months. Step 1. Creation of a network of participants. Step 2. Preliminary study aimed at drawing up and adapting a questionnaire. Step 3. Sample selection. Step 4. First Conference in Rome.

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety First Conference in Rome Rome - 15/16 October 2009

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Step 6. Organization of a database (data coding and input). Step 7. Data analysis. Step 8. Interpretation of results and first intermediate report. Ljubljana Workshop Step 9. Identification of best practices. Step 10. Creation of a manual both in paper and electronic format. Step 11. Final conference in Brussels.

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Workshop in Ljubljana in order to discuss: a) common and/or national-specific risk factors. b) individual variables predicting a risk taking behaviour. c) existence of groups of drivers at higher risk of being involved in car crashes and their individual variables.

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Total Sample 9611 Respondents 4010 Car Drivers 2556 males yo 1454 females yo 1349 Scooter Drivers 1000 males – 20.1 yo 349 females yo 4252 Non-Drivers 2560 males – 21.3 yo 1692 females yo

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Today, results will be discussed about: Italy Slovenia Austria Bulgaria Ireland Cyprus Poland Lithuania Latvia

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Work are still in progress for the following Countries: Malta Germany Francia Slovakia Estonia

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety The Questionnaire A series of Scales concerning:  General attitude toward road safety (Scale A)  Locus of Control (Scale B)  Driving-related rage (Scale D)  Moral disengagement (Scale E)  Personality (Scale F)  Driving behaviour (Scale I)  Representation of alcohol effects (Scale F)  Questions about driving expertise, habits etc.

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Layout of Analyses  Data check  Identification of the dimensions underlying the Scales Factor Analyses, Principal Axis Method, Oblimin Rotation  Identification of the number of groups of respondents Cluster Analyses, Hierarchical Algorhythm, Complete Linkage, Squared Euclidean Distances  Identification of groups of respondents Cluster Analyses, K-Means Method  Identification of profiles and risk factors Multivariate Analyses of Variance and Discriminant Analyses

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety For instance:  A group of “ Safe Drivers ” exists in all the Countries  A group of “ Risky Drivers ” exists in all the Countries  However, specific groups exist in some Countries but not in all of them, such as the “ Overconfident ”, the “ Aggressive ”, the “ Speeding ” Drivers, etc. The general patterns of results are pretty similar across Countries, but specificities do exist.

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Safe Drivers He/she has a friendly attitude toward the others, and has a positive attitude toward the moral norms. He/she doesn’t feel rage against other drivers or obstacles. He/she thinks accidents are mostly due to factors under his/her control, and that a careful driver could avoid them. He/she has a positive attitude toward the traffic code. He/she is aware of the negative effects of alcohol on general human behaviour.

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Risky Drivers He/she has an egocentric attitude, shows moral disengagement, and looks for excitement and strong sensations. He/she feels rage against other drivers and obstacles. He/she thinks accidents are mostly due to factors not under his/her control. He/she has a negative attitude toward the traffic code (sometimes thinks that violations are useful to make traffic going). He/she considers alcohol as having positive effects on the general human behaviour.

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Overconfident Drivers He/she has a friendly attitude toward the others, and has a positive attitude toward the moral norms. He/she doesn’t feel rage against other drivers or obstacles. He/she thinks accidents are mostly due to factors under his/her control, and that a careful driver could avoid them. He/she has a negative attitude toward the traffic code, and is especially tolerant toward speeding. He/she is aware of the negative effects of alcohol on general human behaviour.

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Aggressive Drivers He/she has a friendly attitude toward the others, and has a positive attitude toward the moral norms. He/she feel rage against other drivers and obstacles, has an aggressive way of driving, and is tolerant toward speeding. He/she thinks accidents are mostly due to factors under his/her control, and that a careful driver could avoid them. He/she has a positive attitude toward the traffic code. He/she is aware of the negative effects of alcohol on general human behaviour.

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Safe Drivers He/she has a friendly attitude toward the others, and has a positive attitude toward the moral norms. He/she doesn’t feel rage against other drivers or obstacles. He/she thinks accidents are mostly due to factors under his/her control, and that a careful driver could avoid them. He/she has a positive attitude toward the traffic code. He/she is aware of the negative effects of alcohol on general human behaviour.

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Risky Drivers He/she has an egocentric attitude, shows moral disengagement, and looks for excitement and strong sensations. He/she feels rage against other drivers and obstacles. He/she thinks accidents are mostly due to factors not under his/her control. He/she has a negative attitude toward the traffic code (sometimes thinks that violations are useful to make traffic going). He/she considers alcohol as having positive effects on the general human behaviour.

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Speedy Drivers He/she has a friendly attitude toward the others, and has a positive attitude toward the moral norms. He/she doesn’t feel rage against other drivers or obstacles. He/she thinks accidents are mostly due to factors under his/her control. He/she is especially tolerant toward speeding. He/she is aware of the negative effects of alcohol on general human behaviour.

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Non drivers The same groups of safe and risky “ potential drivers ” But a specific group exists in all the Countries composed of individuals who do not recognize that alcohol and drugs have negative effects on human behaviour (and driving).

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Preliminary results

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety SLOVENIA

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.08, F 44,742 =43.7, p<.0001 CAR DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (57% males) Mean age = 19.0 years (s.d. 1.0)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.08, F 22,408 =47.6, p<.0001 SCOOTER DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (75% males) Mean age = 17.5 years (s.d. 0.9)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.23, F 24,580 =25.9, p<.0001 NON DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (57% males) Mean age = 18.0 years (s.d. 0.7)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety AUSTRIA

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.08, F 40,374 =23.3, p<.0001 CAR DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (49% males) Mean age = 19.8 years (s.d. 7.6)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety * * * *

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.08, F 22,408 =47.6, p<.0001 SCOOTER DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (72% males) Mean age = 17.3 years (s.d. 4.3)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.16, F 24,476 =30.1, p<.0001 NON DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (53% males) Mean age = 17.7 years (s.d. 5.7)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety BULGARIA

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.14, F 36,1318 =61.7, p<.0001 CAR DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (91% males) Mean age = 19.1 years (s.d. 3.1)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety * * ** *

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.04, F 32,242 =29.7, p<.0001 SCOOTER DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (87% males) Mean age = 18.3 years (s.d. 0.9)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety *

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.15, F 24,3106 =209.6, p<.0001 NON DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (82% males) Mean age = 18.5 years (s.d. 1.7)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety *

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety CYPRUS

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.12, F 28,174 =11.4, p<.0001 CAR DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (54% males) Mean age = 22.8 years (s.d. 3.6)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety * *

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety SCOOTER DRIVERS SECTION 2 No enough respondents

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.11, F 24,152 =12.9, p<.0001 NON DRIVERS SECTION 3 90 Respondents (47% males) Mean age = 18.0 years (s.d. 0.4)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety IRELAND

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.08, F 46,250 =13.9, p<.0001 CAR DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (56% males) Mean age = 21.5 years (s.d. 12.2)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety * * * *

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety SCOOTER DRIVERS SECTION 2 No enough respondents

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.20, F 24,672 =32.2, p<.0001 NON DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (60% males) Mean age = 19.9 years (s.d. 12.0)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ITALY

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.13, F 44,844 =33.3, p<.0001) CAR DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (57% males) Mean age = 19.5 years (s.d. 1.1)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety * *

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.9, F 48,520 =24.8, p<.0001 SCOOTER DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (69% males) Mean age = 17.4 years (s.d. 1.3)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety * * * * * * *

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.21, F 24,676 =32.6, p<.0001 NON DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (42% males) Mean age = 17.2 years (s.d. 1.5)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety LATVIA

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.09, F 40,164 =9.5, p<.0001 CAR DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (62% males) Mean age = 18.4 years (s.d. 1.1)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety SCOOTER DRIVERS SECTION 2 No enough respondents

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.19, F 24,1550 =81.4, p<.0001 NON DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (42% males) Mean age = 17.5 years (s.d. 1.3)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety LITHUANIA

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.08, F 44,742 =43.7, p<.0001 CAR DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (48% males) Mean age = 20.7 years (s.d. 2.0)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.08, F 22,408 =47.6, p<.0001 SCOOTER DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (67% males) Mean age = 19.3 years (s.d. 2.0)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.21, F 24,422 =20.8, p<.0001 NON DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (36% males) Mean age = 19.8 years (s.d. 2.0)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety POLAND

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.12, F 42,1062 =46.4, p<.0001 CAR DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (60% males) Mean age = 20.9 years (s.d. 2.0)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety * * * * * *

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.07, F 36,238 =18.1, p<.0001 SCOOTER DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (67% males) Mean age = 20.9 years (s.d. 3.7)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety * * * *

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Wilks’ Lambda=0.21, F 24,404 =19.9, p<.0001 NON DRIVERS SECTION Respondents (53% males) Mean age = 21.9 years (s.d. 1.4)

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety

ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety ICARUS Project Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety Thanks for your attention!