Research Seminar Series 2009: Access and Success for All Jamie Thompson Jamie Harding Karen Williamson
Northumbria Bedfordshire and Manchester Universities To illuminate and improve student retention (student progression, student success) One of seven funded three year projects Building on previous work with ELLI ELLI? Effective Lifelong Learning Inventory
Learning Power Curriculum and Assessment Practices Pedagogy Institutional Ethos Worldviews and Traditions Home, Family and Community Cultural Tools Peer Culture Self-regulation Goal Orientation Interest Sense of Self As Learner Effort Dispositions Locus of Control Self-efficacy Skills and Capacities Awareness Self Esteem
72 item questionnaire Tested and Validated Self-report Malleable and situational Statements of how think / feel / behave as a learner 4 point Lickert scale Available online Instant feedback as a spider diagram Class / group profiles also produced
Changing and Learning Meaning Making Critical Curiosity Creativity Learning Relationships Strategic Awareness Resilience Being Stuck and Static Data Accumulation Passivity Being Rule Bound Isolation & Dependence Being Robotic Fragility & Dependence
Do students’ dispositions change in the course of their academic programme Does using ELLI in itself boost student retention and achievement? Are there dispositions to learn that have an impact on student retention and achievement? Can retention initiatives based on problematic dispositions be formulated and evaluated?
4 students who have withdrawn compared to 374 who have not ‘Withdrawers’ achieved higher mean scores on every dimension Differences significant for Critical Curiosity and Strategic Awareness
PCAP students higher than other groups on Critical Curiosity, Meaning Making, Resilience and Strategic Awareness Psychology students lower than journalism students on Creativity and Critical Curiosity Educational Practice students higher than Journalism in Learning Relationships
Men scored significantly higher on Critical Curiosity, Resilience and Creativity Woman had higher mean marks Men achieved significantly higher marks when they scored higher on Critical Curiosity and Strategic Awareness Women achieved significantly higher marks when they scored higher on resilience
Students from lower socio-economic groups scored lower on Learning Relationships Non-British students scored higher in the area of Creativity and Strategic Awareness, but achieved lower mean marks (not sig.) Chinese students had higher levels of Creativity than White students
3 focus groups: one academic staff on PCAP programme and two students on MAP 5 individual interviews: four ambassadors of MAP students and one academic staff at Manchester Questionnaires from academic staff introducing ELLI to students
Triangulation in the areas of Critical Curiosity and Changing and Learning Students perceived benefits of self- reflection for personal development Students found the language of ELLI advantageous Staff positive, some concerns over practical issues
How should we respond to higher scores on dimensions among students who withdraw? Will negative correlation between marks and Learning Relationships and Creativity be reproduced more widely? How do students dispositions change with time – can this be influenced by interventions? Is there an appropriate response to gender differences?
Exploration of changes to learning dimensions with time Larger datasets to examine further relationships between learning dispositions and marks Exploration of the impact of combinations of different dispositions More withdrawers to make comparisons in terms of learning dimensions
Exploration of learning dimensions with: Students who have withdrawn from an academic programme Students who have been referred in an academic programme Students who have high scores in high dimensions
Evaluation of guidebook highlighting good practice in the use of ELLI Evaluation of different methods of introducing ELLI to students Development of initiatives to boost key learning dimensions Evaluation of initiatives