Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb. 2003 Part III Statistical Characterization of Brain Structures via M-reps Guido Gerig Departments of Computer Science and Psychiatry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VBM Voxel-based morphometry
Advertisements

National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Slide 1 NAMIC at UNC DTI, Shape and Longitudinal registration Closely linked with Utah.
Gordon Wright & Marie de Guzman 15 December 2010 Co-registration & Spatial Normalisation.
Medical Image Registration Kumar Rajamani. Registration Spatial transform that maps points from one image to corresponding points in another image.
Unbiased Longitudinal Processing of Structural MRI in FreeSurfer Martin Reuter
Guido Gerig UNC, October Statistics of Shape in Brain Research: Methods and Applications Guido Gerig, Martin Styner Department of Computer Science,
These improvements are in the context of automatic segmentations which are among the best found in the literature, exceeding agreement between experts.
Age and treatment related local hippocampal changes in schizophrenia explained by a novel shape analysis method 1,2 G Gerig, 3 K Muller, 3 E Kistner, 3.
Hierarchical Statistical Modeling of Boundary Image Profiles Sean Ho Department of Computer Science University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Sponsor: Prof. Sidney Spector Computational anatomy to assess growth pattern of early brain development in healthy and disease populations Guido Gerig.
Medical Image Synthesis via Monte Carlo Simulation James Z. Chen, Stephen M. Pizer, Edward L. Chaney, Sarang Joshi Medical Image Display & Analysis Group,
1/44 Early Detection Of Alzheimer’s Disease Based on Cortical Thickness Measurements Master’s Thesis Defence Morten Simoni Spjuth Flemming H Gravesen 27.
Clustering on Image Boundary Regions for Deformable Model Segmentation Joshua Stough, Stephen M. Pizer, Edward L. Chaney, Manjari Rao Medical Image Display.
Preliminary Results Longitudinal Change Conclusions Acknowledgements The most striking result of the longitudinal growth analysis between 2 and 4 years.
12-Apr CSCE790T Medical Image Processing University of South Carolina Department of Computer Science 3D Active Shape Models Integrating Robust Edge.
Caudate Shape Discrimination in Schizophrenia Using Template-free Non-parametric Tests Y. Sampath K. Vetsa 1, Martin Styner 1, Stephen M. Pizer 1, Jeffrey.
Medical Image Synthesis via Monte Carlo Simulation An Application of Statistics in Geometry & Building a Geometric Model with Correspondence.
Computer-Aided Diagnosis and Display Lab Department of Radiology, Chapel Hill UNC Julien Jomier, Erwann Rault, and Stephen R. Aylward Computer.
ANALYSIS OF A LOCALLY VARYING INTENSITY TEMPLATE FOR SEGMENTATION OF KIDNEYS IN CT IMAGES MANJARI I RAO UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL.
Towards a Multiscale Figural Geometry Stephen Pizer Andrew Thall, Paul Yushkevich Medical Image Display & Analysis Group.
Invariant SPHARM Shape Descriptors for Complex Geometry in MR Region of Interest Analysis Ashish Uthama 1 Rafeef Abugharbieh 1 Anthony Traboulsee 2 Martin.
Desiree Abdurrachim Morphometric analysis of the hippocampus in R6/1 HD mouse model Internship August – October 2007 Desiree Abdurrachim Supervisor: Leigh.
PhD Thesis. Biometrics Science studying measurements and statistics of biological data Most relevant application: id. recognition 2.
Automatic Brain Segmentation in Rhesus Monkeys February 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging 2006 Funding provided by UNC Neurodevelopmental Disorders Research Center.
Framework for the Statistical Shape Analysis of Brain Structures using SPHARM-PDM M. Styner, I. Oguz, S. Xu, C. Brechbuehler, D. Pantazis, J. Levitt, M.
Analyzing Configurations of Objects in Images via
Quantitative analysis of radiologic images: Image segmentation and registration, statistical atlases Christos Davatzikos, Ph.D. Professor of Radiology.
Sparse Shape Representation using the Laplace-Beltrami Eigenfunctions and Its Application to Modeling Subcortical Structures Xuejiao Chen.
OPTIMIZATION OF FUNCTIONAL BRAIN ROIS VIA MAXIMIZATION OF CONSISTENCY OF STRUCTURAL CONNECTIVITY PROFILES Dajiang Zhu Computer Science Department The University.
Enhanced Correspondence and Statistics for Structural Shape Analysis: Current Research Martin Styner Department of Computer Science and Psychiatry.
2004 All Hands Meeting Analysis of a Multi-Site fMRI Study Using Parametric Response Surface Models Seyoung Kim Padhraic Smyth Hal Stern (University of.
Combining the strengths of UMIST and The Victoria University of Manchester Tom Williams, Chris Taylor Andrew Holmes, John Waterton, Rose Maciewicz Graham.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing DTI Atlas Registration via 3D Slicer and DTI-Reg Martin Styner, UNC Clement Vachet,
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing ABC: Atlas-Based Classification Marcel Prastawa and Guido Gerig Scientific Computing.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Non-Parametric Statistical Permutation Tests for Local Shape Analysis Martin Styner, UNC Dimitrios.
NCBC EAB, January 2010 NA-MIC Highlights: A Core 1 Perspective Ross Whitaker University of Utah National Alliance for Biomedical Image Computing.
Statistical Group Differences in Anatomical Shape Analysis using Hotelling T 2 metric February 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging 2006 Funding provided by UNC.
Medical Image SBIA.UPenn Christos Davatzikos Director, Section of Biomedical Image Analysis Professor, Radiology,
UNC Shape Analysis Pipeline
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UNC Shape Analysis Martin Styner, Ipek Oguz Department of CS UNC Chapel Hill Max.
Ventricular shape of monozygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia reflects vulnerability 2 M Styner, 1,2 G Gerig, 3 DW Jones, 3 DR Weinberger, 1 JA Lieberman.
2006 Mouse AHM Mapping 2D slices to 3D atlases - Application of the Digital Atlas Erh-Fang Lee Laboratory of NeuroImage UCLA.
Statistical Parametric Mapping Lecture 11 - Chapter 13 Head motion and correction Textbook: Functional MRI an introduction to methods, Peter Jezzard, Paul.
Lateralized change of ventricular shape in monozygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia 2 M Styner, 1,2 G Gerig, 3 DW Jones, 3 DR Weinberger, 1 JA Lieberman.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing NA-MIC UNC Guido Gerig, Martin Styner, Isabelle Corouge
Automatic pipeline for quantitative brain tissue segmentation and parcellation: Experience with a large longitudinal schizophrenia MRI study 1,2 G Gerig,
References [1] Coupé et al., An optimized blockwise nonlocal means denoising filter for 3-D magnetic resonance images. IEEE TMI, 27(4):425–441, 2008.
Combining the strengths of UMIST and The Victoria University of Manchester A Generic Method for Evaluating Appearance Models and Assessing the Accuracy.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing A longitudinal study of brain development in autism Heather Cody Hazlett, PhD Neurodevelopmental.
Statistical Shape Analysis of Multi-object Complexes June 2007, CVPR 2007 Funding provided by NIH NIBIB grant P01EB and NIH Conte Center MH
Corpus Callosum Probabilistic Subdivision based on Inter-Hemispheric Connectivity May 2005, UNC Radiology Symposium Original brain images for the corpus.
1 UNC, Stat & OR Hailuoto Workshop Object Oriented Data Analysis, I J. S. Marron Dept. of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina.
Department of Psychiatry, Department of Computer Science, 3 Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities 1 Department of Psychiatry, 2 Department.
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Volumetric Studies.
Classification on Manifolds Suman K. Sen joint work with Dr. J. S. Marron & Dr. Mark Foskey.
Age and treatment related local hippocampal changes in schizophrenia explained by a novel shape analysis method 1,2 G Gerig, 2 M Styner, 3 E Kistner, 3.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Analysis and Results of Brockton VA study: Controls vs Schizophrenics Personality Disorder Martin.
Asymmetric Bias in User Guided Segmentations of Subcortical Brain Structures May 2007, UNC/BRIC Radiology 2007 Funding provided by UNC Neurodevelopmental.
Baseline and longitudinal patterns of brain atrophy in MCI patients, and their use in prediction of Short- term conversion to AD: Results from ADNI Xuejiao.
Segmentation of Single-Figure Objects by Deformable M-reps
Corpus Callosum Probabilistic Subdivision based on Inter-Hemispheric Connectivity Martin Styner1,2, Ipek Oguz1, Rachel Gimpel Smith2, Carissa Cascio2,
D Nain1, M Styner3, M Niethammer4, J J Levitt4,
Moo K. Chung1,3, Kim M. Dalton3, Richard J. Davidson2,3
Tobias Heimann - DKFZ Ipek Oguz - UNC Ivo Wolf - DKFZ
Subjects and image data
Kevin Mann, Courtney L. Gallen, Thomas R. Clandinin  Current Biology 
A Network Diffusion Model of Disease Progression in Dementia
3D osteoarthritic changes in TMJ condylar morphology correlates with specific systemic and local biomarkers of disease  L.H.S. Cevidanes, D. Walker, J.
Anatomical Measures John Ashburner
Presentation transcript:

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Part III Statistical Characterization of Brain Structures via M-reps Guido Gerig Departments of Computer Science and Psychiatry UNC Chapel Hill

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Morphometry of Anatomical Structures UNC Chapel Hill: Morphometry of brain structures in: –Schizophrenia –Twin Studies (MZ/DZ/DS) –Autism, Fragile-X –Alzheimer’s Desease –Depression –Epilepsy –… Ventricles: lateral ventricle 3 rd ventricle temporal horn caudate nucleus hippocampus

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Representative Clinical Study: Neuropathology of Schizophrenia When does it develop ? Fixed or Progressive ? Neurodevelopmental or Neurodegenerative ? Neurobiological Correlations ? Clinical Correlations ? Treatment Effects ? Noninvasive neuroimaging studies using MRI/fMRI to study morphology and function

Natural History of Schizophrenia Age (Years) Good Function/ Psycho- pathology Poor Premorbid ProdromalProgressive Chronic/Residual Gestation/ Birth

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Study: Structural analysis of caudate nucleus in Schizophrenia Processing Steps Automatic whole brain tissue classification (EM segm.) User-operated masking of caudate on label image (intra-, interrater reliability > 0.95) Surface parametrization of caudate shapes  SPHARM & PDM Alignment/Normalization: Surface Correspondence Medial mesh generation (m-rep model)

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Modeling of Caudate Shape M-rep PDM Surface Parametrization PDM M-rep

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Basal Ganglia Netter’s Atlas of Human Anatomy Ventricles: lateral ventricle 3 rd ventricle temporal horn caudate nucleus hippocampus

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Caudate Shape Analysis Clinical Groups: –Healthy controls (N=30) –Typical drug treatment (30) –Atypical drug treatment (30) Clinical questions: –Shape difference between groups? –Drug/patient interaction? –Location & type of changes CNTL Atyp Typ Mean Shapes per Group

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Caudate volume analysis *preliminary analysis, not controlled for age Significantly larger volumes of SZ versus controls Trend but not significant difference between Typ/Atyp Where and what is difference?

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Mean Shapes CNTL vs. SZ leftright Overlay of aligned (transl/rot) original shapes: green: CNTL / purple mesh: SZ

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Mean Shapes CNTL vs. SZ leftright Overlay of size normalized* shapes: green: CNTL / purple mesh: SZ *shape should not reflect size change

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Alignment, Correspondence? –Choice of alignment coordinate system? –Establishing correspondence is a key issue for building statistical shape models. –Various methods for definition of correspondence exist (landmarks, high dimensional warping, PDM w. MDL refinement, …). –Resulting eigenmodes of deformation depend on these definitions. –Scaling of objects prior to shape analysis?

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Object Alignment / Surface Homology MZ pair DZ pair Surface Correspondence

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Object Alignment before Shape Analysis 1 st elli TR, no scal1 st elli TR, vol scalProcrustes TRS top side

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Correspondence through parameter space rotation Normalization using first order ellipsoid: Rotation of parameter space to align major axis Spatial alignment to major axes Parameters rotated to first order ellipsoids

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Correspondence ctd. Rhodri Davies and Chris Taylor –MDL criterion applied to shape population –Refinement of correspondence to yield minimal description –83 left and right hippocampal surfaces –Initial correspondence via SPHARM normalization –IEEE TMI August 2002

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Correspondence ctd. Homologous points before (blue) and after MDL refinement (red). MSE of reconstructed vs. original shapes using n Eigenmodes (leave one out). SPHARM vs. MDL correspondence.

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Shape Representation Method: Medial Representation M-rep Implied Surface Skeletal Mesh (sampled) Local Width (Radius) Implied shape represents original shape with 99% volume overlap and  =0.05 MAD at boundary (M. Styner, PhD thesis)

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Shape Difference Analysis of M-rep Mesh PositionLocal Width A and B aligned, superimposed Mesh distance at corresponding nodes: Object deformation, Bending Radius difference at corresponding nodes: Local width change Grp B Grp A

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Statistical Analysis Shapes represented by m-rep: Significant feature reduction, multi- scale Still: Number of features  sample size. Variability hides shape changes. Shapes not represented by scalar values: Standard MANOVA analysis inappropriate. Often: PCA on features, selection of small # of Eigenmodes, Fisher linear discriminant, leave one out test for classification. But: Fisher LD not robust, #of features?, feature selection?, does PCA reflect group differences?

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb radius mesh distance Statistical Analysis

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Shape analysis using medial representations Local width (radius) differences: Growth, Atrophy (Loss) Positional differences: Bending, Deformation radius

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb. 2003

Permutation Test Monte Carlo Sampling (m=k=30) Mean differences from 1000 permutations Test original difference 22.8 versus distribution: p=0.025 #experiments

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Results Caudate Shape Analysis Integrated local effects Typical group shows larger shape difference to controls than atypical group Significant shape difference between typical and atypical treatment group Shape distances not shown in combined SZ versus controls analysis Treatment effect or clinical selection bias? Experimental study design, result need to be verified in cross-validation study *Non-parametric permutation test

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Results Caudate Shape Analysis Comparison of Surfaces Right: CNTL – AtypRight: Atyp – TypRight: CNTL – Typ Right: CNTL – Atyp -Typ CNTL Atyp Typ Significant shape changes mostly in the head of the caudate Shape effect on left side larger than on right side Local significance tests in progress

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Shape Difference: Where and What? Local Mesh Deformation Atypical versus Typical drug treatment groups (N = 30) Local Deformation (Euclidean dist. between corresponding nodes) Local significance tests (nonparametric permutation tests) p-values per mesh nodemesh with nodes p<0.05 mesh with node differences p<0.01

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb mesh with nodes p<0.05 Group B Group A Shape Difference: Where and What? Local Mesh Deformation Atypical versus Typical drug treatment groups (N = 30) Local Deformation (Euclidean dist. between corresponding nodes)

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Atypical versus Typical drug treatment groups (N_atyp=N_typ = 30) Local Width Diff. (Radius diff. between corresponding node positions) Local significance tests (nonparametric permutation tests) p-values per mesh nodemesh with nodes p<0.05 mesh with node differences p<0.05 Shape Difference: Where and What? Local Width Difference

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Atypical versus Typical drug treatment groups (N_atyp=N_typ = 30) Local Width Diff. (Radius diff. between corresponding node positions) mesh with nodes p<0.05 Group A Group B Shape Difference: Where and What? Local Width Difference

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Atypical versus Typical drug treatment groups (N_atyp=N_typ = 30) Local Width Diff. (Radius diff. between corresponding node positions) Shape Difference: Where and What? Local Width Difference Morphing between Atypical (thinner) and Typical (thicker)

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Discussion Caudate Study Netter’s Atlas of Human Anatomy Width and mesh deformation mostly in caudate body/head. Secondary mesh deformation posteriorly Typical treatment group differs from Controls, but not Atypical. Clinical implications? Study caudate shape change relative to neighboring shapes.

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb IRIS: Tool for interactive image segmentation. Manual contouring in all orthogonal sections. 2D graphical overlay and 3D reconstruction. Hippocampus segmentation protocol (following Duvernoy). Hippocampus: reliability >0.95 intra-, >0.85 inter- rater) Study: Hippocampal Shape in Schizophrenia

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Hippocampal Volume Analysis Left smaller than right SZ smaller than CNTRL, both left and right Variability SZ larger than CNTL

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb D Shape Variability: Left Hippocampus of 90 Subjects

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Hippocampal Shape Analysis Left and right hippocampus: Comparison of mean shapes CNTL-SZ (signed distance magnitude relative to SZ template) leftright outin LeftRight Movie: Flat tail: SZ, curved tail: CNTL

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Hippocampus M-rep: Global & Local Statistical Analysis Hippocampus: Integrated difference to template shape (structures size normalized) Width (p<0.75)Deformation (p<0.0001) p<0.01 individual m- rep local group discrimination statistics SZ CNTL G. Gerig & M. Styner

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Local Statistical Tests Medial representation study confirms: Hippocampal tail is region with significant deformation.

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Statistical Analysis of M-rep representations *Work in progress Keith Muller, Emily Kistner, M. Styner, J. Lieberman, G. Gerig, UNC Chapel Hill Systematic embedding of interaction of age, duration of illness and drug type into local statistical analysis Correction for multiple tests Difference in hippocampus shape between SZ and CNTRL as measured by M-rep deformation *Repeated measures ANOVA, cast as a General Linear Multivariate Model, as in Muller, LaVange, Ramey, and Ramey (1992, JASA). Exploratory analysis included considering both the "UNIREP" Geisser-Greenhouse test and the "MULTIREP" Wilks test. M-rep 3x8 mesh Tail Head

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Patient-CNTL Deformation Difference at Age 40 Patient-CNTL Deformation Difference at Age 30 Patient-CNTL Deformation Difference at Age 20 Deformation at mesh nodes (mm) AGE Model: Row x Col x Drug (y/n) x Age: p = Tail Head Difference in hippocampus shape between patients and controls: Located mostly in the tail of the hippocampus, becomes more pronounced over time.

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Comparison to CNTLs Change in hippocampus shape over ten years for controls Tail Head Deformation at mesh nodes (mm)

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Patients vs. Controls: Local width L/R asymmetry analysis Typical DrugAtypical Drug Radius diff. at mesh nodes log (mm) Model: Row x Col x Drug type x Age & Left/Right width asymmetry: p = AGE

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Preliminary conclusions local asymmetry of width analysis Reduction in control/patient difference in hippocampus width asymmetry seems more pronounced in the atypical group. Differences between patients and controls in hippocampus width asymmetry decrease over time. Given the expected atrophy over time due to aging, it seems that the hippocampus of a young schizophrenic looks like the hippocampus of an older control. Atypical treated patients start (at an early age) less far from the normals than do those treated with typical drugs (TREATMENT EFFECT OR CLINICAL SELECTION BIAS?).

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Conclusions Shape represents changes not reflected by volume analysis Several clinical studies: Shape discriminates better than volume M-rep superior to boundary models –separate analysis of local width/bending –results explained in natural language terms –potential to analyze figure-subfigure relationships and figures in anatomic context Improved statistical framework for discrimination in development

Guido Gerig, UNC, Feb Acknowledgements Martin Styner Sean Ho Sampath Vetsa Keith Muller Jeffrey A. Lieberman Stephen M. Pizer and M-rep team Talk at: