33kV Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Dr. Chris Goodhand Northern Powergrid Adrian Wilson Applied Superconductor Purpose Review 2008 Understand requirements for 2009 Enable you to finalise your plans 2009 deliverables longer term improvements Identify things that will help or hinder our efforts

The Project Deployment of a 33kV superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) Builds on a previous project funded through IFI Some results from this later Device based on a relatively new class of materials Collaboration between three DNOs Device developer - Applied Superconductor Ltd, an SME Relatively large and long term project

Project Motivation The short and medium term future includes an increase in the connection of low carbon technologies to our networks This will include increased distributed generation connection at 33kV This can already be seen as an approaching trend – Wind, anaerobic digestion, biomass There are barriers to this connection.

Project Motivation Increased fault level burden associated with these connections Networks are run close to capacity, much switchgear and protection is close to maximum fault level budget Additional prospective fault level contribution from distributed generation limits our ability to connect Additional investment is therefore required to facilitate – relatively slow and expensive process

Potential Solution Fault current limiting devices Superconducting Fault Current Limiters (SFCL) Advantages Large fault current clamping Disadvantages New devices, lots of potential but little track record Systems readiness issues

The Project Install and operate a 33kV Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Deliver some key learning outcomes: Where can these be applied? How can they be operated? How can they be integrated into our current systems? What technical advantage do they confer? Can we make a business case for their use? Can we make a carbon case for their use? What else can we discover through experiential learning with these devices?

System Readiness Issues Type Testing Specification Non-standard network component – Significant input from transformer and switchgear experts at National Grid to identify which parts of their standards apply to the Fault Current Limiter List of standards/tests for Type Testing now agreed Long process to get all technical stakeholders on board

System Readiness Issues Design and planning Detailed design complete Nomenclature agreed Site Responsibility Schedule updated Substation Control System Protection scheme agreed SGT2 SGT1 S10 S14 S18 L13 L23 2K3 2K0 R2 SFCL H23 H13 33kV (T365) (T364) Brinsworth (B371) 1T2 1R7 1R3

Other Systems Readiness Issues Currently a health and safety problem, unrelated to the project, prevents access to the identified site Project too advanced to move to alternative location Eight month delay to installation and commissioning Supply Chain Problem Key supplier and intellectual property owner in administration ASL acquired IP and identified alternative component source Not critical path

Applied Superconductor Ltd. Founded 2004 in Blyth, North East England to commercialise Fault Current Limiters October 2009 First unit to be installed in UK Summer 2012 Three units now installed July 2012 Purchase parts of Zenergy Power

Applied Superconductor Globally Applied Superconductor Ltd Blyth Applied Superconductor Inc San Francisco Applied Superconductor Pty Woolongong

Inductive Limiters – Principles of Operation (HTS Magnets) Fault Current Limiters Inductive Limiters – Principles of Operation (HTS Magnets)

Inductive Limiters – Principles of Operation (HTS Magnets) Fault Current Limiters Inductive Limiters – Principles of Operation (HTS Magnets)

Fault Current Limiters Inductive Limiters – Principles of Operation The equivalent FCL inductance is a non-linear function of the instantaneous line current CLR Constant Inductance Instantaneous AC Current [kA] FCL Inductance is small at load current Increases dramatically during a fault 14

Inductive Limiters – Comparison to Reactors Fault Current Limiters Inductive Limiters – Comparison to Reactors 50 % Reactor VOLTAGE DROP FCL 6.2% 2% 1.8% 0.5% 0.42 kA 1.3 kA Current/Power 10 kA 100 MVA 320 MVA Confidential and Proprietary Information

Scunthorpe, Station Rd. – 11kV Installation 5 Lorry loads Precision lifts Clean Room Activities

Performance Under Fault – 11kV There was a three phase fault cable on a circuit out of Station Road, Scunthorpe on 7th August 2012. The SFCL had 3.3kA flowing through it on all 3 phases for 0.6s Device worked as expected under fault condition LV power lost, DC power maintained by batteries All systems recovered following the fault clearance

Performance Under Fault – 11kV VOLTS IN VOLTS OUT CURRENT VOLTS ACROSS

Key Learning – Dealing With The Unexpected Un-expected site access issue, despite attempted mitigation, has resulted in project delay. Loss of key supplier and core intellectual property Difficult to foresee Exogenous Risks! Need a plan for when the unforeseen occurs.

Key Learning – Still Much To Learn Installation at Scunthorpe complex and resource consuming 33kV project will address this learning Fault performance on 11kV device has been good System behaved as expected – good clamping Boosts confidence for the 33kV installaion 11kV Ancillary and support systems were impacted by fault GPRS monitoring and warnings never received 33kV systems needs to be “hardened” against such problems

Project Outlook Initial analyses and system design are complete. Systems readiness issues overcome (?) SFCL build in progress Device installation and commissioning due summer 2013 after access issues resolved in Spring 2013 Dissemination of learning expected, late 2012-2013