Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PERE Real Estate CFOs Forum Regulation Coming? October 7, 2009 New York R. Eric Emrich Chief Financial Officer Lubert-Adler Partners, LP.
Advertisements

2010 RR Donnelley SEC Hot Topics 2010 Proxy Season Year in Review September 14, 2010 Presenter: Thomas A. Germinario Senior Vice President D. F. King &
Financial Conflict of Interest July 2012 rev
Building on Our Core Values Building on Our Core Values © 2003 by the AICPA The Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
COMPENSATION EXCESS LEADS TO CORPORATE REFORM
2010 DODD-FRANK ACT EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REFORM Presented by Andrew B. Coburn Wyche Burgess Freeman & Parham, P.A. August 25, 2010 Copyright 2010 Wyche.

Japan Audit & Supervisory Board Members Association (JASBA) Explanatory Memorandum on the Audit & Supervisory Board Members (The companies with Audit &
Certifying the Accuracy of SEC Filings and Update on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, NYSE and Nasdaq Proposals.
Process of CG in Egypt Mohamed Omran Vice Chairman Cairo & Alexandria Stock Exchanges December, 13 th 2006.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of Benefits of Act Three quarters of the financial executives in the Oversight Systems survey said that their company had realized.
Rick Lacher Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin Investment Banking Services 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1900 Dallas, TX Phone: (214)
Chapter 43 An Act Relative to Improving Accountability and Oversight of Education Collaboratives Presentation to Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Regulatory Reform and Implications for the Municipal Bond Market RBDA Financial Regulatory Reform Webinar Lynnette Kelly Hotchkiss, Executive Director.
ELECTION AND QUALIFICATIONS OF DIRECTORS Robert D. Strahota, Assistant Director * SEC Office of International Affairs Prepared for the panel on Improving.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. 2 What Is It? Act passed by Congress in response to the recent and continuing corporate scandals. Signed into law July 30, Established.
Third ICAC Symposium The New York Stock Exchange – A Regulator and a Listed Company James F. Duffy Executive Vice President & General Counsel NYSE Regulation,
Ann Graham, JD, MBA Professor of Law Director, Business Law Institute Hamline University School of Law Banking Law Prof Blog:
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 Section 16 of 1934 Securities Exchange Act Section 16(a) of 1934 Act defines any person who.
WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the TITLE MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide in alignment with 3D icon blocks. What Every.
Stockholder Rights and Corporate Governance Stockholders Corporate Governance Executive Compensation: A Special Issue Shareholder Activism Government.
1. 2 CVM’s OBJECTIVES u to stimulate the creation of savings and their investment in securities; u to promote the expansion and regular and efficient.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Slide 12-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter Twelve Financial Reporting and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 1 Era of Fundamental Governance Change ■ Change in balance of state vs. federal regulation of governance ■ Internal affairs.
3rd session: Corporate Governance
Promoting Objectivity in Research by Managing, Reducing, or Eliminating Conflicts of Interest UT HOP UT HOP The University of Texas at Austin.
Fiduciary Standard Implications Regulatory Reform and Implications for the Municipal Bond Market Webinar Sponsored by the Regional Bond Dealers Association.
Washington Update: Impact & Analysis: IR in 2014 Jeff Morgan President & CEO National Investor Relations Institute
1 Denver Boulder Colorado Springs Dublin London Los Angeles Munich Phoenix Salt Lake City San Francisco Update on SEC’s Proxy Disclosure Enhancements.
2007 Spencer Stuart Board Index Findings Review of S&P 500 Proxies Spencer Stuart William B. Reeves Managing Director, Atlanta.
Clause 49 - Corporate Governance. 2 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  Good governance- expectation of stakeholders  Enhancing business performance and accountability.
NEW SEC AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE REQUIREMENTS Financial Executives International Janet Luallen Director - Technical Activities.
0 October 2005  THE CODE ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT.
GOING PUBLIC – THE PROCESS, LEGAL ASPECTS AND ALTERNATIVES Interaction Between US/UK and Israeli Law November 8, 2006 Daniel K. Gamulka.
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 1 Era of Fundamental Governance Change ■ Change in balance of state vs. federal regulation of governance ■ Internal affairs.
By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando.
Investment Adviser Workshop: the New Form ADV Part 2, New Rules, and the IA Switch.
ADB Project TA 3696-PAK, Regulation for Corporate Governance 1 REGULATION FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN PAKISTAN CAPITAL MARKETS.
PROXY VOTING Presented by Jeffrey S. Kropschot, VP and CCO A.G. Edwards Trust Company FSB FIDUCIARY AND INVESTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 2008 NATIONAL.
Verica Hadzi Vasileva-Markovska Macedonian Institute of Directors Brussels,
SEC Update—Dodd-Frank Act Dallas CPA Society’s 7 th Annual Education Conference May 26, 2011 Alex Frutos Phone: (214) Jackson Walker.
Corporate Governance: Executive Compensation and the Rest of the Changing Landscape Gary C. Ivey Alston & Bird LLP September 2, 2009.
COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning..
Issues in Corporate Governance: Board Structures and Functions Based on a Student Presentation by Joshua Shullaw and Matthew Domeyer.
By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando.
CHOATE HALL & STEWART LLP 1 New Rules for Proxy Statement Disclosures Presentation to The National Association of Stock Plan Professionals, Boston Chapter.
Annual seminar in Berlin – 27 th May Should EU corporate governance measures take into account the size of listed companies ? How ? Should a.
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
The Board Place burnslev.com theboardplace.com (c) 2010 Russ Hansen Corporate Governance Provisions of Dodd-Frank Board of Directors XYZ, Inc. August 25,
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/ Irwin 14-1 Business and Society POST, LAWRENCE, WEBER Stockholders and Corporate.
Accounting Update Part 1 Chicago Regional Training Conference Indianapolis, Indiana June 14, 2006 Robert F. Storch, Chief Accountant Division of Supervision.
A Human Resource Management Approach
© Strategic Financial Solutions, Inc Corporate Governance: What Can We Learn From The West? Robert McDonough.
A FRAMEWORK FOR DISCLOSURE AND REGULATION OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS Robert D. Strahota, Assistant Director * US SEC Office of International Affairs.
SECURITIES REGULATION SPRING 2006 January 10, 2006.
Capital Markets and Corporate Governance Hot Topics for 2015 PRESENTATION TO Clients and Friends.
Building on Our Core Values Building on Our Core Values © 2003 by the AICPA The Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
May 5, 2016 May 5, Reporting obligations for  Investment banks,  Stockbrokers and dealers  FM and Investment advisers 2. Publication financial.
Fifteenth Board Meeting Geneva, April 2007 Ethics Committee Annual Report Professor Sheila Dinoshe Tlou, M.P., POH (Chair) Dr Brian Brink (Vice Chair)
Sept-Oct 2010 Washington IR Perspective Brad Wilks - Chair Jeff Morgan – President & CEO National Investor Relations Institute.
Chapter 9 Mutual Funds as Institutional Investors.
Case Study: Examination of an Investment Adviser to a Hedge Fund Dalia Osman Blass, Division of Investment Management Pete Driscoll, Office of Compliance.
UW Conflict of Interest Program Manager Office of Research Policy
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Compensation and benefits tax: executive compensation
Corporate Governance for Mutuals
Dr. Donald K. McConnell Jr.
Board of Directors Roles and Responsibilities
What is corporate governance?
Dodd-Frank Act Signed into law by President Barack Obama on July 21, The law was initially proposed on December 2, 2009, in the House of Representatives.
Presentation transcript:

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

Executive Compensation and Corporate Governance Provisions of the Dodd–Frank Act (all public companies)

Executive Compensation and Corporate Governance Reform The Dodd-Frank Act provides for the following reforms: Executive Compensation Say on Pay Recoupment/Clawback Policies Compensation Committee Independence Additional Compensation Proxy Disclosure Corporate Governance Mandatory Proxy Access Disclosure About Chairman and CEO Positions Broker Discretionary Voting Disclosure of Any Employee or Director Hedging SEC Management Improvements

Say on Pay Requires a separate, non-binding shareholder vote to approve the compensation of the named executive officers (i.e. “say-on-pay”) at least every 3 years. Requires, at least every 6 years, a shareholder vote on how frequently the non-binding “say-on-pay” vote will occur (every 1, 2 or 3 years). Required for annual meetings held on or after January 22, 2011.

Say on Golden Parachutes Any proxy statement seeking approval of a change in control transaction must include: “clear and simple” disclosure of any agreements the acquirer has with any named executive officers of the subject company concerning any compensation that relates to the change in control transaction (“golden parachute” payments); and a separate non-binding shareholder vote to approve such “golden parachute” agreements, unless the agreements have already been subject to a vote pursuant to say-on-pay requirements. Required for meetings held on or after January 22, 2011.

Recoupment/Clawbacks SEC required to issue rules requiring a company to recover incentive compensation from certain executives in the event of an accounting restatement due to a material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements. Company must recover any amounts in excess of what would have been paid under the restated financials. Applies to any current or former executive who received incentive compensation (including stock options) during the 3-year period preceding the date the company is required to prepare the restatement.

Compensation Committee Independence SEC required to issue rules within 1 year requiring the NYSE and NASDAQ to establish independence standards for all members of the Compensation Committee. In determining independence for this purpose, the Dodd-Frank Act requires the securities exchanges to consider certain factors, including: the source of compensation for the director (such as any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fees paid by the company), and whether the director is affiliated with the company, a subsidiary of the company or an affiliate of a subsidiary of the company.

Compensation Committee Independence (cont.) The Compensation Committee in its sole discretion may engage compensation consultants, legal counsel or other advisers to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee must be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of compensation consultants. The Compensation Committee may select compensation consultants only after considering factors that might affect the independence of such advisers to be promulgated by the SEC. Company must disclose in its proxy statement if the Compensation Committee retained a compensation consultant and any conflict of interest issues. This will be required for 2012 proxy season.

Compensation Proxy Disclosure Companies must include a discussion of the relationship between executive compensation and stock performance. Companies must also disclose: Median annual total compensation of all employees (other than the CEO); Annual total compensation of the CEO; and The ratio of the two amounts. Not currently expected to be in effect for 2011 proxy season.

Mandatory Proxy Access The Dodd-Frank Act expressly authorizes the SEC to issue rules granting shareholders access to company’s proxy statement to nominate directors. Senate provision requiring 5% ownership and a 2-year holding period was removed from the final Dodd-Frank Act; SEC to determine details of access. SEC expected to take action soon, for rules to be in effect for 2011 proxy season.

Chairman and CEO Position Disclosure SEC required to issue rules requiring disclosure in a company’s proxy statement of its reasons for having the same person or different individuals serving as Chairman and CEO. Current rules require disclosure of board leadership structure, including whether Chairman and CEO positions are combined or separated, and why the company believes its structure is appropriate. SEC required to issue rules by January 17, 2011.

Broker Discretionary Voting Directs the NYSE and NASDAQ to prohibit discretionary voting in connection with the election of directors, executive compensation (e.g., “say on pay” and “say on golden parachute” votes) or any other significant matter (as determined by SEC). Discretionary voting has already been eliminated from director elections.

Executive Compensation No Timeframe Provided SEC Must Implement Rules Requiring the Following Executive Compensation Disclosures: Two new executive compensation disclosures: (i) pay for performance disclosure and (ii) internal pay equity disclosure. Clawbacks: Prohibit listing of a company that does not implement a policy providing (i) for disclosure of the company’s policy on incentive-based compensation that is based on financial information and (ii) that the company will recover from a company’s current or former executive officers who received incentive-based compensation in the three-year period preceding a restatement. Disclosure of Hedging by Insiders: Require companies to disclose whether employees and directors are allowed to hedge the value of any equity securities. Nine Months (Apr. 21, 2011) Incentive-Based Compensation Requires Federal financial regulators to jointly prescribe regulations to: (i) require “covered financial institutions” to report the structures of all incentive-based compensation arrangements and (ii) prohibit incentive-based payment arrangements that encourage inappropriate risks by providing employees, directors or principal shareholders with excessive compensation or that could lead to material financial loss to the covered financial institution. One Year (Jul. 21, 2011) Independence of Comp. Committees The SEC must issue rules directing national exchanges to require listed companies to have independent compensation committees within one year after enactment of DFA. DFA outlines factors to be considered. Apr. 21, 2011 Jul. 21, 2010 Jan. 21, 2011 Jul. 21, 2011 Effective Immediately (Jul. 21, 2010) Broker Discretionary Voting Listing exchanges must prohibit broker discretionary voting in connection with the election of directors, executive compensation, or any other significant matter, as determined by the SEC. Six Months (Jan. 21, 2011) Say on Pay Must provide shareholders with a non-binding vote on executive compensation at least once every three years. Must provide shareholders with a non-binding vote at least once every six years to determine the frequency of the say on pay vote. Say on Golden Parachutes Must provide shareholders with a non-binding vote on named executive officer golden parachute arrangements where shareholders are asked to approve an M&A transaction. One Year (Jul. 21, 2011) Retaining Comp. Consultants/Other Advisors General: Compensation committees must have authority to retain or obtain the advice of an advisor. Independence of Advisors: Compensation committees must consider factors affecting independence when retaining an advisor. Disclosure: In any proxy for an annual meeting occurring more than one year after enactment of the Act, compensation committees must disclose: (i) whether a compensation consultant was retained and (ii) whether the work of the compensation consultant presented a conflict of interest.

Disclosure of Employee and Director Hedging The SEC must issue a rule requiring companies to disclose whether their employees or directors are permitted to purchase financial instruments designed to hedge against any decreases in the market value of the company’s stock. The Dodd-Frank Act is silent as to when this will be required.

Implementation Timelines and Further Actions

Changes to SEC Management SEC required to submit annual report and certification that assess the effectiveness of the SEC’s internal supervisory controls and its procedures used to perform examinations, investigations and reviews of filings. U.S. Comptroller General is required to submit: A triennial report evaluating SEC personnel management; An annual report assessing the SEC’s internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting; and A triennial report on the SEC’s oversight of FINRA. SEC Divisions of Trading and Markets and Investment Management provided with staff of examiners to perform compliance inspections and examinations.

Changes to SEC Management (cont.) SEC Inspector General required to establish hotline for SEC employee confidential suggestions regarding waste, misconduct or mismanagement. SEC required to employ a consultant to review the internal operations, structure, funding and need for comprehensive reform of the SEC and its relationship with self-regulatory organizations. U.S. Comptroller General required to perform study on the turnover of Staff that work for financial institutions regulated by the SEC and determine whether post-employment restrictions are necessary.