OSTP Presentation to the AAAC Michael Salamon and Rob Dimeo NSF HQ, Washington, DC October 12, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan June 18, 2013 For the Washington Internship for Students of Engineering (WISE) Program AAAS.
Advertisements

The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 11, 2013 for IAFF 2190W, Science, Technology, & Policy George Washington University.
The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan March 31, 2014 For the Catalyzing Advocacy in Science and Engineering Workshop AAAS R&D.
The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy.
1 Budgeting for Performance in the U.S. Using the Program Assessment Rating Tool J. Kevin Carroll U.S. Office of Management and Budget July 2008.
Tales from the Sausage Factory: How the Federal Government Gets a Budget Neile L. Miller Director Office of Budget U.S. Department of Energy.
THE NSF BUDGET Overview of Agency Funding Processes Presented by Beth Blue National Science Foundation Office of Budget, Finance, and Award Management.
Unit 5: The Executive Branch
Where Does the Weather and Climate Enterprise Go From Here? August 2008 Presented by Joel M. Widder Lewis-Burke Associates LLC Washington, D.C.
Sequestration How Does it Work. Passed the Congress in August 2011 Established the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction It’s the Law! P.L
Conversation with ACCORD on GSMT 21 January 2005 Michael S. Turner, Assistant Director Directorate for Mathematical & Physics Sciences National Science.
View from the Hill Ellen E. Burns, Ph.D Office of Congressman Vern Ehlers.
The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 9, 2015 For George Washington University Course IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology &
U.S. Science Policy Cheryl L. Eavey, Program Director
Technologies for Homeland Security Shana Dale Chief of Staff and General Counsel Office of Science and Technology Policy October 29, 2004.
Shaping of Public Environmental Policy: User Community Impact Samuel P. Williamson Federal Coordinator for Meteorology Office of the Federal Coordinator.
1 Marvin Goldberg A Symposium for Nick Samios' 70 th Birthday.
2012 Outlook for Federal Contractors Kevin Plexico Vice President, Federal Information Services Deltek, Inc. September 15, 2011.
Research Needs of the Federal Government: A Perspective from the White House Adapted from Presentation by The Office of Assistant Director for Environment.
Office of Science & Technology Policy Executive Office of the President The National Climate Assessment Version 3.0 Kathy Jacobs Assistant Director for.
NSF Budget Process MPS Advisory Committee April 4, 2003.
Health Economics Unit Budget of the US Government Fiscal Year 2000 l October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2000 l Total Government Spending is 29% of.
Franca R. Jones Senior Policy Analyst Chemical and Biological Countermeasures National Security and International Affairs Remarks for the Interagency Board.
NSTC Smart Grid Subcommittee Overview and Goals for Ongoing Federal/State Collaboration By George Arnold, NIST & Jessica Zufolo, RUS NARUC Annual Convention,
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
All Youth Ready at 21. Connecticut Youth Futures Policy Team  Participates in: Youth Policy Institute of the National Conference of State Legislatures,
Austerity In the Age of Innovation Bethany Johns, Ph.D. John Bahcall Public Policy Fellow American Astronomical Society June 22, 2012 IPPW-9.
Professional Science Master’s Programs: Federal Budget Strategy April 4, 2008 Council of Graduate Schools.
The Office of Science and Technology Policy Executive Office of the President of the United States Kate Beers Assistant Director Physical Sciences and.
Moving Toward Quantitative Evidence-based Science Policy: Science of Science Policy Developmental Efforts In Theory, Evaluation Methods, and Data Infrastructure.
Senior Legislative Policy Analyst
Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force Interim Report Proposed Governance Structure Review Peter Hill October 13, 2009.
Policies Regarding International Students, Postdocs, and Visiting Scholars James A. Griffin, Ph.D.
Rob Dimeo & Jon Morse February 8, 2007 OSTP OSTP Update Rob Dimeo & Jon Morse Physical Sciences and Engineering Office of Science and Technology Policy.
The Only Government-wide Forum for Technology Transfer FLC Washington DC Office Gary K. Jones FLC Washington DC Rep FLC Mid-Atlantic Regional Meeting Rocky.
The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan March 19, 2015 for the Marine Geoscience Leadership Symposium AAAS R&D Budget and Policy.
President’s Office of Science and Technology Policy Deborah D. Stine Specialist in Science and Technology Policy December 3, 2008.
Biological Sciences in the Federal R&D Portfolio Kei Koizumi April 17, 2008 for the NSF BIO Advisory Committee AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program
Gene Whitney Assistant Director for Environment Office of Science and Technology Policy Executive Office of the President COMMUNICATING GEOSCIENCES TO.
FY 2008 Proposed Budget ($2.776 Trillion OL) R&D = 13% of discretionary spending Non-Def. 16% Other Mandatory 11.5% Social Security 20.9% Net Interest.
Government at Work: The Bureaucracy Chapter 15. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT Section 2.
Physics of the Cosmos Program Analysis Group John Nousek Penn State University International Workshop on Astronomical X–Ray Optics Prague, Czech Republic.
BERAC Meeting, 04/30/03 Connecting Bucks with the Cosmos: Six Policy Questions for the New Fiscal Year Joel Parriott Office of Management and Budget.
Federal R&D Budget: Context and Current State of Play Matt Hourihan September 27, 2014 for the National Association of Graduate-Professional Students AAAS.
The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan November 17, 2014 For the AAAS S&T Policy Leadership Seminar AAAS R&D Budget and Policy.
Sequestration and Federal R&D Matt Hourihan November 14, 2012 For the House Research & Development Caucus AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program
4th Annual University Federal Dialogue on Environmental and Energy Research and Education Scott Rayder Chief of Staff National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration.
Strength Through Science BESAC Presentation Office of Science Dr. James Decker Acting Director, Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy August 2, 2001.
American Fisheries Society Incoming Governing Board Breakfast Scott Rayder Chief of Staff National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration September 15,
Chapter 14 Section 5 Objective: To understand the executive agencies and the role of the cabinet.
An Overview of the Federal Budget for 2009 Kei Koizumi March 13, 2008 for the CCAS Washington Seminar AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program
Office of Science Office of Science Advisory Committee Chairs Perspectives on the Department of Energy Office of Science - Issues and Opportunities in.
National Science Foundation Congress and the National Science Foundation OLPA-1.
NITRD Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Program 19 March 2009.
2013 SCOWT WASHINGTON MEETING/ WASHINGTON, DC 20 JUNE2013 AASHTO Waterborne Freight Bottom Line Report Chris Smith Intermodal Policy and Program Manager.
AAAC Meeting: October 13, 2006 OSTP Update Rob Dimeo & Jon Morse Physical Sciences and Engineering Office of Science and Technology Policy Executive Office.
OSTP and Neutron Science OSTP is authorized to (under PL , National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976): Advise.
NITRD Networking and ITRD IT R&D CIC computing, info and comm HPCC and communication HPC high-performance computing George O. Strawn NITRD co-chair and.
NSF and the Federal Budget Michael Sieverts Division Director, Budget Division Office of Budget, Finance, and Award Management U.S. National Science Foundation.
Science Funding and Shaping Science Policy SCB at Foothills Brewing January 2015 Mark O. Lively Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry.
1 American Competitiveness Initiative John H. Marburger, III President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology March 28, 2006.
House and Senate Energy and Water Appropriation Bills FY 2017 House and Senate Appropriation Bills on Energy and Water Spending Compared to President’s.
Federal budget 101. Federal budget 101 PROCESS AND TIMELINE President’s Budget Request February Congressional Budget Resolution Early spring (passed.
R&D Funding in the New Administration and Congress
Outline: OCS Overview: Organizational Structure USDA Coordination
Kate Beers Assistant Director Physical Sciences and Engineering
Tutorial 4 The budgetary process
The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives
Financing Government Chapter 16.
The U.S. Federal R&D Budget: Overview and Outlook
Presentation transcript:

OSTP Presentation to the AAAC Michael Salamon and Rob Dimeo NSF HQ, Washington, DC October 12, 2005

OSTP Presentation to the AAAC OSTP Primer What are the interagency science priorities? The science of science policy FY 2006 budget status OSTP activities in near future

OSTP Primer Established by Congress in 1976 to advise the President and others on the effects of science and technology on domestic and international affairs. Serves as a source of scientific and technological analysis and judgment for the President on major Federal policies, plans, and programs. Leads interagency efforts to develop and implement sound policies and budgets. Builds partnerships among Federal, State, and local governments, other countries, and the scientific community. Evaluates the scale, quality, and effectiveness of the Federal effort in science and technology. In concert with the OMB, issues “Administration Research and Development Budget Priorities.” Provides advice to the OMB during budget formulation process. Director co-chairs the PCAST, the Presidential Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Director convenes meetings of the NSTC, the National Science and Technology Council (which, e.g., issues Charters for IWGs).

OSTP Organization Chart

Science Priorities from the July, 2005 Memorandum of John H. Marburger III & Joshua B. Bolten, “FY 2007 Administration R&D Budget Priorities” Memo provides general guidance for setting priorities among R&D programs and interagency R&D efforts. The priorities are produced in consultation with PCAST and collaboration within the interagency NSTC. General guidance: “The combination of finite resources and a multitude of new research opportunities requires careful attention to funding priorities…Agencies may propose new, high-priority activities, but these requests should identify potential offsets by elimination or reductions in less effective or lower priority programs…” Identified interagency priorities: –Homeland Security R&D –High-End Computing and Networking R&D –National Nanotechnology Initiative –Priorities in the Physical Sciences: “Examples of well coordinated, interagency investments in the discovery-oriented sciences are described in the IWG report…The Physics of the Universe” –Understanding Complex Biological Systems –Energy and Environment (incl. Hydrogen Fuel Initiative, global Earch observations, climate)

FY 2005 Proposed Budget ($2.4 Trillion OL) R&D = 14% of discretionary spending Non-Def. 16% Other Mandatory 13% Social Security 23% Net Interest 10% Defense 14% Defense R&D 2% Medicare 12% Medicaid 7% Non-Def. R&D 3% Mandatory Spending Discretionary Spending

From presentation by J. Marburger at 30 th Annual AAAS Forum on Science and Technology Policy, April 2005 President’s FY 2006 Budget increases total R&D to $132.3 B (45% greater than FY 2001) R&D represents 13.6% of total discretionary outlays Non-defense R&D accounts for 5.6% of total discretionary outlays (3-decade average is 5%)

R&D as a Share of Discretionary Spending It’s approximately constant over the last 30 years! 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% R&D/ Discretionary, CivilianCivilian R&D share, excluding Apollo R&D/ Discretionary, TotalTotal R&D share, excluding Apollo The ratio of non-defense science to the non-defense discretionary budget is remarkably stable at ~11% over decades. This has even led to scholars questioning the need for science policy altogether!

The Social Science of Science Policy (from April 21, 2005 presentation by J. Marburger to the AAAS 30 th Annual Forum on Science and Technology Policy) “I am confident about America’s near-term future in science and technology, but I share the concerns of many about the longer term. I do not fear so much that our current budgets are too small, or that our facilities are inadequate, or that our policies guiding federal research are too restrictive. But I worry constantly that our tools for making wise decisions…are not yet sharp enough to manage the complexity of our evolving relationship with the awakening globe. I want to base advocacy on the best science we can muster to map our future in the world.” “I am suggesting that the nascent field of the social science of science policy needs to grow up, and quickly, to provide a basis for understanding the enormously complex dynamic of today’s global, technology-based society. We need models that can give us insight into the likely futures of the technical workforce and its response to different possible stimuli…the impact of globalization on technical work…of yet further revolutions in information technology…” “My perception of the field of science policy is that it is to a great extent a branch of economics, and its effective practice requires the kind of quantitative tools economic policy makers have available, including a rich variety of econometric models…”

Current Status of FY 2006 Budget President’s FY 2006 Budget House FY 2006 Mark Senate FY 2006 Mark DOE/SC3.463 B3.666 B3.703 B NSF5.605 B5.643 B5.531 B NASA Science, Aero, Exploration B9.726 B9.761 B (DOE budget comes under Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittee) (NSF, NASA budgets come under Commerce, Justice and Science Appropriations Subcommittee) Now operating under a Continuing Resolution. House Appropriations Committee Chair, Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA) has suggested the possibility of having a year-long continuing resolution rather than a large omnibus bill (should individual bills not be passed). Effect of Katrina costs (order of $10 11 ) on above budgets not yet known, but will most probably have significant impact. FY 2006 is going to be a hard year. And FY 2007 may be harder.

Near-Future AAAC-Related Activities by the OSTP Assist the OMB in its current budget formulation process. Renewal of the charter of the Physics of the Universe Interagency Working Group (IWG) by the NSTC. Develop interagency plans in response to the reports of the Dark Energy Task Force and the Task Force for CMB Research. Eagerly await the recommendations of the NSF Senior Review! Policy on private/public partnerships in astronomy facilities. Welcome input from the AAAC and the A&A community on issues where the OSTP can play a helpful role.

Backup Slides