Using NHTS to Estimate Activity Patterns Heather Contrino, Travel Surveys Team Leader FHWA Office of Highway Policy Information Nancy McGuckin, Travel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Work Trip in the Context of Daily Travel Census Data for Transportation Planning Conference, May 2005 Nancy McGuckin, Travel Behavior Analyst Nanda.
Advertisements

The National Household Travel Survey Heather Contrino US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Office of Highway Policy Information.
US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration
HAVE THE YOUNGER POPULATION LOST INTEREST IN CARS? An Interim Report Alan E. Pisarski.
National Center for Health Statistics DCC CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION Changes in Race Differentials: The Impact of the New OMB Standards.
Different activity-travel participation of different generation in different life cycle stages of women in Sweden Yusak O. Susilo, Chengxi Liu, Maria Börjesson.
Population Segmentation Outdoor Recreation, Physical Activity, and Health Sue Williams Senior Social Research Officer Countryside Council for Wales.
National Household Travel Survey California Data (NHTS-CA)
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Comparison of Activity-Based Model Parameters Between Two.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS THREE Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
Time for Dinner? Determinants of Time Use in Food Preparation Constance Newman and Lisa Mancino Motivation Since 1975, USDA has used the Thrifty Food Plan.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Lec 7. Ch.3P3 Characteristics of urban travel Trip types (purposes) Three approaches for modeling trips Travel behaviors of men and women Trip purpose/temporal,
GreenSTEP Statewide Transportation Greenhouse Gas Model Cutting Carbs Conference December 3, 2008 Brian Gregor ODOT Transportation Planning Analysis Unit.
Commuting in America Using the ACS to Develop a National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends Penelope Weinberger, CTPP Program Manager, AASHTO ACS.
Consumer Buying Trends 2005 January 28, Furniture/Today’s exclusive consumer data responses of 2,500 households, closely matching the demographic.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
COMMUTING IN AMERICA 2013 ALAN E. PISARSKI PRESERVING THE AMERICAN DREAM Oct 2013.
The Implications of Demographic Change for Transportation in Texas
Driven to Extremes Has Growth in Automobile Use Ended? The National Transportation Systems Center Advancing transportation innovation for the public good.
Brent Diversity Profile Labour Market Work patterns in Brent May 2015.
National Household Travel Survey Data User Tools Adella Santos FHWA-OFFICE OF HIGHWAY POLICY INFORMATION APDU 2008 ANNUAL CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 25, 2008.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics U.S. Department of Transportation Overall Travel Patterns of Older Americans Jeffery L. Memmott
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
In this presentation, we will: 1.Describe each step the Compass model and show comparable steps in the IRM. Compass = What,, Where, How IRM= Who, What,
The National Household Travel Survey Heather Contrino US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy Information.
January Utah Statewide Household Travel Study Study overview and results.
For Model Users Group June 10, 2011 Kyeil Kim, Ph.D., PTP Atlanta Regional Commission.
National Household Travel Survey Statewide Applications Heather Contrino Travel Surveys Team Lead Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy.
Recent Trends in Worker Quality: A Midwest Perspective Daniel Aaronson and Daniel Sullivan Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago November 2002.
Ed Christopher Resource Center near Chicago Federal Highway Administration Governors Drive Olympia Fields, IL 60461
Characteristics of Weekend Travel in the City of Calgary: Towards a Model of Weekend Travel Demand JD Hunt, University of Calgary DM Atkins, City of Calgary.
MPO/RPC Directors Meeting Asadur Rahman Lead Worker-Traffic Forecasting Section, BPED, July 28, 2015.
Time Use and Gender Working Group Gretchen Donehower The Tenth Meeting of Working Group on Macroeconomic Aspects of Intergenerational Transfer Beijing,
2001 National Household Travel Survey Kentucky Add-on Ben Pierce Presentation By.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented to 13 th Transportation Planning Applications Conference prepared and presented by David.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
VMT Reduction Programs: Time for a Change? Stacey Bricka, PhD, NuStats 12 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Products of Your.
NHTS Update and Data Analysis Plans presented to Florida Model Task Force presented by Krishnan Viswanathan November 10, 2009.
Highway Information Seminar October 25, 2012 Adella Santos, NHTS Program Manager FHWA, Office of Highway Policy Information.
1 STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Time use survey in Serbia.
EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS EARLY ADOPTERS’ SURVEY Interpretive Summary Highlights of EWS Early Adopters Learning and Sharing Summit Survey, George W. Bush Institute,
TIME USE SURVEY Seminar on Time Use Surveys Brussels, 12 October 2006 SEMINAR ON TIME USE SURVEYS Brussels, 12 October 2006.
Pilot National Travel Survey 2009 Summary Findings Prepared by Mairead Griffin.
Source: The Media Audit International Demographics, Inc~ February, 2010.
Peak Travel in America: Where Are We Going? 12 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications Houston 2009 Nancy McGuckin, Travel Behavior Analyst.
Evaluating Transportation Impacts of Forecast Demographic Scenarios Using Population Synthesis and Data Simulation Joshua Auld Kouros Mohammadian Taha.
Time transfers within households along the lifecycle: a NTA and gender perspective Anne Solaz (Ined) Elena Stancanelli (Paris 1)
Understanding Activity Patterns and Trends David Levinson.
EFFECTS OF HOUSEHOLD LIFE CYCLE CHANGES ON TRAVEL BEHAVIOR EVIDENCE FROM MICHIGAN STATEWIDE HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEYS 13th TRB National Transportation Planning.
TYBEE ISLAND TOURISM STUDY, OUTLINE 1.Introduction 2.Survey of Tybee Island Visitors 3.Visitor Expenditure Patterns 4.Estimated Annual Visitation.
Assembly David Levinson. Induced Travel S1: Supply before S2: Supply after Price of Travel Quantity of Travel (VMT) Q1 Q2 P1 P2 Demand.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Trip Generation CE 451/551 Grad students … need to discuss “projects” at end of class.
Systems Analysis Group One ABM for Four Cities: Experience of ABM Estimation on a Pooled Dataset of Multiple Surveys Surabhi Gupta, Peter Vovsha, Gaurav.
Who’s Minding the Kids in the Summer? Child Care Arrangements for Summer 2006 Lynda Laughlin - U.S. Census Bureau Joseph Rukus - Cornell University Annual.
WOMEN’S PAY AND POVERTY Provisional Data from the ONS 2012 Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings Jackie Longworth Fair Play South West.
Analysis of Travel Behavior Using the ACS J.G. Berman, Siim S öö t and Susumu Kudo Urban Transportation Center, UIC.
Impact of Aging Population on Regional Travel Patterns: The San Diego Experience 14th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Columbus.
Traveler Typologies and the Causes for Recent Changes in Millennial Travel Patterns Kelcie M. Ralph Assistant Professor Transportation Research Board 2016.
Kids these days Since the mid-2000s, car use and licensure declined in the US and peer countries, particularly among the young. We explore the dramatic.
David Sutton, Chief Officer Integrated Transport Strategy Directorate.
ILUTE A Tour-Based Mode Choice Model Incorporating Inter-Personal Interactions Within the Household Matthew J. Roorda Eric J. Miller UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO.
Presented to Toll Modeling Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.. September 16, 2010 Time of Day in FSUTMS.
Differences in Trip Chaining Between Men and Women Nancy McGuckin, Travel Behavior Analyst and Johanna Zmud, President, NuStats Prepared for the Conference.
Steps Closer to ABM: Example from Jerusalem
TransCAD Vehicle Routing 2018/11/29.
Activity-Travel Trends
Model Work Trips Appropriately Based on Travel Behavior and Change Pattern Differences 2016HTS Characteristics and Changes vs. 2006HTS 16th TRB National.
Presentation transcript:

Using NHTS to Estimate Activity Patterns Heather Contrino, Travel Surveys Team Leader FHWA Office of Highway Policy Information Nancy McGuckin, Travel Behavior Analyst Yuki Nakamoto, SAS Programmer Extraordinaire Planning Applications Conference, 2007

Objectives To explore the application of travel survey data for activity analysis and AB Model inputs: Fill data gaps for transportation planners, Provide guidance on key determinants of travel, Support benchmarking and testing during transition time from four-step to new generation, and Assess trend behavior in use of time/activity

Data Steps… 1. Bridge the trip purpose codes and activity types using three categories: subsistence/mandatory, maintenance, and discretionary 2. Re-code the trip file into home-to-home tours 3. Develop profiles of traveler types (developed with CART) to look at time spent in each activity type, and time spent in travel for each activity type 4. Examine Trends in activity patterns using traveler profiles

Step 1: Bridge Trip Purposes into Activity Types

Percent of Trips within Mandatory/Subsistence Category Step 1 – Bridging Trips and Activities Source: 2001 NHTS

Step 1 – Bridging Trips and Activities Percent of Trips within Maintenance Category Source: 2001 NHTS

Step 1 – Bridging Trips and Activities Percent of Trips within Discretionary Category Source: 2001 NHTS

Result: Maintenance activities account for the largest share of trips Step 1 – Bridging Trips and Activities Source: 2001 NHTS

Step 2: Code the NHTS into home-to- home tours

93.2 percent of daily travel is in Home-to-Home tours 2.5 percent of daily travel tours start at home but don't return home at the end of the day 2.9 percent of daily travel tours start at a non-home location but return home 1.4 percent of daily travel tours neither start at home nor return home Step 2 – Code Home-to Home Tours Not all people begin and/or end the day at home

Some home-to-home tours are complex, including households with multiple workers and many activities Step 2 – Code Home-to Home Tours

Home But most home-to-home tours are simple Step 2 – Code Home-to Home Tours

Note: People can have more than one activity at a location Home 26 percent of tours include subsistence activities: Step 2 – Code Home-to Home Tours

Step 3: Develop Traveler Profiles

Start with characteristics that determine travel from CART (Cluster Analysis Regression Tree), e.g.: Worker status Vehicle Availability Presence of Children (we used ‘dependants’ who do not drive) Sex Then run the number of activities, time in activities, travel time, total out-of-home time, etc by these profile demographics Then do it for 1995 and look to see if any trends emerge Look for the groupings that define population segments for activity analysis: Step 3 – Develop Traveler Profiles

Worker status showed greatest difference in time spent in activities out-of-home: Workers spend more time out-of-home and less time in maintenance and discretionary activities Non-workers spend nearly as much time in daily travel as do workers. Less work may not equal less travel Presence of dependants/children effected both working and non-working women’s time in maintenance activities Early Findings Step 3 – Develop Traveler Profiles

Workers spend more time in out-of-home activities – slightly over 8 hours per day Step 3 – Develop Traveler Profiles Source: 2001 NHTS

This is true even if there are fewer vehicles than drivers… Source: 2001 NHTS Step 3 – Develop Traveler Profiles

Source: 2001 NHTS Non-workers spend nearly as much time in daily travel as do workers… Step 3 – Develop Traveler Profiles

Source: 2001 NHTS Even when there are fewer vehicles than drivers… Step 3 – Develop Traveler Profiles

What are the Trends in Activity Patterns?

Altogether, people are spending more time at home; just under 30 minutes a day -- (is this Internet effects? Social changes? Big screen TVs? Not aging cohorts within adult men—I checked by age group) Workers are reporting more time in mandatory activities and more minutes of travel every day for mandatory Workers are spending less time in out-of-home discretionary activities, but slightly more time in travel for discretionary All groups are spending much less time in out-of-home maintenance activities, but slightly more time in travel for maintenance Summary of Early Findings Step 4 – Examine Trends

Since 1995, both men and women report spending more time at home… Step 4 – Examine Trends

Source: NHTS Data Series And workers are reporting more time in mandatory/subsistence activities Step 4 – Examine Trends

Source: NHTS Data Series While just slightly more time in travel for mandatory activities Step 4 – Examine Trends

All groups are spending less time in out-of- home maintenance activities as compared to 1995 Step 4 – Examine Trends Source: NHTS Data Series

And slightly more time in travel for out-of- home maintenance activities… Source: NHTS Data Series Step 4 – Examine Trends

Source: NHTS Data Series All workers are spending less time in out- of-home discretionary activities Step 4 – Examine Trends

But all groups are spending more time in travel for discretionary activities Source: NHTS Data Series Step 4 – Examine Trends

Summary Overall, most tours are simple Workers and non-workers have similar daily amounts of time in travel (is there a minimum threshold to ‘travel time budgets’?) Non-workers travel more and spend more time in Maintenance and Discretionary activities Less time constraint ≠ less travel As baby-boomers retire will they travel more for maintenance and discretionary activities? Trends show workers spending less time in maintenance if people are substituting/multi-tasking at work then let’s not just focus on substitution ‘at-home’

Further Analysis Look at the complexity of tours/activity patterns related to urban area size Are simple tours less likely in large metro areas? Look at shared activities/shared ride Still haven’t untangles inter-household interaction/decision making aspect Auto constraint of less cars than drivers didn’t show much difference in behavior Suggestion: try to separate shopping more precisely into maintenance or discretionary Suggestion: better data on work-at-home and at-work multi-tasking Other suggestions on data gaps?

Shared activity between household members This schema does not include children’s activities, which is available in NHTS and also more likely to result in shared activity and travel General Schema of NHTS Trip Data Look at Shared Activities

Look at shared ride Carpool Fam-pool All 1990 HBW 24.5%75.5%100% 2001 HBW 17.0%83.0%100% 2001 Work Tours 26.3%73.7%100% All=All Multi-Occupant Vehicle Trips

Thank You! Visit our website: Contact: