Roadway Safety For Local Agencies Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roadway Safety For Local Agencies Wrap-up Doug Bish.
Advertisements

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Welcome to: Safety Programs for Local Agencies.
Roadway Safety for Local Agencies Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation.
Robert Herling, Planner Duluth-Superior Metropolitan Interstate Council A Quantitative Assessment Method For System Safety.
SPIS System Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Safety Priority Index System (SPIS)
All Roads Transportation Safety Roadway Departure Crash (Formerly Jurisdictionally Blind Safety)
PIARC T.C. C2.1 & C2.3 Comparison of National Road Safety Policies & Plans Crash Analysis/Problem Definition & Time of Return Methodology October 2008.
HSM: Celebrating 5 Years Together Brian Ray, PE Casey Bergh, PE.
HSM Implementation Tools Safety Analyst
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Roadway Departure Crash
SafetyAnalyst Michael S. Griffith FHWA July 2003.
Investigation of Varied Time Intervals in Crash Hotspot Identification Authors: Wen Cheng, Ph.D., P.E., Fernando Gonzalez, EIT, & Xudong Jia; California.
Oregon Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Implementation Plan.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Publication No. FHWA-HRT Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety.
High Friction Surface Site Selection Analysis Photo from High Friction Surface Roads ( High Friction Roads is maintained.
Spring INTRODUCTION There exists a lot of methods used for identifying high risk locations or sites that experience more crashes than one would.
Lec 32, Ch5, pp : Highway Safety Improvement Program (objectives) Learn the components of FHWA’s Highway Safety Improvement Program Know typical.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E. Traffic Investigations Engineer, ODOT February 26, 2015.
ODOT Wildlife Collision Hotspots Study RESULTS OF STATEWIDE ANALYSIS August 26, 2008 Melinda Trask Oregon Department of Transportation, Geo-Environmental.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Safety Investment Program (SIP) Policies for Oregon Literature Review Findings.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
The Empirical Bayes Method for Safety Estimation Doug Harwood MRIGlobal Kansas City, MO.
Network Screening 1 Module 3 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment: July 22, Boise, Idaho.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Hot Spot ODOT Region 1 Kick-Off Meeting March 18, 2015.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Identifying High Collision Concentration Locations Raghavan Srinivasan 1 Craig Lyon 2 Bhagwant Persaud 2 Carol Martell.
1 CEE 763 Fall 2011 Topic 1 – Fundamentals CEE 763.
Traffic Control & Tort Liability
Safety management software for state and local highway agencies: –Improves identification and programming of site- specific highway safety improvements.
Introduction: Overview of Roadway Safety Management Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment: July 22, Boise, Idaho 1 Module.
Role of SPFs in SafetyAnalyst Ray Krammes Federal Highway Administration.
Overview of the AASHTO Highway Safety Manual Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section.
HSM: Another Tool for Safety Management in Wyoming 1 Excellence in Transportation.
9-1 Using SafetyAnalyst Module 4 Countermeasure Evaluation.
Forecasting and Evaluating Network Growth David Levinson Norah Montes de Oca Feng Xie.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation November 2014.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Angela Kargel Region 2 Traffic Manager Oregon Department of Transportation January 2015.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
CE 552 Week 9 Crash statistical approaches Identification of problem areas - High crash locations.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Doug Bish OTCDC March 8th.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 176 Alternative Database System HSIS (Highway Safety Information.
US 25 Corbin to London Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting December 2011.
Robert Herling, Planner Duluth-Superior Metropolitan Interstate Council A Quantitative Assessment Method For System Safety.
Prioritization Techniques to Evaluate Sites for Improving Winter Safety in Iowa Mohammad Shaheed Zach Hans Konstantina Gkritza Inya Nlenanya Neal Hawkins.
1 Ian Skinner Crash information Systems Integrating geographical and statistical analysis for maximum benefit.
Oregon’s All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Zahidul Siddique, Ph.D., PE, PTOE Oregon Department of Transportation October 26, st International.
Oregon Department of Transportation This program works with communities, law enforcement and internal ODOT partners regarding all aspects of transportation.
DEFENSIVE DRIVING TRAINING What's difficult about driving? Increasing amount of vehicles on the road Other drivers attitudes Weather conditions Heavy.
The Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. Data, Partnerships, and Results: The Southeast Michigan Example.
SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) GRANTS Presented By: Patrick V. DeChellis Deputy Director Los Angeles County Department.
Session 2 History How did SPF come into being and why is it here to stay? Geni Bahar, P.E. NAVIGATS Inc.
Adrian Window, Head of Unit BUDGET D3 Presentation to the Homologues’ Group, Ljubljana 12 October 2009 Tolerable Risk of Error (TRE) in Community programmes.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
Evaluating the performance of three different network screening methods for detecting high collision concentration locations using empirical data Prepared.
Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Presented at Pooled Fund Meeting April 19, 2004.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Presented to presented by Alabama Department of Transportation April 8, 2016 The Alabama Transportation Planner’s Guide to Safety Data Access and Documentation.
1 The Highway Safety Manual Predictive Methods. 2 New Highway Safety Manual of 2010 ►Methodology is like that for assessing and assuring the adequacy.
Caldwell and Wilson (1999) 1. Determine primary rating factor for a road section based on traffic volume and user types 2. Primary rating factor is then.
Highway Safety Improvement Program
Moving Maryland Toward Zero Deaths
Using CMF’s in Benefit/Cost Analysis and Project Prioritization
Network Screening & Diagnosis
Misapplications of CMFs
Highway Safety Improvement Program
New Hampshire Department of Transportation
Clark County, WA Safety Management Program
Presentation transcript:

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies Safety at ODOT What is SPIS anyway? What does SPIS mean? Why is it important? A little about Discretionary Immunity

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies SPIS (Network Screening) SPIS is just a model, one way to prioritize “All models are wrong, but some are useful” Crash histories are subject to random variations, one year will be high the next low. “Just wait a year and this intersection will improve”

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies SPIS (Network Screening) A Data Driven Process: Safety Priority Index System (SPIS) –Oregon DOT’s primary tool for selecting and identifying problem locations since 1986 –Uses 3 years of crash data –Uses a tenth of a mile “sliding” window –Use of multiple measures overcomes weaknesses of any one –Still not perfect, does not account for RTM *RTM (regression to the mean) do anything today to a high crash site and it will look like it improved next year (i.e., natural variation looks like real change)

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies SPIS Sliding Window Each “window” slides a hundredth of a mile and recalculates SPIS for another tenth of a mile. Eligible for SPIS if there is either one fatal or 3 crashes of any severity Tenth of a mile “windows” Fatal Injury A Injury B PDO 1st segment – 1 F and 1 A (one fatal – SPIS eligible) 2nd segment – 1 F and 1 A (one fatal – SPIS eligible) 3rd segment – 1A, 1 B, and 1 PDO (3 crashes, SPIS eligible) 4th segment – 1 B and 1 PDO (2 crashes, not SPIS eligible) Roadway PDO

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies SPIS (Network Screening) SPIS is similar to a “black spot” map used to prioritize high crash locations, but combines the best of different indicators— Crash Rate has tendency to over-emphasize low volume roads with a few crashes Crash Frequency has a tendency to over- emphasize higher volume roads with many crashes SPIS combines Frequency, Rate and Severity into one index.

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies SPIS (Network Screening) SPIS = Frequency + Rate + Severity (using 3 years of Crash data to generate a composite index) Crash Frequency (25%) –150 crashes in a tenth of a mile produces a maximum score of 25 Crash Rate (25%) –7 crashes per mvm produces a maximum score of 25 Crash Severity Ranking (50%) –Fatal and Injury A crashes 100 points each –Injury B and C crashes 10 points each –PDO crashes 1 point each –300 points produces a maximum score of 50

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies Example of SPIS SPIS 0Fatal accidents14,200ADT 1Inj. A accidents 0Inj. B accidents10.95Frequency portion 3Inj. C accidents4.99Rate portion 4PDO accidents22.33Severity portion 8Total accidents 38.27SPIS value SPIS 1Fatal accidents20,000ADT 2Inj. A accidents 4Inj. B accidents15.17 Frequency portion 5Inj. C accidents7.80Rate portion 8PDO accidents50.00Severity portion 20Total accidents 72.97SPIS value Severity will reach maximum score of 50 with 3 F&A or 2 F&A and 10 B&C. Frequency will reach a score of 20 at about 50 crashes, and a maximum score of 25 at 150 crashes. Rate is dependent on the ADT and will reach maximum score of 25 at a rate of 7 crashes per mvm. Top 5% SPIS Example Top 15% SPIS Example (about 54 and above) (about 37 to 44)

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies SPIS (Network Screening) The result is a list of sites ordered according to score. The sites with the highest score may or may not be those most likely to benefit from measures to reduce crashes. Sites must be investigated to determine if they are good sites for fixing. Not all sites in the top have cost effective fixes. Trying to find sites with “most bang for the buck”.

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies SPIS Maps and Reports

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies SPIS for All Public Roads (future) ODOT is working on a new version of SPIS for all public roads Based on GIS Flexible, can be adjusted for each jurisdictions needs Will produce a SPIS ranking for all public roads

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies Why is something like SPIS important? To identify and rank sites most likely to benefit from a crash reduction countermeasure Helps to prioritize safety on the system Helps to consider safety in decision making A priority system like SPIS can help with discretionary immunity

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies What is Discretionary Immunity? Discretionary immunity means that the jurisdiction (or it’s employees) cannot be held liable for discretionary decisions (i.e. how your agency is going to prioritize your safety spending). A discretionary decision is a policy level decision that involves a balancing of social, political, economic, and safety considerations. Discretionary immunity applies when the plans and policies were adopted at the highest levels. Discretionary immunity helps assure that decisions on how best to use limited resources can and will be made (not by fear of the courts).

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies What is Discretionary Immunity? An example: The state is sued because they failed to put a traffic signal in at a crosswalk and a child was hit in the crosswalk. The state has limited funds for safety improvements (as set by the Commission) Documented safety program - spending and priorities Use the funds to improve the highest priority sites Could be demonstrated this crosswalk was a lower priority with a tool like SPIS

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies How can a good safety program protect You? Prioritizing safety decisions by a well thought out process. Set aside some funds specifically for Safety improvements. Making decisions about spending safety dollars based on documented process. Documenting the decisions (document, document, document!). Policy decided at the highest policy setting level (get your council or commission to approve and support the program). Check with legal counsel about discretionary immunity.

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies How can a good safety program protect You? If we identify it and don’t fix it aren’t we in trouble? No as long as you are following your policy as set by higher levels. “You have limited funds and can’t fix everything”. If we don’t know about we aren’t liable, right? Wrong, you can be held liable regardless, especially if you should have known about it or if someone had informed you of it (i.e., “the public complained several times about the intersection”).

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies Questions? Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation