Activity-Based Model For Atlanta (Day 1) by Guy Rousseau, Atlanta Regional Commission Based on the CT-RAMP (Coordinated Travel – Regional Activity- based.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Deploying GMP Applications Scott Fry, Director of Professional Services.
Denver’s Activity-Based Model Project: Status Report Erik Sabina, P.E., DRCOG Thomas Rossi, Principal, Cambridge Systematics TRB Transportation Planning.
SUZANNE CHILDRESS, ERIK SABINA, DAVID KURTH, TOM ROSSI, JENNIFER MALM DRCOG Focus Activity-Based Model Calibration/Validation Innovations in Travel Modeling.
1. Topics Is Cloud Computing the way to go? ARC ABM Review Configuration Basics Setting up the ARC Cloud-Based ABM Hardware Configuration Software Configuration.
NCHRP Renaissance Planning Group Rich Kuzmyak Chris Sinclair Alex Bell TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 6, 2013 Columbus,
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS TWO Denver Regional Council of Governments June 30, 2011.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Comparison of Activity-Based Model Parameters Between Two.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS THREE Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
TPAC | Columbus, OH | May 2013 Application of an Activity-Based Model for Highway Pricing Studies in Chicago.
MPO Modeling Efforts in the Development of an Activity-Based Model (ABM): The San Diego Experience 14th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
San Francisco Bay Area Activity-Based Models Specification & Training Study Chuck Purvis Metropolitan Transportation Commission Oakland, California Workshop.
Debunking the Top 10 Myths of Small Business Server: Using Windows SBS in Larger Environments Abstract: This session will debunk some of the common myths.
Model Task Force Meeting November 29, 2007 Activity-based Modeling from an Academic Perspective Transportation Research Center (TRC) Dept. of Civil & Coastal.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FIVE Denver Regional Council of Governments July27, 2011.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Project: Model Integration Options Greg Erhardt DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th,
2010 Travel Behavior Inventory Mn/DOT TDMCC- Jonathan Ehrlich October 14, 2010.
The Development of a Direct Demand Non-Home Based Model for Urban Rail Travel Rhett Fussell, PE –PB Americas Bill Davidson-PB Americas Joel Freedman-PB.
TPB Models Development Status Report Presentation to the Travel Forecasting Subcommittee Ron Milone National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
Bob Thome, Senior Director of Product Management, Oracle SIMPLIFYING YOUR HIGH AVAILABILITY DATABASE.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
Travel Modeling at MTC David Ory Metropolitan Transportation Commission November 17 and 18, 2011 Presentation to Triangle Region Model.
In this presentation, we will: 1.Describe each step the Compass model and show comparable steps in the IRM. Compass = What,, Where, How IRM= Who, What,
SHRP2 C10: Jacksonville Partnership to Develop an Integrated Advanced Travel Demand Model and a Fine-grained Time- sensitive Network Key Agency Partners:
ARC ABM Visualization & Reporting ARC – Nov 12, 2010 Activity-Based Model (Java, Cube) Activity-Based Model (Java, Cube) Database (SQL Server) Visualization.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
A New Policy Sensitive Travel Demand Model for Tel Aviv Yoram Shiftan Transportation Research Institute Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Act Now: An Incremental Implementation of an Activity-Based Model System in Puget Sound Presented to: 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
For Model Users Group June 10, 2011 Kyeil Kim, Ph.D., PTP Atlanta Regional Commission.
AMPORF Common Modeling Platform Consolidated Travel Model Software Platform Development & Enhancement Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission 2014 AMPO.
DVRPC TMIP Peer Review TIM 2 Model Oct. 29 th, 2014.
Characteristics of Weekend Travel in the City of Calgary: Towards a Model of Weekend Travel Demand JD Hunt, University of Calgary DM Atkins, City of Calgary.
1 Activity Based Models Review Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Model Task Force Data Committee October 17, 2008.
Utilizing Advanced Practice Methods to Improve Travel Model Resolution and Address Sustainability Bhupendra Patel, Ph.D., Senior Transportation Modeler.
Development of the Graphical User Interface and Improvement and Streamlining of NYMTC's Best Practice Model Jim Lam, Andres Rabinowicz, Srini Sundaram,
Comparing a Household Activity-Based Model with a Person Activity-Based Model 14th TRB Conference on Transportation Planning Applications May 5-9, 2013,
14 th TRB National Planning Applications Conference May 5-9, 2013, Columbus, Ohio Rosella Picado Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Vladimir Livshits, Petya Maneva, Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG), Phoenix, AZ Peter Vovsha, Surabhi Gupta, Parsons Brinckerhoff, New York, NY.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
TO THE BLACK BOX AND BACK – The TRANS Model October 2008.
Guy Rousseau, Modeling Manager, Atlanta Regional Commission Atlanta Travel Forecasting Methods: Traditional Trip-Based & Activity-Based Model AMPO Travel.
Activity-Based Modeling How does it work?. CT-RAMP model Coordinated Travel – Regional Activity Based Modeling Platform (CT-RAMP) for the Atlanta Region.
Peter Vovsha, Parsons Brinckerhoff, New York, NY, USA Gaurav Vyas, Parsons Brinckerhoff, New York, NY, USA Danny Givon, Jerusalem Transportation Masterplan.
© 2006 Avaya Inc. All rights reserved. Avaya – Proprietary & Confidential. For Limited Internal Distribution. The information contained in this document.
Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager. Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager Use Cube Base and Cube Voyager to develop data, run scenarios, and examine.
SHRP2 C10A Sensitivity Testing of an Integrated Regional Travel Demand and Traffic Microsimulation Model TRB Planning Applications Conference May ,
Dowling Associates, Inc. 19 th International EMME/2 Users’ Conference – 21 October 2005 Derivation of Travel Demand Elasticities from a Tour-Based Microsimulation.
SHRP2 C10A Final Conclusions & Insights TRB Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013 Columbus, OH Stephen Lawe, Joe Castiglione & John Gliebe Resource.
Presented to Model Task Force Model Advancement Committee presented by Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Date November 24, 2008.
Application of an Activity-based Model for a Toll Road Study in Chicago Matt Stratton Parsons Brinckerhoff May 19, 2015.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Model Application.
Methodological Considerations for Integrating Dynamic Traffic Assignment with Activity-Based Models Ramachandran Balakrishna Daniel Morgan Srinivasan Sundaram.
Christi Willison | PB | | Development of an Activity- Based Model in the Lake Tahoe Region.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
Impact of Aging Population on Regional Travel Patterns: The San Diego Experience 14th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Columbus.
1 Forecasting Traffic for a Start-Up Toll Road 12 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference May 18, 2009 David Schellinger, P.E. Vice.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Third International Conference on Innovations in Travel Modeling presented by Thomas Rossi Cambridge.
Systems Analysis Group TPAC, 2015 Application Experience of Multiple Discrete Continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) Model for Activity Duration and Trip Departure.
2018/5/14 QUANTIFYING PHYSICAL ACTIVITY USING AN ACTIVITY-BASED TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL My topic today is---READ Question try to address is- READ I want to.
Debunking the Top 10 Myths of Small Business Server: Using Windows SBS in Larger Environments Abstract: This session will debunk some of the common myths.
Integrated Dynamic/AB Models: Getting Real Discussion
Presentation transcript:

Activity-Based Model For Atlanta (Day 1) by Guy Rousseau, Atlanta Regional Commission Based on the CT-RAMP (Coordinated Travel – Regional Activity- based Modeling Platform) Family of Activity-Based Travel Demand Models Main features: Explicit intra-household interactions Continuous temporal dimension (Half-hourly time periods) Integration of location, time-of-day, and mode choice models Java-based package for AB model implementation

Features of CT-RAMP for ARC Combination of best features of developed AB models: –Fully disaggregate micro-simulation of daily patterns –Consistent treatment of travel tours Addresses specific planning needs of ARC: –Dynamic / changing population –Toll facilities and managed lanes Innovations: –Intra-household interactions –Toll choice –“Available” time influences travel generation –Parking location choice

Treatment of Space 2027 TAZs TAZs subdivided into transit accessibility: Short walk (1/3 mi) Long walk (2/3 mi) No walk (> 2/3 mi) All origins and destinations identified by TAZ and sub-zone 6081 total alternatives in destination choice

4 ARC ABM Evolution / History > 2002: Household Travel Survey Data Collection & Analysis 2003  2006 – Models estimated, population synthesizer developed (as ITM 2006 in Austin TX) 2007  2008 – Model implementation, calibration started 2009  2010 – Calibration/validation completed, documentation, deployment at ARC, and sensitivity testing 2011 – Enhanced data reporting and visualization of outputs

Person Types NUMBERPERSON-TYPEAGEWORK STATUS SCHOOL STATUS 1Full-time worker18+Full-timeNone 2Part-time worker18+Part-timeNone 3Non-working adult18 – 64UnemployedNone 4Non-working senior65+UnemployedNone 5College student18+AnyCollege + 6Driving age student16-17AnyPre-college 7Non-driving student6 – 16NonePre-college 8Pre-school0-5None

Activity Types TYPEPURPOSEDESCRIPTIONCLASSIFICATIONELIGIBILITY 1WorkWorking at regular workplace or work-related activities outside the home. MandatoryWorkers and students 2UniversityCollege +MandatoryAge 18+ 3High SchoolGrades 9-12MandatoryAge Grade SchoolGrades K-8MandatoryAge EscortingPick-up/drop-off passengers (auto trips only). MaintenanceAge 16+ 6ShoppingShopping away from home.Maintenance5+ (if joint travel, all persons) 7Other MaintenancePersonal business/services, and medical appointments. Maintenance5+ (if joint travel, all persons) 8Social/RecreationalRecreation, visiting friends/family. Discretionary5+ (if joint travel, all persons) 9Eat OutEating outside of home.Discretionary5+ (if joint travel, all persons) 10Other DiscretionaryVolunteer work, religious activities. Discretionary5+ (if joint travel, all persons)

Treatment of Time Time-of-day choice models work on hourly periods AM and Midday skims used in choice models Output trips assigned by 5 time periods for highway, 3 for transit NUMBERDESCRIPTIONBEGIN TIMEEND TIME 1Early3:00 A.M.5:59 A.M. 2A.M. Peak6:00 A.M.9:59 A.M. 3Midday10:00 A.M.2:59 P.M. 4P.M. Peak3:00 P.M.6:59 P.M. 5Evening7:00 P.M.2:59 A.M.

Treatment of Modes Explicit toll versus non-toll choice in mode choice Local versus Premium (express bus, BRT, rail) transit

Implementation Design Goals Overnight run time  Model Relevance Around 12 to 16 hours Requires distributed processing and threading via Cube Cluster Commodity hardware  Minimize total lifetime cost Hardware available today from common vendors; reasonably priced Easy to Setup and Use  Staff acceptance Not too complicated to setup, run, debug, etc

Hardware and Software Setup Three Windows Server bit Machines: Dual Quad Core Intel Xeon X GHz with Hyper- Threading  16 threads 32 GB of RAM Cube Voyager + 8 seat Cube Cluster license Total cost ~ $30,000 in 2009

Hardware and Software Setup 64 bit OS for large memory addresses 64 bit Java for CT-RAMP 32 bit Java to integrate with Cube’s native matrix I/O DLL Cube Base for the GUI Cube Voyager + Cluster for running the model, assignment, etc Java CT-RAMP software 64 bit R for reporting/visualization

Overall System Setup Cube runs the show and calls all Java processes User starts the remote processes on the 2 nd and 3 rd machine (for now) Everything talks to one mapped network folder location

Model Validation Highway Trip-Based ModelActivity-Based Model

New Measures

Persons Not At Home by TAZ

New Measures Persons by TAZ

New Measures

ABM Visualization & Reporting System Activity-Based Model (Java, Cube) Activity-Based Model (Java, Cube) Database (SQL Server) Visualization Dashboard (Flash) Visualization Dashboard (Flash) Reports (Excel) Data Access Layer (IIS, ASP.Net) Data Access Layer (IIS, ASP.Net) Custom Analysis

ABM VIZ – Time Use New time use (person activity over the day) Can select different person types (the above is showing Full-time workers)

Radar Charts