Presentation to Federal Public Defenders Art Beeler – Instructor North Carolina Central University Retired Complex Warden FBOP March 15, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Advertisements

Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Step by Step Guide for Regulations S HELLY B EZANSON K ELLY O FFICE OF G ENERAL C OUNSEL S EPTEMBER 5, 2012.
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STATE TASK FORCE FOR THE PREVENTION OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STATE TASK FORCE FOR THE PREVENTION OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING.
Staff Development Emergency Operations 1. Identify 5 purposes of the offender/student grievance process Identify 5 grievable issues Identify 12 non-grievable.
PREVENTING VIOLENCE IN THE FAMILY DAPHNE III Programme ‘Preventing and combating violence against children, young people and women and to protect victims.
Voice over the Internet Protocol (VoIP) Technologies… How to Select a Videoconferencing System for Your Agency Based on the Work of Watzlaf, V.M., Fahima,
Shepherd Internship Erin Walters. The Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia (PDS) Mission : The Public Defender Service for the District.
1 Overview of the 2003 Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) These materials were developed by The Moss Group, Inc.under cooperative agreement #03P21G1Y4.
Page 1 County of Los Angeles Corrective Action Plan Program Enhancements John Sterritt CEO Risk Management.
Field Federal Safety & Health Councils (Insert FFSHC Name) (Insert Name & Title of Presenter) (Insert Date of Presentation)
1 Inmate Mental Health Care Legislative Audit Bureau April 2009.
“Justice Reinvestment through Policy Analysis in South Carolina” South Carolina State Senator Gerald Malloy 1.
Department of Defense FOIA “On the Horizon” Defense Freedom of Information Policy Office (703)
ECM Project Roles and Responsibilities
External Quality Assessments
North Dakota Open Records & Meetings Law Government in the Sunshine.
Provider Human Rights Coordinator Role Accessing HCSIS to Support Human Rights Committee Reviews September 11, 2013.
Statutory and Policy Limits 18 U.S.C. § 3582(b) – Effect of Finality of Judgment Notwithstanding the fact that a sentence to imprisonment can subsequently.
Social Security Administration Yolanda York
DATA PRIVACY PERSONNEL FILES “P-FILE”. Wisconsin Public Records Wisconsin Statue – Wisconsin Statue – Wisconsin Statue 230 Wisconsin.
Involving the Whole Organization in Creating or Restructuring a Volunteer Program Louise DeIasi DeCava Consulting.
Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) RECALLS.  21 CFR 7.40 provides guidance on the policy, procedures, and industry responsibilities for recalls. 
Ethics Case of the Year 2013 Speaker Conference Name Date, Location.
UFIRST: University of Florida Integrated Research Support Tool research.ufl.edu/faculty-and-staff/initiatives/ufirst.html.
Auditor Relationships – What you can do to make them as painless as possible Presented by Matthew Lenton, C.P.A. M AYER H OFFMAN M C C ANN P.C Dupont.
Randy Costales Executive Director, The Arc of New Mexico 1.
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
Standing for trust and integrity 19 th XBRL International Conference Paris, June Status FEE XBRL Task Force, what is happening around Europe.
 George Bakerjian, Staff Attorney. Statutory Authority  “[A]ny decision of the parole panel finding an inmate suitable for parole shall become final.
Insights from a Former Federal Auditor Briget Biernat Jans Director of Financial Aid Compliance DePaul University.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
Chapter 34 Organization of the Federal Trade Commission CommissionerCommissioner Chairman CommissionerCommissioner Executive Assistant Office of Congressional.
International Symposium on the changing role of Parliament in the budget process: Experiences from PUIC Countries and EU Member States Cooperation between.
Final UNDERSTANDING CONFIDENTIALITY Training Overview by Jolynn Rogers.
1 You are a New Member of the JAC; NOW WHAT? As a new Journey-Level Advisory Council (JAC) member, you probably have many questions, including those about.
Paragraph 81 Project. 2RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY Background FERC March 15, 2012 Order regarding the Find, Fix, Track and Report (FFT) process  Paragraph.
Rebecca Nickleson, MS, CRA Assistant Director Office of Research & Sponsored Programs.
Children and Young People Select Committee - Review of School Organisation and Admission Arrangements (Phase 1) – Response to consultation.
Office of Research & Development (ORD) Local Accountability of Research 2009 Baltimore, Maryland January 13-14, 2009 “Meeting the Current Challenges of.
Reasonable Accommodation Process Access. Michelle Day Project Manager Kim Jones Regional Disability Coordinator 2.
Abstract ID: 395 Author Name: Araya Sripairoj Presenter Name: Araya Sripairoj Authors: Sripairoj A, Liamputtong P, Harvey K.
DRAFT Proposed Sexual Harassment Policy Office of General Counsel Southern Illinois University September 2008.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
OSHA – What to Expect When You’re Inspected (Following Federal Guidelines)
Prison Rape Elimination Act The Prison and the Community.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
Planning and Organizing Chapter 13. The Planning Function Planning for a business should stem from the company’s Business Plan – The business plan sets.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
The Art of Developing Policies A Look At Requirements, Trends & Challenges.
November | 1 CONTINUING CARE COUNCIL Report to Forum Year
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
ASCA Seminar for Recently Appointed Administrators Directors’ Issues and Expectations June 23 – 26, 2016 Reno, Nevada.
CJA 383 AID Experience Tradition/cja383aid.com
Montana School Wellness Policy Tracking Tool
Finance Committee Update
MEDICS CATALONIA PROJECT
Designing Effective Accommodation Plans in Clinical Placement & Internship Settings
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
RECOMMENDATIONS STATE TASK FORCE FOR THE PREVENTION OF HUMAN
Charter School Leaders Seminar December 6, 2016
ASSISTANCE DOGS INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES 2018
FOIA, Privacy & Records Management Conference 2009 FOIA Office and Initial Denial Authority Interaction, Roles, Duties, and Responsibilities Nathan.
LEGAL OVERVIEW Board Governance
Colorado state university-pueblo policy and administration (PA)
Senate Meeting Summary
Title IX Proposed Regulations
LEGAL OVERVIEW Board Governance
Presentation transcript:

Presentation to Federal Public Defenders Art Beeler – Instructor North Carolina Central University Retired Complex Warden FBOP March 15, 2013

Presentation to FPD’s  Grey Wall of Silence  The Grey Wall of Silence was documented in 1988 by a former correctional officer and researcher, which in parts says that correctional workers are suspicious of all outsiders. (Kauffman 1988)  Some research since 1988 says this is not as strong as Kauffman documented, but there is no doubt this exists among many correctional workers.

Presentation to FPD’s  Building Relationships  As many correctional workers are suspicious of outsiders, the building of positive relationships whenever possible is of benefit to you and your client.  Start with the Unit Team. Case Manger, Counselor and Unit Manager.  Refrain from getting into confrontation with a staff member. If Unit staff is not available, ask to see the Executive Assistant. Know that there is one Executive Assistant for the Complex at Butner.

Presentation to FPD’s  Use to learn of policy before requesting something for your client. If it is discretionary as many issues are, prepare a letter to the Warden indicating why you would like for your client to be provided X.  Know that each institution has what are known as institutional supplements to implement policy – but not to replace it.

Presentation to FPD’s  Compassionate Release  Governed by Program Statement  28 CFR  Whenever possible go to the bop website and look up the policy along with procedure. CFR provides for policy, website gives procedures as well as policy.

Presentation to FPD’s Process for Compassionate Release  Inmate applies for Compassionate Release.  At medical facilities there is generally a multi- disciplinary committee which reviews the inmate’s application. (At other institutions this is done by unit team, but vast majority of applications are from MRC’s)  This committee reviews the application and makes a recommendation to the Warden to recommend or not recommend compassionate release.

Presentation to FPD’s Process for Compassionate Release  If the Warden recommends Compassionate Release, a package of material to include sentencing information and medical information is forwarded to the Regional Director. The Regional Director may approve the recommendation or deny it.  If approved by the Regional Director, the recommendation is forwarded to the Office of the General Counsel. The General Counsel coordinates with Medical to determine if the cited health condition warrants consideration.

Presentation to FPD’s Process for Compassionate Release  The OGC reviews or obtains input from a host of stakeholders but primarily USPO’s and United States Attorney Offices. These offices and the constituencies they represent may provide an opinion regarding the proposed compassionate release.  The General Counsel discusses the case and recommendation with the Director. If the Director concurs with the recommendation a motion is prepared to the Sentencing Court. If the Director does not concur, OGC prepares a memo to the inmate indicating the denial (non-appealable).

Presentation to FPD’s Process for Compassionate Release  If the Warden does not recommend Compassionate Release, the inmate may appeal. If the inmate is so infirmed he/she is not able to write an appeal, a staff member will be assigned to assist. The program statement governing appeals is: PS  Policy gives time periods to answer appeals. By experience, most Wardens do not wait the entire period to answer the appeal.

Presentation to FPD’s Process for Compassionate Release  If denied at the local level, the inmate files an appeal to the Regional Director and ultimately the Office of General Council. OGC is the final authority for reconsideration.

Presentation to FPD’s  Recently Human Rights and FAMM published a report: The Answer is No: Too Little Compassionate Release in US Federal Prisons

Presentation to FPD’s  The major findings are there are too few and the processing takes too long.  I, from a personal standpoint, would agree there are ways to streamline the process, which the Director agreed would be reviewed.  But there is one finding in particular I personally would caution against.

Presentation to FPD’s  The report suggests this process be moved from being administrative to judicial.  From my experience, I would argue against making this an adversarial process.  Although the report intimated there was no process for Wardens when they made recommendations, it is my contention they deal with risk analysis everyday.

Presentation to FPD’s  Generally the three things a Warden has to consider.  Risk Analysis  Medical Need  Resources

Presentation to FPD’s  In closing Compassionate Release Consideration is a complex analysis where compassion, public safety, depreciation of the seriousness of the offense behavior or previous offense behavior, victim rights, medical need and resources are all considered.

References  Kauffman, K. (1988). Prison Officers and Their World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press  Klofas, J. (1984). “Reconsidering Prison Personnel: New Views of the Correctional Officer Subculture.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 28(3):

References  Program Statement , Compassionate Releases  Program Statement , Administrative Remedy Process  Human Rights Watch (November, 2012). The Answer is No; Too Little Compassionate Release in US Federal Prisons, New York