Punished, Protected or Prisoner: Restraints Considerations in Law, Operations and Practice 22 nd ANNUAL TRANSPORTING STUDENTS W/ DISABILITIES CONFERENCE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © Education Compliance Group, Inc. All rights reserved. By Peggy A. Burns, Esq. When the Bus Stands Still: Where Do Your Legal Duties Stand?
Advertisements

Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
USDOE Restraint and Seclusion: Resource Document, May 2012.
Driver Inservice Child Safety Restraint Systems on School Buses.
SAFELY TRANSPORTING HEAD START CHILDREN Passenger Safety Texas AgriLife Extension Service in cooperation with Texas Department of Transportation Educational.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Special Needs Transportation Joe Lightsey Pupil Transportation Alabama Department of Education.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Enrollment49,500 Enrolled for Transportation24,800 Enrolled for Special Transportation560 Total Miles each day24,520 Total Miles each year4.4 million.
Individual Education Program (IEP) Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
1 The Individualized Education Program (IEP) Yell / The Law and Special Education, Second Edition Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights.
Understanding The IEP Process: Transportation’s Role Presented By: Jamie Warrington, ESE Transportation Specialist, FDOE P.J. Hope, Director of Transportation,
Seclusion and Restraint Regulations Special Education Leadership September 10, 2014.
Child/Youth Protection Policies and Procedures. Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such.
Restraint and Seclusion Ty Manieri Scott Hall 1. Overview Current Oregon law concerning the use of restraint and seclusion in public schools; The recent.
Staff Training PowerPoint.  To define Emergency Safety Interventions – seclusion and restraint.  To identify if an ESI has occurred.  To identify the.
Child Safety Restraint System (CSRS) Safety Vest Installation 21 st Annual Lake Yale Training Meeting – Teamwork: Building Partnerships Through Safety.
Emergency Safety Intervention.  Emergency: Immediate danger  Safety: Immediate danger of student harming self or others  Intervention: Restraint or.
Worth The Fight: Effective Approaches to Seclusion and Restraint Legislation AASA Member Webinar Series July 10, p.m. E.T.
Special Services Department. Regulations in response to a State Law passed in 2001 Involves time-out, restraint, and seclusion of students Affects Special.
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
Emergency Safety Interventions “What Practitioners Need to Know” 1.
1. To define Emergency Safety Interventions (ESI):  Seclusion  Restraint  History and Purpose 2. To identify the requirements of the ESI regulations.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-1 Chapter 2 Planning and Providing Special Education Services.
Article 42. – Emergency Safety Interventions ESI Regulations K.A.R and As Passed by the Kansas State Board of Education 2.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
Restraint and Seclusion.  Amends several statutes that are not part of school code -  s , F.S., Facility licensure, - relates to facilities.
Margaret Rose McDonnell Kathleen A. Rinehart.  The IDEA – ◦ Applies from birth to age 21, or until the student receives the regular education diploma.
COMMISSION ON SECLUSION & RESTRAINT Seclusion and Restraint Plan Understanding the Law and the Rule 2014.
Worker Focused Safety Program Violence in the Workplace Worker Training Module 3.
Supporting Children with Challenging Behaviors Refresher Training.
1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Education’s Professional Development Center Dr. Clifford Janey, Superintendent Dr. Don Marinaro, Assistant Superintendent.
Communications among Stakeholders for Successful Transportation Peggy Burns, Esq. Education Compliance Group, Inc.
Getting Oriented to Exceptionality and Special Education There is no single accepted theory of normal development, so relatively few definite statements.
Child Passenger Safety in Other Vehicles Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004.
Chapter 10: Children in Forward- Facing Child Restraints.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Free Appropriate Public Education, Individual Education Plan, and Least Restrictive Environment 1.Individuals.
Peggy Burns, Esq. Education Compliance Group, Inc Copyright © 2011, Education.
Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN:
School Bus Drivers Inservice 2011– Key Responsibilities. 2. Teamwork. 3. Physical Demands. 4. Pre & Post-trip with Child-check. 5. Federal and.
Chapter 13: Child Passenger Safety in Other Vehicles/Modes of Transportation.
School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, 5e © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Individuals.
©2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 13 Using Program Assessments to Look at Children in Groups “Pointing the finger of blame at others.
Hot Topics – Today & Tomorrow – In Special Needs Transportation Law Peggy Burns, Esq. Copyright © 2009, Education.
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
SPECIAL NEEDS TRANSPORTATION ISSUES JULY, 2009 CASE CONFERENCE SPECIAL NEEDS TRANSPORTATION ISSUES JULY, 2009 CASE CONFERENCE Cathy Staggs State Department.
KASB ESI Policy GAAF GAAF Emergency Safety Interventions (See JRB, JQ, JQA, and KN) GAAF.
2011 Wisconsin Act Seclusion and Physical Restraint Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction April, 2012.
North Calloway Elementary July 23, KAR 7:160 Effective February 1, 2013 Use of physical restraint and seclusion in public schools All school.
C HAPTER 5 Individuals With Disabilities EDAD 859 By: Group 2.
Individualized Education Plans SPED 461 4/4/11. IEP Components Current performance Goals Special education and related services Accommodations and Modifications.
Copyright © 2007, 2003 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 12 Restraint Alternatives and Safe Restraint Use.
Restraint and Seclusion Shanlee Lunt SPED 393 Brigham Young University- Idaho.
1 WA Legal and Policy Documents School Education Regulations 2000 Occupational Safety and Health Act 1984 –Occupational Safety And.
Please sit in the table marked for your subject area.
Annual Review of Student Services, Special Education, Civil Rights Cohasset Public Schools.
M eetings of the IEP Team Produced by NICHCY, 2007 | Updated by CPIR, 2016.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Non-Compliance Behaviors General Overview of Physical Restraint Requirements for Public Education Programs Prepared by the Massachusetts Department of.
Restraint and Seclusion 101
Seclusion and Restraint GUIDELINES AND Overview of State BOE rule
Update on Physical Restraint and Seclusion
State-funded Preschool
Sarah J. Loquist KASB Attorney July 22, 2013
Current Practices for Meeting the Needs of Exceptional Learners
Procedures for school teams to address struggling students
Positive Behavior Support
Your Partner for Success!
Autism (ASD) and the Educational Environment
Presentation transcript:

Punished, Protected or Prisoner: Restraints Considerations in Law, Operations and Practice 22 nd ANNUAL TRANSPORTING STUDENTS W/ DISABILITIES CONFERENCE AND TRADE SHOW Peggy A. Burns, Esq. Education Compliance Group, Inc. Susan Englert Shutrump, OTR/L Supervisor OT/PT TCESC Cheryl Wolf Special Needs Transportation Consultant

Why is it a “hot topic”? Seclusion and restraint have been under the microscope at least since a 2009 government report of hundreds of cases of alleged abuse and death of students over the last 20 years Schools have emphasized prevention and containment of violence Inclusion may have led to more frequent use by individuals w/ less training

The Legal Debate When safety becomes a constitutional rights issue Seizure? Justified at inception Reasonably related in scope to original circumstances False imprisonment? Student not permitted to leave bus? Confined against their will?

The Legal Debate, contd. Unlawful restraint? Law, regulation, policy? Circumstances surrounding its use Specific circumstances of school and child DOE’s 15 Principles Type of restraint Purpose for restraint Training on alternatives, and on safe use Review and revision of policies Documentation – each instance; review/revise Notification of parents

A seizure? Is this an unusual restriction on movement? What’s its purpose? Is it reasonably designed to accomplish that purpose? Compare: Wrap-around desk (10 th Circuit) 5 employees hold student face down on ground (Ohio)

Proper and improper purposes for restraint Distinctions between physical restraint and use of CSRS Types of physical restraint Basket hold Wall containment Prone containment Which CSRS? When and why? When is each proper? Improper?

Can just anyone use restraint? Training Implementation Planning Documentation

When “Restraint” Becomes Operative Word in CSRS School Aged Child in CSRS Behavior drives choice of CSRS No physical/postural support needs Occupant restraint utilized by typical peers not enough due to limited attention, cognition or behavior prompting tendency to leave bus seat or to remove/get out of shoulder/lap or lap belt

Preschool Student in CSRS Utilizing CSRS which is different than preschool peers All of the previous mentioned criteria for school aged students in CSRS’s also applies

Procedural Safeguards for Use of CSRS’s With These Students Assure less restrictive supports have been tried and found ineffective Visual Supports/Schedules Fidgets/Activities/Busy Bag Peer in Aisle Alternate/Multi-Sensory Modes Utilized to Communicate Bus Safety Rules and Expectations Source of Triggers Analyzed and Accommodated Behavior Intervention Plans/Reinforcements

Team Must Focus on Vehicle Occupant Safety Meets FMVSS 213 as does all child safety seats/CSRS’s Safety Vest not “Harness” Do not modify: Use only per strict manufacturer’s guidelines

Support in Bus Environment Consistent With Other School Environments Postural Supports/Equipment in Classroom? Ratio of Adult to Child in Classroom? Intrinsic Support of Classroom Vs. Isolated Bus Environment

Assure Full Team Involvement Selection Fit Use Training

Must Include Crotch Strap/Support Well Fitted Crotch Strap is VITAL on All CSRS’s Used For Students Who May Attempt to Get Out of It ! Prevents “Submarining” or Sliding Keeps Belts/Harness From Moving Up Onto Neck

Plan for Graduation/Discontinuation Assure plan is in place to support student learning proper behavior to eliminate need for additional support Specific plan in ITP which is reviewed annually (at a minimum) in IEP meeting

Documentation Full Team Involvement Documented All Responsibilities Identified and Delegated in Written Plan Training for Plan Implementation Documented Test Ride Done With Results Documented Parent and Other Team Members Sign to Acknowledge Responsibilities to Inform of Changes Requiring Modification to the ITP Reviewed Annually At a Minimum

Training Driver and Attendant Guidelines for the “Safe” Transportation of Pre-School Age Children in School Buses Clear understanding of the IEP Placement of the CSRS on the bus Securement of the CSRS on the bus Child secured in the CSRS