Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Refusals to Deal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Advertisements

Chapter 15 Marketing Channels, Logistics, and Supply Chain Management.
Chapter 46 Antitrust Law Copyright © 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Jentz Miller Cross BUSINESS.
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 46 Antitrust Law Chapter 46 Antitrust Law.
Slides developed by Les Wiletzky Wiletzky and Associates Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. Antitrust Law.
 Section 1 of Sherman Act regulates “horizontal” and “vertical” restraints.  Per Se vs. Rule of Reason.  Per Se violations are blatant and substantially.
1 COPYRIGHT © 2007 West Legal Studies in Business, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and West Legal Studies in Business are trademarks.
Chapter 45 Antitrust Law. Introduction Common law actions intended to limit restrains on trade and regulate economic competition. Embodied almost entirely.
1 Abuse of Monopoly Power (or Dominant Position) Moscow, July 9, 2010 Douglas H. Ginsburg.
© 2007 by West Legal Studies in Business / A Division of Thomson Learning CHAPTER 20 Promoting Competition.
Copyright©2004 South-Western 16 Oligopoly. Copyright © 2004 South-Western BETWEEN MONOPOLY AND PERFECT COMPETITION Imperfect competition refers to those.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Improving the Product.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Lorain Journal Co. v. United States (1951) Basic Facts: Defendant, controller newspaper and radio station.
Lectures in Microeconomics-Charles W. Upton Issues in Special Selling.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Predatory Pricing.
Business And Its Legal Environment (Mgmt 246) Professor Charles H. Smith Antitrust and Securities Law (“the second” Chapter 21 and Chapter 28) Spring 2010.
Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Mergers. Other Issues Predatory Pricing Refusal to Deal Tie-in Mergers Cartels.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Tie in Deals. Tie In Deals.
A Primer on Foreclosure
CHAPTER 8: SECTION 1 A Perfectly Competitive Market
MAP Pricing Policies Charlie Meyer November 29, 2012.
Public Policy in Private Markets Vertical Market Restrictions.
Public Policy in Private Markets Vertical Market Restrictions.
1 C H A P T E R 14 1 © 2001 Prentice Hall Business PublishingEconomics: Principles and Tools, 2/eO’Sullivan & Sheffrin Market Power and Public Policy:
Antitrust Policy and Regulation ECO 2023 Chapter 18 Fall 2007.
Types of Cases Government Criminal Case Government Civil Case Private Civil Case W/jury Punishment (jail) Damages (money) Damages (money) W/judge only.
1 What is antitrust/competition law? What is its purpose?
Do Now Do you believe Wal Mart is “evil”/bad or are they just a smart corporation?
Antitrust. “Is there not a causal connection between the development of these huge, indomitable trusts and the horrible crimes now under investigation?
© 2008 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 BUSINESS LAW TODAY Essentials 8 th Ed. Roger LeRoy Miller - Institute for University.
 “Market power” is the power of company to control the market for its product.  The law does allow for market monopolies when a patent is issued. During.
Competition Policy and Law Presentation to Study Tour for Russian Member Universities of the Virtual Institute Network 26 March 2009.
A monopolistically competitive market is characterized by three attributes: many firms, differentiated products, and free entry. The equilibrium in a monopolistically.
Trade Practices Common law –Covenant not to compete –Must be reasonable –Society demands laws against predatory business practices Legislation –Laws are.
Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
U.S. vs. Standard Oil 1911 “…The combination of the defendants in this case is an unreasonable and undue restraint of trade in petroleum and its products.
Antitrust Law 1. Learning Objectives: 1.The three major pieces of federal antitrust legislation 2.Monopoly power vs. monopolization 3.Horizontal vs. Vertical.
Its Legal, Ethical & Global Environment 6 th Ed. Its Legal, Ethical & Global Environment 6 th Ed. B U S I N E S S MARIANNE M. JENNINGS Copyright ©2003.
What is a monopoly? What is market power? How do these concepts relate to each other? What is a monopoly? What is market power? How do these concepts.
 Federal gov may regulate business for any reason as long as advances gov economic need  States may regulate business as long as the laws do not interfere.
Legal Environment for a New Century. Click your mouse anywhere on the screen when you are ready to advance the text within each slide. After the starburst.
Chapter 46 Antitrust Laws and Unfair Trade Practices
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Lorain Journal Co. v. United States (1951) Basic Facts: Defendant, controller newspaper and radio station.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Monopoly Power: Getting it and keeping it US Perspective Sharis Pozen, Partner ACCE Seminar 13 May 2008.
1 Economic Regulation and Antitrust Policy Chapter 15 © 2006 Thomson/South-Western.
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 43: Antitrust By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts.
Chapter 23 Antitrust Law and Unfair Trade Practices.
Ch THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS A Critical Thinking Approach Fourth Edition Nancy K. Kubasek Bartley A. Brennan M. Neil Browne Nancy K. Kubasek.
© 2005 West Legal Studies in Business, a division of Thompson Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 PowerPoint Slides to Accompany The Legal, Ethical, and International.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 26 Antitrust and Monopoly.
COPYRIGHT © 2011 South-Western/Cengage Learning. 1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears,
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business, a Division of Thomson Learning 20.1 Chapter 20 Antitrust Law.
49-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
Chapter 7 Market Structures. Competition The Four Market Structures Market Structure Control Over Price Number of Firms Types of Goods Barriers to Entry.
Chapter 37 Antitrust Law.
Chapter 22 Promoting Competition.
Chapter 27: Antitrust and Monopoly
CHAPTER 38 Antitrust.
Economic Regulation and Antitrust Policy
PowerPoint Slides to Accompany ESSENTIALS OF BUSINESS AND ONLINE COMMERCE LAW 1st Edition by Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 21 Antitrust Law Slides developed.
Customized by Professor Ludlum December 1, 2016
Chapter 17 Trade Practices: Antitrust
Chapter 25 Price Planning.
Chapter 15 Marketing Channels, Logistics, and Supply Chain Management.
Economic Regulation and Antitrust Policy
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Enforcing Competition: the United States Antitrust Laws
Presentation transcript:

Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Refusals to Deal

Other Issues Predatory Pricing Refusals to Deal Tie-in Mergers Cartels

Refusals to Deal We generally have the right to deal with whom we choose. But sometimes this can get you into trouble.

Refusals to Deal Some Examples Kodak V. Southern Photo Materials (1927) –Kodak tried to purchase Southern Photo Materials, a distributor. Southern refused to sell. Kodak then refused to sell to Southern at Wholesale. The Supreme Court found Kodak guilty of violating the Sherman Act, for the intent of its action was to monopolize the industry.

Refusals to Deal Some Examples Kodak V. Southern Photo Materials (1927) Aspen Skiing v. Aspen Highlands Skiing (1985) –One firm owned three of four ski slopes at Aspen, and refused to cooperate in a joint marketing effort with the owner of the fourth. The court held that the defendant was motivated by a decision to avoid providing any benefit to the smaller rival, though it would have entailed no cost.

Refusals to Deal Some Examples Kodak V. Southern Photo Materials (1927) Aspen Skiing v. Aspen Highlands Skiing (1985) The Essential Business Facility doctrine. –I own an essential business facility and I unreasonably refuse to make it available to my competitors. My attempt must be monopolization.

Refusals to Deal Some Examples Kodak V. Southern Photo Materials (1927) Aspen Skiing v. Aspen Highlands Skiing (1985) Image v. Kodak (1992) –Kodak refused to sell parts for its photocopiers unless the owner used its repair service or self repair. The district court gave Kodak summary judgment, for Kodak did not have market power in photocopiers. The appeals court reversed the summary judgment, and the Supreme Court upheld the appeals court.

Refusals to Deal Some other Examples I am a buyer for Wal-Mart. I walk into Nordstrom's and find an exclusive man's dress shirt on sale for $70. I know that the wholesale price of the shirt is $25, and know that I can sell the product for $35 and make a generous profit. I call the maker and order 15,000 in various sizes. He refuses to sell to me. Can Wal-Mart sue the manufacturer for actions in restraint of trade?

Refusals to Deal Some other Examples I am a buyer for Wal-Mart. I walk into Nordstrom's and find an exclusive man's dress shirt on sale for $70. I know that the wholesale price of the shirt is $25, and know that I can sell the product for $35 and make a generous profit. I call the maker and order 15,000 in various sizes. He refuses to sell to me. Can Wal-Mart sue the manufacturer for actions in restraint of trade? Probably not. There is a good reason to sell a product only through exclusive stores. So, the manufacturer is probably OK. (Besides, it does not have a monopoly in shirts)

Refusals to Deal Some other Examples I have just purchased the McDonald's franchise in Beechwood Place. I notice that McDonalds's does not sell Chicken McNuggets there, though Chick-O-Filet (or something like that), another store in the food court, sells the equivalent, and does quite well. My lease prohibits me from selling chicken. Is this clause in restraint of trade?

Refusals to Deal Some other Examples I have just purchased the McDonald's franchise in Beechwood Place. I notice that McDonalds's does not sell Chicken McNuggets there, though Chick-O-Filet (or something like that), another store in the food court, sells the equivalent, and does quite well. My lease prohibits me from selling chicken. Is this clause in restraint of trade? Probably not. A mall has a good reason to offer the consumer choice and allowing the sale of chicken products would probably wipe out the chicken store.

Refusals to Deal Some other Examples After purchasing the McDonald's franchise, I learn that I have to purchase all sorts of products such as mustard ketchup, etc, from the McDonald's corporation. I find many of these products available from local vendors at lower prices. Is the contract with McDonald's in restraint of trade?

Refusals to Deal Some other Examples After purchasing the McDonald's franchise, I learn that I have to purchase all sorts of products such as mustard ketchup, etc, from the McDonald's corporation. I find many of these products available from local vendors at lower prices. Is the contract with McDonald's in restraint of trade? Probably not. McDonalds wants to maintain quality over all its stores.

Refusals to Deal End ©2004 Charles W. Upton