Naziism & Holocaust Eichmann in Jerusalem Obedience to Authority Sanctioned Massacres.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“First They Came for the Jews” By Pastor Martin Niemöller
Advertisements

David Myers 11e Chapter 6 Conformity
Milgram Experiment By Sean Shtofman.
Social psychology Concerned with how others influence the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of the individual Social thinking When something unexpected.
The perils of obedience
Warm up! 1.Stand up 2.Shake the hand of the person next to you 3.Sit down 4.Clap your hands together five times 5.Moo like a cow.
Jared and Sara 6B. Attribution theory: people’s tendency to attempt to explain possible relationships in the social world.
Adolf Eichmann War criminal WWII Nazi Germany WWII Tiananmen Square China, 1989.
Psychology in Action (9e)
Social Psychology.
SOCIAL INFLUENCE Obedience Social Psychology Miss Bird.
Naziism & Holocaust Eichmann in Jerusalem Obedience to Authority Sanctioned Massacres.
Lecture Overview Our Thoughts About Others Our Feelings About Others Our Actions Toward Others Applying Social Psychology to Social Problems Applying Social.
Naziism & Holocaust Eichmann in Jerusalem Obedience to Authority Stanford Prison Experiment Sanctioned Massacres.
Social Psychology Social psychology studies the beliefs and behaviors of the individual (the self) within a group (others). Humans are social animals:
1 Social Psychology Psychology 40S. 2 Focuses in Social Psychology Social psychology studies how we behave, think and feel in social situations. Social.
Examples of Famous Experiments What Can WE Learn from THEM ? Where Did They Get Their Research Question? ZimbardoAshMilgram.
____________ 1 ___________________ 2 __________ 3 ____________________________ 4 _______________ 5 students have been given instructions. You MUST follow.
Chapter 7 Social Influence. Conformity Changing one’s beliefs or behavior to be consistent with group standards Compliance Doing what we are asked to.
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior 2e Charles T. Blair-Broeker Randal M. Ernst.
The Milgram Obedience Experiment The Perils of Obedience "The social psychology of this century reveals a major lesson: often it is not so much the kind.
IRB – Institutional Review Board Purpose  Protect the Right of Human Subjects participating in research  Protect VULNERABLE populations  This includes.
Social Psychology Contents What is Social Psychology? Assumptions Methods of Investigation Core Studies from Social Psychology: Milgram. (1963) and Zimbardo.
“Ordinary People” Doing Evil
Authority and Aggression social influence social norms learned, socially based rules reciprocity norm not universal nor unchanging.
Social Psychology. Types of Social Influence Compliance  tendency to agree to do things requested by others Conformity Obedience.
Segment 1:  Sociocultural Perspective. T/F People act in accord with their consciences. T/F We appreciate things more when we have to work for them.
Chapter 14: Psychology in Our Social Lives “We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools.” – Martin Luther King, Jr. ( )
Social Psychology & Nazi Germany
Social Psychology. Social psychology Two major assumptions –Behavior is driven by context –Subjective perceptions guide our behavior.
Chapter 6 Groups And Organizations
THE MILGRAM EXPERIMENT
Milgram’s Experiment. The Purpose of the Experiment Prompted by Milgram’s interest in Eichmann and the Nazi’s obedience to Hitler in the Holocaust. This.
Social Psychology – Ch 17 Social Influence.
METTE MORELL NØRRE GYM 2012 Theoretical Perspectives on Evil.
MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE
Social Psychology (Chapter 8)
Social Psychology  The scientific study of how people think about, influence, and relate to one another.
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior Charles T. Blair-Broeker Randal M. Ernst.
Conformity and Obedience to Authority
Joshua at Jericho. Salem Witch Trials In 1692, 20 were executed in Massachusetts.
PSYCHOLOGY: SOCIAL INFLUENCE THE HOLOCAUST. RESEARCH: Conformity Compliance Obedience Persuasion 1)Come up with a definition 2)Create an example in modern.
Conformity and Obedience to Authority. What is Conformity? Quick Write: What do you think of when you hear the word ‘conformity’? Why do people conform?
Chapter 10:Behavior in Social & Cultural Context Section 1: Roles & Rules “We cannot live for ourselves alone.” Herman Melville.
Milgram’s Experiment.
Sanctioned Massacres Nazi “Mobile Killing Units” MyLai Rwanda? Iraqi militias? Abu Gharaib?
Stanford Prison Experiment Haney, Banks and Zimbardo Social Psychology.
©2002 Prentice Hall Behavior in Social and Cultural Context.
Unit 14 Social Psychology. The scientific study of how we think about, influence and relate to one another. Sociology – the study of society Social behavior.
“What are the Origins of Extraordinary Evil?” Friday, March 5 th, 9:00-10:00AM Dr. James Waller Auschwitz Institute for Peace and Reconciliation
Social Psychology How are our actions, thoughts and feelings influenced by others.
Obedience. Extreme Obedience Jonestown, Guyana, 1978 – Jim Jones, cult leader of the People’s Temple, persuaded his followers to drink Kool-Aid laced.
Overview Roles and rules Social influences on beliefs Individuals in groups Us vs. Them: Group identity Group conflict and prejudice.
Quick Review of Things  GROUP DECISION- MAKING Groupthink Great Person Theory Polarization Social Loafing  INFLUENCING BEHAVIORS Deindividuation Bystander.
Explanations of why people obey. Milgram demonstrated the power that a situation has in shaping behaviour. It seems that sometimes our compassion and.
Social Psychology. What are group polarization and groupthink?
SOCIAL INFLUENCE Social Psychology Miss Bird.
Chapter 7 Social Influence Taylor, 2006, Prentice Hall.
How far can social-psychological factors of obedience explain why an normal person could push someone to their death today?
Stanford Prison Experiment
Obedience: Social-psychological factors
Why do people obey?.
Conformity and Obedience to Authority
Piliavin et al. (1969) Good Samaritanism: An Underground Phenomenon?
Module 75.
Unit 13 Social Psychology Social Influence pt. 2
Milgram variations.
Social Influence Topic Tuesday.
Presentation transcript:

Naziism & Holocaust Eichmann in Jerusalem Obedience to Authority Sanctioned Massacres

Psychology’s Response to Fascism Obedience -- Milgram & others Authoritarianism -- Adorno et al & others

Anti-Semitism Christian: Jews as killers of God agents of Satan / killers of babies money-lenders Nazi: communist conspiracy conspiracy of financiers biological race theory:parasites bacteria vermin

Eichmann in Jerusalem Hannah Arendt From minor bureaucrat to organizer of holocaust Not anti-Semitic Authority, loyalty & bureaucracy put conscience out of commission “frighteningly normal”

Milgram Obedience Experiment Subject:plays “teacher” role Confederate:plays “learner” role Confederate:plays “experimenter” role

Milgram Obedience Experiment Series of experiments: Indep. variables: proximity of authority salience of victim group admin of shock Dep. Variable:shock level

Results from main variations

Factors increasing obedience: Authority of experimenter Proximity of experimenter Distance form victim Absence of dissenters Presence of other compliers Reduced role in giving shock Authority of institution

Milgram’s Theory Force fields Subject switches state “autonomous”  “agentic” conscience “inhibited” in agentic state

Zimbardo Prison Experiment Abu Ghraib?

Zimbardo Prison Experiment Random assignment of prisoners & guards 5 released – “extreme emotional depression, crying, rage and acute anxiety” Ended after 6 days

Zimbardo Prison Experiment Guards found “sense of power was exhilarating” Prisoner responses: –Disbelief –Rebellion –Isolation, self-interest, deprecation –Half became “sick”

Zimbardo: Prisoner Responses Loss of personal identity –“Deindividuation” Learned helplessness Emasculation  Power of role

Nazi Doctors Robert J. Lifton Doubling: Doctors create “Auschwitz self” Shift between two selves

Effects of obedience / conformity ? State  Role  Self

Functions of the Executive Chester Barnard, 1938 Two “modes” of viewing & treating others: 1) outside of organizations, people can act as unique individuals 2) as member of organizations, people are “depersonalized,” and “regarded in their purely functional aspects, as phases of cooperation.”

Functions of the Executive Chester Barnard, 1938 “Every participant in an organization may be regarded as having a dual personality -- an organization personality and an individual personality.”

Functions of the Executive Chester Barnard, 1938 At lower levels in the hierarchy organi- zations create a “zone of indifference” … “Within which orders are acceptable without conscious questioning of their authority.” “Makes it possible normally to treat a personal question impersonally.”

Functions of the Executive Chester Barnard, 1938 Higher levels in hierarchy requires creation of 2 nd personality -- “organizational personality” -- aligned with goals of organization: “Most executive decisions appear in the guise of technical decisions, and their moral aspects are not consciously appreciated. An executive may make many important decisions without reference to any sense of personal interest or of morality.”

States  Selves Milgram:45 min.state change Zimbardo:6 daysrole/identity change Lifton:monthsdouble self  State develops via role into self ??

Sanctioned Massacres Nazi “Mobile Killing Units” MyLai Rwanda? Iraqi militias?

Einsatzgruppen “Mobile Killing Units”

My Lai

MY LAI MASSACRE: MARCH 16, 1968

Lt. Calley Sentenced to life in prison; released in 1974

Hugh Thompson

Sanctioned Massacres H. Kelman Authorization Routinization De-individuation of actor De-humanization of victims

Sanctioned Massacres Authorization:authority situation –relieves individual of moral responsibility –calls into play morality of loyalty & duty Routinization:role in organization –task becomes a job –violence broken into tasks –language of euphamisms

Sanctioned Massacres De-individuation of the actor –individual takes on identity of organization –de-emphasize personal characteristics De-humanization of the victims –victims given group identity –victims portrayed as non-human –Deprived of membership in common human group

Sanctioned Massacres Killers & torturers can be made Tearing-down & re-construction of identity –separation –“liminal” phase of instruction, rehearsal & testing –return in new status