Folklore in Activated Sludge Treatment Plant Operations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Desalination Becomes A Reality In Tampa Bay Florida
Advertisements

Operator Observations
Welcome to Shawnee #2 Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Welcome to American #2 Wastewater Treatment Plant.
CE 370 Sedimentation.
ENVE 420 Industrial Pollution Control EQUALIZATION Dr. Aslıhan Kerç.
Treatment of Slaughterhouse Wastewater
Biological waste water treatment
SECONDARY TREATMENT Main aim is to remove BOD (organic matter) to avoid oxygen depletion in the recipient Microbial action Aerobic/anaerobic microorganisms.
ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS AND KINETICS OF ASP
SURVEY OF THE FOULING CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN ATTACHED AND SUSPENDED SUBMERGED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR.
Paving a Path to Potable Reuse Flexible Treatment for To Be Determined Regulations Michael Watts, PhD, PE Water Technology Leader Garver.
FE Review for Environmental Engineering Problems, problems, problems Presented by L.R. Chevalier, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Modeling Suspended Growth Systems – see Grady, Daigger & Lim Environmental Biotechnology CE421/521 Tim Ellis (originally prepared by Dr. Eric Evans) October.
Wastewater Treatment On completion of this module you should be:
INTRODUCTION TO THE TREATMENT OF TANNERY EFFLUENTS
SEDIMENTATION.
Nitrification and Denitrification
Review of Settling AKA sedimentation – suspended solids removed from liquid phase by gravity Common applications in Wastewater Treatment – grit chamber,
WASTE STABILIZATION POND (WSP). Advantages:Simplicity simple to construct simple to construct simple to operate and maintain simple to operate and.
Welcome to Shawnee #2 Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Welcome to Shawnee #2 Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Activated Sludge Design (Complete Mix Reactor)
ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS
Environmental Technology ChimH409 (2-0-1) Michel Verbanck 2012 Universite Libre de Bruxelles Bruface Dept Water Pollution.
ERT 417/4 WASTE TREATMENT IN BIOPROCESS INDUSTRY CH 8 - Suspended Growth Biological Treatment Process Prepared by: Pn. Hairul Nazirah Abdul Halim.
CEE 453 Research Project Chris Garnic Nolan Rogers Creating Ideal Floc for Instant Startup of a Conical Flocculator.
CHEE 370 Waste Treatment Processes
Flotation Flotation involves separation of solids from the water phase by attaching the solids to fine air bubbles to decrease the density of the particles.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT IN LAHTI There are 2 wastewater treatment plants in Lahti - Kariniemi - Ali-Juhakkala In these slides we examine waste water treatment.
Wastewater Treatment. Collection Sewers Collect wastewater and bring it to the wastewater treatment plant – Combined sewer overflows: Take untreated sewage.
1 IV. Wastewater Treatment technologies Topic IV. 9. Wastewater Treatment Facilities with Suspended Biomass - Aerated Tanks: Kinds, Structures, Basic Technological.
Pennsylvania Water Environment Federation PennTEC Annual Technical Conference June 4, 2013 Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion.
Secondary Treatment Processes
A New Twist on an Old Test for Activated Sludge Process Control Estes Park PWO Seminar October 22, 2004 Greg Farmer – Littleton / Englewood WWTP.
Wastewater Treatment Processes
Using the CPE Approach to Optimize Industrial Waste Treatment Facilities Ronald G. Schuyler and Michael Rothberg Rothberg, Tamburini, and Winsor, Inc.
Christopher Hill December 6, 2006 CE 679
DESIGN OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Deborah Helstrom, P.E. Industrial Permits Team Wastewater Permitting Section Membrane Bioreactors Treatment.
5.6 SEDIMENTATION Objective
Secondary Clarifier Jae K. (Jim) Park, Professor
NYWEA ENERGY SPECIALTY CONFERENCE November 20, 2014 Towards Net-Zero Energy in Wastewater Treatment Demonstration of ClearCove’s Enhanced Primary Treatment.
LOW D.O. OPERATION: EFFECTS ON BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL, OXYGEN TRANSFER EFFICIENCY, DENITRIFICATION, AND ENERGY SAVINGS.
A Study on Optimizing Biological Phosphorous Removal by Changing Aerobic Operating Times Phillip Dixon and Juan Diaz-Robles CEE 453 Laboratory Research.
COMPARISON OF MBBR AND Suspended growth BNR Performance at the HRWTF
BioWin3 ® – An Introduction Michael D. Doran, P. E. DEE Adjunct Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering CEE 426.
Secondary Clarifier 1.
Waste Water Treatment Denis MOTA. Overview Waste water Treatment Treatment in LYON  Pierre Bénite.
Activated Sludge Workshop Techniques and Tools that Improve Clarifier Performance Mike Beattie Operations and Reliability.
Filamentous Foaming Causes and Remedies.
Aeration System Opportunities Dave Reardon, PE, ENV SP HDR National Director - Water Sustainability WW/W Sustainable Energy Cohort-Session 5 January 31,
Dinesh Bhutada MAHARASTRA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Basic Process Design Parameters Food to mass ratio (F/M) = Q x BOD MLSS x V Where Q = average daily sewage flow to aeration (Ml/d) BOD = Average settled.
1 CTC 450 Review WW Sludge Processes. 2 Objectives Understand the basics with respect to operation of wastewater systems.
Welcome to the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Welcome to American-Bath Wastewater Treatment Plant.
CTC 450 Review WW Sludge Processes.
Attached Growth Biological WW treatment Systems
Modified Ludzack-Ettinger Wastewater Plant
Secondary Clarifier Jae K. (Jim) Park, Professor
Secondary Treatment Processes
Activated sludge settling problem resolved
Wastewater Treatment Activated sludge
CTC 450 Review Preliminary & Primary Treatment Measure flow Screen
Settling and Flotation
Wastewater Treatment Secondary Treatment.
SBSA.
Nitrogen Removal University of Kansas
Advanced Wastewater Treatment
Presentation transcript:

Folklore in Activated Sludge Treatment Plant Operations Rocky Mountain Water Environment Association 65th Annual Meeting September 17, 2002 Folklore in Activated Sludge Treatment Plant Operations Eric J. Wahlberg

Folklore Defined Folklore Defined “An unsupported notion, story, or saying that is widely circulated.”

Learning Objectives Myth 1 Myth 2 Myth 3 Myth 4 Myth 5

What’s In It For You?

Where Did I Get This Title? I Stole It. Folklore Defined Where Did I Get This Title? I Stole It. Richard I. Dick (1976). “Folklore in the design of final settling tanks,” Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, 48, pp. 633-644.

Myth 1 Blankets are necessary for secondary clarifiers to work properly.

How Often Has It Been Said Activated sludge secondary clarifiers perform two functions: 1. Clarification of the overflow 2. Thickening of the underflow

How Often Has It Been Said Activated sludge secondary clarifiers perform two functions: 1. Clarification of the overflow 2. Thickening of the underflow Yuk!

Thickening Role is Root Cause of Many Problems Operators try to achieve unachievable RAS concentrations Denitrification Phosphorus release Deterioration in sludge quality

Just Say No Thickening in secondary clarifiers

RAS Concentration a Fixed Multiple of MLSS Q + QRAS XRAS = XML QRAS

Secondary Clarifier as a Reactor?

Secondary Clarifier as a Reactor?

Secondary Clarifier as a Reactor?

Secondary Clarifier as a Reactor?

Secondary Clarifier as a Reactor?

Secondary Clarifier as a Reactor?

Secondary Clarifier as a Reactor?

Truth 1 Blankets are not necessary for secondary clarifiers to work properly, and better performance will result when no blankets are kept in secondary clarifiers.

Myth 2 The hydraulic detention time in the aeration basin is decreased by increasing the RAS flow rate.

Proper Response to an Over-loaded Clarifier: Increase RAS Increase RAS flow

The Basic Activated Sludge Process Effluent Influent Mixed liquor Secondary clarifier Aeration basin WAS RAS

Control Volume Shows Two Flows Into The Aeration Basin

This Is How The Myth Got Started HRT = VAB/(Q + QRAS)

This Is How The Myth Got Started HRT = VAB/(Q + QRAS) But this is not correct. Why?

Control Volume Shows Two Flows Into The Aeration Basin

Shrinking the Clarifier the RAS Flow Is Completely Internal Control Volume

The Basic Activated Sludge Process Effluent Influent Mixed liquor Secondary clarifier Aeration basin WAS RAS

Tanks Are Full; No Influent, Effluent, WAS Mixed liquor Secondary clarifier Aeration basin RAS

Truth 2 The hydraulic detention time in the aeration basin is not affected by the RAS flow rate. As Glen Daigger stated Sunday: “Bugs only know SRT; they do not know HRT”.

Myth 3 The MLSS concentration can be controlled by the RAS flow rate.

“No” Blankets In Under And Critically Loaded Clarifiers

Blankets Form In Over Loaded Clarifiers Decrease RAS flow

System Response: Blanket Comes Up, MLSS Goes Down

Solids Concentration (g/L) Over Loaded To Under Loaded, MLSS Goes Up 10 20 30 40 5 15 Solids Concentration (g/L) Solids Flux (lb/ft 2 d)

Truth 3 The MLSS concentration can be controlled by the RAS flow rate, but you don’t want to because it’s limited and it requires blankets in the clarifiers (see Truth 1).

Myth 4 Process control means keeping the MLSS concentration or the F:M ratio or the SRT constant.

What Are We Trying to Accomplish?

In Essence Our Jobs Are Very Simple As David Jenkins almost said on Sunday, we want a sludge that: Settles well Compacts well Flocculates well

You Cannot Control What You Do Not Measure Process control should be based on maintaining stable, optimal sludge quality.

Truth 4 Process control means maintaining stable, optimal sludge quality (that meets permit).

Myth 5 The MLSS concentration, the F:M ratio, and the SRT can be controlled simultaneously .

Engineers’ Design Data Keep This Myth Going

Equation For MLSS Concentration So – S SRT XML = {XINF-ISS + [Yg( )]} HRT 1 + bSRT

Truth 5 Fix the SRT to achieve permit compliance and let the MLSS and F:M “drift” to wherever they want to.

Thank you! Myth 1 Myth 2 Myth 3 Myth 4 Myth 5