Optimizing Radiochemical Methods at SRS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ra in Water using MnO2 Resin: New Developments
Advertisements

Analysis of Actinide Elements from Large Environmental Samples
A NALYTICAL S EPARATIONS G ROUP Megan Bennett, Ashlee Crable, Sherry Faye, Narek Gharibyan, Julie Gostic, and Chris Klug Subgroup Leader: Ralf Sudowe.
Magnesium metal is added to nitrogen gas
Rapid Actinide Analysis for Large Soil Samples
SOLIDS ANALYSIS Prepared By
New Applications of Rapid Column Extraction for Methods at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell III Savannah River Site.
Analysis of Actinide Elements from Large Samples Henrieta Dulaiova Guebuem Kim Bill Burnett Florida State University and E. Philip Horwitz PG Research.
SURVEY OF CHEMISTRY LABORATORY I
New Extraction Methods for Urine and Fecal Samples
 What is the molarity of a bleach containing 9.5 grams of NaOCl per liter of bleach?  How many grams of CaCl 2 would be dissolved in 0.75 L of water.
D. P. DiPrete, C. C. DiPrete, and R. A. Sigg
Technical Updates on UTEVA, TEVA and TRU Resins
Types of Chemical Reactions and Solution Stoichiometry
Rapid Separation Methods for Bioassay Samples S. L. Maxwell, III and D. J. Fauth Westinghouse Savannah River Site.
 All salts are ionic compounds.  A salt is formed when a metallic ion or an ammonium ion (NH 4 + ) replaces one or more hydrogen ions of an acid. HClNaCl.
Mg + N 2  Mg 3 N 2 Pb + Ag +  Pb 2+ + Ag Magnesium metal is burned in nitrogen Lead foil is immersed in silver nitrate A solution of ammonium sulfate.
MAKING SALTS 27/08/2015. Making Soluble Salts There are 3 types of reaction that can be used to make soluble salts. All 3 involve: An Acid A metal or.
Solution Stoichiometry
The Determination of 226 Ra in Water Samples Anil H. Thakkar Eichrom Technologies, Inc. eichrom TECHNOLOGIES INC.
The Determination Of 226 Ra In Soil Samples Lawrence D. Morris General Engineering Laboratories, Inc. Anil H. Thakkar Eichrom Technologies, Inc.
Analysis of Actinide Elements from Large Samples Henrieta Dulaiova Guebuem Kim Bill Burnett Florida State University and E. Philip Horwitz PG Research.
Radioactive Materials Analytical Laboratory Eichrom Technologies Inc. User Group Meeting May 2001 J.M. Giaquinto, L.D. Bible, D.C. Glasgow, J.M. Keller.
Actinide Analysis from Large- Volume Seawater Samples Bill Burnett & Guebuem Kim Department of Oceanography Florida State University and Phil Horwitz PG.
Page A European Perspective on the Use of Eichrom Resins Dr Jon Martin BNFL.
FORMULAS hydroxideOH -. FORMULAS sulfateSO 4 2- FORMULAS sulfiteSO 3 2-
Rapid Actinide Analysis for Large Soil Samples-Update Sherrod L. Maxwell, III Westinghouse Savannah River Company.
Lecture 7: Digestion of Samples Digestion of water samples with Kjeldhl method for determination of N Destruction and extraction of soil and sludge for.
00J ppt Rapid Extraction Methods for the Process Laboratory S. L. Maxwell, III V. D. Jones S. T. Nichols J. Satkowski M. A. Bernard Westinghouse.
Elution and Mounting Techniques for Americium using Eichrom TRU Resin Mitch Abbate Radiochemistry Technical Director Severn Trent Services St. Louis May.
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002 Determination of actinides in emergency preparedness using Diphonix or Actinide resin in combination with gamma spectrometry Ulrika.
General Engineering Laboratories Use of Eichrom Resins for Bioassay Pa-231 Bob Timm - GEL Tim Chandler - GEL Bill Burnett - FSU Mike Schultz - PerkinElmer.
Developments in Environmental Radiochemistry* Environmental Radioactivity Measurement Facility Department of Oceanography Florida State University Tallahassee,
Distribution of radionuclides in soils in surroundings of Bratislava, capital of the Slovak Republic. II. Man-made radionuclides Mátel Ľ., Rosskopfová.
The Determination of 226Ra in Water Samples
Working Through Mistakes, Miscues, and Mishaps in Actinide Separations Shane Knockemus US EPA / NAREL Montgomery, AL May 4, 2004.
Updates from Eichrom’s Tech Support Lab Anil Thakkar May 4 th 2004 Charleston, SC.
New Extraction Methods for Actinides in Urine at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell III and David Fauth Savannah River Site.
1) How many moles of water are in an 82.3g sample?
Recent Improvements in Rapid Column Separation Methods at SRS S. L. Maxwell, III, D. J. Fauth, R. C. Henderson, J. J. Smiley, S. R. Johnson Westinghouse.
Th, Pu & U Separation Using TEVA and UTEVA Resin
Recent Improvements in Rapid Column Separation Methods at SRS
New Fecal Method for Plutonium and Americium at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell III and David Fauth Savannah River Site.
Optimizing Peak Separation for Simultaneous Pu and U Measurements Shane Knockemus US EPA / NAREL May 3, 2005.
 Extraction of OM  Rock-Eval (Pyrolysis)  Elemental analysis  GC, HPLC & MS  SIRMS.
Permanganate reactions. Manganese exists in many different oxidation states, each with a characteristic colour including: Mn VII: MnO 4 – purple Mn VI:
Rapid actinide measurements in environmental samples Dr Phil Warwick Geosciences Advisory Unit Southampton Oceanography Centre.
New Fecal Method for Plutonium and Americium at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell III and David Fauth Savannah River Site.
Optimizing Radiochemical Methods at SRS (Ni-63, I-129, Actinides) Sherrod L. Maxwell, III Westinghouse Savannah River Company.
One-Column Separation and Analysis of Isotopic Am and Pu in Soil Samples Nidal M. Jadalla, Eberline Services, Albuquerque, NM Anil Thakkar, Eichrom Technologies,
Chemical Reactions A MiniPractice For Miriam. Write out and balance the correct chemical equations for the following reactions. Then write a net ionic.
Pyrosulfate fusion vs. TEVA / TRU forcing the issue Shane Knockemus U.S. EPA / NAREL Montgomery, AL November 11, 2002.
WARM UP 1. Write the equation for the neutralization reaction between sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ) and ammonium hydroxide (NH 4 OH).
An Improved Method for Determination of Ra-228 * Jamie Christoff & Bill Burnett Department of Oceanography Florida State University “The Double-Pass Approach”
Anil H.Thakkar Eichrom Industries, Inc.. Darien, IL
CERIMETRI SMK Negeri 13 Bandung.
Acids and Alkalis Grade 10.
Mini test – write the formulae for
Separation of Metal and Metal Oxides using Ethyl Acetate & Bromine
The Determination of 226Ra in Water Samples
Strontium Extraction from Urine Samples
Radioactive Waste Processing at the Savannah River Site
Ra in Water using MnO2 Resin: Update
Technical Updates on TRU and TEVA Resins
Rapid Emergency Methods for Actinides and Sr-89/90
Aqueous Solutions Pt. 2.
Particulate and Dissolved 210Po and 210Pb in Water Columns from the
remove 167 mL aliquot for Sr-90 spike with 1 mg stable Sr carrier
National Air and Radiation Environmental Lab
Unit 11 – Solutions and Ions in Aqueous Solutions
Presentation transcript:

Optimizing Radiochemical Methods at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell, III Westinghouse Savannah River Company

Recent Improvements SRS Environmental Monitoring lab new actinide methods for water, air filters, soil, sediments, sanitary sludge SRS Bioassay lab (with Dave Fauth) increased Pu-Np recoveries faster fecal method (HEDPA-no microwave) F/H Laboratory (Process lab) faster single column separation for Pu/Np in high U samples (U-234 removal of 1E6)

SRS Environmental Monitoring Lab Stacked TEVA + TRU cartridges for all matrices Replaced UTEVA+TRU water samples air filter samples soil, sediments (up to 10 grams) sanitary waste sludge (5 grams) vegetation (10 grams) fruit (100 grams)

Advantages of TEVA+TRU Pu, Np, Am, Cm, U (Th) in a single stacked column Allows Pu and Np together on TEVA (Pu-236 tracer) High retention of Pu, Np on TEVA Higher retention of U on TRU vs. UTEVA Better Po-210 removal (interferes with U-232) and Th removal Removal of TEVA/removal on TRU if any residual

Pu, Np, Am, Cm,U, Sr on TEVA/TRU RESIN (Water/Air filters) 1) Redissolve in 10-15 mL 3M HN03 - 0.5M to 1M Al(NO3)3 2) Add 0.5 mL 1.5M Sulfamic Acid + 1 mL 1.5M Ascorbic Acid 3) Add 1 mL 3 M Sodium Nitrite Th Elution 20mL 9MHCI Rinse 20 mL 3MHN03 Pu, Np Elution 20mL 0.10MHC1 - 0.05MHF - 0.03M TiCl3 Add 0.5 mL 30 wt% H2O2 2mL TEVA Resin (50-100 um) Remove TRU cartridge: 1) Elute Am with 15mL 4M HCI 2) 10 mL 4MHCL-0.2M HF to remove any Th 2) Elute U with 15mL 0.1M ammonium bioxalate Cerium fluoride Alpha spectrometry 2.0mL TRU-Resin (50-100 um) Collect, evaporate, dissolve in 8M HNO3 Sr Resin

Alpha Resolution Improvements Strong HCL can cause extractant bleed-off TEVA: 5 mL 3M HNO3 rinse after 9M HCL Th removal rinse prior to stripping Pu and Np TRU: 4M HCL extractant bleed-off affects resolution (worse with 9M) We have gone back to evaporating 4M HCl with con HNO3 and 100 uL of 1.8M H2SO4, then ash with con HNO3 and H2O2, redissolve in 0.5M HCL 3M HNO3 rinse after 4M HCl-0.2M HF rinse UTEVA/TRU: Using 9M HCl with UTEVA or TRU can affect bleed-off and peak resolution/not needed

Total Dissolution Soil, Sediments, Sludge Actinides in soil, sediment and sanitary sludge samples 5 to 10 gram soil 5 gram sanitary sludge Replaced fusion method which had poor recoveries, load solution problems, and Po-210 problems Total Dissolution sodium peroxide/sodium hydroxide fusion (15-20 minutes) multiple samples fused at once in furnace inexpensive zirconium crucibles

Total Dissolution Soil, Sediments, Sludge, contd. Total Dissolution and matrix removal (1 day) soils: heat at 550C, then nitric acid/HF silicon removal first, then fusion sanitary sludge: heat at 550C, then fusion fusion in zirconium crucibles for 20 minutes at 700C 10 grams sodium peroxide/5 grams sodium hydroxide Hydroxide precipitation with TiCl3 reductant and barium present to eliminate carbonate interference

Total Dissolution Soil, Sediments, Sludge, contd. Redissolve in dilute HCl and perform cerium fluoride precipitation (500 ug to 2 mg Ce) with TiCl3 present Rinse precipitate with 0.25M HCl- 6MHF with 0.02M rongalite present Soil load solution: 5 mLs 3M HNO3-0.25M boric acid, 6 mL 7M HNO3, 7.5 mL 2M AL(NO3)3

Transfer to crucible after silicon removal

10 grams sodium peroxide + 5 grams sodium hydroxide 700C for 20 minutes

Just add water after cooling briefly

Dilute to 1 liter with water with iron carrier, TiCl3, and barium present

After centrifuging, acidify and add TiCl3, Ce and HF.

Place on ice, then centrifuge

Rinse with dilute HCl, HF with rongalite present

Redissolve in acid, boric acid and aluminum nitrate

Cerium fluoride / Alpha spectrometry Actinides in SOIL 1) Redissolve in 18.5 mL 3M HN03 - 0.8M Al(NO3)3- 0.07M boric acid 2) Add 0.5 mL 1.5M Sulfamic Acid + 1.25 mL 1.5M Ascorbic Acid 3) Add 1 mL 3 M Sodium Nitrite Rinse Beaker rinse: 3mL 5MHN03 Separate cartridges: TEVA: 5 mL 3MHN03 Collect/acidify - with 2 mL16M HN03 then to TRU TEVA:10 mL5M HNO3 8 mL3M HN03 Th Elution 20mL 9MHCI Pu Elution 20mL 0.10MHC1 - 0.05MHF - 0.03M TiCl3 Remove TRU cartridge: 1) Elute Am with 15mL 4M HCI 2) Add 3M HNO3 rinse from TEVA 3) 10 mL 6M HNO3 -remove any Po-210 4) 15 mL 4M HCl-0.2M HF-remove Th 5) Elute U with 15mL 0.1M ammonium bioxalate Add 0.5 mL 30 wt% H2O2 2mL TEVA Resin (50-100 um) Cerium fluoride Alpha spectrometry 2.0mL TRU-Resin (50-100 um) Cerium fluoride / Alpha spectrometry

(warm and rinse original beaker) Am/RE Removal on TEVA 1) Evaporate 4M HCl with 5mL con.HNO3, 50 uL of 1.8M H2SO4, then ash with nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide 2) Redissolve in 5 mL of 4M NH4SCN, warm gently. Rinse Beaker rinse: 3mL 4M NH4SCN, warm 10 mL 1.5 M NH4SCN to column Am Elution 25 mL 1M HCl (warm and rinse original beaker) 2mL TEVA Resin (50-100 um) Cerium fluoride Alpha spectrometry

Final Am Clean-up on TEVA

QAP 0903-SOIL SRS EML Ratio Pu-238 14.9 14.6 1.021 Pu-239 31.6 30.4 1.039 Am-241 18.3 18.4 0.995 U-234 117.7 127.3 0.925 U-238 119.9 127.1 0.943 Results in Bq/kg 5 gram sample analyzed

Bioassay Lab Improvements Actinides and Sr-90 in urine stacked TEVA+TRU Resin cartridges with vacuum boxes Pu-236 tracer for Pu and Np at same time Pu, Np (TEVA) and U, Am (TRU) Sr (Sr Resin) Pu stripping improvement: Increased rongalite to 0.04M (sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate) - compatible with electroplating adjust bisulfate added for sulfate added from rongalite decomposition (2.0 mLs 10 % bisulfate instead of 3 mLs)

Bioassay Lab Urine Method Tracer Recoveries 2002 2003 2004 Pu 77.5 86.1 95.1 EU 80.6 83.4 87.4 Sr 82.7 80.1 82.2 Am 83.5 84.3 80.5 Np 76.6 87.1 94.4

Recent Improvements in Fecal Method HEDPA strip of Diphonix instead of microwave destruction (18 mL 0.5M HEDPA) 45 minute hot plate destruction 30 mL of 30 wt% H2O2 Add 200 uL of 1.5M ferrous sulfate 1 mL of concentrated HNO3 Ash to dryness Add 5 mL concentrated HNO3, ash to dryness Add 5 mL 30 wt% H2O2, ash to dryness. Repeat 3 more times. Faster than microwave, but requires more aluminum in load solution due to higher phosphate

Process Lab Improvements Process samples to support HEU Blenddown processing Pu and Np are key product specification measurements Pu-236 tracer for Pu and Np on TEVA resin in HEU and LEU process solutions Improvements: Single cartridge instead of two column method use Ti (III) reductant in Pu strip from TEVA Using 0.5mL 30wt% H2O2 instead of nitrite, much better oxidation of U+4 to U+6 1000 x removal of residual U in cerium fluoride precipitation $100K savings-labor and materials

Summary Future work SRS Environmental Monitoring lab work TEVA+TRU for all matrices Cerium fluoride matrix elimination Bioassay lab Improved Pu stripping using rongalite (95% recoveries) HEDPA to eliminate microwave in fecal analysis (save 1-2 days) Process lab Single cartridge separation for Pu, Np in process lab on high uranium samples (cost/time savings) Future work Ra on MnO2 resin

MnO2 Resin