Proposed Amendment to the Yuma Field Office Resource Management Plan Public Scoping Meetings Monday, April 18, 2011, 6 – 8 p.m. Yuma BLM Field Office 2555.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Past and Current Initiatives in Pinellas County to Coordinate Planning between the School Board and Local Governments 1996 – Interlocal Agreement and Comprehensive.
Advertisements

RMP Workshop Objectives Visual, Travel & Special Designations Bureau of Land Management Carlsbad Field Office February 1 st and 2 nd, 2012 Presentation.
March 26, 2014 Transmission Coordination and Planning Committee 2014 Q1 Stakeholder Meeting.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
OSEP QUARTERLY CALL WITH PARENT CENTERS PART B FINAL REGULATIONS RELATED TO PARENTAL CONSENT FOR THE USE OF PUBLIC BENEFITS OR INSURANCE Office of Special.
Geothermal - Utah Program - General Program - General Areas of Geothermal Potential – Prospectively Valuable and Known Geothermal Resource Areas (KGRA)
Bureau of Land Management Regulations Washington State Association of Counties Cooperating Agency & Coordination Training November 22, 2013 – Vancouver,
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Environmental Impact Statement Process Development Services Department Carol Helland, Land Use Director/SEPA Official (DSD) David Pyle, Senior Land Use.
 Meeting Administration and Objectives  The Partnership  Understanding the Study Area  What We Heard  Alternatives to be Evaluated  Participant.
Fort Bliss Energy, Water, and Solid Waste Sustainability Initiatives Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Public Meetings June & 13, 2013.
Agency Staff report on the Creation of a: (Andy Lanier – DLCD, Laurel Hillmann – OPRD)
1 Public Lands Advocacy HOW TO REVIEW A FEDERAL PLANNING DOCUMENT.
Goodsprings Field Office October 30 th  250 “Small” (250ft tall) wind towers  Total height including blades approx. 350ft  Associated Facilities.
Division of Local Assistance Office of Special & Discretionary Programs December 2, 2010.
EEM Established in 1989 Section of the Streets and Highways Code provides the Legislature with the authority to allocate $10 million annually. Fiscal.
1 Invenergy. 2 Invenergy Introduction Developer, owner and operator of power generation projects. Focused on the development of renewable energy and natural.
Variations and Timelines in the Federal Appeals Process Robert Mathes, Bjork Lindley Little PC.
Foreign Affairs Security Training Center
TIM CHARTERS STAFF DIRECTOR U.S. HOUSE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES “ WHY BUILDING A SOLAR PROJECT ON FEDERAL.
SOUTH COAST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN REVISION BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office California Desert District.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Visual Resource Management May 2015 Lander, Wyoming.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Region 10 Regional Response Team Northwest Area Committee Seattle, WA February 12, 2014 EFSEC.
Travel Management Rule Implementation
Table Mountain Wind Proposal Jean Field Office. Project Information Proponent: Table Mountain Wind Co., LLC Project Specifics: ROW grant to use BLM administered.
Unit 15B Class Project Class Project. Objective Using the tools, techniques, and practices covered so far, work in an ID team setting to evaluate a project.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Alternative Energy on the Outer Continental Shelf Robert P. LaBelle Deputy Associate Director Offshore Energy and Minerals Management Minerals Management.
Large Generator Interconnection Procedures Reform Stakeholder Meeting February 19, 2009.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Agenda 6:30 – 7:00 p.m. Open House 7:00 – 7:20 p.m. Presentation Welcome Introductions Project Overview Meeting Purpose Environmental Review Process Other.
Big Sandy Rancheria Band of Western Mono Indians Casino and Resort Project Draft EIS Public Hearing Wednesday, February 2, p.m. – 9 p.m. Foothill.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Course Wrap Up UNIT 16. Overall Course Objective Having participated in the course, you should be able to: Describe the basic principles and concepts.
PROFESSIONALISE | RE-PRIORITISE | STANDARDISE | BENCHMARK | IMPROVE INDUSTRY RELATIONSHIPS AND INDUSTRY PERFORMANCE | LEAD REFORM UNCLASSIFIEDNew Air Combat.
The National Environmental Policy Act and Oil and Gas Development in Region 8 WESTAR Oil and Gas Conference October 22, 2008.
1 Project Analysis and Evaluation UNIT 10 – Project Analysis and Evaluation.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District Harbor Bridge Project U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge)/SH 286 (Crosstown Expressway) Citizens Advisory.
USA Parkway Project Welcome Public Information Meeting to the
1 Sunrise Powerlink Project Update Orange County Business Council March 10, 2009.
Cave and Karst Management Through Land Use Planning James Goodbar Sr. Cave Specialist Bureau of Land Management Cody, Wyoming May 12-16, 2014 Aaron Stockton.
Introduction Part 1 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management May 2006.
CEQA and the Delta Plan Presentation to Delta Stewardship Council February 24, 2011.
Monitoring and Evaluation. Objective Identify appropriate monitoring techniques. Identify approaches to evaluating plan implementation and effectiveness.
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N Integrated Energy Policy Report Workshop Landscape-Scale Environmental Evaluations for Energy Infrastructure.
United States Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Winnemucca District Draft Resource Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
I-465 at I-65 Interchange Modification Public Meeting 6:00pm Monday, October 1, 2012 South Grove Intermediate School Beech Grove, Indiana.
JACK MORROW HILLS COORDINATED ACTIVITY PLAN Bureau of Land Management Rock Springs Field Office Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement Public.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Public.
Energy Policy Act – 2005 West-Wide Energy Corridors.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © 2013 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. EIPC Roll-Up Powerflow Model Zach Smith Director,
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens.
Planning – LUP Process I. Introduction II. Inventory Procedures III.Planning A. Background to LWCs in Planning B. Factors to Consider When Protecting LWCs.
Alternative Alignments Public Meeting
The Plaza at Santa Monica Project PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) August 6, 2008
Fifth Standard Solar Project Complex
SunZia Project Description
SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Alaska Roadless Rulemaking
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Water Quality
Office of Waste Disposal Office of Environmental Management
Presentation transcript:

Proposed Amendment to the Yuma Field Office Resource Management Plan Public Scoping Meetings Monday, April 18, 2011, 6 – 8 p.m. Yuma BLM Field Office 2555 E. Gila Ridge Road Yuma, Arizona Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 6 – 8 p.m. Quartzsite Town Hall 465 North Plymouth Avenue Quartzsite, Arizona 85346

Goals of the Meeting Discuss Project and RMP background Discuss why a Land Use Plan Amendment is being considered Discuss Visual Resources and the alternatives that will be evaluated for the plan amendment

Background The Bureau of Land Management Yuma Field Office (YFO) is considering amending the Yuma District Resource Management Plan (RMP) to allow the use of public land for Solar Reserve’s proposed Quartzsite Solar Energy Project (QSEP) in La Paz County, Arizona. Western Area Power Administration is the lead federal agency for the preparation of the QSEP environmental impact statement (EIS). The land use plan amendment would be analyzed in conjunction with the proposed solar Project, and will be described in the Draft EIS.

Quartzsite Solar Energy Project Quartzsite Solar Energy LLC, (QSE) a wholly owned subsidiary of Solar Reserve LLC, has submitted an application to the BLM requesting a right-of-way to construct, maintain, and operate a solar energy facility capable of producing approximately 450 gigawatt- hours of renewable energy annually, with a nominal net generating capacity of 100 megawatts. In addition, QSE has applied to Western Area Power Administration, an agency of the U.S. Department of Energy, to interconnect the Project to Western’s transmission system at the Bouse-Kofa 161- kilovolt (kV) transmission line.

Quartzsite Solar Energy Project QSE’s proprietary concentrating solar thermal technology uses a field of heliostats (elevated mirrors guided by a tracking system) to focus sunlight onto a 653- foot solar collection receiver erected in the center of the solar field. Each heliostat tracks the sun throughout the day and reflects the solar energy to the central receiver. The Project features thermal energy storage that allows solar energy to be captured throughout the day and retained in a liquid salt heat transfer fluid. Artist Rendering

Purpose and Need for RMP Land Use Plan Amendment The Project area is designated as a Visual Resource Management Class III area. The objective of Class III designation is to partially retain the existing character of the landscape. Under that designation, the level of change to the characteristic landscape should be moderate. An assessment of contrast from SR 95 indicated that the Project could result in a strong contrast, based on the large scale of the solar facility and the potential for glare from the solar receiver. As such, the Project would not be in conformance with the Yuma RMP; therefore, an RMP amendment would be required by the BLM to grant the right-of-way necessary to construct and operate the Project (as proposed).

Timeline for the QSE EIS January 14, 2010: Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS is published in the Federal Register. January 14, 2010 – February 16, 2010: EIS Scoping Period; three scoping meetings held (Yuma, Quartzsite, Parker). January 14, 2010 – March 2011: Analyze the Proposed Action; determined that a Land Use Plan Amendment is required to approve the Project as is. March 30, 2011: Notice of Intent to amend the YFO RMP. May/June 2011: Anticipated 90-Day Draft EIS Public Review and Comment Period begins; includes scoping meetings. October 2011: Anticipated Publication of the Final EIS. December 2011: Anticipated Record of Decision Issued.

Visual Resource Management System (VRM) The VRM system involves: The inventory of the scenic values of public lands. The establishment of management objectives for those values through the resource management planning process. These objectives are then used to: (1) evaluate proposed activities to determine whether they conform with the RMP and (2) modify the design of the project (where feasible and applicable) to reduce visual contrast.

Yuma Field Office RMP Current VRM Class Designations

Visual Resource Inventory (VRI) Process VRI Process Takes into Account:  Scenic Quality Evaluation  Sensitivity Level Analysis  Delineation of Distance Zones Based on VRI, BLM Lands Become:  VRI Class I  VRI Class II  VRI Class III  VRI Class IV Note: these are INVENTORY, not Management Classes

VRI Classes VRM Classes Visual Resource Management Class Designation Decisions under the Multiple-Use Mandate  National and regional priorities  Visual values and viewshed management priorities  Resource uses/ demands  Other resource considerations protection  Desired outcomes and balancing of resource value/use

VRM Class I Objective: To preserve the existing character of the landscape.  Level of change to the landscape should be very low, and must not attract attention.  Provides for natural ecological change  Provides for limited management activity Examples:  Designated Wilderness  Wilderness Study Areas (WSA)  Outstanding Natural Areas (ONA) Class I Landscape in Yuma Field Office – Muggins Mountains

VRM Class II Objective: To retain the existing character of the landscape.  Level of change to the landscape should be low  Changes should repeat the basic elements found in the natural features of the landscape – form, line, color, and texture  Management activities may be seen, but should not attract attention of the observer Class II Landscape in Yuma Field Office – Plomosa Mountains

VRM Class III Objective: To partially retain the existing character of the landscape.  Level of change to the landscape can be moderate  Management activities may attract attention, but should not dominate the view of the casual observer  Change should repeat the basic elements found in the natural landscape – form, line, color, and texture Class III Landscape in Yuma Field Office – Bajada of Plomosa Mountains

VRM Class IV Objective: To provide for activities that require major modification of the landscape.  Level of change to the landscape can be high  Management activities may dominate the view and be the major focus of attention  Still minimize impacts through location and design by repeating form, line, color, and texture Class IV Landscape in Yuma Field Office – La Posa Plain/Long Term Visitor Area (LTVA)

Yuma Field Office RMP Current VRM Class Designations

Proposed Class IV Alternatives to RMP: Alternative 1

Proposed Class IV Alternatives to RMP: Alternative 2

Proposed Class IV Alternatives to RMP: Alternative 3

Proposed Class IV Alternatives to RMP: Alternative 4

Proposed Class IV Alternatives to RMP: Alternative 5 (No Action)

Public Comments During the public scoping period, the BLM is soliciting public comment on issues, concerns, and opportunities that should be considered in the analysis. Comments about the proposed action should focus on the potential environmental impacts, visual resource management, reasonable alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental impacts. In order to be included in the Draft NEPA document, all comments must be received prior to the close of the scoping period (April 29, 2011). Additional opportunities for public participation and formal comment will occur when the Draft EIS is issued. Comments may be submitted by either of the following methods: Mail: Use first-class postage and include your name, any organization you represent, and a return address. Electronic Mail: Include your name, any organization you represent, and return address in the message to: For further information, contact Eddie Arreola, Supervisory Project Manager for the Quartzsite Solar Energy Project. Contact Information: or