Your Water – Your Future Protecting and Preserving Ground Water via the Highlands RMP Ground Water Summit 2008 The Ground Water Protection Committee Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Highlands Draft Regional Master Plan November 2006.
Advertisements

Issues for Council Discussion April 24, Critical Habitat Changes made to Chapter II, IV and V in response to comments received, and experience gained.
Regional Water Planning Senate Bill 1 Introduction and Status as of August 01, 1999.
Smart Growth Update VCARD May 23, Growth Management & Schools during 2005 Volusia County Council adopts new school impact fee. School Board of Volusia.
July 15, 2008 – GB Work Session Discussion of Mayor Thomas E. Swisstack’s Priority List Recommendations.
Land Use in Oregon and Measure 37 the day the world turned upside down Carrie Richter Garvey Schubert Barer Portland, Oregon
Transportation Strategy Board July 28, 2010 Responsible Growth.
2013 Public Law Changes House Enrolled Act 1276 Public Law 6 Amends IC and Township Board Meetings Effective.
Gateway Smart Growth District proposed pursuant to M.G.L. c.40R Town of Reading – Board of Selectmen Public Hearing – Tuesday August, 28 at 7 PM Ted Carman,
Josh Metz, Associate Planner Consistency Determination: City of Seaside – 2013 Zoning Code Text Amendments.
Town of Lyndon Zoning Bylaw Changes Town Planning Commission Public Informational Meeting 09December09.
Volusia Smart Growth Implementation Committee Final Report August 2005.
Indian Trail Town Council Town Council January 12, 2010.
Area Commissions Purpose Area commissions are established to afford additional voluntary citizen participation in decision-making in an advisory.
Fiscal Analysis of the Fair Rent and Home Ownership Initiative A Presentation to the Fillmore City Council June 23, 2006.
Utility Extension Project
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING: Strategic Considerations for Development (or Planning, Process and Pitfalls) Center for Economic Development Law Leslie V. Batchelor.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
1 Brace Centre for Water Resources Management McGill University, Sept. 25 François Boulanger, Regional Director The New Canadian Environmental Assessment.
Water and Wastewater Certification 1 Water & Wastewater Reference Manual.
Issues for Council Discussion June 12, Forest Resource Management and Sustainability Program Changes Program updated to support GPOs Program updated.
California Venue and Event Recycling Legislation Review of AB 2176 Model Ordinance For Waste Reduction at Venues and Events.
MUNICIPAL LAND USE APPROVAL PROCESS “How To Navigate The System” City of East Orange, NJ Mayor Robert L. Bowser Joseph Jenkins, City Administrator James.
Charter Review Recommendations - 1 Presentation Title Subtitle (optional) Date Vancouver City Council Workshop/Public Hearing Staff, Title Charter Review.
Planning Processes/Permits “From Pre-application meeting to Board of Aldermen Approval.” “From Pre-application meeting to Board of Aldermen Approval.”
Roles and Responsibilities in Municipal Land Use.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
From Mandate to Smart Growth: The Evolution of Growth Management in the United States Jesse J. Richardson, Jr. Department of Urban Affairs and Planning.
Georgia’s Water Plan June 17, /09/08 Page 2 Agenda Plan Development Plan Overview.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
Consistency Determination: City of Seaside Local Coastal Program FORA Board Meeting March 15, 2013 Agenda No: 8a.
Santa Monica Sustainable City Plan Purpose The Sustainable City Plan was created to enhance our resources, prevent harm to the natural environment and.
Los Osos Community Services District Basin Management Planning and Proposed Work Program June 5, 2008.
1 Prepared by Les Knapp, Associate Director, MACo and Amanda Stakem Conn, Principal Counsel to MDP* for the Maryland State Bar Association,
Presentation to the Placer LAFCO Commission September 10, 2014.
“Blue Ribbon” Strategies for Demolition Review Ordinances Nadine Peterson Preservation Planner NH Division of Historical Resources Maggie Stier Field Service.
The Community Preservation Act Hadley – April 14, 2004 The Community Preservation Coalition What is the CPA and how does it work? What does the CPA mean.
Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.
April 9, 2011 Mike Wieszchowski, P.E., PTOE Professional Traffic Operations Engineer Road Use Planning Guidelines to Protect Your Roadways.
Slovak Environmental Inspectorate Procedure of issuing the permits in the Slovak Republic.
Rulemaking for Central Florida Coordination Area Coordinated Rulemaking by the South Florida, St. Johns River and Southwest Florida Water Management Districts.
The SSMP Process 1. The Servicing and Settlement Master Plan A plan to encompass the community’s visions and ideas, while approaching planning and servicing.
Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code - MPC State enabling legislation for all municipalities except Pittsburgh and Philadelphia Newly Elected Officials.
Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act December 18, 2007 Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection.
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
June 10, 2008 Board of County Commissioners B-WSFWP-1 Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP) Transmittal Hearing.
PPP Legal & Regulatory Framework. PPP Policy In July 2008 GOK approved the PPP policy directive through which: PPPs are identified as a method for investing.
The Role of NEPA Leasing and Mineral Rights Sales Subject to Environmental Use and Planning Provisions –The National Environmetal Policy Act of 1969 requires.
Regional Planning CCRPC Board Training March 21, 2012.
County-Wide Act 167 Plan “County-wide Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan for Chester County, PA” was prepared by: Chester County Water Resources Authority.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 15 – Energy – Upstream Hydrocarbons.
The Crash Course for Municipal Planning Commission Members in Cumberland County 1.
NAPA COUNTY Conservation Development and Planning Department Code Compliance Flow Chart Building Code Violations 1 COMPLAINT Written complaint (form, letter,
Neighbourhood Planning in Haringey Myddleton Road Strategic Group 7 th November 2013.
Planning & Community Development Department General Plan Implementation Strategy City Council February 29, 2016.
CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE Chatham. Charter Review Committee Section 8-2 Periodic Charter Review  At least once every five years a special.
Presented By: Budget & Research Department FY STATUS REPORT & THREE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST SUMMARY (FY )
Water Efficiency Ordinance ZCA No. 750
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
Environmental Critical Areas Regulations
City-wide LED Street Light Conversion Program
Marriott-Slaterville, Utah March 2018
Consideration of Action Re: Commercial Cannabis Businesses
WSAC Decision Making Framework
Community Development Department
Board Organizational Meeting
FISHERIES AND ENVIRONMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT PRESPECTIVE
Land Use Planning Community Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Your Water – Your Future Protecting and Preserving Ground Water via the Highlands RMP Ground Water Summit 2008 The Ground Water Protection Committee Presented by Thonet Associates Inc. Environmental Planning & Design Consultants October 29, 2008

On August 10, 2004, the Highlands Water Protection and Planning Act became law.

After 4 years of hard work, the Highlands Council has adopted the Highlands Regional Master Plan (RMP)

Now its time for NJ Highlands’ citizens to join the Highlands Planning Team… But what can we do?

What can Towns do to Protect and Preserve Highlands Water Resources? Amend Master Plans and Land Development Ordinances to Conform to the RMP!

When would be a good time? Now!

Step 1: Appoint a RMP Conformance Committee Suggested Committee Members:  Two members of the Environmental Commission;  Two Planning Board members;  Two members of the governing body; and  The Planning Board’s professional consultants (planner, engineer, environmental consultant)

Step 2: The Town’s RMP Conformance Committee Should Get to Work  Start by reading the RMP.  Then, invite the Highlands Council to conduct an overview meeting with:  The Planning Board;  The Environmental Commission;  The governing body; and  The public.

The Town’s RMP Conformance Committee’s Tasks  Ask the Highlands Council to explain:  The benefits associated with Plan Conformance;  The RMP as it applies to the municipality;  The tasks required to achieve confomance;  The process that the municipality must follow for Plan conformance; and  How to file a Notice of Intent;  Ask the Highlands Council to provide an individualized information packet (maps and technical data specific to the municipality).

The Town’s RMP Conformance Committee’s Tasks Prepare a report identifying any factual errors in the RMP and provide a copy to the Highlands Council (and the municipality’s planning board and governing body). Prepare a report identifying any factual errors in the RMP and provide a copy to the Highlands Council (and the municipality’s planning board and governing body). Conduct a “self-assessment” to identify how the municipal Master Plan and Land Development Ordinances need to be amended to conform with the RMP and document findings in a formal report. Conduct a “self-assessment” to identify how the municipal Master Plan and Land Development Ordinances need to be amended to conform with the RMP and document findings in a formal report.

The Town’s RMP Conformance Committee’s Tasks Prepare an implementation plan and schedule for amending the municipal Master Plan and Land Development Ordinances. (Can separate into “Basic Plan Conformance” and “Plan Conformance” Prepare an implementation plan and schedule for amending the municipal Master Plan and Land Development Ordinances. (Can separate into “Basic Plan Conformance” and “Plan Conformance” Present the self-assessment report and implementation plan to the full Planning Board and governing body at a public hearing. Present the self-assessment report and implementation plan to the full Planning Board and governing body at a public hearing.

The Town’s RMP Conformance Committee’s Tasks Obtain authorization from the full Planning Board and the governing body for to prepare the proposed revisions to the municipal Master Plan and Land Development Ordinances. Obtain authorization from the full Planning Board and the governing body for to prepare the proposed revisions to the municipal Master Plan and Land Development Ordinances. Prepare the proposed revisions to the Master Plan and Land Development Ordinances. Prepare the proposed revisions to the Master Plan and Land Development Ordinances. Submit proposed revisions to the Master Plan and Land Development Ordinances to the full Planning Board for its review. Submit proposed revisions to the Master Plan and Land Development Ordinances to the full Planning Board for its review.

The Town’s RMP Conformance Committee’s Tasks Request that the Planning Board pass a resolution recommending to the governing body that the revised Master Plan and Land Development Ordinances be submitted to the Highlands Council as part of the Town’s “Petition for Plan Conformance.” Request that the Planning Board pass a resolution recommending to the governing body that the revised Master Plan and Land Development Ordinances be submitted to the Highlands Council as part of the Town’s “Petition for Plan Conformance.”

Step 3: The Governing Body Submits the Town’s “Petition for Plan Conformance” For municipalities wholly or partially within the Preservation Area: Due by June 8 to December 8, For municipalities wholly or partially within the Preservation Area: Due by June 8 to December 8, For municipalities wholly or partially within the Planning Area: May be submitted at any time for those portions of the community within the Planning Area. For municipalities wholly or partially within the Planning Area: May be submitted at any time for those portions of the community within the Planning Area. For municipalities with portions in both the Preservation and Planning Areas: A petition for simultaneous plan conformance may be requested. For municipalities with portions in both the Preservation and Planning Areas: A petition for simultaneous plan conformance may be requested.

Then What? Review and action by the Highlands Council; Review and action by the Highlands Council; Preparation of any additional revisions needed to the municipal Master Plan and Land Development Ordinances; Preparation of any additional revisions needed to the municipal Master Plan and Land Development Ordinances; Formal adoption of the revised municipal Master Plan by the Planning Board; Formal adoption of the revised municipal Master Plan by the Planning Board; Formal adoption of the revised Land Development Ordinances by the governing body. Formal adoption of the revised Land Development Ordinances by the governing body.

Why Conform to the RMP? The RMP represents a reasonable and rational approach to preserving and protecting the water and other resources in the NJ Highlands for the long term. The RMP represents a reasonable and rational approach to preserving and protecting the water and other resources in the NJ Highlands for the long term. Conforming to a well thought out regional master plan really is better than praying for a sustainable water supply for New Jersey. Conforming to a well thought out regional master plan really is better than praying for a sustainable water supply for New Jersey.

Other Benefits of Plan Conformance  Planning Grants and Technical Assistance;  Transfer of Development Rights Feasibility Grant Program;  Transfer of Development Rights – Impact Fees and Enhanced Planning Grants;  Tax Stabilization Funds;  State Aid and Assistance for Smart Growth;  Strong presumption of validity, extraordinary deference, and burden of proof;  Legal representation; and  Plan Conformance equivalence to State Plan Endorsement.

Concerns with the RMP? Allowing continued development in areas that lack sufficient water supplies; Allowing continued development in areas that lack sufficient water supplies; Allowing new clustered developments served by wells and septics at densities that may result in exceeding the state standard of health and safety for nitrates in well water; Allowing new clustered developments served by wells and septics at densities that may result in exceeding the state standard of health and safety for nitrates in well water; Allowing encroachment into previously undisturbed 300- foot buffers along C-1 waters in redevelopment areas; Allowing encroachment into previously undisturbed 300- foot buffers along C-1 waters in redevelopment areas;

Recommendations Don’t worry about on-going environmentally- related concerns with the current RMP. Don’t worry about on-going environmentally- related concerns with the current RMP. Actively pursue “conformance” with the RMP while continuing to work with the Highlands Council regarding your remaining concerns. Actively pursue “conformance” with the RMP while continuing to work with the Highlands Council regarding your remaining concerns. Employ the Precautionary Principle in revising municipal Master Plans and Land Development Ordinances to conform with the RMP. Employ the Precautionary Principle in revising municipal Master Plans and Land Development Ordinances to conform with the RMP.

Three Elements of the Precautionary Principle Significant Threat of harm Significant Threat of harm Scientific uncertainty Scientific uncertainty Preventive, precautionary action Preventive, precautionary action

Applying the Precautionary Principle Select least harmful alternatives that accomplish compliance; Select least harmful alternatives that accomplish compliance; Select alternatives that are cost effective and demonstrably sustainable in the long-term; Select alternatives that are cost effective and demonstrably sustainable in the long-term; Avoid alternatives that require employment of unproven mitigation. (Prevent impacts. Don’t permit impacts, hoping to later mitigate for those impacts.) Avoid alternatives that require employment of unproven mitigation. (Prevent impacts. Don’t permit impacts, hoping to later mitigate for those impacts.) Don’t hesitate to be more stringent than the RMP requires. The RMP permits more stringent requirements. Don’t hesitate to be more stringent than the RMP requires. The RMP permits more stringent requirements.

It’s time to get to work on conformance!

Thank you Presentation by: John A. Thonet, PE, PP President Thonet Associates Inc. Environmental Planning & Design Consultants 14 Upper Kingtown Road Pittstown, NJ

NJ Highlands’ Nitrate Dilution Model Uses: Uses: Drought recharge [1960’s drought ( ), 2/3 average annual recharge]; Drought recharge [1960’s drought ( ), 2/3 average annual recharge]; Non-degradation target in Preservation Area: Non-degradation target in Preservation Area: 0.83 mg/l regional average; Farmland: 25 acres/septic system; 0.83 mg/l regional average; Farmland: 25 acres/septic system; 0.17 mg/l forested areas; Forested areas: 88 acres/septic system mg/l forested areas; Forested areas: 88 acres/septic system.

NJ Highlands’ Nitrate Dilution Model In the Planning Area: In the Planning Area: Protection Zone: 0.72 mg/l; yields 26 acres/septic system; Protection Zone: 0.72 mg/l; yields 26 acres/septic system; Conservation Zone: 1.87 mg/l; yields 10 acres/septic system; Conservation Zone: 1.87 mg/l; yields 10 acres/septic system; Existing Community Zone: 2 mg/l; yields 9 to 9.5 acres/septic system. Existing Community Zone: 2 mg/l; yields 9 to 9.5 acres/septic system. Where clustering is permitted: 10 mg/l within the developed area. (Violation of State antidegradation policy? Should be 6 mg/l) Where clustering is permitted: 10 mg/l within the developed area. (Violation of State antidegradation policy? Should be 6 mg/l)

NJ Highlands Water Availability Determinations Low Flow Margin Method ( Sept. median flow minus 7Q10 flow); Low Flow Margin Method ( Sept. median flow minus 7Q10 flow); Assumes 23% consumptive use (mostly summertime uses); Assumes 23% consumptive use (mostly summertime uses); Water Availability: Water Availability: Protection Zone: 5% of LFM; Protection Zone: 5% of LFM; Conservation Zone: 10% of LFM for Agricultural use and 5% of LFM for human use; Conservation Zone: 10% of LFM for Agricultural use and 5% of LFM for human use; Existing Community Zone: 20% of LFM. Existing Community Zone: 20% of LFM.

NJ Highlands Water Availability Determinations in Deficit Areas In deficit areas: In deficit areas: Protection Zone: 5% of LFM; Subject to a 1% of LFM cap (Conditional Water Availability) and 125% to 200% mitigation, absent a Municipal Water Use and Conservation Management Plan. Protection Zone: 5% of LFM; Subject to a 1% of LFM cap (Conditional Water Availability) and 125% to 200% mitigation, absent a Municipal Water Use and Conservation Management Plan. Conservation Zone: 5% of LFM Depletive and Consumptive Use (up to Standard Threshold) ; Subject to a 1% of LFM cap (Conditional Water Availability) and 125% to 200% mitigation, absent a Municipal Water Use and Conservation Management Plan. Conservation Zone: 5% of LFM Depletive and Consumptive Use (up to Standard Threshold) ; Subject to a 1% of LFM cap (Conditional Water Availability) and 125% to 200% mitigation, absent a Municipal Water Use and Conservation Management Plan.

NJ Highlands Water Availability Determinations in Deficit Areas Existing Community Zone: 5% of LFM Depletive and Consumptive Use (up to Standard Threshold) subject to a 2% of LFM cap (Conditional Water Availability) until 125% mitigation has been provided, absent a Municipal Water Use and Conservation Management Plan. Existing Community Zone: 5% of LFM Depletive and Consumptive Use (up to Standard Threshold) subject to a 2% of LFM cap (Conditional Water Availability) until 125% mitigation has been provided, absent a Municipal Water Use and Conservation Management Plan.