Federal Fiscal Compliance 101 Texas Education Agency (TEA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented By WVDE Federal Programs Staff July 15, 2009 Title III Monitoring and Fiscal Updates.
Advertisements

IDEA-B LEA Maintenance of Effort (MOE) FY 2014 and Beyond Texas Education Agency (TEA) Division of Federal Fiscal Compliance and Reporting November 2013.
E.F.F.O.R.T. Every Federal Fish Ought to Report Time Presented by Julia Clay, Monica Ornelas & Crystal Hernandez Federal & State Programs Ector County.
Indirect Cost Rate Proposal Region 11 Education Service Center January 28, 2015.
Maintenance of Effort IV-B Funding LEA Level Special Education Services Kansas Department of Education Special Education Services.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
IDEA-B and NCLB LEA Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Texas Education Agency (TEA)
AB 86: Adult Education K-12 Adult Education Expenditure Reporting Survey for Fiscal Year
Application for Approval of Funding for Residential Placement
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 4 of the Organization and Development Process Link Plan to Federal, State, and Local Funding Sources 4 2.
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Excess Cost Presenter Patricia Holcomb-Gray Office of Special Education Programs NJ Department of Education June 3, 2015.
Awarded School GME Training March 28, 2013 AZ CSP FY
A Fiscal Overview of Grants Illinois Association of School Business Officials Educational Support Professionals’ Conference Presented by: Tim Imler.
Special Education Funding Education Service Center, Region 20 Sherry Marsh 1.
Compliance and Special Education Funding What’s MOE got to do with it?
1 South Dakota Department of Education – Grants Management Rob Huffman – Administrator Mark Gageby – Special Education Fiscal Kim Fischer – Fiscal Monitoring.
Texas Education Agency1 eGrants Special Education Funding Applications for Texas Education Agency Division of IDEA Coordination May 6, 2008.
Maintenance of Effort, Comparability, and Supplement/Supplant PAFPC April 2011.
Demonstrating Comparability School Year October 2014October 2014.
Grant Maintenance Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 6, 2011.
A State Department Perspective.  Headed by an elected State Superintendent ◦ No state board of education  425 School Districts  12 Cooperative Educational.
Office of Special Education Fall Forum November 4, 2013.
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
E-Grants: Tips and Tricks Juli Tenneson, Federal Grant Accountant (406)
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Don’t Take It For Granted! Sarah Averill and Audrey Hukari Division of Grants Administration Texas Education Agency.
Medicaid Allowable Expenditure Report- MAER Amy Kanter, SBS Auditor Michigan Department of Health and Human Services 2015 MDHHS SBS Conference – Traverse.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Maintenance of Effort Danna Sanders Phone:
Welcome to Managing the Finances of Your NHPRC Grant 1.
STATE FISCAL STABILIZATION FUND 2011 Updates February 1, 2011.
FIRMS & SCO Reporting Updates and Reminders Roberta McNiel, Senior Manager, Financial Services / SFSR Chancellor’s Office April 23, 2015.
Revenue. Objectives Participants will learn: Sources of special education funds Purpose of special education funds Federal funding sources State funding.
1 Annual Request for Special Education Funds Application Training Fiscal Year 2010 May 28, 2009 New Hampshire Department of Education Bureau of Special.
DIVISION OF PROGRAM MANAGEMENT. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT UPDATES.
School Budget (Draft)
 Two aspects to IDEA MOE: 1. Eligibility Process  Determines eligibility to receive IDEA-B funds  Compares upcoming year’s Budget to prior year Expenditures*
SPECIAL EDUCATION MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT (MOE). MOE REQUIREMENT Federal law requires that each local education agency (LEA) receiving federal funds pursuant.
Budgeting. Objectives Participants will learn: Resources for budgeting Distribution of state special ed funds Projecting state and federal funds Code.
Special Education Budgets GCASE – SELDA February 2015.
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section IDEA Part B Grant Fiscal Monitoring Presented by: Antonia Johnson, IDEA Part B Consultant.
Special Education Consolidated Grant Application and Program Guidelines Revisions for TEA|Division of IDEA Coordination May 2011.
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
REQUEST TEASE ACCESS INDICATOR 7 Steps to Request Access to Indicator 7 through TEASE (Texas Education Agency Secure Environment) Data Collection TEA.
Consolidated Fiscal (OCFO) Requirements: Special Education and Federal Programs Components Spring Fiscal WorkshopsSpring Fiscal Workshops.
1 Division of Public Schools (PreK -12) Florida Department of Education Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 NCLB: 2009.
Request TEASE Access: SPP 13 or SPP 14 Steps to request access to State Performance Plan SPP 13 or SPP 14 through TEASE ( Texas Education Agency Secure.
Business Manager and CFO Roundtable Discussion October 29, 2015 Hank Johnson Consultant.
Annual Governance Reporting Brandon Spenrath | TEA | Charter School Administration.
Title III Application Process Maria Garcia-Morales (717) Title III Program Manager Pennsylvania Department of Education.
DHHS COE Meeting Agenda June 26, 2009 Welcome Introductions Contract Compliance Reporting General Updates Divisional COE news Questions and Answers.
Adult Education Block Grant Webinar February 19, 2016.
Pre Award Process for Federal Program Officers Competitive Grants Randi Neff Federal Program Officer.
Grant Applications Shanna Graham-Garrett
Texas Education Agency - Charter School Orientation Grants Administration July 2013.
How to CORRECTLY Complete a TEASE Access Request Form.
Don’t Take It For Granted! Annie Molina and Rebecca Patterson Tuesday, June 17, 2014.
Division of Federal Fiscal Compliance and Reporting Title I, Part A – Comparability of Services Training Module Completing the Comparability Assurance.
THE REAL SUPPLEMENT VERSUS SUPPLANT STORY Maintenance of Effort ( MOE)
Maryland Association of Counties – Annual Winter Conference 2013 THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF SCHOOL BUDGETING – THE STATE PERSPECTIVE Stephen A. Brooks Deputy.
Special Education Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Michael Brooks Division of School Finance Special Education.
IDEA Grants Application: Maintenance of Effort. 2 What is Maintenance of Effort? IDEA regulation (34 CFR § ) which directs districts, for each grant.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
IDEA-B LEA MOE Federal Fiscal Compliance and Reporting
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Campus ESSA Grant Packet Training
Campus ESSA Grant Packet Training
Virtual Network Meeting: Consolidated Application
Reporting and documenting the data for:
AUDITS----SINGLE AUDIT CONCEPT, COMPLIANCE
Presented by: Melissa Lemons
Presentation transcript:

Federal Fiscal Compliance 101 Texas Education Agency (TEA)

Major Federal Fiscal Compliance and Reporting Requirements  CEIS and MOE Voluntary Reduction Reporting  FFATA Reporting  Indirect Cost Rates  Title I, Part A Comparability  NCLB LEA MOE  IDEA-B LEA MOE  Special Education SSA Configuration Changes  Corrective Actions

Reports, Notifications and Submissions GFFC Reports and Data Collections  TEAL/TEASE Application  TEA Federal Compliance Determinations  LEA responses to Federal Compliance Determinations Ensure appropriate LEA staff have access!

Reports, Notifications and Submissions Grants and Federal Program Compliance (GAFPC) listerv Sign up for GAFPC at: Ensure appropriate LEA staff are subscribed to GAFPC!

CEIS and MOE Voluntary Reduction Reporting Requirement  Report on applicable CEIS Set-Aside amounts, students served, and MOE Voluntary Reduction taken by LEA’s.

CEIS and MOE Voluntary Reduction Reporting Common Errors to Avoid  CEIS Set-Aside amounts > 15%  MOE Voluntary Reduction > 50%  Combined, the CEIS Set-Aside and MOE Voluntary Reduction may not exceed lower of the two

CEIS and MOE Voluntary Reduction Reporting Common Errors to Avoid (Continued)  CEIS Set-Aside yet no CEIS Students Served  CEIS Students Served yet no CEIS Set-Aside  Special Education Consolidated Grant Application is not amended for CEIS Set-Aside changes

FFATA Reporting Requirement  Report on applicable federal subawards (i.e. TEA NOGAs to LEAs) Note: LEA data is tied to the LEA’s DUNS LEA’s must update SAM annually

FFATA Reporting Common Errors to Avoid  Incorrect 9-digit zip code for the physical address in SAM  Outdated address or business contact information in AskTED  Incorrect DUNS on file at TEA

Indirect Cost Rates Request Rate Via Annual Submission  ISDs – Exhibit J-2 of AFR (electronic submission)  Open-enrollment Charter – eGrant Special Collection SC5010  ESCs/Other Governmental Agencies – Indirect Cost Rate Proposal submitted directly to TEA

 LEA may apply its Indirect Cost Rate if allowable by the grant  The indirect cost rate cap may be less than the LEA’s approved Indirect Cost Rate  Administrative caps may limit the amount of indirect costs recovered Application of Indirect Cost Rates

Common Errors to Avoid  The indirect cost recovery is calculated when the LEA submits the final expenditure report  If the LEA has requested reimbursement in excess of the allowable indirect costs on its periodic expenditure reports, a refund due will be generated

Title I, Part A Comparability Requirement  LEAs required to annually submit Comparability Computation Form and Comparability Assurance Document using GFFC Reports and Data Collections  Submissions due November 12 th

Title I, Part A Comparability Common Errors to Avoid  Misclassification of Campus (either Title/Skipped or Non-Title)  Not reporting EE and/or PK campuses in Elementary Grade-span group  Not demonstrating compliance with one test for all grade-span groupings tested

Title I, Part A Comparability Common Errors to Avoid (Continued)  Subdividing Grade-span into High/Low enrollment and not meeting Significant Difference of Enrollment criteria  Uploading Comparability Computation Form as a PDF rather than Excel as required  Uploading Comparability Assurance Document without Superintendent Signature as required

NCLB LEA MOE Requirement  Determine LEA compliance with NCLB Maintenance of Effort (MOE)  Applies to LEAs receiving federal funds under covered NCLB (ESEA) programs

NCLB LEA MOE Common Misconceptions  MYTH: Similar to IDEA-B LEA MOE, there are federal statutory exceptions to NCLB LEA MOE. TRUTH: There are no federal statutory exceptions.  MYTH: TEA has authority to waive penalty for noncompliance. TRUTH: Only USDE has authority to waive penalty.

NCLB LEA MOE Common Misconceptions  MYTH: Receipt of USDE waiver constitutes compliance with requirement. TRUTH: Final Determinations DO NOT change; only the penalty is waived.  MYTH: Penalty only impacts only Title I, Part A. TRUTH: Noncompliance impacts all covered programs.

IDEA-B LEA Eligibility Requirement  LEA must certify it has budgeted in the current year an amount greater than or equal to the amount required to meet the MOE requirement.  Applies to LEAs receiving federal funds under an IDEA-B formula grant

Special Education Consolidated Grant Application Schedule BS Fiscal Compliance Requirements  Part 1: LEA MOE Eligibility  Part 2: CEIS Set-Aside and MOE Voluntary Reduction Amount

IDEA-B LEA MOE Requirement  Determine LEA compliance with IDEA-B Maintenance of Effort (MOE)  Applies to LEAs receiving federal funds under an IDEA-B formula grant

IDEA-B LEA MOE 2014 Updates to IDEA-B LEA MOE Handbook  SHARS Medicaid Cost Share is not included in the IDEA-B LEA MOE calculation  Exceptionally Costly Program is defined as amount greater than the average per-pupil (as defined in Section 9101 of ESEA)

IDEA-B LEA MOE Fiscal Agents and Member Districts  TEA has no authority to resolve SSA disputes  Member Districts must contact their Fiscal Agent for amounts reported on their behalf  State Reconsideration for Significant PEIMS Errors

Special Education Shared Services Arrangement (SSA) Configuration Changes Requirement  LEA must notify TEA of configuration changes annually by February 1 st  LEA must submit the new SSA Contracts annually by June 1 st

Requirement  LEA may owe a refund to TEA from a federal finding in an audit  LEA may have required corrective actions from a federal finding in an audit Corrective Actions

Common Errors to Avoid  Failing to send a check for any refund due to TEA by the deadline  Failing to provide corrective action documents to TEA by the required completion date

Visit the FFCR website: = For questions, please send an to: Additional Questions?