IR 501 Lecture Notes (2) Realism

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IR2501 Theories of International Relations
Advertisements

2501 THEORIES OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
POSC 2200 – Theoretical Approaches
IR 501 Lecture Notes (1) A Retrospective of IR & Theories
Theories of International Relations
Dr. Bezen Balamir Coşkun
RealPolitik or Power Politics
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY – A SIMPLE START DOES THEORY MATTER? WHAT ARE ITS PHILOSOPHICAL & HISTORICAL ROOTS? “REALISM” “LIBERALISM/IDEALISM” PUTTING.
Neo-Realism: a structural theory of IR
Realist and Neorealist Theories of War
Plan for Today: Understanding Classical Realism and Neorealism
Realism Kenneth Waltz Kaisa Ellandi Lecture 2.
Realism and American Foreign Policy. Political Realism 1) States (Leaders) are the key actors 2) States (Leaders) seek power 3) States (Leaders) are rational.
Realism.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY IN POLICY DEBATE Houston Urban Debate League.
 Realists see the world as it is  Basic assumptions of realism  Groupism; group cohesion to survive, nation state and nationalism, anarchic social.
Chapter 2: Theories of World Politics
Institutions and their role in shaping European Security
Finishing classical realism. Neorealism. Other contemporary realism.
Topics Today: Neorealism and Other Contemporary Realism 1.Completing introduction to neorealist principles. 2.Introduction to another version of contemporary.
Realism and the Study of Global Politics Learning Objectives: Understand how Realists describe global politics Identify the Realist view of power Explain.
2.0. Theoretical Perspectives and the Study of Global Politics Learning Objectives: Understand how Realists describe global politics Identify the Realist.
Realism. Assumptions  States: unitary, rational actors -Treaty of Westphalia (1648)  Anarchy: no central government  Survival: primary objective 
International Relations
GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College.
States and International Environmental Regimes. Today: Examine IR theories that focus on states as units of analysis in explaining cooperation Are these.
International Relations
International anarchy could be best defined as: Chaos Multilateralism No world government Government by the United Nations No world government.
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 3: Classical Realism.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY INTRODUCTION HC 35.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORIES: PLURALISM OR LIBERALISM
Chapter 3 Contending Perspectives: How to Think about International Relations Theoretically.
Plan for Today: Forms of Liberalism in IR 1.Introducing major shared principles of liberalism – domestic and international. 2.Summary introduction to liberal.
POSC 1000(056) Introduction to Politics Politics and Governance the Global Level/Conclusions and Exam Advice Russell Alan Williams.
International Security and Peace
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 4: Neo-Realism/ Structural Realism.
Lenses – The Great Debate Unit 1 – Theories of World Politics.
Political Concepts An Introduction To Political Theory and Statehood.
IR 501 THEORIES of ınternatıonal relatıons (introduction) Bezen Balamir Coskun office: 417
©2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. ©2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Thinking Theoretically: Putting.
Introducing the IR Paradigms
POL 3080 Approaches to International Relations Introduction
Lecture 1 The Origins of the International State System.
Realism Statism…survival…self-help. Why theory “A theory must be more than a hypothesis; it can’t be obvious; it involves complex relations of a systematic.
WHY DO ALL STATES FIGHT? THE THIRD IMAGE -Even nice leaders and nice states fight. -Very different states and people behave similarly and predictably -Some.
‘Anarchy is What States Make of It’
NEO-REALISM AND NEO-LIBERALISM THEORIES
The Great Debates in International Relations 1 st Great Debate (20s & 30s) 2 nd Great Debate (50s-80s) 3 rd Great Debate (80s & on)
Neo-realism and Neo-liberalism Introduction to International Relations IF Gao Xiaolei I34020.
International Relations Theory A New Introduction
WEEK 3 THE THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. Vocabulary Focus Positivism is a philosophic system which considers that truth can be verified only by facts.
Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Neo-Realism
LG514: International Relations Theory Lecture 4: Carr, Morgenthau & the Birth of Realism Ken McDonagh School of Law and Government.
LG514 International Relations Theory Lecture 11: Overview/Review: Theorising International Relations in the 21 st Century Ken McDonagh School of Law and.
James Fitzgerald School of Law and Government Dublin City University
Intensive Readings in International Relations Fall 2006 Peking University Instructor: Ji Mi ( 吉宓)
Introduction to Political Science (IRE 101) Week 3 Political Theories
Tragedy.
Introduction to International Relations Week 2 Lecturer: Andris Banka
** Emergence of Realism
Unit Two: Realist Theory and IPE
Ch. 12 International security
World Politics Under a system of Anarchy
REALISM PAMELA RIZIKI I43022.
Realism Oliver-Daddow compares the neo-liberalism and neo-realism. There is three assumptions in both sides that state is central actor, states are sovereign.
IR Theory No Limits Debate.
International Security and Peace
POL 100 International and Domestic Security
Presentation transcript:

IR 501 Lecture Notes (2) Realism Text Dr. Bezen Balamir Coşkun bezencoskun@zirve.edu.tr

Realism Realism is the dominant theory of international relations. Can you think why?

Realism Realists claim that because it provides the most powerful explanation for the state of war which is the regular condition of life in the international system.

The story of realism... begins with the idealist writers’ claims of inter- war period (1919-1939). According to realists, the inter-war scholars’ approach was flawed, for example they ignored the role of power and overestimated the degree to which human beings were rational. Realism rose from the ashes of idealist approach.

The story of realism... a great debate took place in 1930s & 1940s between the inter-war idealists and realists namely E.H. Carr, Hans Morgenthau, Reinhold Niebuhr, Frederick Schuman, George Kennan etc. who all emphasized the primacy of power and the competitive nature of politics among nations.

The story of realism... The theory of realism became dominant after the WW II.

Raison d’etat of Realism The state as the key actor in international politics States must pursue power to perpetuate the life of the state in a hostile and threatening environment Sceptical of the idea that universal moral principles exist 3 Ss= Statism - Survival - Self-help Distinction between domestic and international politics

International Politics “international politics, like all politics, is a struggle for power” (Morgenthau 1948:25) Realists argue that the basic structure of international politics is one of anarchy in that each of the independent sovereign states consider themselves to be their own highest authority and do not recognize a higher power above them.

Classical Realism: key thinkers & texts Thucydides (c. 460-406 bc), The Peloponnesian War Machiavelli (1532), The Prince Morgenthau (1948), Politics among Nations

Classical Realism: key arguments International politics driven by an endless struggle for power which has roots in human nature The ultimate skill of the state leader is to accept, and adopt to, the changing power political configurations in world politics Politics is governed by laws that are created by human nature. The mechanism we use to understand international politics is through the concept of interests, defined in terms of power

Structural Realism: key thinkers & texts Rousseau (c.1750) The State of War Waltz (1979) Theory of International Politics Mearsheimer (2001) Tragedy of Great Power Politics

Structural Realism: key arguments It is not human nature, but the anarchical system which fosters fear, jealousy, suspicion and insecurity Anarchy leads to a logic of self-help in which sates seek to maximize their security. The most stable distribution of power in the system is bipolarity The anarchical, self-help system compels states to maximize their relative power position

Neo-classical Realism: key thinkers Schweller (1997), Neo-realism’s Status Quo Bias: What Security Dilemma Zakaria (1998), From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America’s World Role

Neo-classical Realism: key arguments The systemic account of world politics provided by structural realism is incomplete. It needs to be supplemented with better accounts of unit level variables such as how power is perceived, and how leadership is exercised

Rational Choice Realism Grieco (1993), Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutions Krasner (1999), Sovereignty: Organized Hypocracy

Rational Choice Realism Institutions matter although the problem of relative gains means that they exert less of causal force than neo-liberals. Rational choice realists use advanced social science methodologies such as game theory

Key Points (1) Statism is the centerpiece of Realism. State is the pre-eminent actor in world politics Sovereignty signifies the existence of an independent political community , one which has juridical authority over its territory

Key Points (1) Criticism: Statism is flawed both on empirical (challenges to state power) and normative grounds (the inability of sovereign states to respond to collective global problems)

Key Points (2) Survival is the primary objective of all states. All other goals are secondary or low politics.

Key Points (2) Criticism: Are there no limits to what actions a state can take in the name of necessity?

Key points (3) Self-help: no other state or institution can be relied upon to guarantee your survival. In international politics, the structure of the system does not permit friendship, trust and honour.

Key points (3) Criticism: Self-help is not an inevitable consequence of the absence of a world government. There are historical and contemporary examples of where states have preferred collective security systems, or forms of regional security communities.

Food for thought How would a realist explain the war on terror discuss.