Funding Opportunities For Highway Construction Impacts To Ecological Resources.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2013 TAP CONFERENCE MAP-21 FINAL GUIDANCE ODOT Office of Local Programs.
Advertisements

Federal Lands Highway Program Scott Johnson Office of Federal Lands Highway Federal Highway Administration Scott Johnson Office of Federal Lands Highway.
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
National Transportation Conference August 29-30, 2006, NCTC Rob Draper, Federal Highway Administration Pat Fisher, Oregon Department of Transportation.
Trisha White, Director Habitat and Highways Campaign Defenders of Wildlife.
Tribal Consultations. Topics FY12 Extensions and IRR Program Funding MAP-21 Programs and Funding.
Field Engineers Learning & Development Seminar Dallas, TX — April 19-23, 2010 Designing for Nonmotorists Policy, Planning, Programs, and Provisions for.
Transportation Enhancement Activities Expanding transportation choices, increasing recreation opportunity and access, revitalizing economies.
Nicholas Finch Local Programs Engineer Federal Highway Administration Preview of Federal-aid 101 Authorization Overview: Where we are! Where are we headed?
Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Overview NYS Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Council August 2, 2010 Albany, New York.
Transportation Alternatives. MAP-21 & TAP MAP-21 requires the following with respect to the allocation & selection of projects: ◦TAP funds sub-allocated.
Transportation Enhancements: California’s Past, Present, & Future Stephanie M. Stoermer FHWA California Division.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users P. L SAFETEA-LU.
1 The Development of Federal Surface Transportation Authorization Legislation Jim Kolb Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure U.S. House of Representatives.
Jack Basso Director of Program Finance and Management American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Audit Subcommittee Meeting Phoenix,
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Highway Safety Provisions Elizabeth Alicandri FHWA.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
Federal MAP-21 Programs 1 Module 7 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment July 22, Boise, Idaho.
Funding Levels Similar funding levels to the Transportation Enhancement Activities under SAFETEA-LU: FY 2013: $808,760,000 FY 2014: $819,900,000 Total.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) National Historic Trails Workshop, October
Webinar: August 28, Transportation Alternatives Program Webinar: August 28, 2013 Introduction: Shari Schaftlein, Director, FHWA Office of Human.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) International Snowmobile Congress — June
Statewide Local Agency Project Delivery Conference SAFETEA-LU: Earmarks and Federal Programs Relating to Local Agencies Travis Brouwer ODOT Federal Affairs.
Federal Transportation Funds for Snowmobile Trails Christopher Douwes Trails and Enhancements Program Manager.
RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM MAUREEN NEIGHBORS, COMMUNITY SERVICES UNIT CHIEF CRYSTAL DAVIS, RECREATION AND CONSERVATION PROGRAMS MANAGER.
State and Federal Funding Programs for Local Agency Projects Alan Lively Local Government Section Project Delivery Specialist.
Federal Transportation Funds Benefit Recreation Christopher Douwes, Federal Highway Administration.
2012 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Project Selection Process.
SAFETEA-LU Highlights Roger Petzold Office of Interstate and Border Planning Federal Highway Administration Transportation Border Working Group Nov. 9,
FY 2012 President’s Budget Released February 14, 2011.
SUCCESS OF INDIANA TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS Indiana TE Committee Gerald Nieman, INDOT, TE Program Manager Tom Beck, INDOT/Railroad Glenda Seal, INDOT/Seymour.
Trail Funding Sources & General Information
TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS. OVERVIEW  The CRTPA coordinates the annual submission of priority project lists (PPLs) to the FDOT for annual funding consideration.
Distribution Guided by State Law Surface Transportation Program (STP) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement.
CTEP – FROM START TO FINISH MDT Engineering Conference Hilton Garden Inn – Missoula, MT February 8, 2007 Mike Wherley David C. Larson LeRoy Wosoba.
Highway Program Financing July Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
Mid-States Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety Conference Guan Xu, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Design.
Federal Transportation Funds Benefit Recreation Federal Highway Administration programs build partnerships with Pedestrians and Bicyclists.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS (TE) PROGRAM. Transportation Enhancements (TE) Program What is the Transportation Enhancements (TE) Program? What is the Transportation.
INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING AND ELIGIBILITY Steve Baumann Financial Specialist (503) Mike Morrow(Field Operations Engineer) Mike.
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
Nelson Castellanos Federal Highway Administration March 12, 2013.
Innovative Approaches to Wildlife/Highway Interactions Funding Opportunities.
Highway Program Structure Highway Recommendations Neil Pedersen Chair, ASC Highway Legislative Team Vice Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways Administrator,
Transportation Programs. Habitat and Wildlife Habitat Connectivity Restoration Mitigation Wildlife Human Safety Crossings.
May 5, 2007 AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways.
Action 2020 Training Local Context August 15, 2012.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century TEA-21 Prepared by Iowa Department of Transportation September 1998.
PennDOT’s Transportation Alternatives Program November 16, 2015.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Advancing Safety through SAFETEA-LU Michael Halladay FHWA Office of.
November 8, MAP-21 themes 2 Strengthens America’s highway and public transportation systems Creates jobs and supports economic growth Supports the.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
Leveraging Financial Resources Federal Highway Administration Funding Shana V. Baker Office of Metropolitan Planning Federal Highway Administration
Federal-Aid Funding County Highway Accountants Conference May 10, 2007 zpowerpoint/ProjManagersCriticalIssuesBOB Feb07.ppt.
LPA Certification Riverton, WY November 20, 2014.
FUNDING AVAILABILITY & SAFETY PROGRAMS 3//21/2013.
GREEN GROWTH TOOLBOX Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Black-crowned night heron.
Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-aside
Chris Metka 2017 Statewide Conference on Heritage ???
Recreation and Trails Assessment
Grant Funding for Outdoor Recreation through DCR
Surface Transportation Reauthorization: Corridors and Borders
Federal-aid Highway Program
MAP-21: Current Federal Transportation Policy
Presentation transcript:

Funding Opportunities For Highway Construction Impacts To Ecological Resources

Highway Trust Fund Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)--- Receives 84% of Total AMT Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA), Federal Rail Administration (FRA) Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS)

Federal Highway Administration Interstate Maintenance National Highway System Surface Transportation Program Bridge Program Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program Appalachian Development Highway System Recreational Trails Program Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program Safe Routes to School Program Metropolitan Planning Equity Bonus Program Distribution of Certain Authorized Funds Pursuant to Section 1102(f) of SAFETEA-LUDistribution of Certain Authorized Funds Pursuant to Section 1102(f) of SAFETEA-LU

SAFETEA-LU

SEC BEARTOOTH HIGHWAY, MONTANA. (a) Project Authorization- Of funds made available for the State of Montana for the project for development and construction of United States Route 212, Red Lodge North, Montana, as described in the table contained in section 1934 (including amounts transferred to the project under section 1935), on request of the State of Montana, the Secretary shall obligate such sums as are necessary to reconstruct the Beartooth Highway in the State of Montana. (b) Reimbursement- The amounts used for reconstruction under subsection (a) shall be reimbursed to the project relating to United States Route 212 described in subsection (a) on the date or dates on which funding is allocated for the Beartooth Highway under section 125 of title 23, United States Code. (c) Federal Share- The Federal share payable for funds allocated for the Beartooth Highway under section 125 of such title shall be 100 percent.

Is it Good or Bad?  What can improve on Federal Lands with this project?  How can I remediate a previously impacted area of Federal Land?  FHWA is a good PARTNER that subscribes to ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP.  Areas outside the Easement will require additional NEPA approval.

Federal Highway Program Budget from SAFETEA-LU Program MM$/Year Forest Highway $ 180 $ 20 mtce $10 aquatic pass Public Lands Discretionary $ 150 Recreational Trails $ 75 National Scenic Byways $ 38 Surface Transportation Program $6,400+

 (C) REFUGE ROADS- For refuge roads under section 204 of such title, $29,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2009.

FHWA Program Areas FHWA Program Areas FHWA STP NEPA mitigation Funding Resource agencies for project review Funding for design information TS,T&Esurvey,Archy, IGA 404 Permit Money for acres taken of water of US No net loss of wetland acres T&E Species Funding for Studies/habitat anal. WL catchments/ fencing Recreation Trails Program Enhancements Scenic Byways HUMAN AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Federal Lands Highways Federal Aid Highways Bridges

Don’t Forget… Wildlife don’t recognize what category of highway causes impacts… Wildlife don’t recognize what category of highway causes impacts… …but, you have to know the category to develop solutions …but, you have to know the category to develop solutions

Eco-Logical: An Ecosystem Approach to Developing Infrastructure Projects

Benefits for the Steering Team Partners BLM - Improved resource conservation during land use plan development EPA - Greater flexibility to do environmental good FHWA - Streamlined project development and improved mitigation opportunities NOAA Fisheries Service - Early application of science for solutions NPS - Using science to protect natural resources while providing visitor experience USACE - Finding the balance to keep waters clean and clear USFS - Stewardship of natural resources and facilitated use of public lands USFWS - One conservation framework, endless possibilities for partnership

Surface Transportation Program (STP)  State Administered Program –For Public Roads that are functionally classified as major collector or higher –Each State administers slightly differently  10% set-aside for Transportation Enhancements  10% set-aside for Safety Projects

Forest Highway Program $180 Million/year  Allocated by Formula  FHWA Administered  Project Selection by Tri-Party agreement (USFS, FHWA, State DOT)  Useable as Non-Federal match on some other SAFETEA-LU programs (Section 104)  Funds available for 1+3 years  $ 10 million per year for Aquatic Passages  $20 million per year for maintenance

Forest Highways & Public Lands Highways-Discretionary  Eligible Program Activities –Planning, research, engineering and construction –Transit facilities within public lands –Transportation planning for recreational travel benefiting recreational development –Adjacent parking –Interpretive signing

Refuge Roads Program Section 204 $29 Million/year  Transportation planning, research, engineering, and construction of highways, roads, parkways and transit facilities  State/local match for most types of Federal- aid highway funded projects.  $1 million per year for signage identifying public hunting and fishing access

TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS Program Purpose Program Purpose (Typically not BMP’s that would be normally done) Transportation enhancements (TE) are transportation- related activities that strengthen the cultural, aesthetic, and environmental aspects of the Nation's transportation system. Transportation enhancements (TE) are transportation- related activities that strengthen the cultural, aesthetic, and environmental aspects of the Nation's transportation system. Funding/Formula Funding/Formula Retains the 10 percent transportation enhancements set- aside of Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds. Retains the 10 percent transportation enhancements set- aside of Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds. Eligible Activities Eligible Activities Continues eligibility for any of the following activities, if such activity relates to surface transportation: Continues eligibility for any of the following activities, if such activity relates to surface transportation:

10% STP-Transportation Enhancements (TE) $640 million/year  Transportation-related activities –Cultural –Aesthetic –Environmental  Outside the roadway  State DOT issues call for projects  Any town, county, State, federal agency, or non-profit group may apply  State reviews and selects projects

Eligible STP-Enhancement Activities  Provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles  Provision of safety and educational activities for pedestrians and bicyclists  Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites,  Scenic or historic highway programs (including the provision of tourist and welcome center facilities)

Eligible STP-Enhancement Activities  Landscaping and scenic beautification  Rehabilitation and operation of historic buildings, structures, or facilities  Preservation of abandoned railway corridors  Control and removal of outdoor advertising  Archeological planning and research

Eligible STP-Enhancement Activities (Continued) Eligible STP-Enhancement Activities (Continued)  Environmental mitigation –Address water pollution due to highway runoff –Reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity  Establishment of transportation museums

STP-Safety $640 million / year  Elimination of hazardous locations on all public roads  Elimination of hazards associated with railroad crossings  Applicable to any public road or surface transportation facility, including… – bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail – traffic-calming measures

Recreational Trails Program  Federal Share is 80%  A Federal Land Management Agency’s funds can provide an additional 15% Federal share.  Only 5% needs to come from non-Federal sources Funds are apportioned to the States by formula –50% equally among all eligible State and, –50% in proportion to the amount of off-road recreational fuel use.

Recreational Trails Program  State designated agency administers (not necessarily the DOT)  States must meet minimum funding shares as follows: –30% minimum for motorized recreation –30% minimum for non-motorized recreation –40% minimum for diverse trail use

Recreational Trails Program Examples:  Pedestrian  Bicycling  Aquatic or water  Equestrian-- Could animals use these???  Snowmobiles  Off-road use  Four wheel driving

Scenic Byways Program $38 million /year Purpose: to recognize and enhance roads with the following outstanding characteristics: 1.Scenic 2.Historic 3.Cultural 4.Natural 5.Recreational 6.Archeological

Levels of Scenic Byways Federal Agency or State designation National Scenic Byways All-American Road Scenic Byways Program Funding Requirements 80% Federal share Fed Agency funds may be used for remaining 20%

Off-System Bridge Program 15% to 35% of a State’s apportionment must be spent on bridges off the Federal-Aid Highway system (Roads functionally classified as “Rural and Rural Minor Collectors”)

Bridge Replacements Tens of thousands of bridges across US…and the Federal Agencies…need replacement in the next couple decades Great opportunity to increase wildlife passage and decrease mortality! Think “Bridge Extensions”!

SAFETEA-LU The Secretary is to conduct a Wildlife Vehicle Collision Reduction Study of methods to reduce collisions between motor vehicles and wildlife, and report to Congress within 2 years on causes, impacts, and solutions. A manual of best practices is due 1 year after report to Congress. The Secretary is required to develop a training course for transportation professionals. [1119]

Non-SAFETEA-LU Funding Fish and Wildlife Appropriations (through Interior Appropriations Bill) Other Sources Other Agencies Non-Profit Private Sponsorship State and Local funds Fund Raising and Contributions Public/Private Partnerships Transportation Research Board (TRB) AASHTO

Non-Profit Funding Sources Local Non-Profit Private Foundations National Forest Foundation (NFF) National Fish and Wildlife Foundations (NFWF) Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Alliance (TRCA) Transportation and Community Partnerships

Funding Advice Recognize many Projects may be eligible for several Programs Don’t take the first “NO” as the only answer Combined funding makes for good partnering Know your partners And… Roads

The Guidebook

What do I do now? Think years in the future What are the projects that will help me manage the Refuge Resources in the future Campgrounds-Recreation Facilities Water Wildlife improvements Road Obliteration ETC.

What do I do now? Locate upcoming projects listed on the DOT STIP(State Transportation Improvement Plan) Make sure your project is on the STIP Identify possible funding sources for each project Cost Estimate for projects Commitment from Refuge Managers F&WL will need to do NEPA Time of F&WL Personnel to accomplish – make sure it’s on their program of work

What do I do now? Encourage DOT’s to apply for Awards Build Award Winning projects – SR 260 wildlife crossings by (ADOT) Arizona's Comprehensive Approach to Wildlife Protection and Habitat Connectivity on the State Route 260 Project FHWA Exemplary Ecosystem Initiatives selected for 2003

Tonto National Forest Highway Projects Resource Mitigation Funding FY SR 87 SR 87 Oxbow Hill Spring protection$ 3,000 Oxbow Hill Spring protection$ 3,000 Sunflower Education Center$ 350,000 Sunflower Education Center$ 350,000 Wildlife waters, temporary fencing and reveg$ 89,000 Wildlife waters, temporary fencing and reveg$ 89,000 SR 188/88 SR 188/88 Murray Wash Spring protection$ 11,000 Murray Wash Spring protection$ 11,000 Wildlife Drinker$ 20,000 Wildlife Drinker$ 20,000 Cherry Ck Riparian Fencing$ 89,000 Cherry Ck Riparian Fencing$ 89,000 In Lieu 404 fees$ 150,000 In Lieu 404 fees$ 150,000 SR 260 SR 260 Tonto Creek Campground Replacement$2,450,000 Tonto Creek Campground Replacement$2,450,000 Water Catchments, Bat abodes,trail Constr$ 135,000 Water Catchments, Bat abodes,trail Constr$ 135,000 Transportation Enhancements at Kohl’s Ranch$ 290,000 Transportation Enhancements at Kohl’s Ranch$ 290,000 Kohl’s Ranch wildlife projects$ 150,000 Kohl’s Ranch wildlife projects$ 150,000 SR 88 SR 88 Scenic Byway Enhancements$ 500,000 TOTALS = $4.2 million

Questions and Answers