USFWS Inventory & Monitoring Efforts Theresa A. Thom, Ph.D. USFWS Inventory and Monitoring Network SWPBA – Lake Guntersville, AL November 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
Advertisements

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conserving the Nature of America Step 7 Identify Population Objectives Population Objective is set here.
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
Status of Instream Flow Science in the Southeastern US Mary M. Davis, Ph.D., Technical Advisor Southern Instream Flow Network.
Ecosystem-based adaptation helps to build the resilience of natural habitat and communities to climate change impacts and thereby reduce their vulnerability.
Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative James Broska Science Coordinator
Traditionally relied on MWI Random transect aerial survey –Reinecke et al. (1990) –Pearse et al. (2005) –State agencies continuing work MDWFP (2005-present)
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives Integration and Prioritization of Science Support Needs.
Lake-scale planning for management, conservation and restoration Objective: Bring together researchers, managers, NGO representatives and other interested.
Establishing GIS for Management in the Sauvie Island Wildlife Management Area, Oregon Jeremy Hruska Masters Degree in GIS Candidate Penn State University.
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conserving the Nature of America How does the surrogate species effort relate to other ongoing efforts? Birds of Management.
Setting a Course for a Sustainable Landscape December 2013 Steering Committee Call code:
Britta Bierwagen 1, Roxanne Thomas 2, Kathryn Mengerink 2 & Austin Kane 2 1 Global Change Research Program National Center for Environmental Assessment.
Bureau of Land Management NAIP Information Meeting July 19 th, 2006.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Tom Armstrong Senior Advisor for Global Change Programs U.S. Geological Survey
Brent Frakes, Functional Analyst.  Need to discover, share, have access to large holdings of data and information to address rapid climate change  e.
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
JOINT VENTURES Celebrating 25 Years of Bird Conservation.
Californialcc.org Climate Smart Conservation and Tools for Adaptive Management 1 Debra Schlafmann, Coordinator May 16, 2013.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
Heartland Network Heartland Network Natural Resource Monitoring Program.
Carolinas Integrated Sciences & Assessments (CISA) Work to Support NIDIS July 31 st – August 1 st, 2012 Wilmington, NC.
LCC National Workshop Denver, CO March 28-29, 2012 Defining a Future Conservation Landscape in the Southeastern United States.
Harnessing the Power of Environmental Data for Decision-Making IABIN Phase II.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
 Secretarial Order No establishes Landscape Conservation Cooperatives, which focus on on-the-ground strategic conservation efforts at the landscape.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives The Right Science in the Right Places.
MACOORA Annual Meeting State Partnerships Panel Laura McKay
NFHP Science and Data Committee Report Gary E. Whelan and Andrea C. Ostroff NFHP Science and Data Committee Co-Chairs November 2014.
The Invasive Species Threat. The National Strategy and Implementation Plan for Invasive Species Management -Forests Out of Balance- The Impact of Invasive.
Strengthening Coastal Decision- making in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick Making coastal development geospatial data available and delivering tools needed.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Leetown Science Center Research in the Shenandoah Valley Presented to the Shenandoah Valley Natural.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
Gulf Coastal Plains & Ozarks LCC Steering Committee SECAS, Surrogate Species, and SHC: Connecting the Dots in the GCPO LCC Hot Springs, AR - October 2,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative December 4, 2009 Dr. Benjamin Tuggle and Steve Guertin Regional Directors,
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
Managing White-Nose Syndrome: the Federal Response Jeremy T. H. Coleman, Mike Armstrong, Barbara Douglas, Robyn A. Niver, Lori Pruitt, Noelle L. Rayman,
U.S. Forest Inventory and Analysis Program On the recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Panel on Forest Inventory FIA Progress Update.
James C. Gibeaut Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi Presented to: Coastal Engineering Research.
Objectives: 1.Enhance the data archive for these estuaries with remotely sensed and time-series information 2.Exploit detailed knowledge of ecosystem structure.
USFWS’ Arctic Strategy: Managing Fish and Managing Fish and Wildlife Populations in a Changing Landscape SEARCH Science Steering Committee Meeting October.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Why Does NOAA Need a Climate & Ecosystem Demonstration Project in the California Current System? Capabilities and Drivers La Jolla, CA 6 June, 2005.
Program Implementation Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Tools to Inform Protection, Restoration, and Resilience in the Hudson River Estuary The North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC)
BLM’s Landscape Approach REAs and Related Landscape Initiatives Karen Prentice, BLM, Healthy Landscapes Coordinator, Gordon.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A A.T. MEGA-Transect National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Northeast Temperate Network Fred Dieffenbach.
What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.
1. Adaptation – management actions to help fish and wildlife and their habitats adapt to climate change, using a Strategic Habitat Conservation Framework.
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A A.T. MEGA-Transect Fred Dieffenbach, Environmental Monitoring Coordinator Appalachian National Scenic Trail National.
Division of Federal Program Activities Sikes Act Coordination Activities Fish and Wildlife Service.
Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop.
CEPF Strategic Funding Direction 3 Meeting: 28 th June, 2006 Outcomes Monitoring: Status & trends in biodiversity Establishing standard regional monitoring.
Restoration Under a Future Climate Understanding and managing climate change effects on federal lands Dr. Cynthia West, Director Office of Sustainability.
Progress Under Guidance Documents Northeast Conservation Framework LCC Conservation Science Strategic Plan USFWS Science Investment and Accountability.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Overview & Implementation January 30, Large geographic area (22,360 square miles primarily in VA, NC, and TN)
Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC) Supported Assessment Tools Gulf of Mexico Alliance Tools Café June 2016 Southeast Aquatic Connectivity Assessment.
Progress Relative to the Northeast Conservation Framework and Strategic Plan Setting the Stage for Conservation Design and Delivery Andrew Milliken North.
LCC Role in Conservation Science and Science Delivery
Department of the Interior Northeast Climate Science Center
North Atlantic LCC RFP Topics 1&2: Recommendations for Funding
Presentation transcript:

USFWS Inventory & Monitoring Efforts Theresa A. Thom, Ph.D. USFWS Inventory and Monitoring Network SWPBA – Lake Guntersville, AL November 2012

Southeast Region – Refuge System National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS) in the Southeast Region 129 Refuges 4 million+ acres

National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act (NWRSIA) of 1997 Provide for the conservation of fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats; Ensure the biological integrity, diversity, and environmental health; Plan for the continued growth of the System; Assist in the maintenance of adequate water quantity and quality; Acquire water rights; Monitor the status and trends of fish, wildlife, and plants in EACH refuge The Genesis U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

What is the I&M Network? A nationally coordinated program of inventory and monitoring on the NWRS to generate information critical to ensuring the System’s ongoing contributions to the conservation of the nation’s fish, wildlife and plant resources in the face of climate change and other environmental stressors The I&M program will document the status, assess the condition of, and detect changes in the Refuge’s System’s diverse fish, wildlife and plant communities, physical resources including water air and soils, and ecological processes in order to support scientific-based conservation planning and management at multiple spatial scales Plan & evaluate the effectiveness of conservation strategies in close cooperation with Landscape Conservation Cooperatives (LCCs) Integration of I&M data to advance conservation at multiple landscape scales Collaboration with other Service programs, state, federal and conservation partners

What is the I&M Network? Goal: Provide field stations with the foundational ecological information on which to base planning and management decisions. Goal: Provide innovative, relevant, and timely water resources information, assessments, and guidance to refuge staff, regional and national management, and partners to inform refuge management decisions and help meet refuge legal requirements. Goal: Design, develop and maintain and integrated data management system that supports I&M efforts and promotes data sharing and collaboration with internal and external partners. Goal: Ensure that I&M database modules are efficiently utilized by all stations and they contain accurate, relevant, complete and current data that are accessible to others and inform NWRS management decisions. Goal: Establish and implement a coordinated field based assessment with standard metrics of invasive plant infestations across the Refuge System that incorporates early detection, identification and treatment of high- threat species, and local adaptive management monitoring for established invasive species.

What is the I&M Network South Atlantic LCC Regional coordinator and data manager co-located with NPS 4 ecologist positions co-located on refuges Gulf Coastal Plains and Ozarks LCC Deputy chief and assistant data manager co-located w/refuges/LCC offices 4 biologist/ecologist positions Zone structure – Atlantic & Gulf

What We Are Currently Doing Identifying priority water needs: Water Resource Inventory and Assessments on NWRS and Hatcheries Inventory and monitor fish communities including aquatic invasive species using tools like eDNA on Savannah and Loxahatchee NWRs Evaluate vulnerability of refuge lands to drought-related issues

Fish Community Assessment OBJECTIVES: Survey and Population Assessment Monitoring using eDNA OVERALL PROJECT GOAL: Develop standard data collection techniques to inventory & monitor aquatic invasive species within National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) waters – Coordination of effort – Standardization of data

Initial Sampling Sites/Effort Stratified random design Seasonal (Aug., Nov., Feb., May) Multiple habitats August km Little Back River 3 km Union Creek 3 km Pool 12/13 4 km diversion canal

Aquatic Invasive Species Red-bellied pacu Lionfish Nile tilapia Mozambique tilapia Blue tilapia Asian carp Invertebrates parasites

Multiple Agency Benefit Gulf and South Atlantic Regional Panel on Aquatic Invasive Species National Aquatic Species Task Force Region 4 AIS Program Savannah NWR Southeast Aquatic Resource Partnership South Atlantic LCC

Savannah NWR / Coastal Refuge Complex Warm Springs Fish Technology Center Welaka NFH Regional Aquatic Invasive Species Program Inventory & Monitoring Regional Office – Fisheries & Refuges Partnerships

What We Are Currently Doing Transparent Prioritization Process Water Resource Inventory & Assessments Cape Romain NWR, SC Cahaba River NWR, AL Cache River NWR, AR Okefenokee NWR, GA Lower Suwannee NWR, FL Erwin National Fish Hatchery, TN White River NWR, AR

Specific Needs for Partnering Transparent Prioritization Process Shared Data Standardized Protocols Creative Ways to Work Together PLEASE CONTACT ME! Theresa Thom (843) (office) (706) (cell)

Questions?

What is the I&M Network? Goal: Provide information on the status and monitoring of species classified under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in the Refuge System. Goal: Provide summaries of vegetation resources on Refuge lands and ensure each refuge has the capacity to efficiently acquire vegetative covers datasets that meet their specific needs. Goal: Ensure each refuge has the capacity to utilize core abiotic base data layers in order to inform management decisions on Refuge lands. Goal: Ensure bird inventory and monitoring surveys on refuge lands are scientifically credible, evaluate refuge contributions to local, regional, landscape, flyway,and continental scale bird population objectives, and are coordinated across the landscape with other Service programs and our partners. The data will be used to assess the size, distribution, and status of bird populations and to gauge the success of management and conservation efforts.

What is the I&M Network? Goal: Where needed, to conduct baseline inventories of vertebrates, vascular plants, and a subset of invertebrates on all refuge lands. Goal: Ensure that phenological monitoring conducted on refuge land is scientifically credible and will be used to inform climate related management questions at multiple spatial and temporal scales. Goal: To support the implementation of adaptive management at multiple spatial scales. Goal: To assess the baseline quality of wilderness character on all designated wilderness within the Refuge System and then monitor trends in wilderness character over time using a nationally consistent approach. Goal: Ensure that surrogate species monitoring surveys on refuge lands are scientifically credible, evaluate refuge contributions to local, regional, and landscape scale population and habitat objectives, and are coordinated across the landscape with other Service programs and our partners. The data will be used to assess the size, distribution, and status of the selected populations and to gauge the success of management and conservation efforts.

What is the I&M Network? Goal: Generate fire history atlases for high priority refuges and ensure fire effects monitoring data can be utilized to assess the success of refuge management objectives. Goal: To provide coastal refuges with the information necessary to evaluate potential impacts of sea level rise to coastal habitats and wildlife. Goal: To summarize in one place key materials (documents, permits, reviews, plans, etc.) useful for refuge planning and vulnerability assessments. Examples include abiotic resources such as topographic maps, aerial photography, water resources inventories and assessments, HGM reports, as well as biotic resources such as a catalogue of inventories, veg maps, vulnerability assessments, banding, salvage, and endangered species permits, and hunting, fishing, trapping plans, CCPs, HMPs, IMPs, Wilderness Character Measures, and reports from Wildlife and Habitat Reviews.

What is the I&M Network? Goal: Provide baseline inventory data needed to assist with the assessment of the effects of unforeseen disasters and integrate refuge monitoring data with existing marine networks. Goal: That all field station periodically generate a standardized refuge condition assessment report that aligns with other land management status updates. Goal: Develop a nationally coordinated monitoring effort that incorporates wildlife health surveillance, includes training Refuge employees how minimize the potential for disease transmission to other sites, and prevent the transmission of zoonotic agents; identification (or development) of a baseline database used to detect changes in disease expression; and identifying high risk areas likely to experience changes in pathogen and/or vector populations.

What is the I&M Network? Goal: Implement a coordinated air quality biomonitoring (AQB) effort on refuge lands to provide assistance in prioritizing management of limited Service resources; enhance legal and policy-making decisions in light of climate change issues; and complement existing monitoring efforts underway by Branch of Air Quality (BAQ). Goal: Develop a nationally coordinated monitoring effort that incorporates wildlife health surveillance, includes training Refuge employees how minimize the potential for disease transmission to other sites, and prevent the transmission of zoonotic agents; identification (or development) of a baseline database used to detect changes in disease expression; and identifying high risk areas likely to experience changes in pathogen and/or vector populations.

What We Are Currently Doing Monitoring marsh elevation and relative sea-level rise Working with partners to ensure monitoring compatibility and data integration – NPS, USGS, TNC, NOAA, Refuges, South Atlantic LCC Currently, 20 sites with three RSET stations installed on 18 coastal refuges Refuge managers can use data locally to answer critical questions and adjust management; SALCC will use data to run and validate landscape scale models