Ethics LL.B. STUDIES 2015 LECTURE 4. Deontology: Inspirations & Applications.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-Consequentialism
Advertisements

Michael Lacewing Can war be just? Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Topics in Moral and Political Philosophy Punishment.
Categorical Imperative
1 I I Is Pre-Emptive War Wrong?. 2 Phillips’ Central Claim On the principle that just war requires both justice in going to war (jus ad bellum) and justice.
Deontology: the Ethics of Duty
MORAL OBJECTIVISM Introduction to Ethics. MORAL OBJECTIVISM The belief that there are objective moral principles, valid for all people and all social.
Phil 160 Kant.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Euthanasia
Euthanasia Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Counter Immunity of noncombatants Solidarity Human Family Terrorism Right Intention Conscientious Objector Development Institutional War Forgiveness Israel.
© Michael Lacewing Can war be just? Michael Lacewing
Chapter 11 The Challenge of Peace: Christian Resolution of Conflict 11.1.
Lawrence M. Hinman, Ph.D. Director, The Values Institute University of San Diego 7/12/2015©Lawrence M. Hinman1 The Principle of Double Effect Phil. 321:
Ethics LL.B. STUDIES 2015 LECTURE 3. Deontology Definition Deontology: "a type of moral philosophical theory that seeks to ground morality on a moral.
Aquinas and the Law.
Introduction to Ethical Theory I Last session: “our focus will be on normative medical ethics, i.e., how people should behave in medical situations” –
Kant’s Deontological Ethics. The Plan  What is Deontology?  Good Wills and Right Actions  The Categorical Imperative  Examples and Applications.
CHAPTER 6 MORALITY AND ACTION.
Week Five Seminar Terrorism HU245 Ethics. New Business! Discussion Thread: Capital Punishment One thread this week.
Deontological Ethics Is saving someone from drowning a morally praiseworthy act? Do motives play any role in whether an act is morally praiseworthy?
Consequentialism Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? What if it is a small amount of pain to prevent a.
Immanuel Kant Duty Ethics The moral worth of an action depends on motive (do the right thing for the right reason)
Objectives: SWBAT  Identify Immanuel Kant  Analyze Kantian Rationality  Identify and discuss the Categorical Imperative.
Lecture 6 Kantian ethics Immanuel Kant ( )
Kant ETHICS WITHOUT DIVINE AUTHORITY CONTINUED. Recap of Key terms from last lesson Rationalism Empiricism Deontological Absolute Innate Morality.
We are learning the different precepts of Aquinas’ theory.
PEP 570, DeGeorge, Chp. 3 10/28/20151 Chapter Three: Dr. DeGeorge Utilitarianism: Justice and Love.
1 Applied Ethics Section 6 Ethics of War. 2 Is Ethics Applicable to Warfare? Some reject the applicability of ethics to wars, citing the adage ‘All’s.
EECS 690 Critiques of Deontology 31 January 2010.
Two Frameworks For Understanding The History Of Ethics I.As a transition from JUDGING PERSONS to JUDGING IDEAS A. The Greeks B the "new science"
Natural Moral Law Aquinas and Reason. This theory is absolute and deontological, this means that it is concerned with ‘action’. In his work “Summa Theological.
Principle of Double Effect Physical vs Moral Evil.
Just War When is war the answer?.
Ethics AIO 2015 LECTURE 2.
The Principle of Double Effect. The Conditions There are certain conditions which must be observed before one may perform the action in question. Should.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory Just War Theory   Jus ad bellum: proposals to justify the use of force in a particular type of situation   Jus.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory PHI 2604 January 25, 2016.
Ethics in Public Life Deontology: applications. Kant in action Can a dwarf let be thrown? Conseil d’Etat, 27 Octobre 1995, N° ,
E THICS (V OLUNTARINESS ). V OLUNTARINESS : I TS IMPORTANCE TO ETHICS Ethics deals with the study of human acts (voluntary acts of man) It is the amount.
Theory of Consequences and Intentions There are two traditional ways of looking at the “rightness” or “wrongness” of an act. 1. Look at the consequences.
Nature of Biomedical Ethics & Ethical Theories. Ethics The General discipline of Ethics is defined as the philosophical study of morality. Descriptive.
Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804) Influenced Secular Moral Thought. Raised in a Protestant Household. No formal Church Structure. Morality ground in reason,
KANTIAN ETHICS Immanuel Kant ( ).
Lecture 13 Kantian ethics Immanuel Kant ( )
{ Cognitive Theories of Meta Ethics Is ‘abortion is wrong’ a fact, or opinion? Jot down your thoughts on a mwb Can ethical statements be proved true or.
Proportionalism and the doctrine of double effect
Ethics AIO 2016 LECTURE 2.
This is Why you can’t just blow stuff up.
Contemporary Moral Problems
Introduction to Ethical Theory
Absolutism.
What is a crime? Write a brief definition.
THE JUST WAR THEORY.
Principle of Double Effect
Law For Business And Personal Use
Just War Theory. Just War Theory JWT is not Pacifism Pacifism says that war is always unjust, and therefore always wrong. This is an absolute statement.
LO: Analyse the JWT and explain your own view on war
War and Violence Can war be just?.
UNIT FOUR| DEFENSE & SECURITY
JUST WAR.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory
Kantian Ethics.
Two Frameworks For Understanding The History Of Ethics
1-3 Ethical Bases for Laws.
JUST WAR.
Public Ethics in Law and Politics
Owning your worldview presents:
Utilitarianism.
Presentation transcript:

Ethics LL.B. STUDIES 2015 LECTURE 4

Deontology: Inspirations & Applications

To begin… I Kant resist to show you this:

Lessons from Kant The idea of autonomy of the subject

Lessons from Kant Do not treat humanity instrumentally (as a means or an object)

Lessons from Kant The requirement of univesalisation

When can I lie? Kant, On a Supposed Right to Lie because of Philantropic Concerns Would it be a crime to tell a lie to a murderer who asked whether our friend who is being pursued by the murderer had taken refuge in our house? Kant’s three points: Acceptance of „a right to demand that another should lie for the sake of one’s own advantage”; from this follows „a claim that conflicts with all lawfulness”. „Whoever tells a lie, regardless of how good his intentions may be, must answer for the consequences resulting therefrom” By telling the untruth, as far as it depends on me, „I bring it about that statements (declarations) in general find no credence, and hence also that all rights based on contracts become void and lose their force, and this is a wrong done to mankind in general.”

The Trolley case revisited

A Doctrine of Double Effect A person may licitly perform an action that he foresees will produce a good effect and a bad effect provided that four conditions are verified at one and the same time: that the action in itself from its very object be good or at least indifferent; that the good effect and not the evil effect be intended; that the good effect be not produced by means of the evil effect; that there be a proportionately grave reason for permitting the evil effect. Joseph Mangan, A Historical Analysis of the Principle of Double Effect

Double effect at work Abortion vs. rescuing mother’s life Euthanasia vs. pain relief To torture or not to torture Can war be just?

The doctrine of just war

Requirements for beginning just war (ius ad bellum) -- Just cause. There must be a specific act of injustice to be corrected. -- Competent authority. The decision to wage war should only be made by the person or governing body responsible for maintaining a nation's civil order and security. -- Right intention. The intended result of going to war must be to restore a previous state of peace and civil order. -- Last resort. All realistic nonviolent alternatives must be exhausted before going to war. --Probability of success. There must be a realistic hope of achieving victory. -- Proportionality of projected results. The good expected upon attaining victory must be greater than estimates of what it will cost to achieve victory. Source: Baptist Press,