OLG LAC Reprocessing EPN 2006 G. Stangl 1, C. Aichhorn 2, S. Krauss 2 (1) Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV)‏ (2) Space Research Institute,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3. Geocentre and scale Comparison of weekly and daily IGS reference frames: the first year Peter J Clarke, School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences,
Advertisements

VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Vie_LSM Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm.
Seasonal Position Variations and Regional Reference Frame Realization Jeff Freymueller Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Graz 2003 Report of the OLG LAC EPN and other activities Report 2003 E. Cristea, Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences G. Stangl, Federal.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_GLOB Hana Spicakova.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna VIE_GLOB Hana Spicakova.
1 CS 501 Spring 2005 CS 501: Software Engineering Lecture 22 Performance of Computer Systems.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_SCHED Jing SUN.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_LSM Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm.
Multi-level Selective Deduplication for VM Snapshots in Cloud Storage Wei Zhang*, Hong Tang †, Hao Jiang †, Tao Yang*, Xiaogang Li †, Yue Zeng † * University.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.
Geodetic Survey Division EARTH SCIENCES SECTOR Slide 1 Real-Time and Near Real-Time GPS Products and Services from Canada Y. Mireault, P. Tétreault, F.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, June 2008 Comparison of GMF/GPT with VMF1/ECMWF and Implications for Atmospheric Loading Peter Steigenberger.
© TU Darmstadt-IPG p 1 The CEGRN 2011 Campaign and the densification of ETRF2000 in Central Europe A. Caporali, M. Barlik, M. Becker, L. Gerhatova, G.
WEGENER Nice 2006 OLG Monitoring of the Eastern Mediterranean and Arabia Velocitiy Estimations of Permanent GPS Stations 1Space Research Institute, Austrian.
1 North American Reference Frame (NAREF) Working Group Mike Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 2nd SNARF Workshop Montreal, May.
A Parallel Integer Programming Approach to Global Routing Tai-Hsuan Wu, Azadeh Davoodi Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Jeffrey Linderoth.
Linking GPS to Tide Gauges and Tide Gauge Benchmarks Tilo Schöne GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam Understanding Sea-level Rise and Variability, WCRP Workshop,
Part VI Precise Point Positioning Supported by Local Ionospheric Modeling GS894G.
Future IGS & inter-technique SINEX combinations: Issues and challenges D. Lavallée (aka Peter Clarke), R. Ferland, D. Thaller, T. Herring, R. Biancale.
SRI Seminar 2005 Time series of GPS stations For reference, monitoring and geophysics Günter Stangl Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
1 LAVAL UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF GEOMATICS Mohammed Boukhecha (Laval University) Marc Cocard (Laval University) René Landry (École technique supérieure.
October 8, session 2REFAG2010 Paris1 Distributed processing systems for large geodetic solutions IAG WG “Comparison and combination of precise.
An improved and extended GPS derived velocity field of the postglacial adjustment in Fennoscandia Martin Lidberg 1,3, Jan M. Johansson 1, Hans-Georg Scherneck.
A comparison of the ability of artificial neural network and polynomial fitting was carried out in order to model the horizontal deformation field. It.
Surveying with the Global Positioning System Phase Observable.
P. Wielgosz and A. Krankowski IGS AC Workshop Miami Beach, June 2-6, 2008 University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
CERGOP2 EGU Nice 2004 Development of the CERGOP2 Database - Progress report Work Package 1 P. Pesec, C. Haslinger, E. Cristea, Space Research Institute.
Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 1 NAREF & CBN Velocity Solutions for a New Version of SNARF Mike Craymer Joe Henton Mike Piraszewski 8th SNARF Workshop AGU.
Assessment of Reference Frame Stability trough offset detection in GPS coordinate time series Dragan Blagojević 1), Goran Todorović 2), Violeta Vasilić.
GSI Japan - 21st of June 1999 GPS-Positioning using Virtual Reference Stations - Theory, Analysis and Applications Herbert Landau Spectra Precision Terrasat.
A new Ad Hoc Positioning System 컴퓨터 공학과 오영준.
RECENT ENHANCEMENTS TO THE CDDIS IGS Network Systems Workshop November 2-5, 1998 Annapolis, MD Carey E. Noll Manager, CDDIS NASA GSFC Greenbelt, MD.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 Development of a Ground Based GPS Network for the Near Real Time Measurement of Integrated Water Vapour (IWV) Jonathan Jones.
BES III Computing at The University of Minnesota Dr. Alexander Scott.
Introduction Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke, Nigel Penna, David Lavallée Global GPS Processing strategy Conclusions and Future Work The preliminary.
CEGRN 2015 Campaign A. Caporali (1), J. Zurutuza (1), O. Khoda (2), G. Stangl (3), M. Becker (4), M. Bertocco (1), L. Gerhatova (5), M. Mojzes (5), M.
EUREF Vienna 2005 Antenna Tests at BEV Vienna G. Stangl, H. Titz.
EUREF2011: National Report of Austria Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV) 1 EUREF 2011 Symposium National Report of Austria by Günter Stangl,
AMON Reprocessing Hybrid IGS05+IGS08. EPN Reference Criteria: Long history Reliable TimeSeries Minimal gaps Geographical distribution Other neighbour.
January 14, 2003GPS Meteorology Workshop1 Information from a Numerical Weather Model for Improving Atmosphere Delay Estimation in Geodesy Arthur Niell.
Global VLBI Solution IGG05R01 1 Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics (IGG), Vienna, Austria 2 German Geodetic Research Institute (DGFI), Munich, Germany.
NATO Workshop Veszprem 2004 Recent Monitoring of Crustal Movements in the Eastern Mediterranean The Usage of GPS Measurements G. Stangl, Federal Office.
A Velocity Field for Romania and Bulgaria Cornelia Aichhorn, Sandro Krauss (1) Günter Stangl (2) (1) Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences.
EUREF2012: National Report of Austria Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV) 1 EUREF 2012 Symposium National Report of Austria by Günter Stangl,
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 09 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Water vapour estimates over Antarctica from 12 years of globally reprocessed GPS solutions Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke Newcastle University, UK.
EGS Nice 2003 G17 Deficits of CEGRN Solutions and Time Series G. Stangl.
Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften (ÖAW) / Institut für Weltraumforschung (IWF), 8042 Graz, Austria, Contact:
Time Series of GPS stations in the Near East 1Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences 2Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV) EUREF.
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
Velocity Fields From Geodesy to Geodynamics G. Stangl Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV)‏ + Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of.
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps using GNSS and Levelling E. Brockmann, D.
IGARSS 2011, Vancuver, Canada July 28, of 14 Chalmers University of Technology Monitoring Long Term Variability in the Atmospheric Water Vapor Content.
1/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco TRANSITION OF THE IGS REFERENCE FRAME COORDINATION FROM NRCAN TO IGN - STATUS AND.
Reprocessing CEGRN campaigns M. Becker(1), A. Caporali(2), R. Drescher(1), L. Gerhatova(5), G. Grenerczy(3), C. Haslinger(4), J. Hefty(5), S.
EGU G6 Vienna 2006 The CERGOP2 database after the project EU project CERGOP2/Environment Work Package 1 P. Pesec, C. Haslinger, Space Research Institute.
CERGOP2 Sofia 2004 Development of the CERGOP2 Database - Progress report Work Package 1 P. Pesec, C. Haslinger, Space Research Institute Graz, Austrian.
Relative positioning with Galileo E5 AltBOC code measurements DEPREZ Cécile Dissertation submitted to the University of Liège in partial requirements for.
Online School Management System Supervisor Name: Ashraful Islam Juwel Lecturer of Asian University of Bangladesh Submitted By: Bikash Chandra SutrodhorID.
IGS Workshop 2008, Miami Beach IGN activities as IGS data center The IGN Global Data Centre (GDC) has been designed and implemented in answer to both the.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Menlo Park GPS data processing and archiving J.L. Svarc, J.R. Murray, Fred Pollitz, Scott Haefner,
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.
Reference Frames Global Continental Local -- may be self-defined
Fedora in Education BalCCon2k17 17th September 2017 Nemanja Milošević
Appliance of IceCORS network 2017 by Dalia Prizginiene
Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm
ESOC IGS Reprocessing T. Springer, F. Dilssner, E. Schoenemann,
Agenda Background and Motivation
Presentation transcript:

OLG LAC Reprocessing EPN 2006 G. Stangl 1, C. Aichhorn 2, S. Krauss 2 (1) Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV)‏ (2) Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Science

EPN LAC Workshop Warszawa 20102IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Hardware + System Software  Hardware  Server Intel Xeon E5520 Quadcore  12 GB Memory  1 TB Disk space  6x 1 Gigabit LAN  System Software  Xen Server‏  Virtual Workstation Now: Linux Debian (32bit) Upcoming: CentOS 5.5 (64bit)  Qt | C-Compiler v4.4  2 GB Memory (variable)

EPN LAC Workshop Warszawa 20103IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Bernese Software + Data  Bernese Software  Bernese Software 5.0 release February 10  Qt  C-Compiler v4.4  Now: Intel Fortran Compiler v8.1  Future: g95-x86_64-32 Integer Fortran Compiler  Data  IGP1 : IGS orbits + clocks + EOPs‏ reprocessed  RINEX daily files corrected by ROB DC  ITRF2005 coordinates + velocities a priori for minimum constraint stations from EPN cumulated solution‏

4 OLG LAC Reprocessing Network OLG LAC EPN EPN LAC Workshop Warszawa 2010 OLG LAC Reprocessing Similar to OLG EPN sub-network +20 stations from other OLG networks + 10 completely new stations

EPN LAC Workshop Warszawa 20105IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Analysis Strategy  Bernese Software  3° minimum elevation  L5/L3 ambiguity resolution  Dry Niell a priori + Zenith delays + troposphere gradients wet Niell estimated  Minimum constraints to BOR1, BUCU, GOPE, GRAZ, PENC, SOFI, ZIMM  Network design  Predefined baselines, mainly based on shortest distance strategy  Automation by Bernese Processing Engine, manual afterwork (e.g. exchange of bad baselines)  Every day Helmert 7 parameter transformation on all IGS ‏stations with a priori coordinates (solution check)

EPN LAC Workshop Warszawa Time and Problem Handling  Preparation time without RINEX file check 20 minutes per week‏  Computing time BPE 140 minutes per week  Manual checking minutes per week  Manual problem solving + rerun minutes per week  Outlier = North/East component exceeds 10 mm, Up exceeds 20 mm  Problem checking independently from existing OLG database of outliers  Automatic exclusion of RINEX files less than 12 hours  Baseline changes to improve results (most frequently VLNS- RIGA-METS to VLNS-METS-RIGA)  If no improvement, outliers removed from weekly normal equation (still there in daily normal equation)  31 baseline exchanges (14 times VLNS-RIGA) )~0.1% of all processed ones, almost all improved the solution

EPN LAC Workshop Warszawa 20107IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Statistical Comparison Reprocessing – Old Processing  88 Stations, 12 of them never processed by OLG LAC before  46 out of 76 common ones with documented outliers  Number of stations with outliers remains approximately the same 39 -> 36  Total number of outliers reduced from 139 to 92  Main characteristics of improvement:  Better estimation of troposphere  Minimum constraint more stable than constraint to one station  3° degree elevation provides more data per station

EPN LAC Workshop Warszawa 20108IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Conclusions  200 hours processing for the whole year is affordable, but more speed is required (e.g. 4 years per year)  Problems can be seen more clearly because of the reduction of processing noise (heights)  All problems = outliers with physical, human and electronic background remain –> need for further analysis?  Some network problems depend on network design (outliers are compensated by minimum constraint) ->re-reprocessing with improved station velocities and global station distribution?

Thank you