Assessment Committee Update to Faculty Senate February 18, 2015.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Aligning VALUE Rubrics to Institutional Purposes: Sharing Practical Approaches that Promote Consistent Scoring and Program Improvement Linda Siefert

Advertisements

Linda Nickel EPSB Project Specialist 1.

Bill Zannini Business Programs Coordinator October 27, 2008.

Bachelor of Applied Science and the Liberal Arts Core.

College of Liberal Arts September 18, Overview Fall 2014 Review the Curriculum November 3 Deadline Submit Recommendations for Curriculum.

Making Your Assessments More Meaningful Flex Day 2015.

Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.

Development of Student Learning Outcomes for GE: lessons from a collaborative approach A Lawson General Education in California Conference, CSU Fullerton.

No Child Left Behind Teacher Qualification. NCLB: Three Main Parts All teachers to meet new federal standards –New hires to meet standards now –Existing.

Program Review and General Education Assessment at the University at Albany: Past, Present and Future Barbara Wilkinson Assistant Director for Assessment.

STANDARDIZATION It’s Not a Bad Word!. Before Standardization Between 4 Adult Schools, CBET Classes and Offsite Classes, ALL ESL classes had different.

Brian Yusko Associate Dean of Academic Programs Subject and grade-level specific.

GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Planning the assessment ( ): During the school year , the GE assessment was planned during multiple.

Department of Humanities College of Sciences and Liberal Arts Writing Program Assessment at New Jersey Institute of Technology Carol Siri Johnson Associate.

First Choice Graduate Programs First Choice Programs Consultation and Review Processes.

Critical Thinking Assessment Project. Assessment of Critical Thinking is part of larger effort BCC Assessment Task Force: Co-Chairs: Charles Prescott.

Update on Institutional Reaccreditation and the Foundations of Excellence Fall Faculty In-Service August 19,

Assessment Leader Training General Education Student Learning Assessment GEO Training Series: 2 of 5 Spring 2012 February 13, 2012.

OCTEO Fall 2012 Dr. Debra Gallagher Ohio Northern University.

Curriculum Implementation Task Force (CITF) Status Report – April 14, 2009.

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.

September 11,  Measurements of Student Progress (MSP) ◦ Reading and math were tested every year in grades 3 through 8. ◦ Writing was tested in.

Randy Hanna Chancellor Division of Florida Colleges.

Honors Level Course Implementation Webinar Honors Rubric and Portfolio Review Process October 7, 2013.

End of Course Evaluation Taimi Olsen, Ph.D., Director, Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center Jennifer Ann Morrow, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Evaluation,

Strategies for Implementing Program-Level Assessment through Outcomes Jeremy Anderson Manager, Academic Computing Dr. Kaitlin Walsh Instructional Designer/Technologist.

Evidence of Student Learning Fall Faculty Seminar Office of Institutional Research and Assessment August 15, 2012.

Title I Annual Parent Meeting Bardmoor Elementary.

Objective: Reviewing the vision and restarting the work. Agenda 1.Design 21 overview 2.Accept Fall 09 timetable draft 6 3.Career Academies: Brainstorming.

Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research 2010 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research Assessment Review Committee Report College of Technology.

THE SLO PROCESS #1 create/update SLO’s, rubrics, & assessment methods #2 assess all students in all sections of all courses #3 maintain SLO assessment.

Developing a Teaching Portfolio Jaclyn Mueller OCN750 Spring 2013.

Budget Adjustment Process November 19, Components of the Budget Adjustment Process Student Data Analysis Complete Budget Adjustment Complete Assurance.

Reviewer Training 5/18/2012. Welcome & Introductions Co-Chairs: NHDOE Representative:Bob McLaughlin.

General Education Assessment Workshop: Spring 2016 Attributes General Education Assessment Committee (GEAC) SUNY Oneonta November 17 & 20, 2015.

WASC Site Visit Briefing LSB Chairs Diane Jonte Pace 9/9/09  Responsibilities of LSB faculty during October CPR site visit  WASC’s expectations for CPR.

Assessment Committee. Communicate what we Think about Assessment. Learn to Integrate assessment into our teaching practice and Act on it toward continuous.

Patty Francis Associate Provost Institutional Assessment & Effectiveness.

KKC’s Assessment Academy Project Update August 2012.

Administrator-Association Collaboration-from MOUs to Problem-solving SIOUX CITY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.

ARCADIA UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUM Get Ready…..For the Journey of Your Life Andrea Crivelli-Kovach Associate Professor & Director Community Health.

Who We Are When Working in Assessment  Carl Brun works with Gen Ed and other programs  Aligning curriculum with standards  Collecting syllabi and posting.

Critical Thinking Assessment General Education Assessment Committee (GEAC) Workshop on Nov 18 & 21.

TAG/Advanced Discussion. Elementary School TAG Model 1 day a week pull out Gifted Curriculum Standards “Enrichment” for SS and SC Teacher input, grades,

Georgia Alternate Assessment The Importance of Portfolio Review Prior to Submission February 2011Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent.

Assessment Committee Update to Faculty Senate February 17, 2016.

Presentation to the Faculty Senate on General Education Beth Rosenberg, Dir. of Gen. Ed. – Jeff Jablonski, Asst. Dir.

Recommendation: Accept P&T Work Group Implementation Recommendations Subject to recommended modifications.

AAC&U VALUE Project: Minnesota Collaborative Demonstration Year 2 ( ) Demonstration Year 3 ( ) 1.

The Process The Results The Repository of Assessment Documents (ROAD) Project Sample Characteristics (“All” refers to all students enrolled in ENGL 1551)

CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study

Workload Fulfillment Term Faculty Appointments Patricia Linton

KKC’s Assessment Academy Project Update

Engaging Faculty in Institutional Assessment - A Panel Discussion

Discourse Faculty Meeting

General Education Assessment

Accreditation Pathway

Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment

Key Dates for GEARS Spring 2018 All Faculty Selected Faculty

We will get started as soon as everyone arrives.

Updates on School-based Assessment (SBA)

General Education Redesign Task Force

Faculty R & D Grant Applications: Fall 2016 – Fall 2018

Association of Teacher Educators Jacsksonville, FL. February 18, 2003

_Accounting_ Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report

Assessment of the UCA Core Annual Brief (AY ‘18-19) Diversity

Key Dates for GEARS Fall 2017 All Faculty Selected Faculty

Department Chair: Liz Brown Date of Presentation: 01/19/18

Curriculum Coordinator: Pamela Quinn Date of Presentation: 1/19/18

Recruitment & Retention Committee Update Job & Task Analysis Outcomes

Presentation transcript:

Assessment Committee Update to Faculty Senate February 18, 2015

Outline Who is involved? What we are doing? Request for input

Who is serving on AC? Heidi Steltzer (Sciences, chair) Erich McAlister (Sciences) Shawn Meek (Arts and Humanities) Mika Kusar (Business) Michael Martin (Arts and Humanities) Rebecca Austin (Social Sciences) Kim Hannula (ex-officio) Lisa Snyder (ex-officio)

Planning and conducting assessment of Liberal Arts Core at FLC DateTasks Oct 2014Faculty senate tasked the AC to complete LAC assessment in Oct-Dec 2014AC met 2-3x per month to develop an approach for LAC assessment. Dec 2014Faculty submitted writing samples Jan-Feb 2015Creating resources for scoring, recruiting scorers, and training scorers Feb-Mar 2015Scoring writing samples for Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Mar 2015Complete report on Fall 2014 term LAC assessment Apr-Jun 2015Complete Spring 2015 term LAC assessment

Method for LAC assessment at FLC Faculty teaching capstone senior courses submit writing samples for each student/group within their course at the end of the term. Writing samples are scored for critical thinking and problem solving, using the AACU LEAP rubrics. Writing samples are selected through a stratified random sampling approach Stratification is by area (Science, Social Science, Arts and Humanities, Business, Teacher Education) and within areas by faculty to increase chances that selected writing is not all from one faculty, as is possible. Data will only be analyzed across areas and faculty – assignments are de-identified

Data on submissions for Fall 2014 AreaTotal # writing samples# selected samples Arts and Humanities10 Business11 Social Science4715 Science4415 Teacher Education00 Number of writing samples is affected by the 1) number of students/courses taught 2) whether assignments are completed individually or as groups and 3) if suitable assignment is included in the capstone course, i.e. writing, in English, critical thinking and problem solving can be assessed.

Who is scoring Fall 2014 writing samples Michael Martin (AH)* Michele Malach (AH) Gordon Cheesewright (AH)* Rebecca Austin (SS)* Brad Clark (SS) Cathy Hartney (Hon) Gary Gianniny (S) Melissa Knight-Maloney (S) Erich McAlister (S)* Paul Clay (B) *are individuals also serving on the AC or the LAC **individuals were asked to serve by faculty on the AC Thanks to all involved.

Request for input Service commitment for scoring for LAC assessment LAC assessment is required by HLC and must be completed each year Commitment includes training (~2-3 hours) and scoring (~10 hours) About 20 scorers are needed each year

Request for input – how to plan for scorers Option 1: Volunteer Option 2: Requirement for faculty serving on LAC Council and Assessment Committee Option 3: Jury-service type system (AC recommendation) All faculty after completing 2 nd year service become eligible for selection Random selection, document service completed, not called again to serve until all other faculty have served Can’t be called in term when instructing for a course being assessed Can defer by one term ~110 faculty eligible, ~20 scorers needed per year, service about 1x every 5 years Option 4: Service requirement for LAC assessment is included in faculty expectations statement; chairs document this is completed.