Nucleon-pair transfer-intensities nuclear shape-phase transitions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some (more) Nuclear Structure
Advertisements

Collective properties of even- even nuclei Vibrators and rotors With three Appendices.
Valence shell excitations in even-even spherical nuclei within microscopic model Ch. Stoyanov Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Sofia,
Structure of the ECEC candidate daughter 112 Cd P.E. Garrett University of Guelph TRIUMF Excellence Cluster “Universe”, Technische Universität München.
Generalized pairing models, Saclay, June 2005 Generalized models of pairing in non-degenerate orbits J. Dukelsky, IEM, Madrid, Spain D.D. Warner, Daresbury,
Development of collective behavior in nuclei Results primarily from correlations among valence nucleons. Instead of pure “shell model” configurations,
Pavel Stránský 29 th August 2011 W HAT DRIVES NUCLEI TO BE PROLATE? Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Alejandro.
II. Spontaneous symmetry breaking. II.1 Weinberg’s chair Hamiltonian rotational invariant Why do we see the chair shape? States of different IM are so.
The Collective Model Aard Keimpema.
The proton-neutron interaction and the emergence of collectivity in atomic nuclei R. F. Casten Yale University BNL Colloquium, April 15, 2014 The field.
Tidal Waves and Spatial Symmetry Daniel Almehed Stefan Frauendorf Yongquin Gu.
ISOLDE workshop, CERN, November 2008 Correlations between nuclear masses, radii and E0 transitions P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Simple nuclear mass formulas.
Nuclear Low-lying Spectrum and Quantum Phase Transition Zhipan Li School of Physical Science and Technology Southwest University 17th Nuclear Physics Workshop,
Open Problems in Nuclear Level Densities Alberto Ventura ENEA and INFN, Bologna, Italy INFN, Pisa, February 24-26, 2005.
Structure and Reactions of Exotic Nuclei PI32 Collaboration (theory group, but ….) Some conclusions (keywords)
Introduction to Nuclear Physics
(An outgrowth of our studies of shape/phase transitions and empirical signatures for them) A) An enhanced link between nuclear masses and structure B)
The IBA The Interacting Boson Approximation Model Preliminary review of collective behavior in nuclei Collective models, and why the IBA Basic ideas about.
IBA Lecture 3. Mapping the entire triangle Technique of orthogonal crossing contours (OCC)
NSDD Workshop, Trieste, February 2006 Nuclear Structure (II) Collective models P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France.
Even-even nuclei odd-even nuclei odd-odd nuclei 3.1 The interacting boson-fermion model.
Odd nuclei and Shape Phase Transitions: the role of the unpaired fermion PRC 72, (2005); PRC 76, (2007); PRC 78, (2008); PRC 79,
fermions c j N bosons A nucleons valence nucleonsN nucleon pairs L = 0 and 2 pairs s,d  even-even nuclei 2.2 The Interacting Boson Approximation A.
1 New formulation of the Interacting Boson Model and the structure of exotic nuclei 10 th International Spring Seminar on Nuclear Physics Vietri sul Mare,
Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic How the world, with all its apparent complexity and diversity can be.
Lecture 4 Quantum Phase Transitions and the microscopic drivers of structural evolution.
Proposal: Beta-delayed neutron spectroscopy of Ca.
1 New horizons for MCAS: heavier masses and α-particle scattering Juris P. Svenne, University of Manitoba, and collaborators CAP 15/6/2015.
Shape phase transition in neutron-rich even-even light nuclei with Z=20-28 H.B.Bai X.W.Li H.F.Dong W.C.Cao Department of Physics, Chifeng University, Chifeng.
原子核配对壳模型的相关研究 Yanan Luo( 罗延安 ), Lei Li( 李磊 ) School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin Yu Zhang( 张宇 ), Feng Pan( 潘峰 ) Department of Physics, Liaoning.
The calculation of Fermi transitions allows a microscopic estimation (Fig. 3) of the isospin mixing amount in the parent ground state, defined as the probability.
The Algebraic Approach 1.Introduction 2.The building blocks 3.Dynamical symmetries 4.Single nucleon description 5.Critical point symmetries 6.Symmetry.
Core-excited states in 101 Sn Darek Seweryniak, ANL GS/FMA collaboration.
N = Z N=Z line coincides with doubly-magic core Single-particle states wrt 100 Sn core Neutron-proton correlations in identical orbitals Neutron-proton.
Coupling of (deformed) core and weakly bound neutron M. Kimura (Hokkaido Univ.)
Electromagnetic moments for isomeric states in nuclei far from stability in nuclei far from stability NIPNE Bucharest ↔ INFN LNL Legnaro 10 experiments.
Discovery of a Quasi Dynamical Symmetry and Study of a possible Giant Pairing Vibration R.F. Casten WNSL, Yale May 11,2011 Evidence for a Quasi Dynamical.
Surrey Mini-School Lecture 2 R. F. Casten. Outline Introduction, survey of data – what nuclei do Independent particle model and residual interactions.
IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 The interacting boson model P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Dynamical symmetries of the IBM Neutrons, protons.
Héloïse Goutte CERN Summer student program 2009 Introduction to Nuclear physics; The nucleus a complex system Héloïse Goutte CEA, DAM, DIF
Symmetries and collective Nuclear excitations PRESENT AND FUTURE EXOTICS IN NUCLEAR PHYSICS In honor of Geirr Sletten at his 70 th birthday Stefan Frauendorf,
ShuangQuan Zhang School of Physics, Peking University Static chirality and chiral vibration of atomic nucleus in particle rotor model.
NS08 MSU, June 3rd – 6th 2008 Elisa Rapisarda Università degli studi di Catania E.Rapisarda 18 2.
Quantum Phase Transitions (QPT) in Finite Nuclei R. F. Casten June 21, 2010, CERN/ISOLDE.
Petrică Buganu, and Radu Budaca IFIN-HH, Bucharest – Magurele, Romania International Workshop “Shapes and Dynamics of Atomic Nuclei: Contemporary Aspects”
July 29-30, 2010, Dresden 1 Forbidden Beta Transitions in Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Kazuo Muto Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
WHY ARE NUCLEI PROLATE:
Some (more) High(ish)-Spin Nuclear Structure Paddy Regan Department of Physics Univesity of Surrey Guildford, UK Lecture 2 Low-energy.
Interacting boson model s-bosons (l=0) d-bosons (l=2) Interpretation: “nucleon pairs with l = 0, 2” “quanta of collective excitations” Dynamical algebra:
Correlations in Structure among Observables and Enhanced Proton-Neutron Interactions R.Burcu ÇAKIRLI Istanbul University International Workshop "Shapes.
Quantum phase transitions and structural evolution in nuclei.
Quantum Phase Transitions in Nuclei
Dipa Bandyopadhyay University of York
Emergent Euclidean Dynamical Symmetry in Nuclear Shape Phase Transition Yu Zhang Department of Physics, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China
Quantum Phase Transition from Spherical to γ-unstable for Bose-Fermi System Mahmut Böyükata Kırıkkale University Turkey collabration with Padova–Sevilla.
Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Highlights in Physics –14 October 2005, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano Contribution to nuclear.
Nuclear Low-lying Spectrum and Quantum Phase Transition 李志攀 西南大学物理科学与技术学院.
Quantum shape transitions in the shapes of atomic nuclei. J. Jolie, Universität zu Köln.
National Insitute of Nuclear Physics
Determining Reduced Transition Probabilities for 152 ≤ A ≤ 248 Nuclei using Interacting Boson Approximation (IBA-1) Model By Dr. Sardool Singh Ghumman.
V. Nuclear Reactions Topics to be covered include:
Yu Zhang(张宇), Feng Pan(潘峰)
Euclidean Dynamical Symmetry in Nuclear Shape Phase Transition
oblate prolate l=2 a20≠0, a2±1= a2±2= 0 Shape parameterization
Emmanuel Clément IN2P3/GANIL – Caen France
Surrey Mini-School Lecture 2 R. F. Casten
Introduction to Nuclear physics; The nucleus a complex system
Introduction Calculations for the N=7 isotones Summary
Nuclear shapes for the critical point
Kazuo MUTO Tokyo Institute of Technology
Presentation transcript:

Nucleon-pair transfer-intensities nuclear shape-phase transitions as a fingerprint for nuclear shape-phase transitions Ruben Fossion Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Università di Padova ITALY INPC2007, Tokyo, Japan

Changing nuclear structure through a series of isotopes Paradigms/benchmarks to understand nuclear structure Fig. from R. Casten “Nuclear Physics from a Simple Perspective” s.p. behaviour (shell model) s.p. behaviour (shell model) Collective behaviour Geometrical model Pair breaking Pair breaking Vibrator Vibrator Rotor Recently 2 new analytical solutions for the critical points X(5), E(5) F. Iachello, PRL85 (2000) 3580 F. Iachello, PRL87 (2001) 052502 x INFN, Università di Padova, Italy INPC2007, Tokyo, Japan Ruben Fossion

Nuclear shape-phase transitions IBM symmetry-triangle Interacting Boson Model (IBM) A. Arima and F. Iachello, “The Interacting Boson Model”, Cambridge University Press, 1987 valence bosons as basic building blocks s (L=0) and d (L=2) algebraic structure U(6) with three limits that have exact analytical solutions for the excitation spectrum and the EM-transition rates outside of the limits only numerical solutions IBM symmetry-triangle “phase diagram” deformed Axial asymmetric rotor x spherical Axial symmetric rotor vibrator Boson coherent states/condensates geometrical interpretation of the IBM Fig. from R. Casten and E. McCutchan, J. Phys. G34 (2007) R285 INFN, Università di Padova, Italy INPC2007, Tokyo, Japan Ruben Fossion

Analogy with macroscopic systems 5. Transizioni di fase di forma: sistemi macroscopici Discontinuities where the phase changes INFN, Università di Padova, Italy INPC2007, Tokyo, Japan Ruben Fossion

Microscopic systems - Experimental observables Search for fingerprints of nuclear shape-phase changes Observables 2-neutron separation energies B(E2,21+ -> 01+) B(E0,02+ -> 01+) Isomer shift R=E(41+)/E(21+) Isotope shift B(E2,22+ -> 01+) B(E2,22+ -> 21+) Pair-transfer reaction intensities Experiments on pair transfer In the past: with stable beams Renewed interest: experiments with exotic beams D. Bucurescu, et. al., Phys. Rev. C73, 064309 (2006). D.A.Meyer et. al., Phys. Rev. C74, 044309 (2006). D.A. Meyer et. al., Phys. Lett. B638, 44 (2006). P. Van Duppen et al., the ISOLDE collaboration (CERN), internal communication. Can we learn something from pair-transfer reactions about nuclear shape-phase transitions and the critical points? INFN, Università di Padova, Italy INPC2007, Tokyo, Japan Ruben Fossion

Fingerprints of shape-phase transitions in 2-particle transfer reactions Theoretically, if you move from one limit of nuclear structure to another, how will the intensity of the pair-transfer change. Can we identify fingerprints for shape transitions and critical points? Do we find these fingerprints back in real series of isotopes? INFN, Università di Padova, Italy INPC2007, Tokyo, Japan Ruben Fossion

Fingerprints of shape-phase transitions in 2-particle transfer reactions 1. From a spherical vibrator to an axial symmetric rotor INFN, Università di Padova, Italy INPC2007, Tokyo, Japan Ruben Fossion

Experimental information on the 64Gd isotope series Fingerprints of shape-phase transitions in 2-particle transfer reactions 2. Some series of isotopes Experimental information on the 64Gd isotope series A 150 154 158 162 Axial symmetric rotor Spherical vibrator Α=154 Α=154 Pick-up Strip-off R. Casten and E.A. McCutchan, J. Phys. G34 (2007) R285 R. Fossion et al., accepted by Phys. Rev. C INFN, Università di Padova, Italy INPC2007, Tokyo, Japan Ruben Fossion

Fingerprints of shape-phase transitions in 2-particle transfer reactions Conclusions We suggest as a fingerprint for the critical point for nuclear phase-shape transitions a loss of intensity for the pair transfer between two ground states in combination with a gain of intensity for transfer to excited states Collaborators INFN, Padova, Italy A. Vitturi and L. Fortunato Universidad de Sevilla, Spain C. Alonso and J. Arias ありがとうございます Thank you

Simple algebraic results in the Boson Coherent-State framework Expression of the nucleon-pair transfer intensity in terms of the number of bosons and quadrupole deformation variables (N, β1, β2) β2 Ground-state to ground-state transfer N=15 β1=β2 β1 β2 Transfer of the ground-state to the beta-vibrational state β1 R. Fossion et al., accepted by Phys. Rev. C INFN, Università di Padova, Italy INPC2007, Tokyo, Japan Ruben Fossion

Pair-transfer intensities in the IBM-1 Definition of the operators Most general boson-equivalent of the L=0 pair-transfer operator P(0)+,0 up to cubic terms Operator cast into a more condensed form In a first approximation, the transfer intensity can be defined as Connection with experiments σ=(kinematics)×(structure)

Boson analogue of the nucleon-pair transfer-operator Within the IBM algebraic results for the limits numerical results between the limits Boson Coherent-State frameworks simple analytical formulae ββ βγ γγ A+2 (N+1) bosons γγ β Κ=0 Κ=4 Κ=2 γ ββ Κ=0 βγ gs A N bosons γγ γγ Κ=0 β Κ=0 Κ=2 Κ=4 Κ=2 γ Κ=0 gs Κ=0 Κ=0 Κ=2 s† (λ=0,μ=0) ΔL=0 ΔK=0 0+ 0+ K=0 K=0 Transfer of an s-boson Κ=0 INFN, Università di Padova, Italy INPC2007, Tokyo, Japan Ruben Fossion

Pair-transfer intensities, gs dbv in the three limits

Fingerprints of shape-phase transitions Fase transition from a spherical vibrator to a axial asymetric deformed rotor

Fingerprints of shape-phase transitions Fase transition from a spherical vibrator to a axial asymetric deformed rotor

Huge density of 0+ states near the critical point Fragmentation of the transfer strength IBM numerical calculation Huge density of 0+ states near the critical point R. Casten and E.A. McCutchan, J. Phys. G34 (2007) R285 D. Meyer et al., Phys. Lett. B638 (2006) 44.

New benchmarks: analytical solutions X(5) and E(5) for the critical points Fig. from R. Casten, Nature

New benchmarks: analytical solutions X(5) and E(5) for the critical points F. Iachello, PRL85 (2000) 3580 F. Iachello, PRL87 (2001) 052502 Fig. from R. Casten and E. McCutchan, J. Phys. G34 (2007) R285

First and second order shape-phase transitions in nuclei