Introduction Materials and Methods Results Conclusions CD133 Polymorphisms are associated with clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biomarker Analyses in CLEOPATRA: A Phase III, Placebo-Controlled Study of Pertuzumab in HER2- Positive, First-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Baselga.
Advertisements

Mizutomo Azuma 1, Michael M. Shi 2, Christian J. Jacques 2, Carl Barrett 2, Kathleen D. Danenberg 3, Syma Iqbal 1, Anthony El-Khoueiry 1, Dongyun Yang.
Introduction Patients and Methods Results Conclusion Wnt signaling is essential for embryonic development, stem cells and tissue regeneration. Colorectal.
KRAS is mutated in about 40% of colorectal cancers; it is the only validated predictive marker used in patients with metastatic CRC 1. It is also a negative.
Re-Examination of the Design of Early Clinical Trials for Molecularly Targeted Drugs Richard Simon, D.Sc. National Cancer Institute linus.nci.nih.gov/brb.
References 1.Salazar R, Roepman P, Capella G et al. Gene expression signature to improve prognosis prediction of stage II and III colorectal cancer. J.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Outcome According to CYP2D6 Genotype Among Postmenopausal Women with Endocrine-Responsive Early Invasive Breast Cancer Randomized in the BIG 1-98 Trial.
Clinicaloptions.com/oncology Expert Insight Into the First-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer N016966: Efficacy Results  PFS significantly.
What would you recommend as first line therapy for a 68 y/o woman with advanced pancreatic cancer and limited metastatic disease with ECOG-1? Gemcitabine.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer 2005 Daniel G. Haller, M.D. Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.
Insert Program or Hospital Logo Introduction Melanoma is notoriously resistant to chemotherapy. While surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy can.
A Micro RNA Polymorphism (MiRSNP) in 3’UTR of K-ras gene was associated with clinical outcome in mCRC patients treated with either single agent cetuximab.
Mizutomo Azuma 1, Dongyun Yang 2, Marinella Carpanu 3, Ellen Hollywood 3, Michael Lue-Yat 3, Wu Zhang 1, Kathleen D. Danenberg 4, Peter V. Danenberg 5,
Prospective study of EGFR intron 1 CA tandem repeats as predictive factor of benefit from cetuximab and irinotecan Antoniotti C 1, 2, Loupakis F 3, Cremolini.
Guanylyl Cyclase C (GCC) Lymph Nodes (LN) Classification as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Stage II Colon Cancer: A Pooled Analysis Daniel J. Sargent,
High Cereblon Protein Expression Correlates with Improved Response and Survival in Myeloma Patients Treated with Lenalidomide 1 Cereblon Expression Predicts.
*University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
ICAM-1, GRP-78 and NFkB gene polymorphisms associated with clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first line 5-FU.
Introduction Results Material and Methods Conclusions Genetic variants predict clinical outcome clinical outcome in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal.
Cancer Stem Cell SNPs Have Opposite Prognostic Outcome in Patients with Gastric Cancer Among Asian and Western Countries Melissa J. LaBonte 1, Takeru Wakatsuki.
Impact of age and comorbidities on treatment effect, tolerance and toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treated on CALGB
Response rate using conventional criteria is a poor surrogate for clinical benefit on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal.
Risk Stratified Analysis Improves Prediction of Treatment Benefit Over Subgroup Analysis: Findings from Intergroup N9741 HK Sanoff, ME Campbell, HC Pitot,
Mace L. Rothenberg, M.D. Professor of Medicine Ingram Professor of Cancer Research Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer Management: KRAS Mutations and EGFR.
Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Best of ASCO Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Ali Shamseddine, MD Professor of Medicine Head of Hematology/Oncology.
Tumor clock protein PER2 as a determinant of survival in patients (pts) receiving oxaliplatin-5-FU- leucovorin as 1st line chemotherapy for metastatic.
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
Transcription Factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) Polymorphism Was Associated with Worse Survival in Three Independent Cohorts from the USA, Austria, and Japan Rita.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
Introduction Patients and Methods Results Conclusion Pericytes are a key component in the maturation of the VEGF driven tumor angiogenic process 1. Bevacizumab.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
Monoclonal Antibodies EGFR Inhibitors for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Where are we and What’s next Discussion of Abstracts Jeffrey Meyerhardt,
Time to Secondary Resistance (TSR) After Interruption of Imatinib: Updated Results of the Prospective French Sarcoma Group Randomized Phase III Trial on.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
Impact of Bevacizumab (Bev) on Efficacy of Second-Line Chemotherapy (CT) for Triple- Negative Breast Cancer: Analysis of RIBBON-2 Brufsky A et al. Proc.
Introduction Patients and Methods Results Conclusion Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the 108 patients included in the biomarker analysis. Objectives.
IntroductionPatient baseline characteristics Conclusion The process of EGFR recycling is important mechanism of resistance of cetuximab in colorectal cancer.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
Who can benefit from chemotherapy holidays after first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer ? N. Perez-Staub, B. Chibaudel, A. Figer, A. Cervantes,
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
Pharmacogenetic analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with second-line irinotecan (IR)+/- cetuximab (CB): The EPIC experience.
A trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) and the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG) A Randomized.
Pharmacogenetics of Irinotecan Clinical perspectives: utility of genotyping Mark J. Ratain, MD University of Chicago 11/3/04.
Biomarker analyses from a phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib (G) versus carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/P)
Early Treatment of Relapsed Ovarian Cancer Based on CA125 Level Alone Versus Delayed Treatment Based on Conventional Clinical Indicators Results of the.
Genetic polymorphisms, toxicity, & response rate in African Americans (AA) with metastatic colorectal cancer compared to Caucasians (C) treated with IFL,
Samuel Aparicio, B.M., B.Ch., Ph.D., and Carlos Caldas, M.D.
Microsatellite Instability Predicts Improved Response to Adjuvant Therapy With Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin in Stage III Colon Cancer In association.
Complete pathologic responses in the primary of rectal or colon cancer treated with FOLFOX without radiation A. Cercek, M. R. Weiser, K. A. Goodman, D.
Annals of Oncology 23: 298–304, 2012 종양혈액내과 R4 김태영 / prof. 김시영.
AR-V7 Splice Variant in Prostate Cancer : Taking Centre Stage
Chips? SNPs? or PCR? What do we really want and what do we need? Heinz-Josef Lenz, MD Professor of Medicine Co-Director, Colorectal Center Co-Director,
Blood-based biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy: Tumor mutational burden in blood (bTMB) is associated with improved atezolizumab (atezo) efficacy in.
Higher Vitamin D Levels Associated With Improved Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Prognostic Factors for First-line Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab or Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights* of the.
TBCRC (the translational breast cancer research consortium) 005 Prospective study
VEGF and VEGFR1 Gene expression levels predict tumor recurrence in adjuvant colon cancer Yan Ning1, Georg Lurje1, Kathleen Danenberg2, Janine Cooc2, Dongyun.
Genetic variants of kinases suppressors of Ras (KSR)in KRAS-BRAF
A subgroup analysis of a large multicenter study
Progression-Free Survival Times Overall Survival Times
Published online September 20, 2017 by JAMA Surgery
Cetuximab with chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies according to KRAS.
Primary side of origin affects the outcome of mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab independently of BRAF status and mucinous.
Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy
KSR1 gene polymorphism in mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI and bevacizumab Marta Schirripa1, Fotios Loupakis1, Chiara Cremolini1, Dongyun.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction Materials and Methods Results Conclusions CD133 Polymorphisms are associated with clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with either first-line 5-FU+ bevacizumab (BV) or second-line irinotecan (IR)/ cetuximab (CB) or IR alone Alexandra Pohl 1, Wu Zhang 1, Dongyun Yang 1, Georg Lurje 1, Yan Ning 1, Shirin Khambata-Ford 2, Christiane Langer 2, Michael Kahn 1, Jia Ling-Teo 1, Heinz-Josef Lenz 1 1. University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2. Bristol Myers Squibb Research and Development, Princeton, NJ References Increasing evidence substantiates the cancer stem cell hypothesis, which proposes that only a subpopulation of cancer cells is responsible for tumorinitiation, disease progression and chemoresistance. These cells have been named due to their similar characteristics with normal stem cells cancer stem cells (CSC). Several cell surface markers have been proposed in various malignancies for the identification of these CSC; CD133, a pentaspan transmembrane protein, has been used to isolate CSC in colorectal cancer 1,2. In vivo and in vitro studies demonstrated the ability of CD133 + cells to initiate and maintain tumorspheres, whereas CD133 - cells could not. A recent study indicates that elevated levels of CD133 plasma mRNA correlated with colon cancer recurrence 3. Furthermore, plasma levels of CD133+ progenitor cells have been found to be decreased after treatment with BV 4. We tested whether three germline variations in the 3’UTR-region of the CD133 gene (rs , rs3130 and rs ), will be associated with clinical outcome in patients with mCRC, treated in first-line with FOLFOX/BV and in second-line treated withIR/CB or IR alone. Genomic DNA was extracted either from peripheral blood (79 patients, who were enrolled in a phase-II clinical trial at University of Southern California medical facilities) or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples (186 patients, who were enrolled in the EPIC-phase III clinical trial, US-sites only) of mCRC pts. Patients received either first-line treatment with FOLFOX (33 patients) or XELOX (46 patients) and BV or second-line treatment with irinotecan and cetuximab (84 patients, arm A) or irinotecan (102 patients, arm B) alone. All polymorphisms were tested in each patient. All patients signed informed consent. Genotyping was performed using PCR-RFLP assays or direct sequencing. These are the first data showing that polymorphisms in CD133 were associated with clinical outcome in patients with mCRC. Our results suggest a prognostic and potentially predictive role for CD133 in patients treated with first-line FOLFOX/BV and second-line therapy irinotecan. These results need to be confirmed in larger prospective studies. 1.O'Brien CA, Pollett A, Gallinger S, Dick JE. A human colon cancer cell capable of initiating tumour growth in immunodeficient mice. Nature 2007;445: Ricci-Vitiani L, Lombardi DG, Pilozzi E, et al. Identification and expansion of human colon-cancer-initiating cells. Nature 2007;445: Duda DG, Cohen KS, diTomaso E, et al. Differential CD146 expression on circulating versus tissue endothelial cells in rectal cancer patients: implications for circulating endothelial and progenitor cells as biomarkers for antiangiogenic therapy. J ClinOncol 2006;24: Lin EH, Hassan M, Li Y, et al. Elevated circulating endothelial progenitor marker CD133 messenger RNA levels predict colon cancer recurrence. Cancer 2007;110: Results 79 patients (47 men, 32 women) received FOLFOX/BV or XELOX/BV. Genotyping was successful in 76 of 79 patients. Radiologic response: 43 patients (54%) showed a complete or partial response, 35 patients (45%) had stable or progressive disease. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.8 months (95%CI: ), median overall survival (OS) was not reached. For the first-line setting, the combined analysis of rs and rs3130 showed a significant association with PFS (p=0.010, log-rank test) in patients receiving FOLFOX/BV or XELOX/BV. Patients who carried CC in rs and rs3130 or the combination of CT with either CT or TT showed a increased PFS of 16.5 months, compared with 8.4 months PFS for patients with CC in one polymorphism and CT or TT in the other polynorphism(p=0.010, log-rank test). Allele frequencies were 16% for rs and 52% for rs3130 for each variant allele in the white study population. In multivariate analysis, the combination analysis of rs and rs3130 showed to be an independent prognostic factor for PFS (adjusted p=0.012). The second cohort consisted of 186 patients (103 men, 83 women). Genotyping was successful in 183 of 186 patients. Radiologic response in our patient cohort was: In arm A, 11 patients (13%) showed a complete or partial response; 73 patients (87%) had stable or progressive disease. In arm B, 6 patients (6%) demonstrated a complete or partial response, whereas 96 patients (94%) showed stable or progressive disease. Median PFS (arm A) was 3.0 months (95%CI: ) vs. 2.7 months PFS for arm B (95%CI: ), median OS was 9.3 months (95%CI: ) for arm A vs 12.3 months (95%CI: ) for arm B. Patients baseline characteristics were not representative for the whole study population (table 1). K-ras mutation status in this cohort was not significant for response to cetuximab-therapy. In second-line setting, patients treated with irinotecan alone (arm B) carrying any G in rs had a significant better OS (20.7 months) compared to patients homozygous for the T-allele (10.7 months, p=0.004, log-rank test). There was no significant association with rs and rs3130 for arm B. Allele frequencies were 24% for each variant allele in rs in the white study population. Multivariate analysis showed a borderline significance for OS in rs (adjusted p=0.078). There was no significant association between response rate and any of these polymorphisms. There was no significant association with patients in arm A and clinical outcome for these polymorphisms. OS by rs for pts treated with irinotecan alone PFS by rs and rs3130 for pts treated with FOLFOX/BV or XELOX/BV Patients baseline characteristics