A brief overview What is program evaluation? How is an evaluation conducted? When should it be used? When can it be used? Used with Permission of: John.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chemawawin Cree Nation. Community Planning Change, Expectations and Performance Some Observations Chief Clarence Easter Chemawawin Cree Nation Aboriginal.
Advertisements

Results Based Monitoring (RBM)
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
March 23, Todays Outcomes By the end of todays workshop, participants will be able to... Revise and/or finalize SAOs within their areas Discover.
M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
Strategic Planning An Overview. General Definition The process of strategic planning involves deciding where you want to go, how you want to be positioned,
Program Evaluation Strategies to Improve Teaching for Learning Rossi Ray-Taylor and Nora Martin Ray.Taylor and Associates MDE/NCA Spring School Improvement.
HOWARD UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES Strategic Planning Retreat, 2005.
Quality management Vincent A Ssembatya.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP: SESSION 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES ACADEMIC AND STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PRESENTED BY THE DIVISION OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Evaluation is a professional and ethical responsibility and is a core part of PHN professional practice Commitment to evaluation helps build the PHN intelligence.
The Lumina Center Grantseeking Workshop Series Presents Outcomes & Evaluations April 20, 2006.
Scientific method - 1 Scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena and acquiring new knowledge, as well as for correcting and.
Types of Evaluation.
Stufflebeam’s Approach to Evaluation The Model Norbert Jerina Javier Leung Tirana Porter Destini Robinson Michelle Salmona Cheral Wintling.
Writing an Effective Assessment Plan
Measuring Learning Outcomes Evaluation
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT 1
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
HOW TO WRITE A GOOD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR FOR EVALUATION Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 Pinky Mashigo.
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
Performance Management Training Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget 1.
Dr. G. Johnson, Program Evaluation and the Logic Model Research Methods for Public Administrators Dr. Gail Johnson.
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Understanding Project Management. Project attributes  The project has a purpose  Project has a life cycle like an organic entity  Project has clearly.
Verification: Quality Assurance in Assessment Verification is the main quality assurance process associated with assessment systems and practice - whether.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Strategic Planning Session David Rudder, Ph.D. Rudder Consultants, LLC. May 17, 2006.
Program Evaluation EDL 832 Jeffrey Oescher, Instructor 6 June 2013.
Outcome Based Evaluation for Digital Library Projects and Services
Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended.
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment LO 1.1&1.2&1.3.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
1 PROJECT EVALUATION IT’S ALL ABOUT STUDENTS. 2 In partnership, we help America’s students stay in school and graduate by: Reducing gaps in college access.
Promoting a Culture of Evidence and Use of Data through Program Evaluation Session Theme 2 Presentation to: OSEP Project Directors’ Conference July 21,
1 Unit 1 Information for management. 2 Introduction Decision-making is the primary role of the management function. The manager’s decision will depend.
IPMA Executive Conference Value of IT September 22, 2005.
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
1 Contact: From Evaluation to Research Description of a continuum in the field of Global Education.
University of Palestine Dept. of Urban Planning Introduction to Planning ( EAGD 3304 ) M.A. Architect: Tayseer Mushtaha Mob.:
ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015 Summary of Changes
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 2c – Process Evaluation.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
For ABA Importance of Individual Subjects Enables applied behavior analysts to discover and refine effective interventions for socially significant behaviors.
Evidence-based Education and the Culture of Special Education Chair: Jack States, Wing Institute Discussant: Teri Palmer, University of Oregon.
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Chapter 6: THE EIGHT STEP PROCESS FOCUS: This chapter provides a description of the application of customer-driven project management.
Program Evaluation Overview. Definitions of Program Evaluation systematic collection of information abut the activities, characteristics, and outcome.
An Expanded Model of Evidence-based Practice in Special Education Randy Keyworth Jack States Ronnie Detrich Wing Institute.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
B.A. (English Language) UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA
Welcome to Program Evaluation Overview of Evaluation Concepts Copyright 2006, The Johns Hopkins University and Jane Bertrand. All rights reserved. This.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
The purpose of evaluation is not to prove, but to improve.
EVALUATION RESEARCH To know if Social programs, training programs, medical treatments, or other interventions work, we have to evaluate the outcomes systematically.
Basic Concepts of Outcome-Informed Practice (OIP).
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 1 Research: An Overview.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Research And Evaluation Differences Between Research and Evaluation  Research and evaluation are closely related but differ in four ways: –The purpose.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Stages of Research and Development
Right-sized Evaluation
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
Presentation transcript:

A brief overview What is program evaluation? How is an evaluation conducted? When should it be used? When can it be used? Used with Permission of: John R. Slate

Presentation Outline n Definitions n Purposes n Types n Key concepts of evaluative research n Research designs n Requirements for program evaluation

A Definition of “Program” “An organized set of resources and activities directed toward a common purpose or goal”

Two Definitions of “Program Evaluation” n “... an assessment, through objective measurement and systematic analysis, of the manner and extent to which Federal programs achieve intended objectives.” ( Source - Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA)) n “The application of scientific research methods to assess program concepts, implementation and effectiveness” ( Source - General Accounting Office, Designing Evaluations, Report GAO/PEMD )

Where Does Evaluation Fit Into a Program’s Planning, Development and Implementation Process? Make decision to create program and set strategic direction 5

Where Does Evaluation Fit Into a Program’s Planning, Development and Implementation Process? Make decision to create program and set strategic direction Determine what the program will do and how it will do it, set targets and program objectives 6

Where Does Evaluation Fit Into a Program’s Planning, Development and Implementation Process? Make decision to create program and set strategic direction Determine what the program will do and how it will do it, set targets and program objectives Create program infrastructure & management, administrative & information systems, develop performance measures 7

Where Does Evaluation Fit Into a Program’s Planning, Development and Implementation Process? Make decision to create program and set strategic direction Determine what the program will do and how it will do it, set targets and program objectives Create program infrastructure & management, administrative & information systems, develop performance measures Determine required levels of human resources and material support 8

Where Does Evaluation Fit Into a Program’s Planning, Development and Implementation Process? Make decision to create program and set strategic direction Determine what the program will do and how it will do it, set targets and program objectives Create program infrastructure & management, administrative & information systems, develop performance measures Determine required levels of human resources and material support Implement action plan (Program operation & management, performance measurement, corrective action, etc...,.) 9

Where Does Evaluation Fit Into a Program’s Planning, Development and Implementation Process? Make decision to create program and set strategic direction Determine what the program will do and how it will do it, set targets and program objectives Create program infrastructure & management, administrative & information systems, develop performance measures Determine required levels of human resources and material support Implement action plan (Program operation & management, performance measurement, corrective action, etc...,.) Program effectiveness, impact, efficiency evaluations to determine the continue need for the program, alter program design, resource requirements, etc.. 10

Types of Program Evaluations n Formative n Formative - Judging the worth of a program while activities are forming or in process focus is on the process more than the outcome can help make in- process improvements often involves a small scale field test 11

Types of Program Evaluations n Formative n Formative - Judging the worth of a program while activities are forming or in process focus is on the process more than the outcome can help make in- process improvements often involves a small scale field test n Summative n Summative - Judging the effectiveness of a fully operating or completed program focus in on outcome and overall program worth can help decisions to expand, terminate, modify usually encompasses the entire program 12

Questions Asked by Program Evaluations* n Descriptive - Statistics on inputs, outputs, and outcomes; how does the program work? n Normative - What is the expected performance (goal) of the program in relation to actual achievement? n Impact - If a goal is not met, why not? Program evaluations must establish a cause/effect relationship between an unmet goal and program activities or other, external factors * from Designing Evaluations, GAO/PEMD

Decisions Program Evaluation Can Help Make n Continue or discontinue a program n Improve policies and procedures n Add or drop specific program elements n Institute similar programs elsewhere n Allocate resources n Accept or reject approaches & theories

Key concepts of Evaluative Research n empirical - based on valid, reliable data n replicable - study can be repeated in exactly the same way in another time, place or setting n falsifiable - hypothetical cause/effect relationships can be demonstrated or not According to standards in the research and academic communities, program evaluations should strive for scientific proof and method, i.e.., they should be:

Evaluation Methodology (highly simplified) n Define program n Identify outcome goals and objectives n Model hypothetical cause/effect relationships between program activities and outcomes n Develop goal/objective measurement criteria and desired achievement levels n Locate, collect and analyze data on program participants (and maybe control group) n Compare actual results with target levels

Evaluation Strategies and Designs* * Based on Designing Evaluations, GAO/PEMD

Evaluation Strategies and Designs* * Based on Designing Evaluations, GAO/PEMD

Evaluation Strategies and Designs* * Based on Designing Evaluations, GAO/PEMD

Evaluation Strategies and Designs* * Based on Designing Evaluations, GAO/PEMD

Evaluability Assessment n A study to determine if, when, and how a program can be evaluated n Prevents premature impact and outcome evaluations n Usually involves: clarification of the intent of the program formulation of “testable” cause/effect statements determines what can be measured and how assesses validity, reliability, and relevance of data on which the evaluation would based

Circumstances When Program Evaluation is Not a Good Idea n When there is no question about the program n When there is no clear program structure or focus n When program activities cannot be distinguished from other activities n When people cannot agree on what the program is trying to achieve n When valid measurement methods and data do not exist and cannot be created n When the study would serve no useful purpose

Overview Program Evaluation Prerequisites n An operating “program”, i.e.., a distinct set of activities and resources with a common purpose and focus n Agreement on program goals and objectives n Agreement on program metrics for its goals and objectives n Agreement on what constitutes program “success” n Existence, or ability to develop, valid data n Absence of legal, administrative, or cultural barriers to the study n Agreement on intended use of the study