National Monitoring Standards 2013 CDR Matthew Newland Public Health Analyst Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Concepts for Senior Corps. Session Objectives Provide an opportunity for participants to network in program specific group Discuss key fiscal and.
Advertisements

Financial and Grants Management Institute - March 18-20, Key Concepts for Learn and Serve.
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Fiscal Monitoring: Ensuring Accountability of Your Sub-Grantees
Threshold System Presented by Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability Fall Title I Directors Conference October 23-25,
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Overview of HAB’s Policy Clarification Notices through September 17, 2013 Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
HIV/AIDS Bureau Division of State HIV/AIDS Programs (DSHAP)
A-133 Compliance & Audit Readiness Presented By: Tracy Jackson and Susan Cook.
Audit Requirements  A-133 Gov't, Education and Non-Profit  Thresholds $500K or more expended during the FY - Single Audit required  Audit Report - due.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
2011 National Extension and Research Administrative Officers’ Conference Session #33, May 24, :30 p.m. – 2:45 p.m. Anchorage,Alaska Federal Audits.
AB 86: Adult Education Consortia Planning Grant Management Reporting System Webinar Series
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program SSVF Grantee Uniform Monitoring.
Grants Management Ryan White Part A Grantees
Grant Management Webinar Presenters – Karla Freeman – Beth Romero – Chris Epoca.
Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Program Federal Monitoring Update James Gray Program Specialist.
Making Sense of the National Monitoring Standards CDR Matthew Newland Mae Rupert Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
Promoting Objectivity in Research by Managing, Reducing, or Eliminating Conflicts of Interest UT HOP UT HOP The University of Texas at Austin.
1 | Weatherization Assistance Programeere.energy.gov Eric Bell 1 Federal/State Monitoring 2010 Orientation for State WAP Directors and Staff.
Application Amendments and Budget Transfers (Part 2) Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I University,
Program Income Imposition of Charges and Application of Sliding Fee Scale CDR Matthew Newland Mae Rupert Department of Health and Human Services Health.
Webinar April 19, 2011 HazMat Grant Program: HMEP Application Guidance Overview and Explanation of the Sample Application for the HMEP Grant Program for.
 10% Deviation from Total Award $$ (does not apply to grants $100K or less)  Change in Scope of Project  Change in Project Period (no cost extension)
Reporting on the Federal Financial Report “SF-425” Presented by HOMELESS GRANT AND PER DIEM PROGRAM and The Financial Service Center 1.
Reimbursements, Reporting & Budget Modifications
The State Offices of Rural Health Grant The State Offices of Rural Health Grant Keith J. Midberry, MHSA Department of Health & Human Services Health Resources.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Matthew Pakos School Improvement Grant Programs May 23, 2011.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
“Establishing Internal Financial Controls” Presented by: Fred Thomas, Bureau Chief of Administration.
Got the Grant What’s next??????????? Joy R. Knipple Team Leader, National Institute of Mental Health July 26, 2006.
FY 2011 Part A Program Updates May 17, 2011 The HIV/AIDS Bureau Division of Service Systems.
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Charter School 2015 Annual Finance Seminar Grant Management Office of Grants Fiscal September 11, 2015.
Award Monitoring Update National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for Business and Operations October 22, 2003 Mary Santonastasso, Director, Division.
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
How to Submit An Amendment Tips from the 21 st CCLC Unit Updated September 17, 2009.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Effects of the Passage of ABX4 2 on California-Adopted Instructional.
Application Amendments and Budget Transfers (Part 1) Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I University,
Update and Clarifications Regarding Local Pharmaceutical Assistance Programs Susan Robilotto, D.O. Clinical Consultant/ Medical Officer Department of Health.
1. 2 Department of Education Public Charter School Program  PURPOSE: To expand the number of high- quality charter schools by providing financial assistance.
National Monitoring Standards September 15, 2011 Ryan White Part A Technical Assistance Webinar HIV/AIDS Bureau Division of Service Systems.
1 Felisha Hitt, Senior Procurement Analyst March 18, 2008 Defense Acquisition Regulations System
Health Resources and Services Administration HIV/AIDS Bureau Policy Clarification Notices 15-03: Clarification Regarding the RWHAP and Program Income and.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Indian Health Service Grants Management Grants 101- Fundamentals.
Application Amendments and Budget Transfers Title I University Chris McLaughlin, Title I Specialist Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Subgrantee Compliance February 27, 2013 Preparing TPPS Subgrantees for Monitoring Shelby County Grants Office presents:
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
PORT OF TACOMA Nationally: Port Security Grant Program (PSGP) Port Security Grant funds first appropriated in 2002 Approximately $400M each Federal Fiscal.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: November 3, 2015 Presented by: Office of Grants.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
NCJA’s National Forum on Financial Management Training
ETA Financial System Hot Topics
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Managing Federal grants
Managing Your Federal Grant Award
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
Presentation transcript:

National Monitoring Standards 2013 CDR Matthew Newland Public Health Analyst Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration HIV/AIDS Bureau Division of Metropolitan HIV/AIDS Programs

Session Overview Purpose of National Monitoring Standards HRSA/HAB Expectations Monitoring Standards Implementation Updates to Standards Resources

Purpose of National Monitoring Standards (NMS) Provide a compilation of all major Ryan White Program documents used for COMPLIANCE, OVERSIGHT, and EXPECTATIONS Assist grantees in meeting Federal requirements for program and fiscal management, monitoring, and reporting Help standardize project officer monitoring of grantees Clarify the oversight expectation of Ryan White Part A Program Assist/guide grantees in compliance to monitoring expectation Identify specific roles regarding monitoring of sub-grantees

Purpose of NMS Compliance, Oversight, and Expectations Ryan White Legislation Code of Federal Regulations HHS Grants Policy Manual HRSA/HAB Policies Part A Funding Opportunity Announcement Part A Manual (clarification, best practice) Program Terms and Conditions of Award OIG/GAO Reports and Recommendations

National Monitoring Standards NMS  Developed in response to OIG, Congress, and GAO oversight issues  Published April 2011  Revised May 2013 Three Components to the NMS  Universal Monitoring Standards (18 pages)  Fiscal Monitoring Standards (43 pages)  Program Monitoring Standards (78 pages) Monitoring Standards: FAQs (19 pages)

Why Do We Need National Monitoring Standards? Contract Monitoring Fiscal Monitoring – a system to assess the appropriate use of funds including the control, disbursement, use, and reporting of allowable costs Program Monitoring – a system to assess whether allowable services are provided to eligible clients according to service limits Quality Management – a system to assess the degree to which a service meets or exceeds established professional standards and user expectations

HRSA/HAB Expectations Any agency or individual receiving Federal funding is required to be monitored for compliance with federal and programmatic requirements Grantees must perform fiscal monitoring activities to ensure Ryan White funding is being used for approved purposes Grantees are required to conduct “comprehensive” annual monitoring site visits to all sub-grantees, unless an exemption has been granted by HAB/DMHAP

NMS-OIG Recommendations Specify and enforce standards and guidelines for how grantees should monitor grantees Standardize a corrective action process and address grantee issues more formally Increase the frequency and comprehensiveness of site visits

NMS Implementation Grantee Responsibilities: Conduct annual visit Develop its own Monitoring Standards Ensure compliance with all the National Monitoring Standards Make National Monitoring Standards available to sub- grantees and document monitoring activities Keep POs informed about its monitoring activities

Monitoring Standard Elements Each Monitoring Standard has four elements: Performance Measure/Method Grantee Responsibility Provider/Sub-grantee Responsibility Source Citation

Example of a Part A Fiscal Monitoring Standard Standard Performance Measure/ Method Grantee Responsibility Provider/Subgrantee Responsibility Source Citation Section A: Limitation on Uses of Part A funding 1.Adherence to 10 percent limit on proportion of federal funds spent on administrative costs in any given grant year  For grantees without a fiduciary intermediary or administrative agent  Identification and description of all expenses within grantee budget that are categorized as administrative costs  Documentation that administrative expenses do not exceed 10 percent of the awarded Ryan White grant  Identify and appropriately categorize administrative expenses and ensure that they do not exceed 10 percent of total grant  Provide HRSA/HAB with current operating budgets with sufficient detail to determine and review administrative expenses N/A PHS ACT 2612 A 2604(h)(1)

Universal Monitoring Standards Section A: Access to Care Section B: Eligibility Determination Section C: Anti-Kickback Statute Section D: Grantee Accountability Section E: Reporting Section F: Monitoring Appendix 1 – Report Due Dates

Universal Standards - Updates ItemLocationChange TypeSource/Purpose Section B: 1.Eligibility Determination ClarificationPCN #13-02 Client Eligibility and Recertification Requirements Section D: 1.Grantee Accountability New CitationsSteven Young and Heather Hauck Letter 09/20/2012 “Exemption to Annual Site Visits” Section E: 2.ReportingLanguage added under Grantee Responsibility; New Citations FFATA Reporting Section F: 2.MonitoringStandard updated; New Citation “Note” added on Annual Site Visit Exemption; SY and HH Letter 09/20/12 Appendix 1Report Due Dates UpdatedAdded “Estimated UOB and Carryover” due date

Part A Fiscal Monitoring Standards Section A: Limitation on Uses of Part A Funding Section B: Unallowable Costs Section C: Income from Fees for Services Performed Section D: Imposition and Assessment of Client Charges Section E: Financial Management Section F: Property Standards Section G: Cost Principles Section H: Auditing Requirements Section I: Matching of Cost-Sharing Funds Section J: Maintenance of Effort Section K: Fiscal Procedures Section L: Unobligated Balances

Part A “Fiscal” Monitoring Standards - Updates ItemLocationChange TypeSource/Purpose Section A: 4, 5, 6, 8 Limitation on Uses of Part A Funding Clarification (6, 8); New Citations (4, 5, 6, 8) Item 6. “Note” added under Standard - website for obtaining Indirect Cost Rate; Citations: H. Philips & S. Young Letter “Administrative Costs & Rent”; FOA – “Indirect Cost Rate”; HAB PN – “Waiver of Core Medical Services Requirements” Section B: 7, 9 Unallowable Costs Language addedPerformance Measure/ Method - Item 7 new bullet on document review for outreach; Item 9 new bullet on document review for foreign travel

Part A “Fiscal” Monitoring Standards - Updates ItemLocationChange TypeSource/Purpose Section D:Imposition & Assessment of Client Charges Terminology Updated Schedule of Charges (previously sliding fee scale) Section E: 3, 4, 5, 6 Financial Management Language added; reformat Revisions to approved budgets Section H: 2Auditing Requirements New StandardSmall Program Audits; S. Young & H. Hauck Letter 09/20/12 Section K: 10Fiscal Procedures Language added to Grantee Responsibility Estimation of carryover request Section L: 1Unobligated Balances Language update; new Citation Submission of UOB; HAB PN “UOB and Carryover Provisions”

Part A Program Monitoring Standards Section A: Allowable Uses of Part A Service Funds Section B: Core Medical Services Section C: Support Services Section D: Quality Management Section E: Administration Section F: Other Service Requirements Section G: Prohibitions and Additional Requirements Section H: Chief Elected Official (CEO) Agreements and Assurances Section I: Minority AIDS Initiative

Part A “Program” Monitoring Standards Updates ItemLocationChange TypeSource/Purpose Section B: 3Core Medical Services Language updated LPAP eligibility, advisory board, 340B compliance Section C: 7, 10 Support ServicesLanguage updated and clarified Housing services; Medical transportation – clarified need for prior approval when purchasing or leasing vehicle Section F: 2Other Service Requirements Language updated “Referral relationships with key points of entry” Section G: 5, 9 Prohibitions on Promotion Language updated and added Direct Cash Payments; two items added to Additional Prohibitions

Part A “Program” Monitoring Standards Updates ItemLocationChange TypeSource/Purpose Section H: 3a, 3f, 5a CEO Agreement & Assurances Language updated - 3a & 3f; Language deleted with referral to Fiscal Monitoring Standards – 5a 3a-Obligation and expenditure of funds; 3f-Medicaid status; 5a- Imposition of charges for services Section J: 1cData Reporting Requirements Language addedGrantees ensure providers are entering client- level data

Monitoring Standards: FAQs FAQs are divided into seven sections:  National Monitoring Standards (NMS) Basics  Structure of the NMS Documents  Implementation of the NMS  Universal Monitoring Standards Questions  Program Monitoring Standards Questions  Fiscal Monitoring Standards Questions  Appendix 1

FAQ - Updates FAQ #SectionChange TypeSource/Purpose #9Structure of NMSDeleted#9 from FY12 no longer relevant #23Implementation of NMS Updated (replaces #24 & #25) Annual site visit exemption #24Implementation of NMS Updated (Previously #26) Desk audits may substitute for site visit with approved exemption #34Universal MSNewPCN #13-02 Client Eligibility & Recertification Requirements #42Universal MSNewUnderinsured qualify for RW services

FAQ - Updates FAQ #SectionChange TypeSource/Purpose #43Universal MSUpdatedClarifies eligibility for insurance and RW #53Fiscal MSClarificationClarifies use of RW funds for QM #54Fiscal MSClarificationIndirect cost rates #55Fiscal MSClarificationIndirect cost rate documentation requirements for grantee/subgrantees #56Fiscal MSUpdatedIncludes “exceptions” for rent as allowable direct service cost #57Fiscal MSUpdatedIncludes language on auditing of high-risk programs

FAQ - Updates FAQ #SectionChange TypeSource/Purpose #58Fiscal MSNewSmall program audits; S. Young & H. Hauck Letter 09/20/12 #61Fiscal MSClarificationSchedule of charges and limit on client charges #66Fiscal MSNewSchedule of charges discounts based on individual income #68Fiscal MSClarificationReimbursement is a form of program income #70Fiscal MSClarificationEstablishing MOE #71Fiscal MSUpdatedContains new web link for sample monitoring tools Appendix 1UpdatedWebsite links updated

Resources Part A and B Monitoring Tool: monitoring (click the “Grantee” tab at the top of the page)

Contact Information CDR Matthew Newland Public Health Analyst (301)