1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES National Synchrotron Light Source II Status and Progress of 0.1meV R&D at NSLS-II Xianrong Huang, Zhong Zhong, Yong Cai.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Focusing monochromators/analyzers Asymmetric diffraction geometry of the monochromator Dispersive double crystal monochromator Two wavelength sandwich.
Advertisements

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Can the optics get to 1-nm? Hanfei Yan NSLS-II, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Flash Spectroscopy using Meridionally- or Sagittally-bent Laue Crystals: Three Options Zhong Zhong National Synchrotron Light Source, Brookhaven National.
Tomsk Polytechnic University1 A.S. Gogolev A. P. Potylitsyn A.M. Taratin.
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource Sources and Optics for XAS Apurva Mehta.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES National Synchrotron Light Source II Semi-permanent Setup at the NSLS for 0.1 meV Optics R&D Zhong.
Yury CHESNOKOV Crystal Collimation workshop, March 7, 2005 CALIBRATION of CMS CALORIMETERS with LHC PROTON BEAM DEFLECTED BY CRYSTAL CALIBRATION of CMS.
IPCMS-GEMME, BP 43, 23 rue du Loess, Strasbourg Cedex 2
Richard M. Bionta XTOD July 19-21, 2005 UCRL-PRES-xxxxxx X Ray Diagnostics LCLS FAC Meeting Oct. 27, 2005.
James Welch October 30, FEL Commissioning Plans J. Welch, et. al. FEL Commissioning Plans J. Welch, et. al. Accelerator.
Richard M. Bionta XTOD October 12, 2004 UCRL-PRES-XXXXX X Ray Transport, Optics, and Diagnostics, Overview Facility Advisory Committee.
Bingxin Yang High resolution effective K September 22-23, 2004 High-Resolution Effective K Measurements Using Spontaneous.
John Arthur November 14, 2005 Summary Discussion John Arthur SLAC LCLS Beam-Based Undulator K Measurement Workshop.
1 A Grating Spectrograph for the LCLS Philip Heimann Advanced Light Source Observe the spontaneous radiation spectrum of the individual undulators Observe.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Welcome: Workshop Overview of the Workshop Yong Cai NSLS-II February 7-8, 2008.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Nanopositioning R&D Plan Yong Chu Experimental Facilities Division, NSLS-II Experimental Facilities Advisory Committee.
R. M. Bionta SLAC November 14, 2005 UCRL-PRES-XXXXXX LCLS Beam-Based Undulator K Measurements Workshop Use of FEL Off-Axis Zone Plate.
J. B. Hastings LUSI DOE Review July 23, 2007 X-ray Optics 1 X-ray Optics J. B. Hastings Beam definition Attenuators Slits Pulse picker.
Seminar Author: Bojan Hiti Mentor: doc. dr. Matjaž Kavčič Determination of trace impurities on Si wafers with x-ray fluorescence.
1 Components of Optical Instruments, Cont… Lecture 7.
Polarized Beams Using He-3 at the NCNR Triple-Axis Spectrometers Ross Erwin Tom Gentile Wangchun Chen Sarah McKenney.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
Progress on the New High Intensity Cold Neutron Spectrometer, MACS C. Broholm 1,2, T. D. Pike 1,2, P. K. Hundertmark 1,2, P. C. Brand 2, J. W. Lynn 2,
Effective lens aperture Deff
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Lonny Berman and Dario Arena, NSLS Summary The present built-out NSLS-II design includes: 30 bending magnet ports, each.
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
Study of Phase-Dispersive X-Ray Imaging Tomomi Ohgaki and Ichita Endo (Hiroshima Univ.)
14 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
18 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
Technical Challenges and Concerns S. Sharma and R. Alforque, R. Beuman, C. Foerster, E. Haas, E. Hu, P. Montanez, P. Mortazavi, S. Pjerov, J. Skaritka,
PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 PACS FPU Subunits1 FM FPU Subunits A. Poglitsch.
The Development of Laue Monochromator at X17B3 National Synchrotron Light Source in (111) diffraction intensities by severer of non-bending Si.
Slide: 1 IXS with sub-meV resolution: opening new frontiers in the study of the high frequency dynamics Giulio Monaco ESRF, Grenoble (F) outline: High.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Experimental Facilities John Hill Director, NSLS-II Experimental Facilities Division NSLS-II User Workshop July 17, 2007.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Experimental Facilities J.P. Hill Experimental Facilities Division Director PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
Assessing Single Crystal Diamond Quality
A Double Crystal Monochromator of Sagittal Focusing at SSRF J.H. He, S.J. Xia, Z.C. Hou, J.L. Gong, X.M. Jiang and Y. Zhao SSRF Project Team Shanghai Institute.
1nm R&D plan K. Evans-Lutterodt Contributions from:
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 0.1-meV Optics Update Yong Cai Inelastic X-ray Scattering Group Experimental Facilities Division, NSLS-II Experimental.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Redundancy Requirements for Critical Devices R. Casey August 8, 2007.
1 Data Acquisition What choices need to be made?.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Mirror Metrology and Development Strategy Q. Shen, K. Kaznatcheev, A. Fluerasu Experimental Facilities Division NSLS-II.
Stability Requirements for Superconducting Wiggler Beamlines
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Workshop, February 7-8, 2008 Inelastic X-ray Scattering at NSLS-II IXS Program, and Current Project Beamline.
Status Report particle identification with the RICH detector Claudia Höhne - GSI Darmstadt, Germany general overview focus on ring radius/ Cherenkov angle.
Proposed NSLS X13B Microdiffraction Instrument Source & Optics James M. Ablett National Synchrotron Light Source.
Parameters of the new diffractometer “ARES” Aleksey E. Sokolov PNPI NRC “KI”
14FEB2005/KWCAE2-UsersGroup Astro-E2 X-Ray Telescopes XRT Setup & Structure Performance Characteristics –Effective Area –Angular Resolution –Optical Axes.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Lonny Berman EFAC May 10 th 2007 ID Beamline Optics and Damping Wigglers.
Neutron Scattering Group February, 2001 A High Performance Instrument for the Single Crystal Spectroscopy at the Pulsed SNS. n What is the spectrometer.
A New High Intensity Cold Neutron Spectrometer at NIST J. A. Rodriguez 1,3, P. Brand 3, C. Broholm 2,3, J.C. Cook 3, Z. Huang 3, P. Hundertmark 3, J. Lynn.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES A Wiggler Beamline for XAS at NSLS-II Paul Northrup NSLS-II Project and Environmental Sciences Department Brookhaven National.
Michael Pivovaroff OCT 2005 UCRL-PRES FEL Offset Mirrors LCLS Week * FAC Meeting 26–27 October 2005.
Next Generation Science with Inelastic X-ray Scattering
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Chi-Chang Kao National Synchrotron Light Source Brookhaven National Laboratory Recent Developments.
Taikan SUEHARA et al., LCWS2007 & DESY, 2007/06/01 R&D Status of ATF2 IP Beam Size Monitor (Shintake Monitor) Taikan SUEHARA, H.Yoda, M.Oroku,
SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors G. Burtin, R.J. Colchester, G. Ferioli, J.J. Gras, R. Jung,
X-ray Interferometer Mirror Module ISAL Study Pre-work Overview.
HYSPEC IDT Polarized Beam Mode for the Hybrid Spectrometer (HYSPEC) at the Spallation Neutron Source. Outline Polarization analysis and the HYSPEC place.
SRI 2007: CLS Optical Metrology Facility- Overview
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
Fabrication of strip-like crystals for channeling
Introduction to Synchrotron Radiation
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
WP-73 TDR ART Review Report: Hard X-Ray Monochromator
Crystal technology at PNPI
PNPI Gatchina Crystal Farm
X-Ray Transport, Optics, and Diagnostics WBS Alan J
Optics John Arthur, SLAC & William W. Craig, LLNL April 24, 2002
Presentation transcript:

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES National Synchrotron Light Source II Status and Progress of 0.1meV R&D at NSLS-II Xianrong Huang, Zhong Zhong, Yong Cai Thanks to Yu. Shvyd’ko (designer, APS), S. Coburn (BNL), D. P. Siddons (NSLS), A. Baron (RIKEN), C. Kewish (APS), A. Macrander (APS), J. Hill (BNL) and all contributors Feburary 7-8, 2008

2 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Outline I.Angular Dispersion Optics: Principles and Designs II.R&D Progress:  Modeling, developing dynamical theory programs  Revisit Shvyd’ko’s preliminary experiment of CDW prototype  Set up semi-permanent R&D facilities at NSLS  0.7 meV prototype development... III.Technical challenges and possible solutions IV.Exploring alternative approaches V.R&D schedule and resources

3 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 0.1-meV-resolution Spectroscopy Inelastic X-ray Scattering (IXS) spectroscopy for low-energy photons (5-10keV):  More photons from undulators while IXS is extremely flux-hungry  Better momentum resolution for the same acceptance angle  Stronger scattering cross section, better match to sample size  Extend high-resolution IXS to low- and medium-energy SR facilities (e.g. NSLS-II) ... Unfortunately, lower-energy IXS conflicts with the principles of backscattering analyzers and monochromators — spectral Darwin widths of low-index Bragg reflections are too large,  E > 20 meV. Solutions : Select a small portion of the spectrum New Angular Dispersion Optics Si (008) backscattering E = 9.1 keV

4 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES I. Principles of Angular Dispersion Optics  = const Rigorous ! Dispersion in asymmetric diffraction: Different wavelengths diffracted along different directions where Si (008), E H  9.1 keV  e = 3  rad,  = 89.6  Dispersion maximized in Grazing Backscattering:   E = 0.1 meV Resolution determined by  and  e Independent of spectral Darwin width Asymmetric angle Polychromatic

5 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Implementation for 9.1 keV: Basic components (Yuri Shvyd’ko’s designs) Si (220) In-line CDDW h = 500  m 1 meV L = 12 cm 0.3 meV L = 38 cm 0.1 meV L = 140 cm h = 50  m 1 meV L = 1.2 cm 0.3 meV L = 3.8 cm 0.1 meV L = 14 cm Backward CDW Transmission through thin crystals due to Borrmann effect

6 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Dynamical Theory Calculations 1.7  Completely verified the principles R same crystal lengths and parameters

7 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Unique property: Acceptance ~100  rad Acceptance = 140  rad C/W  Wide acceptance due to collimating by C crystal.  Does not place stringent requirements on stability of incident beam. Works for divergent beam (so can be used as analyzers).  = 89.5 o  1 = 1.0 o CDW and CDDW both have large acceptance up to 200  rad

8 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Incidence  1 E Acceptance ~ 100  rad  E ~ 0.1 meV DuMond Diagram

9 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Focused–beam Mono and Analyzer Monochromator Analyzer  Major difficulty: Long D crystal length L For beam height h = 0.5 mm  L ~ 1-2 m !  Possible solution to shorten L : Using slightly focused beam h < 50  m  L ~ 10 cm utilizing wide acceptance  Analyzer side: it is important to develop precise Multilayer Mirror to improve efficiency

10 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Parallel–beam Mono with Channel-cut < 5  rad Better resolution function

11 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Energy Tuning Energy scan within the spectral width  E = 34 meV of the backscattering through  Rotation of the D crystal in CDW  Rotation of both D 1 and D 2 in CDDW Out of  E range, energy scan is through temperature scan of D crystals rotating fan W

12 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Or 0.1 meV spectrometer: Layout Focusing mirror 1 for reducing the beam size Choice of Analyzer depends on focusing condition: 1. Segmented CDW (L ~ 20 cm for each segment) if beam size > 0.1 mm 2. A single CDDW with L < 20 cm if beam size < 0.1mm Developing Multilayer Mirror is important Large-acceptance

13 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Main Features of CDW and CDDW   E/E H purely determined by  and  e (geometrically), independent of E H or of Bragg reflection  For same  and  e,  E decreases with decreasing E H, working better for lower energy  High efficiency (~ 50%)  Wide angular acceptance ~0.1 mrad, working for divergent or focused beam!  Steeper wings (i.e. cleaner resolution function)  For both Mono and Analyzer (analyzer must be combined with collimating mirror)  New but feasible optics with meV resolution for low- to medium-energy IXS  e determined by asymmetric factor b of C/W crystals

14 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES II. R&D Progress 1. Modeling optics & developing dynamical theory programs Simulation programs and tools based on rigorous dynamical theory have been developed from scratch, tested to be error-proof Applicable to backscattering, extremely asymmetric diffraction, transmission, Borrmann effect,... Component-orientated, easy plug in (using C++ classes) For design, spectrum calculation, simulating experiments (alignment, energy tuning), etc These codes have been used to verify quantitatively that the CDW and CDDW schemes work and are efficient at achieving 0.1 meV energy resolution.

15 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 2. Revisit Shvyd’ko’s preliminary experiment of CDW prototype Successfully observed angular dispersion effect Darwin width 34 meV  narrowed to 2.2 meV Very promising Why the discrepancy??? Yu. Shvyd’ko et al, PRL 97, (2006) SRI (2007) E=9.1 keV  E=2.2 meV

16 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Problems:  Damages caused by cutting and polishing  Lattice bending caused by machining or weak- linking, broadens  E dramatically  Surface roughness (next slide) X-ray topography of thin W crystals on peak off peak Lattice is bent (bent part out of the Borrmann effect angular range). Crystal is not acting as a flat wavelength selector Transmission Image taken at 33 BM, APS Defects destroy Borrmann effect

17 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES X-ray topography (cont.) Reflection topograph taken from the upper surface of W crystal showing surface roughness Topograph of the long D crystal. Almost perfect except scratches. Conclusion: Failure to achieve theoretical performance is mainly due to the bad quality of W crystals, particularly the bent areas that select different wavelengths. Solution: Completely redesign it

18 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES  Experiments underway to measure Borrmann effect and to determine the thickness t and the feasibility of free- standing crystal (next by Zhong Zhong). Structure factors calculated using Sean Brennan’s program 3. Redesign W crystal, measure Borrmann effect Our simplified W crystal that works better. Final design will be a free- standing thin crystal  Redesign it to an independent component, used in both CDW and CDDW  Transmission through W crystal is due to the Borrmann effect for measuring Borrmann

19 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES II. R&D Progress (cont.) 4. Setting up semi-permanent R&D facilities at NSLS 5. Recent progress of 0.7 meV CDW experiments (see next by Zhong Zhong)

20 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES III. Technical challenges and solutions 1.Lattice constant homogeneity of Long D crystal: ~20 cm per segment, up to 10 segments, but using a strip detector, perfect alignment or precisely the same temperature is not required. Lattice constant homogeneity is required  d/d ~ throughout each segment Solution:  Acquire highest-quality Si crystals, need accurate measurements before use by the Laue-case lattice comparator setup designed by D. P. Siddons (underway).  Use focused beam (h <50  m) to shorten crystals to < 20 cm, down to a few cm Less challenging on Mono side. On analyzer side, depends on development of Multilayer mirrors D crystal

21 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Challenges and solutions (cont.) 2. Temperature homogeneity and stability of Long D crystal: < 1 mK, achievable from previous experiments 3. Surface roughness (slope error) for grazing diffraction: Calculations shows the C/S crystal can tolerate local surface slope error <  0.05º, achievable. Roughness of D crystal affects the bandwith for grazing angle ~0.5º (  = 89.5º).  E depends on . Need high-precision fabrication of crystal surfaces, slope error <  0.05º. 4. D crystal mounting: Strain-free mounting, no bending of D crystal (< 0.5  rad), achievable. 5. Stability: 0.5  rad stability of D crystals. Thermal coefficient of Si: 2.56  K -1

22 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Challenges and solutions (cont.) 6. Developing high-efficiency multilayer mirrors Large acceptance (~5 mrad), collimating/focusing to <0.1 mrad and 50  m Focusing determining the choice of analyzer and D crystal length. Solution:  Similar mirrors are already achievable at commercial companies.  or R&D effort will be made in collaboration with APS, Spring-8, ESRF etc to develop specifically designed high-efficiency multilayer mirrors.  Mirror efficiency reduce performance but does not affect resolution.

23 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES IV. Alternative approaches of 0.1 meV Cons:  Still need long crystals  Efficiency less than CDDW Acceptance > 100  rad Pros:  More flexible, many variants  Arbitrary energy E = 9.3 keV 1. Four-bounce, for both mono and analyzer

24 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 2. Multi-cavity Fabry-Perot Interferometer (funded by BNL’s LDRD) Si (12 4 0) E = 14.4 keV 5meV 0.5meV 0.1meV  Multi-cavity FB can increase both Free Spectral Range and Finesse.  Reduce bandwith from ~10 meV to sub-meV  Pre-monochromatization not difficult.  Ultra-compact, single- component, powerful  In principle with no limit  neV Pre-mono Courtesy of D. P. Siddions, K. Evans-Lutterodt, A.Isakovic

25 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 3. Massive Parallel Analyzer 500 pieces, covers 10  rad each 5 mrad total 0.2 mm 1 m 0.3 mm 3.5 mm  Concept is similar to back-scattering analyzer.  Each crystal is a small D crystal.  Collimation provided by small beam size on sample, small crystal surface and distance.  Angular dispersion by D crystal allows acquiring all energies by a PSD detector. Sample Shielding PSD Detector

26 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES V. R&D Schedule FY 08 — to achieve 0.3 meV  Improve facilities (monos, slits, detectors/CCD camera, motors etc) at X12A  Fabricate crystals and repeat 0.7 meV CDW  Set up temperature-controlled chambers for long D crystals  Measure Borrmman effect to optimize thickness of thin W crystals, repeat 0.7 meV CDW (optics can be used for 1meV endstation)  Build inline CDDW to achieve 0.3 meV resolution  Test monochromatization with divergent beam  Design multilayer mirrors

27 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES FY 09 — to achieve 0.1 meV prototype  Full work on CDW and CDDW prototype to achieve 0.1 meV resolution (with limited flux)  Detailed exploration of crystal quality (defects, impurities, inhomogeneities)  Detailed study of fabrication issues (figure error, roughness)  Detailed exploration of temperature control  Develop collimating/focusing multilayer mirrors (collaboration with OFM group at APS, other labs, commercial vendors etc)  Dynamical theory calculations of alternatives (interferometer, four-bounce, multi-crystal analyzer), concentrating on feasibility as analyzer  Test alternative four-bounce design (if necessary)

28 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES FY10-FY11 FY10  Design and develop engineering solutions for adequate temperature homogeneity and stability control  Achieve full-scale 0.1 meV CDW/CDDW components with limited flux  Test and improve collimating/focusing multilayer mirrors  Build and test full-scale CDW/CDDW components (particular mono optics) FY11  Test and improve analyzer optics with multilayer mirrors (10 x 5mrad 2 H&V angular acceptance)  Test alternative approaches  Finalize design

29 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 0.1 meV R&D Resources Staff (we are hiring) FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 Scientist Assist Sci Post-doc Designer Crystal Fab Technician Crystal Fabrication Equipment Diamond rough saw Diamond mill Lapping machine Chemical polisher Table top x-ray source Chemical hood, cabinet etc Access to NSLS beamlines: X12A: dedicated R&D X19C: crystal characterization (regular beamtime) Many other beamlines at NSLS PUP at APS

30 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Summary  New optics achieving 0.1 meV resolution at ~9 keV photon energy have been designed for IXS at NSLS-II based on simple and well-established angular dispersion effect in asymmetric Bragg diffraction.  The main optical components are CDW and CDDW mono and analyzer; their detailed operation principles have been proved by rigorous dynamical theory calculations; the CDW mono has been experimentally tested to 2.2meV.  All mechanisms involved are fully understood.  There are technical challenges (e.g. the long crystal issue). These challenges are also well understood and we have feasible solutions (including alternative approaches).  The R&D have already been underway, including detailed theoretical modeling and preliminary experiments. Further R&D are well planned with adequate resources.