Fluid substitution effects on seismic anisotropy Long Huang, Robert Stewart, Samik Sil, and Nikolay Dyaur Houston April 2 nd, 2014 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rock Physics Models for Marine Gas Hydrates
Advertisements

Title Petrophysical Analysis of Fluid Substitution in Gas Bearing Reservoirs to Define Velocity Profiles – Application of Gassmann and Krief Models Digital.
Chapter 1- General Properties of Waves Reflection Seismology Geol 4068
1 Guangsheng Gu 1 Advisors: George J. Hirasaki 1, Walter G. Chapman 1 Collaborators: Colin A. Zelt 2, Priyank Jaiswal 2 1 Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular.
SINTEF Petroleum Research The strength of fractured rock Erling Fjær SINTEF Petroleum Research 1.
Rheology and wave propagation by J. M. Carcione (OGS)
Time-lapse Seismic and AVO Modeling, White Rose, Newfoundland
3-D Fault Visualization with Fracture Swarms
Important for : Conversion from traveltime to depth Check of results by modeling Imaging of the data (migration) Classification and Filtering of Signal.
Near-Surface Geophysical Investigation of the 2010 Haiti Earthquake Epicentral Area Eray Kocel, Robert R. Stewart, Paul Mann, and Li Chang Eray Kocel,
5. AVO-AVA Introduction Weak-contrast, short spread approximation for reflection coefficient Information content Classification Tuning effect Examples.
Near-surface Imaging at Meteor Crater, Arizona Soumya Roy, Ph. D. Student Advisor: Dr. Robert R. Stewart AGL Annual Meeting University of Houston, 2 nd.
AVO responses as modelled with a finite- difference program Peter Manning and Gary Margrave Introduction: classic AVO cases Surface seismic records F-D.
Physical processes within Earth’s interior Topics 1.Seismology and Earth structure 2.Plate kinematics and geodesy 3.Gravity 4.Heat flow 5.Geomagnetism.
Quantifying Seismic Reflectivity
Earthquakes and earthquake (or seismic) waves Pages , ,
Measureable seismic properties
Earth Study 360 Technology overview
Small is beautiful: AGL physical modeling and salt measurements N. Dyaur, R. Stewart, and L. Huang Houston May 16,
Analyses of tunnel stability under dynamic loads Behdeen Oraee; Navid Hosseini; Kazem Oraee 1.
Wave Imaging Technology Inc. PSDM for “Easy” Unconventional Reservoirs? Morgan Brown Rocky Mountain Section, AAPG September 10, 2012.
Elastic Inversion Using Partial Stack Seismic Data: Case Histories in China.
1 A Time-Lapse Seismic Modeling Study for CO2 Sequestration at the Dickman Oilfield Ness County, Kansas Jintan Li April 28 th, 2010.
Manifestation of Fluid Saturation in Scattererd Waves – Numerical Experiments and Field Study 25 September 2014 II Russian-French Workshop "Computational.
1 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. VSP modeling, velocity analysis, and imaging in complex structures Yue Du With Mark Willis, Robert Stewart May.
Seismic Anisotropy Beneath the Southeastern United States: Influences of Mantle Flow and Tectonic Events Wanying Wang* (Advisor: Dr. Stephen Gao) Department.
Use of PP and PS time-lapse stacks for fluid-pressure discrimination. ALEXEY STOVAS 1, MARTIN LANDRØ 1 & BØRGE ARNTSEN 2 1 NTNU, Dept. of Petroleum Engineering.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation.
Weighted Stacking of 3-D Converted-wave Data for Birefringent Media Richard Bale.
New Trends in AVO Brian Russell and Dan Hampson
Bode Omoboya 16 th May,  Introduction  Bakken Shale Case Study  Barnett Shale Case Study  Other Forward Modeling Projects.
Amplitude Variation with Offset (AVO) Theory & Applications.
Geol 4068 Class presentation to accompany reading of Chapter 2- Waves in Fluids Elements of 3D Seismology, 2nd Edition by Christopher Liner September 6,
Fractures play a major role in many tight reservoirs such as shale, carbonate, and low permeability sand by providing fluid flow conduits, for this reason.
6. Seismic Anisotropy A.Stovas, NTNU Definition (1) Seismic anisotropy is the dependence of seismic velocity upon angle This definition yields both.
Physical Modeling: Time Lapse, 3D, and VSP Robert W. Wiley Allied Geophysical Laboratories University of Houston.
A Petrophysically valid Xu- White Velocity Model Andy May March 19, 2014.
Uncertainty in AVO: How can we measure it? Dan Hampson, Brian Russell
1 Tatiana Chichinina * Irina Obolentseva and Geser Dugarov (Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian.
Detection of Mobile Fluids in the subsurface By Dr. Kandiah [BALA] Balachandran Kalamazoo, MI Kalamazoo Valley Community College
Seismic Petrophysics Andy May April 14, Rock Physics Determine the in-situ acoustic properties of the reservoir and surrounding rocks and their.
A model of the Earthquake surface waves V.K.Ignatovich. FLNP JINR STI2011 June 8.
Sandy Chen*, L.R.Lines, J. Embleton, P.F. Daley, and L.F.Mayo
Mapping the P-S Conversion Point in VTI Media * Jianli Yang Don C. Lawton.
TAD M. SMITH VERITAS EXPLORATION SERVICES
Anomalous Vp/Vs ratios in the focal zone of West/Bohemia earthquake swarms T. Fischer1,2, T. Dahm3 (1) Institute of Geophysics, Czech Academy of Sciences.
Reflection Coefficients For a downward travelling P wave, for the most general case: Where the first term on the RHS is the P-wave displacement component.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 27 Jan 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Read for Fri 29 Jan: Burger (Ch 3-3.2) Last time: Seismic Amplitude depends on.
Wave-Equation Migration in Anisotropic Media Jianhua Yu University of Utah.
Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting The Stanford VI-E Reservoir: A Synthetic Data Set for Joint Seismic-EM Time- lapse Monitoring Algorithms Jaehoon.
Introduction to Shear Wave Splitting Erin Elliott Guofeng Yuan February 26, 2010.
Erno Takacs 1, Zoltan Hajnal 1, Bhaskar Pandit 1 1 Department of Geological Sciences, U of S ______________________________________________________ Joint.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Mon 29 Feb: Burger (§8.4) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation Seismic.
Geology 5640/6640 Introduction to Seismology 30 Jan 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Read for Mon 2 Feb: S&W (§2.4); Last time: The Equations of Motion.
Insight into the lithospheric structure and deformation in Eastern Tibet from splitting and traveltime variations of core phases S. Sol, A. Meltzer, B.
A depth trend tool to assist the interpretation of seismic amplitudes Trond Anders Seland, Statoil Force seminar, NPD, Stavanger 28 th September, 2004.
SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES FOR RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION
Amit Suman and Tapan Mukerji 25th SCRF Annual Meeting May 9 – 11, 2012
Dario Grana, Tapan Mukerji
Richard A. Bale and Gary F. Margrave
Introduction to Shear Wave Splitting
Class presentation to accompany reading of Chapter 2- Waves in Fluids
Does AVO Inversion Really Reveal Rock Properties?
Combining magma flow models with seismic signals
Class presentation to accompany reading of Chapter 2- Waves in Fluids
SKS SPLITTING: Using Seismic Waves to Understand Mantle Structure
VARIATION OF VELOCITY WITH LITHOLOGY
Haiyan Zhang and Arthur B. Weglein
Velocity and anisotropy parameter scan
Class presentation to accompany reading of Chapter 2- Waves in Fluids
Presentation transcript:

Fluid substitution effects on seismic anisotropy Long Huang, Robert Stewart, Samik Sil, and Nikolay Dyaur Houston April 2 nd,

Outline  Motivation Natural fractures and anisotropy, fluid effects  Theory and methods Anisotropic Gassmann’s equations, parameterize, recast Gassmann’s equations  Discussions P- & S-wave moduli and velocities, Thomsen’s parameters, azimuthal amplitude variation  Conclusions 2

X Z Y Orthorhombic Beautiful fractured Atoka Sandstone at Natural Dam. (Liner, 2013) X Y Z HTI ( The deformation in carbonates rocks How to characterize these fractured rocks? How would fluid influence their physical properties? How about seismic anisotropy with different fluids? Fractures 3 (Huang et al., 2013)

Theory 4 X Y Z (Schoenberg, 1980; Schoenberg and Sayers, 1995; Bukulin et al., 2000) Dry term Fluid term (Gassmann, 1951) Dry term Fluid term (Gassmann, 1951)

5 The complete recipe

Gas to brine substitution: S-waves Shear-wave moduli are independent of fluid type Shear-wave velocities depend on fluid type due to density change Φ=5% Φ=25% Red is for gas Blue is for brine Φ=5% Φ=25% 6

Gas to brine substitution: P-wave Φ=5 % Φ=25% 7 Φ=5% Φ=25% Red is for gas Blue is for brine Fluid substitution effects on P-wave are anisotropic P-wave moduli of high-porosity sands are more sensitive to fluids Vertical P-wave velocity of low- porosity sands is constant with fluids X Y Z Φ=5% Φ=25% gas brine

Gas to brine substitution: Thomsen’s parameters Shear-wave splitting (γ) is independent on fluids Both ε and δ are sensitive to fluids (1) (2) (Bakulin et al., 2000) 8 Φ=5 % Φ=25% Red is for gas Blue is for brine X Y Z X Z Y YZ planeXZ plane brine gas

Gas to brine substitution: AVAZ High-porosity: gas sands have more azimuthal amplitude variations Low-porosity: wet sands have more azimuthal amplitude variations 9 Shale Sandstone X (0°) Y (90°) P-wave reflectivity (180°) (Rpp calculated from Václav Vavryčuk and Ivan Pšenčík, 1998) (Azimuth versus incidence angle)

Future work: experiments with 3D printed models Shear-wave splitting in both directions implies it’s slightly orthorhombic material. (Huang et al., 2013) 10 3D printed cube with penny-shaped cracks.

 Extended Gassmann’s equations for an orthorhombic medium  Shear rigidity and splitting are independent on fluid type, but not shear- wave velocity  Fluid substitution effects are anisotropic  Vertical P-wave velocity of low-porosity sands is constant with fluids  High-porosity gas sands or low-porosity wet sands, have more azimuthal amplitude variations 11 Conclusions

Acknowledgement Allied Geophysical Laboratories, UH Dr. Robert Sheriff and SEG Foundation UH adjunct and research professors: Dr. Leon Thomsen and Dr. Colin Sayers 12

13 Thank you! Questions?