Hall A 11 GeV Arc Energy Mapping. Mapper in shed 9 1234 = “fixed” NMR to measure B 0 Mapper measures ∫Bdl and B 0 In this configuration the mapper and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Extraction of G E n at Q 2 =1 (GeV/c) 2 by Measurements of May 1, 2011 Ge Jin University of Virginia.
Advertisements

Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky for the JLab Hall A Collaboration College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA.
1. 2 Molecular nanomagnets as milestones for the study of low-dimensional magnetism: fundamental physics and applications magnetism: fundamental physics.
Geographic Information Systems Using ESRI ArcGIS 9.3 CAD import.
CALICE WHCAL testbeam at SPS H8 27 sep – 03 oct: 6 days for energies up to 180 GeV (+ polarity)
More on making fake TT clusters More creating Fake TT clusters We can compute the number of combinations instead of the purity (following all the possible.
What can Superbeams and Neutrino Factories Add to Scattering Measurements?
RULES of Contour Mapping.
Graphical position analysis of a 4 bar RRRR linkage Choose your coordinate system and origin.
Test Pulse Neighbors #3 Carl Goodrich 9/18/07. Electronic ID – Software ID Map Eid Sid location 0 682inner 12046outer 22047outer 32045outer 4 681inner.
A first look at the digital approach Vishnu V. Zutshi NIU/NICADD.
About N em cut: 20 GeV neutron N(em)=0 N(em)
February 8th, 2007Anne-Marie Magnan - Imperial College London 1 Update on clusterisation studies for MAPS Comparison between 2 methods of clustering Geant4/LCIO.
Cross Section meeting, 5 Nov 1999 Maria Girone1 Preliminary results on the WW fully leptonic cross section for the LEPC Maria Girone Imperial College.
Solenoid Magnetic Field Mapping Paul S Miyagawa University of Manchester Objectives Mapper machine Mapper software Simulation Corrections Fitting Future.
Solenoid Magnetic Field Mapping Paul S Miyagawa University of Manchester Introduction Mapper machine Mapper software - Simulation - Corrections - Fitting.
PAIR SPECTROMETER DEVELOPMENT IN HALL D PAWEL AMBROZEWICZ NC A&T OUTLINE : PS Goals PS Goals PrimEx Experience PrimEx Experience Design Details Design.
Meson Productions for Target System with GA/HG Jet and IDS120h Configuration X. Ding (Presenter), D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J.S. Berg, BNL Muon Accelerator.
23 July 2012D. Sober1 Some thoughts on Hall D tagger magnet field mapping D. Sober Catholic University of America GlueX Beam/Tagger biweekly meeting 23.
Bisect an Angle links: file:///Users/dboarman/Deskto p/Bisect%20an%20angle/bise ctangle.html file:///Users/dboarman/Deskto p/Bisect%20an%20angle/bise ctangle.html.
Coatbridge High School Tangency 2 Lines A Curve Tangential to 2 Lines Draw two arcs with the centre on the lines Draw two lines parallel to the other.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 IPR October 18-20, 2011 John J. LeRose Independent Project Review of 12 GeV Upgrade Jefferson Lab.
Standard: M8A3 c. Distinguish between relations that are functions and those that are not functions. Relations and Functions.
ION COMMISSIONING REVISITED 1 Thanks to: John Jowett, Walter Venturini. Matteo Solfaroli.
Magnet Measurement for the Hall A Compton Dipole Ken Baggett
Transversity Readiness and Timeline Xiaodong Jiang, March 17th, This document specifies the overall readiness for Hall A experiments E06-010/E
Measuring the Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 Timothy Holmstrom College of William and Mary For the Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration.
How to …… Bisect an angle.. What? ‘Bisect’ means to cut exactly in half. If you bisect an angle, you get two equal angles e.g. if you bisect a 60° angle.
The PrimEx-I Beam line. A. GasparianPrimEx-II Beam Line, August 5, MC Results for the PrimEx-I configuration Beam Background on HyCal: Energy Distribution.
Hall A Installation Review John J. LeRose 2/25/2009.
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
The PrimEx-I Beam line. A. GasparianPrimEx-II Beam Line, August 5, MC Results for the PrimEx-I configuration Beam Background on HyCal: Energy Distribution.
1 Software Meeting Akiya Miyamoto KEK 17 May 2006.
MICE Tracker Software A. Dobbs CM32 9 th Feb 2012.
VERY PRELIMINARY SURVEY OF MAGNET AXES OF USS – FC – DSS 26 March 2015 V. Blackmore & J. Cobb Everything that follows must be regarded as very preliminary.
JRA1 PCMAG field mapping Elements of the work: Hall sensors: improvements and production Calibration of Hall sensor cards Mechanical mapping device Installation.
Energy Security Some global perspectives using WORLDMAPPER
How a topographical map is made.
Re-mapping the Residual B-Field in NA62
HERD Prototype Beam Test
Product Training Program
The PrimEx-I Beam line.
Multiples and Factors Unit 2.
Hire Toyota Innova in Delhi for Outstation Tour
MDL0L02 Dipole and Environmental Fields
Localization by RFID ref:
MDL0L02 Dipole Field Offset
Localization by RFID ref:
Lettering on Maps (Type)
MapReduce Algorithm Design
إعداد المشرفة التربوية نجلاء الجارد
Fix Garmin GPS Map Update Error
… continue with realistic particle
MDL0L02 Dipole Hysteresis Loop Study
Hall C – this week Time Period Plans 10/24-10/27 Target cool down
Global aperture measurements at 450 GeV with 170 mrad crossing angle
Multiples and Factors.
Crossing angle and polarity first aid
NPS Sweep Magnet Field-Mapping
Overview of Polarized 3He Target
Research algorithm of overlapping clusters in PrimEx
Relations and Functions
Exponents is repeated multiplication!!!
HALLA APEL REPORT Yves Roblin Hall A colllaboration Meeting
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
The Feasibility of Using RHIC Magnets for MEIC and Cost Impact
Group 9 Andrew White Ryan Hamdorff Jimmy Psihogios
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Presentation transcript:

Hall A 11 GeV Arc Energy Mapping

Mapper in shed = “fixed” NMR to measure B 0 Mapper measures ∫Bdl and B 0 In this configuration the mapper and “fixed” NMR are cross calibrated Step 1

Mapper in shed Step 2 ∫Bdl 1 vs. B 09

Mapper in shed Step 3 ∫Bdl 2 vs. B 09

Mapper in shed Step 4 ∫Bdl 3 vs. B 09

Etc.

Mapper in shed Step 9 ∫Bdl 8 vs. B 09

Mapper in shed Step 10 (repeat step 1)

∫Bdl i vs. B 09 i=1,2,3…8 In the end we have: