Alternative Feeds for Beef Cattle Dr. Matt Poore Extension Ruminant Nutritionist North Carolina State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Essential Nutrients and Feedstuffs
Advertisements

BYPRODUCT FEEDS FROM GRAIN PROCESSING Pages
PREMIUM ANIMAL NUTRITION
Ridley Block Operations
What is the Future of Feed Management? Or Life After the “P” Project C. C. Stallings Professor and Extension Dairy Scientist.
Horse Nutrition Bob Coleman Ph. D. PAS Extension Horse Specialist.
The Jaylor Advantage Dr. Alan S. Vaage Ph.D. Ruminant Nutritionist.
Lambs from Birth to Harvest Feeding and Managing
Dr. Mary Drewnoski.  US agriculture production oriented  More is better! Right?  Focus on making profitable decisions  Increasing profit ◦ Increase.
The Basics Livestock managers work hard to balance the nutritional needs of livestock and the cost of feed. Improper feeding can keep an animal from gaining.
1-800-CIRCLE-Awww.circlearanch.com Circle A Feeders develops all their cattle under roof to protect them from environmental stressors. The feeding facility.
Practical feeding of finishing cattle
Silage and Haylage: facing new economic realities Stan Smith Fairfield County, OSU Extension.
By C Kohn, Department of Agricultural Sciences Waterford, WI
RICH PORTER PORTER FARMS WET DISTILLERS. STARTING CALVES.
Fall Feeder Cattle Marketing Options ANR Update October 10, 2013 Kevin Laurent UK Animal Sciences.
Feeding Show Lambs Jim Sprinkle Area Extension Agent, Animal Sciences University of Arizona.
Management and Supplementation Strategies to Improve Reproduction of Beef Cattle on Fescue John B. Hall Extension Beef Specialist Virginia Tech.
FEEDING ANIMALS AGRISCIENCE/TECHNOLOGY Modified by Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office July, 2002.
Evaluation of Conventional vs. Grass Fed Beef Production G. C. Duff Department of Animal Sciences The University of Arizona, Tucson July 29, 2009.
1 Performance Modifiers. 2 The Problem After the realization that animals had a need for protein supplementation the livestock industry was still trying.
Unit 9: Dairy Cattle Feeding
Livestock Feeding Practices By: Mariah Gumfory, Arlene Barrett, Haley Vrazel, & Dennis Bratton.
ENERGY SUPPLEMENTS pp Fats and Oils Types –Animal fats Types –Choice white grease –Beef tallow –Poultry fat –Fish oil Characteristics –Saturation.
Winter Feeding a Cow for $200 UW Extension State-wide Beef Cow-calf Days Medford By: Keith Vander Velde UW Extension Seven County Agriculture Specialization.
Production Costs Hints UW Extension Livestock Team Statewide Cow/Calf Seminars 2008.
Teacher:prof.Ing. Bohuslav Čermák,CSc
Maintaining U.S. Beef Industry Competitiveness with High-Priced Grain Derrell S. Peel Breedlove Professor of Agribusiness And Livestock Marketing Specialist.
1 Supplementation of Low Quality Forages Norman Suverly WSU Okanogan County Extension Educator.
Beef Cattle Nutrition Feeder and Stocker Cattle. Market Beef Lifecycle Age of animal, months Weaning Birth GrowingFinishing 06-7 Stocker and.
Cow-Calf Operations Its all about BEEF!. Advantages Forage is cheaper than feed. Less labor requirements. Low death loss. Adapt well. Good demand for.
Animal Science II Principles of Animal Nutrition.
1 Production of Meat Animals (95412) Topic 7: Feeding growing and finishing beef cattle Dr Jihad Abdallah Department of Animal Production An-najah National.
USING A TEST HAY FOR FEEDING LIVESTOCK Shelby J. Filley Regional Livestock & Forage Specialist Proper nutrition at a lower cost.
Unit 14: Explore animal nutrition and digestion in relation to livestock and poultry management Determine nutritional requirements for livestock and poultry.
Feeding During a Drought Johnny Rossi Extension Animal Scientist – Tifton.
Pasture-Based Nutrition Considerations for Beef Cattle Lawton Stewart Extension Animal Scientist April 15, 2009.
MANAGING Tough Times Feeding Strategies for Coping with High Commodity Prices Dan Loy Iowa State University.
Pasture-Based Nutritional Considerations for Beef Cattle Lawton Stewart Grazing School September, 2010.
Nutrient Composition, Use and Limitations of Commonly Available Feedstuffs.
Feeding Dried Distillers Grains to Hogs Ron Plain, University of Missouri.
Part II: Conserving Forage Dennis Hancock Extension Forage Agronomist Crop and Soil Sciences Dennis Hancock Extension Forage Agronomist Crop and Soil Sciences.
After Wildfire - Beef Cattle Management MSU photo Authors: John Paterson, Montana State University; Greg Lardy, North Dakota State University; Rick Funston,
Quantity and Quality Lawton Stewart - Extension Beef Specialist The University of Georgia Lawton Stewart - Extension Beef Specialist The University of.
Forage Quality I: Nutritional Quality Lawton Stewart SE Hay Convention March 29, 2011.
Nutrition and Reproduction in Beef Cows Cattlemen’s College January 29, 2003 David Lalman Oklahoma State University.
Animal Nutrition & Feeding
Forage Analysis For Beef Cattle: Why, How, and So What Dr. Matt Hersom Dept. of Animal Sciences.
Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle - MP 391 Overview.
SUMMER SUPPLEMENTATION: PLANT AND ANIMAL RESPONSE – A KANSAS PERSPECTIVE Lyle Lomas and Joe Moyer KSU SE Agricultural Research Center Parsons.
Developmental Stages of Lambs
Objective Explain nutritional requirements for livestock and poultry breeds found in North Carolina.
Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle
Segregating herds based on animal class and nutritional need Lawton Stewart Grazing School September 22, 2011.
Winter Supplementation Utilizing Co-Products as a Supplement on Winter Range and Crop Residue Systems Aaron Stalker University of Nebraska.
Know how. Know now. Jerry D. Volesky Walter H. Schacht University of Nebraska-Lincoln Ethanol CoProduct Conference Grazing Management when Supplementing.
Pasture-Based Nutritional Considerations for Beef Cattle Lawton Stewart Grazing School May 6, 2010.
Nutrient Requirements of Horses Presentation Part 3: Protein #8895-C.
Heifer Development OSU Beef Team Growing Phase Lesson 4.
Animal, Plant & Soil Science Lesson C3-1 Nutrients and Their Importance to Animals.
Supplementing Feed to Grazing Cattle Dallas Mount Platte County Extension Educator.
Factors affecting performance and economic traits of intensively managed beef cattle in Italy G. Cesaro, M. Berton, L. Gallo, E. Sturaro
Feeding Dairy Cattle Chapter 41.
Strategies for Extending Your Hay Supply
ALTERNATIVE FEEDS FOR CATTLE
Unit F: Principles of Animal Nutrition
Cow-Calf Operations Its all about BEEF! From foukeffa.org
Comparing Feeds How do you choose?
Livestock Feeding Practices
Cow-Calf Operations Its all about BEEF! From foukeffa.org
Presentation transcript:

Alternative Feeds for Beef Cattle Dr. Matt Poore Extension Ruminant Nutritionist North Carolina State University

Forages are the most efficient feed we have for growing cattle, or cow/calf! Alternative feeds should supplement a good forage program

What is an Alternative Feed? u A non-traditional source of energy or protein generally to reduce feed cost u NCBA SPA database indicates that feed accounts for over 50% of total costs, in 1992 total cow cost was $390 and feed was $185

Two Basic Types of Byproduct-Based Backgrounding Programs u Small cow/calf producers backgrounding calves after weaning, or producers with small numbers of stockers u Forage-Based Programs u Single Commodity Supplementation Programs u Mid to large sized commercial backgrounders u Feedlot Programs with Total Mixed Rations u Commodity Sheds with Complex Blends of Byproducts

Example of how an alternative feed can impact feed cost u Example. Compare feeding a 14% CP commercial supplement to soybean hulls u Commercial concentrate at $150/ton, soybean hulls at $85/ton, mineral at $500/ton, hay at $60/ton. u 84 day feeding, 2.18 lb/day gain u Gain valued at $.50/lb u Actual data from UMRS, Laurel Springs

Influence of Concentrate Source (6 lb/d) on Performance of Stocker Calves 1 1 Calves were fed for 84 days on hay and 6 lb of concentrate at the Upper Mountain Research Station, Laurel Springs, NC

Feed Costs for Backgrounding Cattle Fed Soybean Hulls or a Commercial Concentrate Feed amountsCommSoyhulls 6 lb concentrate $.45 $ lb hay $.53 $ lb mineral $.06 $.06 Total $/day $1.04 $.85 Total $/84 days $87.36 $71.40 Gross Return $92.40 $92.40 Return over Feed $ 5 $ 21

Classification of Alternative Feeds u Co-products u Have attained primary ingredient value. Soybean meal, cottonseed meal. u Byproducts u Great potential. Some factors may limit their use. Underutilized. Soybean hulls, corn gluten feed. u Waste products u Certain factors greatly limit their usefulness. Broiler litter, cotton waste, potato waste.

Factors Affecting Usefulness of Alternative Feeds u Moisture Content u Nutrient Density u Local Availability u Seasonal Availability u Limited Inclusion Rate u Handling/Processing/Storage u Health Side Effects u Public Perception

Common Alternative Feeds in NC u Soybean Hulls - Seed coat, high in digestible fiber, good source of energy and protein u Wheat Middlings - Byproduct of flour production, good source of energy and protein u Corn Gluten Feed - Wet is better than dry, results with dry are sometimes disappointing u Whole Cottonseed - Good source of energy (fat) and protein, Gossypol limits use rate u Grain Screenings - Quite variable, may contain mycotoxins and weed seeds u Recycled Poultry Bedding (RPB) - Formerly known as “litter”. Low in energy, high in CP (1/2 from NPN) and minerals

Example of a Mixed Byproduct Backgrounding Ration 1 ___________________________________ 1 This diet has consistently given 2.5 to 2.9 ADG over 56 days

Simple shed for storing byproduct commodities

Many studies at NCSU and elsewhere have shown that soybean hulls, wheat middlings and corn gluten feed are equal or nearly equal to corn and soybean meal, or commercial feeds, when fed at 4-6 lbs/head daily, along with pasture or hay and a good mineral.

Recently we have been working with self-feeding programs utilizing byproducts. Soybean hulls seem very well suited to this use. Growing cattle will eat lb of soybean hulls out of a self-feeder plus hay or pasture, and will gain between 2 and 3 lbs/day

Whole Cottonseed is a Great Supplement for Brood Cows u Whole cottonseed is very economical when purchased in October and November in North Carolina u The high level of protein and fat make it an ideal brood cow supplement u It can be fed off the sod, in bunks or on unrolled hay u Feeding cottonseed (or any fat source) before calving for days improves calf vigor and cow reproduction

Cautions When Feeding Whole Cottonseed u Observe daily feeding limits. u Cows 0.5% of body weight (6 lbs for a 1200 lb cow) u Calves 0.33% of body weight (2 lbs for a 600 lb calf) u Spread out so all can eat at once u Don’t feed to bulls except when they are with cows during the breeding season (because of the toxin gossypol). u Feed every other day to brood cows works, but not more than 10 lb/cow/feeding

Storing Whole Cottonseed u Store under an open shed u Don’t cover with plastic because it will sweat u Don’t put it on plastic either. Concrete is ideal, but if floor of shed is dirt, then put down a layer of hay or straw. u If kept dry it will last at least one year in storage. Carrying over from one year to the next seems to work ok.

Any shed where you can back in a tractor trailer is a potential place to store whole cottonseed or other byproduct feed

Cottonseed can be fed out of bunks, off sod, or as shown here on top of hay that has been unrolled

Safety of RPB? Is It An Issue? u Animal health issues u Copper toxicity u Hardware u Salmonella and other pathogens? u Public concerns u Heavy metals in food supply u Potential for pathogen contamination of meat supply u Others? u Over the many years broiler litter has been fed there have been few if any incidents that warrant banning RPB as a feed ingredient

Influence of RPB Stacking Method on Performance and Salmonella Shedding in Beef Calves u Calves were fed a control ration or RPB-based diets with or without monensin u RPB was from houses that tested positive for Salmonella u Stacking was either deep (normal heat) or shallow (insufficient heat) u Backgrounding diets fed for 84 days, then cattle were finished u Fecal samples were taken every 2 weeks up until slaughter

Conclusions u RPB was Salmonella positive at cleanout and when it arrived at the research station, but was negative after stacking by either method u Deep-stacking RPB improved gain and intake u No Salmonella shedding was found throughout the backgrounding and finishing phase u RPB had no negative impact on finishing performance or carcass characteristics

Future Work with Alternative Feeds u Further determination of the realized value of underutilized byproducts, and developing strategies to get more out of poorly performing products u Manufacturing value-added ingredients from various waste and byproducts common in the region u Improving public acceptance, especially of waste products as feed ingredients

Summary u Alternative feeds have great potential to reduce feed costs for producers in the Mid-Atlantic region u Increased management is almost always necessary to make alternative feed programs work u Byproducts can be used in very simple, one ingredient applications or in complex multi-ingredient rations