August 2007 Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment: Legislation and Recent Changes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using the B-BBEE legislation to access Enterprise Development funding.
Advertisements

PRESENTATION ON THE KZN PROVINCIAL PERSPECTIVE ON B-BBEE IMPLEMENTATION SMME/B-BBEE CONFERENCE DURBAN, ICC 31 August 2010.
Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Keith Levenstein Presented by EconoBEE November 2009.
1. 2 WELCOME 3 Table of contents  Welcome  Salient features  Sustainability achievements  Financial review  Strategy ›Short-term challenges and.
BBBEE STRATEGY. OBJECTIVES OF BEE OBJECTIVES OF BEE..... (cont)  To promote economic transformation to enable meaningful participation of black people.
B-BBEE VERIFICATION FRAMEWORK.  The BEE Verification process evolved since the release of the B- BBEE strategy in 2003  The dti was requested to provide.
Black Economic Empowerment Presentation by Dijon de Jager.
AMENDED CODES OF GOOD PRACTICE
BROAD-BASED BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT KWAZULU-NATAL 2010 SIXTUS SIBETA.
1 FRAMEWORK FOR MEASURING BROAD-BASED BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT CODES OF GOOD PRACTICE FOR B-BBEE.
Enterprise development from a BEE perspective Badian Maasdorp.
B.B.B.E.E IS THE WAY FORWARD….  BEE has been on the agenda of government since The detail for implementation is to be found in Codes of good Practice.
Summary of Revised BEE Codes of Good Practice and Key Implications Substantial changes are suggested in the Revised Codes, which will require companies.
FOREST SECTOR CHARTER COUNCIL B-BBEE Progress Report to the Portfolio Committee of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 23 JUNE 2015 Mr Simangaliso Mkhwanazi.
TRANSFORMATION the Key to the future Portfolio Committee on
Thabo Masombuka Chief Executive Officer (CE0) CSCC TRANSFORMATION TRENDS IN THE CONSTRUCTION SECTOR 30 July 2014.
The New B-BBEE Codes – What they mean for business Presenter: Anton de Wet CA(SA) Specialist B-BBEE Auditor and Trainer.
THE CODES OF GOOD PRACTICE FOR BROAD – BASED BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT & PREFERENTIAL PROCUREMENT CODE 500 – STATEMENT 500.
Market Institutions and the future course of the SA Property Market ( Prof) Francois Viruly School of construction Economics and Management – Johannesburg.
Thabo Masombuka Chief Executive Officer (CE0) CSCC TRANSFORMATION TRENDS IN THE CONSTRUCTION SECTOR 13 August 2014.
1 The Code of Good Practice on Black Economic Empowerment.
ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT THROUGH EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP: EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP CONFERENCE 24 – 25 JULY 2012 Tendani Nelwamondo Senior Socio-Economic Development.
ROAD FREIGHT CHARTER B-BBEE SCORECARD Presenter: Sibongile Zikalala.
Overview of the Charter November WhiteBlackWomen Men 90% 6% 94% 10%
CONSTRUCTION SECTOR CHARTER COUNCIL PRESENTED TO DPW PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE BY DDG: POLICY (MS L. BICI) 1 AUGUST 2012.
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES AGRIBEE CHARTER COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN AND BUDGET FOR 3 YEARS 2015/16 –
Rural and Community Development Africa Indaba July 2015 Rural Development as a means to achieve Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment.
Transformation in the financial sector: 2005 Financial Sector Charter Council Portfolio Committee on Finance 15 November 2006.
1 Presentation on AgriBEE Charter. 2 Agenda Achieving Broad-based BEE Ownership Statement 100 Consolidation of Economic Control through Management Statement.
REVIEW OF PETROLEUM AND LIQUID FUELS CHARTER 2 November 2000 – August 2010.
AgriBEE INDABA 6 Dec 2005 Proposal for an AgriBEE Charter.
THE CODES OF GOOD PRACTICE FOR BROAD – BASED BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT OWNERSHIP CODE 100 – STATEMENT 100, 102 AND 103.
1. 2 tSince 1994 BEE has been a major thrust of all government policies but there was no coherent strategy towards the implementation of BEE tThe BEE.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Trade and Industry on the Amended B-BBEE Codes of Good Practice 9 JUNE 2015.
BROAD-BASED BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT PRESENTATION FOR EMERGING-CONTRACTORS CONFERENCE MAY 2010 SIXTUS SIBETA.
Presentation to Portfolio Committee on Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries Embracing Change 14 June 2011.
07 December 2010 FINANCIAL SECTOR CODE. 07 December 2010 Agenda  Where are we in the gazetting process?  Who does it apply to?  What has changed?
Amended Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Codes of Good Practice 2013 PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON TRADE & INDUSTRY 20 FEBRUARY 2013.
BROAD BASED BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT AND THE CODES OF GOOD PRACTICE PHASE 1 & 2 VENUE: CAPE TOWN -PARLIAMENT DATE: 07 March 2006.
THE CODES OF GOOD PRACTICE FOR BROAD – BASED BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT QUALIFYING SMALL ENTERPRISE SCORECARD CODE 800 STATEMENT
AMENDED BROAD -BASED BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT CODES OF GOOD PRACTICE NOVEMBER 2012.
1231 DEPARTMENT OF MINERAL RESOURCES 1232 MINING CHARTER.
Forest Sector Charter Council Forest Sector Charter scorecard Vs Generic scorecard.
B-BBEE CODES OF GOOD PRACTICE 30 OCTOBER Presentation Layout Introduction B-BBEE Codes of Good Practice Way forward 2.
1 Transformation in the Petroleum Industry – The Journey Presentation to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee for Minerals and Energy 10 MAY 2007 Prepared.
1 BROAD BASED BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT ACT 53 of 2003 Assented to 1 January 2004 Commencement – to be proclaimed.
FINANCIAL SECTOR CHARTER September 2007 presented by Leila Moonda.
BRIEFING BY THE NATIONAL DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM ON THE AMENDED TOURISM B-BBEE SECTOR CODE Portfolio Committee on Tourism 20 May 2016.
INTRODUCTION AND IMPLEMENTATION ON THE CODES OF GOOD PRACTICE FOR BROAD – BASED BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT.
New BEE Codes 2014 How will the new codes impact your business?
Presentation to Parliament’s Standing
B-BBEE Codes of Practice Presented by: Prakash Singh
SAIMM Mining Charter III presentation presented by: Otsile Matlou
Purpose To introduce the amendments to the BBBEE Codes of Good Practice, published in the Government Gazette on 11 October 2013, implemented May 2015.
Inclusive B-BBEE Skills Development Strategies
The New B-BBEE Codes – What they mean for business Presenter: Anton de Wet CA(SA) Specialist B-BBEE Auditor and Trainer.
BRIEFING BY THE NATIONAL DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM ON INTERVENTIONS TO ACCELERATE TRANSFORMATION Select Committee on Trade and International Relations 21.
AMENDED CODES OF GOOD PRACTICE BROAD-BASED BLACK ECONOMIC EMPWERMENT
Scorecard.
B-BBEE Presentation to Technical Review Committee
REVIEWED BROAD-BASED BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT CHARTER FOR THE SOUTH AFRICAN MINING AND MINERALS INDUSTRY, 2016 ("MINING CHARTER 3") PRESENTATION PREPARED.
THE CODES OF GOOD PRACTICE FOR BROAD – BASED BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT FRAMEWORK FOR MEASURING BROAD-BASED BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT.
Amended B-BBEE Codes of Good Practice
Presented ON BEHALF OF Thabo Masombuka (Mr) Chief Executive (CSCC)
The BHF Southern African Conference July’07 Sun City
TRANSFORMATION PROGRESS IN THE (BLACK MANAGEMENT FORUM- BMF )
The Code of Good Practice on Black Economic Empowerment
HRD Presentation BEE UNIT 14TH SEPTEMBER 2007.
ARMSCOR BEE PRACTICE Presented by Minah Sindane-Bloem Acting General Manager Corporate Affairs To The Portfolio Committee on Defence August.
PRESENTATION TO JOINT MEETING OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE &
Presentation transcript:

August 2007 Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment: Legislation and Recent Changes

What is BEE? B lack E conomic E mpowerment: Furthering the economic interests of Black people Black = African, Coloured or Indian persons, born in SA, a citizen by descent or became a citizen by naturalisation before 27 April ’94 or can demonstrate that they were unable to obtain citizenship by naturalisation under Apartheid

History of BEE Black Political Empowerment 1990 – Mandela released 1994 – Elections 1995 – Labour Relations Act 1997 – Basic Conditions of Employment Act 1998 – Skills Development Act 1998 – Employment Equity Act 2000 – Preferential Procurement Framework Act 2003 – Black Economic Empowerment Act

History of BEE Black Economic Empowerment 1990s – BEE Equity deals Focus on ownership Creation of Black elite 1998 – BEE Commission appointed 2001 – BEE Commission report 2002 – First Charters 2003 – Broad Based BEE Strategy Document 2003 – BEE Act 1994 ~90% of assets White owned 2004 ~90% of assets White owned

BEE Act Establish BEE Advisory Council Strategy for BEE Codes of Good Practice for BEE  Balanced Scorecard Transformation Charters  Section 12 – Sector Charters  Section 9 – Sector Codes

How is BEE Enforced? BEE Scorecard 1. Ownership 2. Management 3. Employment Equity 4. Skills Development 5. Preferential Procurement 6. Enterprise Development 7. Socio-economic Development

How is BEE Enforced? Scorecard varies by entity size  Generic More than R35 million turnover per annum  Qualifying Small Enterprises (QSE)‏ R5 million to R35 million per annum  Exempted Micro Enterprises (EME)‏ Less than R5 million NO SCORECARD!

Scorecard Weightings: How is BEE Enforced? 100*100TOTAL 255 pointsSocio-economic Development 2515 pointsEnterprise Development 2520 pointsPreferential Procurement 2515 pointsSkills Development 2515 pointsEmployment Equity 2510 pointsManagement 2520 pointsOwnership QSEGenericElement *QSEs elect 4 of the 7 elements in which to score

How is BEE Enforced? Verification Agency BEE Verification – score  Score is broken into levels: Level One: 100 or higher Level Two: From 85 to 100 Level…….. Non compliant: <30 National Empowerment Database (DTI)‏ Measured every 12 months

How is BEE Enforced? Public Sector:  BEE score incorporated in tender score  Minimum tender requirement  Concessions and Licences  Sale of state owned assets  Public Private Partnerships  Criteria for Rebates and Grants

How is BEE Enforced? Private Sector:  Your score counts towards your customer’s score  Your supplier’s score counts towards your score

How is BEE Enforced? LowHighNon- compliant BEE Score 2 days delivery 5 days delivery Service Same brand of paperQuality R35/ream R40/reamPrice Supplier CSupplier BSupplier A Differentiating Factor Most likely choice

How is BEE Enforced? BEE not a compliance issue…… ……..it is a competitiveness issue.

Think of the scorecard as a test….  Question 1: Ownership Counts 20 marks out of 100  Question 2: Management Counts 10 marks out of 100 And so on……… The BEE Scorecard

25%+13Black voting rights 2.5%1Economic interest of Black designated groups; participants in Employee Ownership Schemes; beneficiaries of Broad-based Ownership Schemes; participants in co-operatives 10%2Economic interest of Black women 25%4Black economic interest 10%2Voting rights of Black women TargetWeight (Points)‏ Indicator Generic Scorecard: 1. Ownership

20TOTAL Bonus Points 10%2Black New Entrants 10%1Black participants in: Employee Ownership Schemes; Broad-based Ownership Schemes or Co- operatives Complete1Ownership fulfilment 23TOTAL Increasing7Net Value TargetWeight (Points)‏ Indicator Generic Scorecard continued :

1. Ownership QSE Scorecard 10%2 Ownership by Black Women Bonus Points: 10%1 Employee Ownership Schemes, Co-operatives or Broad-based Ownership Schemes Complete1Ownership fulfillment 25%+16Black voting rights 25TOTAL Increasing9Net Value 25%9Black economic interest TargetWeight (Points)‏ Indicator

1. Ownership Net Value & 45 & 67 & 89 & 10 Year Net Value Target %

1. Ownership Always trace back to a natural person. Flow-through Principle Trust Company A Company B Measured Company 90% 65% 26% Black Person 90% x 90% x 65% x 26% = 13.7% (90%) ‏ (81%) ‏ (52.7%) ‏

1. Ownership Modified Flow-through Principle Trust Company A Company B Measured Company 90% 65% 26% Black Person 90% x 90% x 100% x 26% = 21.1% One company in a chain may be considered 100% Black owned if its ownership is measured >50% using the Flow-through Principle. (90%) ‏ (81%) ‏ (52.7%) ‏

1. Ownership Exclusion Principle Trust Company A Company B Measured Company 90% 65% 26% Black Person Ownership by an Organ of State is excluded from the calculations (90%) ‏ (81%) ‏ (52.7%) ‏ 23% Organ of State 90% x 90% x 100% x 26% = 21.1% 21.1% / (100% - 23%) = 27.4%

Bob sells 20% of his shares in Bob’s Farms to a black consortium Zola(45) and Thandi(32) are the members of the consortium each with a 50% share Consortium pays for half their shares up front Remainder to be paid from their share of future dividends The shares have full voting rights Ownership – Example: 1. Ownership

Black voting rights: Target = 25% + 1 vote Achieved = 20% Weighting = 3 (marks)‏ Score = 20/25 x 3 = Ownership Ownership – Example:

Voting rights of Black women: Target = 10% Achieved = 10% Weighting = 2 (marks)‏ Score = 10/10 x 2 = 2 1. Ownership Ownership – Example:

No Complete 01Ownership fulfilment 20% 10% 20% 10% 20% Achieved Score 25%+13Black voting rights 20TOTAL 25%7Net Value 2.5%1Economic interest of Black designated groups 10%2Economic interest of Black women 25%4Black economic interest 10%2Voting rights of Black women TargetWeightIndicator 1. Ownership

Multinationals  Recognition of Equity Equivalents  Criteria: Own and control entire entity Ownership subject to global practice Can do either equity equivalent or equity sale, but not both.

1. Ownership Multinationals  Equity Equivalents include: Approved Public Programme Contribute 25% of value of local operation OR 4% or local turnover for 10 years

1. Ownership Organs of State, Public Entities, Section 21 and Companies Limited by Guarantee  Ownership omitted  Score on an Adjusted Scorecard

1. Ownership “Once empowered always empowered”  Exiting black shareholders  Hold shares for minimum of 3 years  Period for which points are allocated limited to the length of time the shares were held  Cannot contribute more than 40% (8 points) on the Ownership scorecard

Generic Scorecard 2. Management 40%1Bonus point: Black independent non- executive board members 40%2Black other top management* 50%3Black board member voting rights* 10TOTAL 40%3Black senior top management* 50%2Black Executive Directors* TargetWeight (Points)‏ Indicator * Using adjusted recognition for gender

2. Management Adjusted Recognition for Gender: Black % Black Women % 2 + Where the Black Women % is limited to half of the target

2. Management Adjusted Recognition for Gender  Say 2 out of 10 people in Other Top Management are black men:  Say 2 out of 10 people in Other Top Management are black women: 20% (black)‏ 0% (black women)‏ % = 20% (black)‏ 20% (black women)‏ % =

2. Management QSE Scorecard 25%2 Bonus points: Black women representation at Top Manager level 50.1%25Black representation at Top Management Level 25TOTAL TargetWeight (Points)‏ Indicator

Generic Scorecard 3. Employment Equity 15TOTAL Yr 6-10Yr % 75% 60% 3%2%2Black people with disabilities* 3Bonus points for meeting or exceeding the EAP targets in each category above. 68%4Black Junior Management* 63%4Black Middle Management* 43%5Black Senior Management* TargetWeight (Points)‏ Indicator * Using adjusted recognition for gender

3. Employment Equity QSE Scorecard 25TOTAL Bonus points for meeting or exceeding the EAP targets in each category above. Yr 6-10Yr % 60%40%15Black representation in all Management* 60%10Black employees as a percentage of all employees* TargetWeight (Points)‏ Indicator * Using adjusted recognition for gender

Generic Scorecard 15TOTAL 5%6Adjusted* number of black employees participating in Learning Programmes as a percentage of total employees 0.3%3Adjusted* spend on skills development for black disabled as percentage of Leviable Amount 3%6Adjusted* spend on Black skills development as percentage of Leviable Amount TargetWeight (Points)‏ Indicator 4. Skills Development * Using adjusted recognition for gender

4. Skills Development QSE Scorecard 25TOTAL 2%25Adjusted* Skills Development Spend on Learning Programmes for black employees as a percentage of Leviable Amount TargetWeight (Points)‏ Indicator * Using adjusted recognition for gender

Generic Scorecard 5. Preferential Procurement *TMPS – Total Measured Procurement Spend Yr 6-10Yr % 15% 70%50%12BEE Procurement Spend from suppliers as percentage TMPS* 20TOTAL 15%5BEE Procurement Spend from 50% Black owned or 30% Black women owned suppliers as percentage TMPS* 10%3BEE Procurement Spend from QSE or EME suppliers as percentage TMPS* TargetWeight (Points)‏ Indicator

5. Preferential Procurement 0Non-compliant< Level 830 – Level 740 – Level 645 – Level 555 – Level 465 – Level 375 – Level 285 – Level Recognition LevelBEE StatusBEE Score BEE Recognition Levels:

5. Preferential Procurement Overall BEE Procurement Spend:R610 / R1000 = 61% R610R1000TOTAL R50.1L8R50D R3300.6L6R550C R1250.5L7R250B R1501.0L4R150A BEE SpendRecognition Level BEE Level Actual Spend Supplier Calculating a Preferential Procurement Score: X=

QSE Scorecard 5. Preferential Procurement Yr 6-10Yr %40%25BEE Procurement Spend from all Suppliers based on the BEE Procurement Recognition Levels as a percentage of Total Measured Procurement Spend 25TOTAL TargetWeight (Points)‏ Indicator

5. Preferential Procurement Inclusions  Operational expenses, cost of sales and capital expenditure  Procurement from monopolistic suppliers  Third-party procurement recorded in your books  Labour brokers and independent contractors  Pensions and medical aid – the admin related fee, not the investment

5. Preferential Procurement Inclusions  External commissions – ie. Not paid to employees  Costs related to facilitating BEE contributions – Enterprise & Socio-economic Development  Intra group expenses  Bodies listed in Schedules 2 & 3 of the PFMA  Imports (certain exclusions can be made)‏

5. Preferential Procurement Exclusions  Taxes or levies  Organ of state or public entity with regulated monopoly  Bodies listed in Schedule 1 of PFMA  Salaries and wages  Pass through third party procurement where it is not recorded in your books  Investments in or loans to an Associated Enterprise

5. Preferential Procurement Exclusions  Investments, loans or donations made for Enterprise Development and Socio-economic Development  Imports: Capital goods or components for value-adding in South Africa provided that there is no existing local equivalent Or one can differentiate local from imported on the basis of brand or technical specifications

Generic Scorecard 3% of net profit after tax 15Average annual value of all Enterprise Development Contributions and Sector Specific Programmes made by the measured entity as a percentage of the target. 15TOTAL TargetWeight (Points)‏ Indicator 6. Enterprise Development NOTE: Contributions are measured cumulatively from the Commencement Date (9 Feb 2007) or an Inception Date chosen by the Measured Entity

6. Enterprise Development QSE Scorecard 2% of net profit after tax 25Average annual value of all Enterprise Development Contributions and Sector Specific Programmes made by the measured entity as a percentage of the target. 25TOTAL TargetWeight (Points)‏ Indicator NOTE: Contributions are measured cumulatively from the Commencement Date (9 Feb 2007) or an Inception Date chosen by the Measured Entity

6. Enterprise Development What if I make a loss?  If a loss was made in last financial year or on average for last 5 years  OR NPAT was less than ¼ industry norm in last financial year  Then take last year when profit was greater than ¼ industry norm and multiply profit margin for that year by turnover for last financial year to get deemed net profit

6. Enterprise Development What counts?  Grants, discounts and donations – 100%  Overhead costs – 80%  Loans: Interest free, no security – 100% Standard loan to QSE or EME – 70% Standard loan to other beneficiaries – 60% Guarantee – 3% Lower interest rate: Prime - Actual

6. Enterprise Development What counts?  Equity Investments Minority stake in EME or QSE – 100% Minority stake in other beneficiary – 80% Investment with lower interest to financier: Ordinary dividend rate – Actual dividend rate  HR Capacity Free professional services – 80% Discounted professional services – 80% Employees time – Salary / 160 = hourly rate

6. Enterprise Development What counts?  Shorter payment periods Percentage of invoice Percentage = 15 days less time from invoice to payment Shorter period no longer than 10 days

Generic Scorecard 7. Socio-economic Development 1% of net profit after tax 5Average annual value of all Socio- economic Contributions made by the Measured Entity as a percentage of the target 5TOTAL TargetWeight (Points)‏ Indicator NOTE: Contributions are measured cumulatively from the Commencement Date (9 Feb 2007) or an Inception Date chosen by the Measured Entity

7. Socio-economic Development QSE Scorecard 1% of net profit after tax 25Average annual value of all Socio- economic Contributions made by the Measured Entity as a percentage of the target 25TOTAL TargetWeight (Marks)‏ Indicator NOTE: Contributions are measured cumulatively from the Commencement Date (9 Feb 2007) or an Inception Date chosen by the Measured Entity

7. Socio-economic Development Qualifying Beneficiaries:  Black people  Organisations where 75% of benefit flows to black people  Where the benefit is less than 75% it counts pro- rata

7. Socio-economic Development What counts?  Grants, discounts and donations – 100%  Overhead costs – 80%  HR Capacity Free professional services – 80% Discounted professional services – 80% Employees time – Salary / 160 = hourly rate

BEE Charters Status of Charters  Generic Codes take precedence  Development of Sector Charters  Not binding on the State  Only Sector Codes have equal status  No gazetted Sector Codes yet

Accountancy Charter Fundamental Principle:  To be gazetted as Sector Charter & Code Stick to the generic code and make slight deviations to the interpretations so as to be suitable to the accounting profession.  Inclusive process with diverse stakeholders  Finalise process in July 2007

Financial Services Charter Significant differences  FSC is a sector charter NOT a sector code and Generic Codes take precedence  Applies to banks, insurance companies, pension funds, stock exchanges  Significant differences between FSC and Generic Codes

BEE and your clients Consider this:  Financial record keeping  Consulting versus Rating  'Independence & impartiality' challenge  Reporting in financial statements

BEE & Financial Record Keeping  Enterprise development  Ownership  Management  Skills development  Preferential procurement

Verification  Need an official verification  Get verified every 12 months  BEE status recorded on National Empowerment Database

Verification Agencies  Private companies  Accredited by SANAS  Approved by DTI  Member of ABVA  Fees – market related

Transitional Period Transitional Score:  First 12 months after Commencement Date  Use full scorecard score OR  GENERIC: Score = 1.92 x (Ownership + Management)‏  QSE: Score = 1.18 x (Ownership + Management)‏

Dynamics of BEE Time BEE Score Your BEE score Pressure from your competitors Limit of your BEE capabilities Practical minimum score 30 (40)‏

Future of BEE Legislation  Codes updated / amended  Accreditation of Verification Agencies  National Empowerment Database  New Charters defined

Future of BEE 2 Years  Lots of change  Benefits to early birds  Failures and frustration 10 Years  Stability to the process  Leveling of the playing field 5 Years  Everybody’s doin’ it!  Benefits to those whose approach is sound  Take 2s!

Thank You Guy Taylor can be contacted on Murray Chabant can be contacted on