T he C onnecticut E nergy A dvisory B oard Mary J. Healey Vice Chair, CEAB CT Consumer Counsel Connecticut Power & Energy Society March 13, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

EESE O&E Committee Update & Next Steps May 14, 2010.
Transportation Strategy Board July 28, 2010 Responsible Growth.
RESOLVE, Inc. National Geothermal Collaborative An Overview January 20, 2004.
Public Interest Energy Research –Natural Gas Program Status Presentation to Air Emissions Advisory Committee May 12, 2005 Philip Misemer California Energy.
Hydropower Development: Experience of Nepal
Economic Criteria for Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Region Public Utility Law Seminar DeAnn Walker August 3, 2012.
Power Supply Options for Connecticut’s Energy Future Connecticut Energy Advisory Board Scott Davido President, Northeast Region NRG Energy, Inc. December.
Donald W. Downes Chairman, CT Department of Public Utility Control Chairman, CT Energy Advisory Board C ONNECTICUT’S E NERGY F UTURE Legislative Office.
Climate Action Planning Presentation & Discussion University of Connecticut January 15, 2009.
DRA Advocacy Joe Como, Acting Director. 2 DRA Facts The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference! 3  History: CPUC created DRA (formerly known as the.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
1 Enhancing the Role of Renewable Energy in California Robert A. Laurie Commissioner California Energy Commission Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting.
The Potential for Increased Cooperation on Offshore Wind among the Northeast States Warren Leon, Executive Director.
Less is More: SEE Action and the Power of Efficiency Hon. Phyllis Reha Commissioner, Minnesota PUC Co-Chair, SEE Action Customer Information and Behavior.
Consideration of Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) Standards A Public Hearing- October 22, 2007.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Discussion of Proposed Generating Resource Action Items Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
1 Transmission Development at Ameren and in the Midwest ISO Mid-America Regulatory Conference Maureen A. Borkowski June 8, 2010.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Region 10 Regional Response Team Northwest Area Committee Seattle, WA February 12, 2014 EFSEC.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
Energy Action Plan “Report Card” and the AB32 “Umbrella” CFEE ROUNDTABLE CONFERENCE ON ENERGY Julie Fitch California Public Utilities Commission Director.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Realigning Utility Incentives Commissioner Wayne E. Gardner Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Keystone Energy Efficiency Alliance Sept. 20, 2011.
The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) WRAP formed in 1997 as the successor organization to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission (GCVTC) –
BISCAYNE BAY REGIONAL RESTORATION COORDINATION TEAM Development of Overarching Objectives: Dreams and Realities March 12, 2004.
Smart Growth Implementation Assistance Montgomery County, MD Fact Sheet More about Smart Growth at Preliminary Project.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
ISO Outlook Summer 2005 and Beyond Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee February 22, 2005 Jim Detmers Vice President of Grid Operations.
Overview of a Water Action Plan: California Public Utilities Commission Paul G. Townsley, President Arizona American Water January 18, 2011.
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
Regulatory Planning for Supply to GTA & Toronto Areas Presentation to Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee May 14, 2003.
1 Market Evolution Program Long-Term Resource Adequacy Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
Livable Delaware Energy Task Force - the Key to Energy and Environmental Co-Benefits.
New York State System Benefits Charge (SBC) – NGA Center for Best Practices April 29, 2004 Bob Callender Vice President for Programs NYSERDA.
Role of the Commission and Recent Policy Actions Interconnection Workshop Carol Revelt Utah Public Service Commission December 4, 2007.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION California Bioenergy Action Plan Southern California Emerging Waste Technologies Forum Los Angeles, California July 27, 2006.
CLEAN POWER PLAN: Opportunities for Energy Efficiency in Affordable Housing Todd Nedwick Housing and Energy Efficiency Policy Director National Housing.
Georgia Public Service Commission Regulatory Update Presentation For: Southeastern Energy Society Luncheon September 18, 2006 Alston & Bird LLP Law Offices.
Generation Subcommittee, Day Two Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise, Idaho.
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. Southwest Connecticut RFP Markets Committee November 14, 2003.
Regional Planning CCRPC Board Training March 21, 2012.
Regional System Operator Issues Analysis Ron Lehr Western Clean Energy Advocates January 7, 2016.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 1 Overview of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Roland W. Wentworth Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates.
Michael A. Chowaniec, Legislative Director Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control Planning Conference on Maryland’s Energy Future July 26, 2007.
Kansas City Power & Light and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations – Suggestions for Chapter 22 Revisions Missouri Public Service Commission Meeting Aug 31,
Regional Transmission Expansion Project Staff Council Briefing Tom Kaiserski (MT) Program Manager February 15, 2011 Governor’s Office of Economic Development.
Presentation to the Alaska House Special Committee on Economic Development, Tourism, & Arctic Policy December 9,
Overview of Sustainability Policy Issues CMAP Board of Directors October 10, 2007.
Mickey Oros Altergy Systems Sr. Vice President – Business Development Chairman, Industry Advisory Panel National Hydrogen Association Keynote Session 2:
4/16/2010 Regional Planning Group Meeting Long-Term Planning Study of the ERCOT Interconnection Warren Lasher Manager, System Assessment.
Understanding the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP 2010 Rev 2)
Department of Energy Energy Agency Reorganization Plan Little Hoover Commission Hearing on Governor Schwarzenegger’s Plan to Establish a Department of.
East Coast utility EV Initiative
New Mexico Electricity An Industrial Perspective
Natural Gas Infrastructure Assessment
Affordable Energy Production from Renewable Fuel
Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable
AGA Advocacy Priorities
Tom Wolf, Governor Patrick McDonnell, PA DEP Secretary
National Governing and Leadership Structure
New England Resource Adequacy
Incentives for electricity infrastructure – ERGEG view
The Role of Hydro-Québec in New England Electric Markets The New England Electricity Restructuring Roundtable June 14, 2013 Stephen Molodetz, Vice.
Comments on New England Regional State Committee*
Commissioner Anne C. George
Presentation transcript:

T he C onnecticut E nergy A dvisory B oard Mary J. Healey Vice Chair, CEAB CT Consumer Counsel Connecticut Power & Energy Society March 13, 2006

Mission: CEAB’s primary goal is to encourage competing energy solutions and to provide the opportunity to review multiple energy solutions simultaneously CEAB is responsible for identifying and coordinating state energy needs & recommending strategies & solutions to meet those needs in a manner that is not only environmentally responsible, but also meets reasonable cost & reliability criteria. CEAB Guiding Principles –Citizens and businesses in CT must have access to a safe, affordable, diverse and reliable energy supply. –CT’s policy makers must act in forums where the state's energy interests can be advanced. –CT’s policy makers must act in a coordinated fashion on both a state & regional basis to address energy issues using CEAB's energy plan as a blueprint for action. The Connecticut Energy Advisory Board CEAB Purpose

New Role for CEAB – to review/ evaluate proposed energy solutions CEAB membership changed – independent, restricted membership by parties with interest – (ex. lobbyists/ project developers) Independent funding – through Combined Public Benefits Charge funded by ratepayers Primary duties – develop a state energy plan; develop preferential criteria for evaluating solutions for energy needs Planning Entity per PA The Connecticut Energy Advisory Board

Primary duties – develop a state energy plan; develop preferential criteria for evaluating solutions for energy needs identifying & coordinating state energy needs recommending strategies & solutions to meet those needs - CEAB Preferential Criteria - Balance 5 Overall Policy Goals: Energy (reliability) Economics (costs) Environment (air and water quality) Energy Efficiency/Conservation/Demand Response Quality of Life (local impact concerns) Send signals to energy market/planners - on what preferred features/characteristics the solutions should fulfill Role in State Energy Planning The Connecticut Energy Advisory Board

Triggered by two different scenarios: Reactive RFP Activated in response to an energy project application filed with CT Siting Council CEAB is then required to issue an RFP seeking an alternative solution(s) Proactive RFP CEAB determines that an energy-related need or problem exists for which it will solicit a possible solution(s) CEAB will then issue an RFP requesting that the parties respond with a possible solution(s) Review Process Application The Connecticut Energy Advisory Board

In both scenarios – the range of solutions may include transmission, electric generation, demand-side changes, any other strategy or combination of strategies. Multiple responses to an RFP – will be examined simultaneously & reviewed at the macro-level against the Preferential Criteria Different strategies or combinations of strategies - will be considered relative to each other Review Process (cont’d) The Connecticut Energy Advisory Board

Submits report to CT Siting Council - with commentary on each proposal’s ability to meet energy goals/needs Includes any information obtained through the RFP process - and may also identify issues requiring further review Serves as an advisory document - which will provide information to the CSC for consideration in its review of energy projects, and also inform other states agencies of cognizance Energy project that receive CSC’s approval - will continue to be required to receive approval by the appropriate state regulatory agencies (ensuring all applicable statutory & regulatory requirements are satisfied) The CEAB Report The Connecticut Energy Advisory Board

CT Policy Approach to Improve Electric System AAC Energy Independence (Public Act 05-1/June Special Session) Basic concept – unique hybrid approach…state is catalyst for market to respond directly to identified needs Four basic strategies promoted: 1) Customer-side/ Grid-side distributed generation 2) Incentives for other new generation (capacity contracts) 3) Demand side resources – demand response & EE 4) Rate changes: New C&I rates – Time-of-Use/ TOU (1/1/07); voluntary interruptible or load response (6/1/06) New seasonal rates – for all users (4/1/07) The Connecticut Energy Advisory Board

First Report (Sept. 2005) – CEAB filed a Needs Assessment on near-term FMCC reduction measures (1/1/06) Recommendations on Actions: Mitigate CT’s peak demand Preserve CT’s local generation & encourage new generation resources Improve CT’s transmission Second Report – CEAB Needs Assessment to make determination on longer-term FMCC reduction measures (Mar-Apr RFP). AAC Energy Independence – carved out projects awarded under DPUC 2006 RFP from CEAB RFP process CEAB’s Role in DPUC Implementation of Energy Independence Act REPORT The Connecticut Energy Advisory Board

Benefits of Implementation of CT Strategies New & upgraded facilities - will result in improvements to system reliability & efficiency Load management & reduction will: –decrease customer & system costs –operate to cut $$$ for LMP, LICAP The Connecticut Energy Advisory Board

CEAB Board Members Donald W. Downes, CEAB Chairman Chairman Commissioner F. Philip Prelli Department of Public Utility Control Department of Agriculture Mary Healey, CEAB Vice Chairman John A. Mengacci Consumer Counsel Designee of the Secretary, OPM Commissioner Gina McCarthy Kathleen O'Connor Dept. of Environmental Protection Governor's Appointee Commissioner Stephen E. Korta IIIJames P. Sandler Department of Transportation Appointee of Senate President Pro Tempore Carl J. Schiessl Appointee of the Speaker of the House CEAB website: The Connecticut Energy Advisory Board