1 Prepared by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC. A service of Hampton Roads Transit Downtown Norfolk Transportation Needs Assessment Study January 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (TMA) GREATER IRVING-LAS COLINAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AUGUST 25, 2009.
Advertisements

West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
1 Prepared by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC. A service of Hampton Roads Transit Hampton Area Transportation Needs Assessment Study October 2001.
2 Presenter Nancy Lipscomb Director of Employee Relations & Local Government Services.
#EMF2014 Transportation Solution Roundtable. #EMF2014 Post-Presentation Discussion Period.
What is the Regional Guaranteed Ride Home (GRH ) Program? Multi-county sponsored program Reimburses cost of emergency rides for ridesharing employees.
Oakland Industrial Park Transportation Needs Assessment Study Sponsored by A service of Hampton Roads Transit Prepared by THE MARKETING SOURCE,
THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC 2000 Lynnhaven/Oceana Area Transportation Needs Assessment Study Sponsored by.
1 HOV Attitudinal Research Among Hampton Roads Commuters Sponsored by Conducted by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC August 2002.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
Juneau Downtown Tourism Transportation Study May 27, 2003.
Tom Fairchild The R&D initiative of Arlington County Commuter Services.
Prepared for Hampton Roads Transit July 2002 Greenbrier Transportation Needs Assessment Study Prepared by THE MARKETING SOURCE.
Providing Travel Choice Through Employee Shuttles Association for Commuter Transportation of Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit 2012 Suzanne Charbonneau,
Externalities on highways Today: We apply externalities to a real-life example.
Vanpool 101 Vanpool Works for Transit Caryn Souza, Director, RideshareNation and Associate Director Community Transportation Association of America, Washington,
Walking Works Promoting Walking to and on your campus Richard Smith Head of Business and Consultancy Services.
A Brief Comparison on Traffic System Between London and Shanghai Allen Liu, Shanghai Feb. 16 th 2012.
2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12.
1 Providing Commute Choices to Employees Krute Singa.
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC Naval Station Norfolk Transportation Needs Assessment Study Final Report Sponsored by February 13, 2001.
The Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law.  The CTR Law requires major employers - in Urban Growth Areas throughout Washington - to implement an employee.
Connie Ruth, EPA Best Workplaces for Commuters The Advantages of Excellent Commuter Benefits Why your University or College Should Achieve the Best Workplaces.
October 29, 2013 Calgary flood 2013 – Resilience of City’s workforce supports Continuation of operations Ron Schafer, Transportation Planning Sandy Virgo,
Northern Shenandoah Valley Regional Commission and WinFred MPO Regional Commuter Survey Southeastern Institute of Research, Inc.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
GoBerkeley 1 goBerkeley: Integrating TDM and Parking Management into Downtown Berkeley Monday, October 28 th, 2013 Steer Davies Gleave 970 – 355 Burrard.
Transportation 101 June 12, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  GG & C Bus Company, Inc.  Mid Mon Valley Transit.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
GeniUS! Challenge #4 - Utilising footfall & transport 15/3/12 Andy D’Agorne.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
TAG 2012 Survey Data. Survey sent to 16, responded.
Transportation 101 August 7, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  IndiGO: Indiana County Transit Authority 
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
GNTP Business Forum – The Big Idea – Gary Smerdon-White 18 th September 2012.
Business Logistics 420 Urban Transportation Fall 2000 Lectures 6: Coping with Edge City Transportation Problems: Livable Cities, Transit-Friendly Land.
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study TPB Citizens Advisory Committee Public Forum in Oxon.
1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC.
DRAFT What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? Public Forum on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.
1 HOV Attitude and Usage Study September 24, 2003.
Pulsar Advertising Southeastern Institute of Research 1 I-66 Corridor: Westbound Traffic Issues Within the I-495 Beltway Community Involvement Survey December.
10/22/021 Recent Innovations in Transportation Demand Management Peter Valk Transportation Management Services 12 th Annual UCLA Symposium on the Transportation/Land.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation
Finding Alternative Transportation TripMe By: Sabrina Burleigh, Andy Chen, Jordan Evans, Thomas Kooi.
GCAA Feb 17, Results 1.2 million miles of travel 600 tons of air pollution Each day these efforts reduce: Currently partnering with more than 1650.
Transportation 101 February 18, CommuteInfo Introducing… a better way to work.
Phase 2: Data Collection Findings and Future Steps.
UFCU Employee Mobility Program. Did you know?  Mobility programs can be marketed as part of employee benefits packages. Companies that offer these options.
Externalities on highways Today: We apply externalities to a real-life example.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Attitudinal Evaluation Overview and Update Johanna Zmud / NuStats October 28, 2004 MnPass Copyright WSDOT © 2002.
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Ronald F. Kirby Director, COG Department of Transportation.
Successful Commute Programs Critical components include: 1.An active and informed Employee Transportation Coordinator (you!) 2.Guaranteed ride home 3.Parking.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Performance Measurement.
WELCOME! Employer Transportation Coordinator (ETC) Training Part 1: Orientation to the Commute Trip Reduction Law.
Burlington Transportation Alternatives Presented by: UVM Service Learners May 2004.
C ANYONS SPA T RANSPORTATION P LAN. V ISION & G OALS Vision Provide a high level of transportation service to guests, employees and residents through.
OneCommute People Vanpool Management Contacts Program Management Accounts Surveys Meetings/Events Transit Passes Program Plan Actuals Mode Counts Vehicle.
Sustainability Programs
The BART System Map.
Our Suite of Services.
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC
Mass Transit Usage According to IBISWorld, the public transportation industry increased 14.3%, from $63 billion during 2013 to $72 billion for 2017,
2000 Lynnhaven/Oceana Area Transportation Needs Assessment Study
Performance Measurement
Presentation transcript:

1 Prepared by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC. A service of Hampton Roads Transit Downtown Norfolk Transportation Needs Assessment Study January 2002

2 Overall Study Objective To help reduce traffic congestion to and from the study area.

3 Specific Objectives  Determine the perceived impact of area traffic on congestion.  Identify current transportation modes used.  Determine parking concerns.  Measure awareness and usage of alternative transportation options.  Measure how willing employers and employees are to adopt and implement alternate transportation programs.

4 Study Area Outer Core Inner Core

5 About the Study Area  Current Transportation Alternatives  Express Bus (recently discontinued)  Ferries (Harborlink and Portsmouth Park and Sail)  Regular HRT bus service  NET shuttle service  Some parking areas offer preferential parking for car/vanpools.  Parking  Limited  Most pay for parking

6 One-on-One Self-Administered Interviews Surveys Study Components Employer Commuter

7  32 Employer Interviews  586 Commuter Surveys  Inner Core – 459 surveys  Outer Core – 127 surveys  Conducted July – October 2001 About the study

8 Employers Interviewed <50 employees Chamber of Commerce Downtown Norfolk Council Hipage Company, Inc. Systems Engineering Service employees Glenn & Sadler Associates Hanbury Evans et al Hofheimer Nusbaum et al Infinet Co. Paine Webber, Inc. S.L. Nusbaum Taylor & Walker PC Wachovia employees Advantis KPMG Peat Marwick McArthur Center Mall Merrill Lynch Nordstroms Norfolk Housing & Redevelopment NYT Shared Service Cntr. Radisson R S Glasser & M Glasser Wilcox & Savage PC WVEC Television, Inc employees Coast Guard Goodman & Company Marriott Norfolk Southern Corp. Tidewater Community College (TCC) 500+ employees Bank of America City of Norfolk Norfolk State VA Pilot

9 Employer Findings

10 Employers do not think traffic congestion is a big problem.  Traffic congestion caused few problems for business.  To a few, the unpredictability of traffic flow was most problematic.  Parking problem more serious  However, they fear that Hampton Roads traffic has the potential to become a major problem.

11 Bridges and tunnels are the major trouble spots.  Trouble spots:  Bridge and tunnel congestion during peak travel times.  Downtown back-ups during inclement weather.

12 Employers ideas to relieve traffic congestion.  Increase/improve tunnel crossings  Offer more flextime or staggered work hours  Encourage ridesharing  Improve and expand current bus service  Implement light rail

13 Who pays for parking? Among those interviewed…  Over half paid all parking costs for employees.  Another quarter subsidized parking costs.  Employees who do not receive paid or subsidized parking from their employer are generally:  low-level service workers  employees in commission-based financial jobs

14 Employer’s ideas to address parking issues.  Build more parking decks  Improve frequency and convenience of the NET  Provide better information about the NET schedule  Post better signage to tourists to identify parking areas  Improve parking conditions at Harbor Park  Implement consistent parking fees  Relocate business out of downtown

15 Most employers were not favorable towards Harbor Park.  Inconvenient location for employees  Perceived security risks - especially during evening hours and for female employees  Lack of lighting  Lot is partially paved and not always well- maintained  No protection from the elements  Floods during rain  NET is not consistently available when needed  Lot is unusable during daytime ball games

16 Employers want to see NET schedules.  Employers are aware of the NET.  Unfamiliar with the schedule.  Unaware that service was available to downtown workers other than for parking lot shuttling.  Fear the NET would not move in a timely manner. This perception was in part, due to the absence of printed schedules.

17 Employers suggested improvements to the NET.  Provide shuttle schedules.  Offer more service during non-peak times, including evenings.  Select more convenient pick-up sites.  Build shelters to protect commuters from bad weather.  Revise NET route maps to improve comprehension.  Train NET drivers in customer service issues.  Consider offering smaller buses for non-peak times.

18  Currently, there are only two formal transportation programs in the companies that were interviewed.  Interviews revealed low awareness of, and participation in employee-sponsored transportation programs. Employers just don’t know about TRAFFIX.

19 Employers unfamiliar with the TRAFFIX program eagerly volunteered to provide employees with information about alternative transportation and the NET shuttle system. But they are willing to help.

20  Employers prefer preferential parking for carpoolers as a ridesharing program.  Minimal investment of time and money  Commuters would use it Preferential Parking was preferred.

21 Commuter Findings

22 Who participated?

23 Occupation of participants

24  Where do downtown Norfolk workers live?  How do they travel to and from work?  What is their workweek like? The Commute to Work

25 Where do downtown Norfolk workers live? VA Beach37% Norfolk 24 Chesapeake21 Peninsula 7 Portsmouth 5 Suffolk 4 Other 2

26 Drive alone 87% Carpool 7 Bus 2 Combination 2 Other 2 Area SOV % Oceanfront area66% Naval Station Norfolk 81% Oakland Industrial Park85% Norfolk Commerce Park 86% Hampton Area87% Downtown Norfolk87% Oyster Point area88% Lynnhaven Mall area91% Current Commute Mode

27  Average distance to work: 14 miles  Very compressed morning and evening “rush hours” (8:00 –9:00 a.m.; 5:00- 6:00 p.m.)  Most work a traditional Monday-Friday workweek.  41% use their car at least once a week for work-related travel.  Commonly use the area’s major roadways for their commute (I-264, I-64, I-464). The daily commute

28 Where do commuters stop on their way to and from work?

29  Are commuters familiar with area alternatives?  Do commuters use these alternatives? Transportation Alternatives

30 Area Transportation Alternatives Tested  NET (Norfolk Electric Transit) Shuttle Service  Harborlink Park and Sail Program  Portsmouth Park and Sail Program  Downtown Norfolk HOV Express Bus service  Guaranteed Ride Program

31 Familiarity and usage of area services. Harborlink Park & Sail 33% NET 78% % who have used the service 48%6%15%12%7% Portsmouth Park & Sail 28% Guaranteed Ride Home 22% HOV Express Bus 26% % who are familiar

32  Where do commuters park?  How much do employers and commuters pay for parking?  Do commuters think that parking is a problem? Parking

33 Where commuters park.

34 Who pays for parking? Employer Pays All Employer Pays Part Commuter Pays All % of Sample49%21%20% Avg. monthly Cost to Commuter $0$30$70 Avg. monthly cost to employer $76$35$0 Most often park at… Parking Garage Off-Site Parking Lot

35 Commuters say parking is a problem. Very Big No Problem

36 How does this compare to other areas? % who view parking Area as a problem Oceanfront area66% Downtown Norfolk45 Norfolk Commerce Park 35 Lynnhaven Mall area 9

37 Interest in Harbor Park  However, employers are critical. Inconvenient location Lot is partially paved Lack of lighting Perceived security risks No protection from weatherFlooding when it rains NET is not always available Lot is not available during daytime ballgames 23% said “YES” Would commuters park in Harbor Park and walk or take the NET to their worksite if their employers paid for parking?

38  Are SOV commuters willing to share a ride at least once a week?  Who is the target audience? Willingness to Rideshare

39 42% say they will consider ridesharing.

40 Among commuters…willingness to occasionally rideshare is high. % Willing Area to Rideshare Downtown Norfolk42% Naval Station Norfolk 42% Oakland Industrial Park39% Norfolk Commerce Park 33% Hampton Area30% Oyster Point 26% Oceanfront area26% Lynnhaven Mall area24% Highest

41 Who is the target audience?

42 As in other studies, carpool is the preferred alternate mode.

43 Incentives boost interest among the target audience.

44 More frequent pick-ups and access to information would encourage bus usage. Suggestion % Nothing53% More frequent pick-ups23 Access to route and 19 schedule information More drop-off points17 Employer pays a portion of 11 bus costs Offer a bus route near home 3 Offer Express bus route 2 Other 4

45 Key Findings

46 The Work Commute  Majority drive alone.  Have longer work trip than commuters in previous studies.  Peak morning and evening travel periods are very compressed.  Four in ten (41%) commuters say they use their car for work-related travel at least once per week.  Commuters most often stop at grocery stores during their work commute.

47 Transportation Alternatives  Downtown commuters have several transportation alternatives.  Awareness and usage is highest for the NET.  Over half (53%) of the sample indicated no improvements to HRT bus service would encourage them to ride the bus.  However, more frequent pick-ups and access to information would encourage bus usage for some.

48 Traffic Congestion  Many employers say that traffic congestion does not currently pose a serious problem for their business.  Employers gave a variety of suggestions to help relieve traffic congestion in the areas of concern.

49 Parking  During the workday, the majority (71%) of commuters park their vehicle in a parking garage.  Over half of the employers questioned paid all parking costs for their employees and another quarter offered subsidized parking.  Nearly half (45%) of commuters believe that parking in Downtown Norfolk is problematic. Parking is the REAL problem for employers.  About one-quarter (23%) of commuters indicate they would be interested in parking in Harbor Park and walking or taking the NET to their worksite if their employer paid for parking. But employers are skeptical.

50 Willingness to Help  Few employers currently offer formal transportation programs to employees, but they are eager to provide information.  Four in ten (42%) of SOV commuters say they would consider using an alternate mode of travel for their work commute at least once a week.  Information about several commuter incentives programs increased willingness to rideshare.

51 Recommendations

52 Reach out to area businesses and commuters.  Co-sponsor downtown activities.  Offer a “Lunch and Learn” session.  Contact Building Managers to coordinate lobby promotions.  Display TRAFFIX information on employer bulletin boards.  Make a presentation at Tenant meetings.  Use the Clean Commute Day as a major promotional event.  Work with Chamber of Commerce and Norfolk Council to gain access to employers.

53 Continue to “get the word out”.  Consider advertising in downtown publications.  Place advertisements in student newspapers.  Promote TRAFFIX on drive-time radio.  Share the research findings with the City of Norfolk.

54 Make ridesharing easier.  Advocate more preferential parking for carpools and vanpools.  Increase dissemination of information about the NET.  Further investigate the Harbor Park parking arrangement.

55 Prepared by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC. A service of Hampton Roads Transit Downtown Norfolk Transportation Needs Assessment Study January 2002