Emergence and Evolution of Active Regions A.C. Birch, H. Schunker (MPS), D. C. Braun (NWRA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Free Magnetic Energy and Relative Helicity in Quiet Sun Regions and their role in Solar Dynamics Kostas Tziotziou IAASARS, National Observatory of Athens,
Advertisements

2011/08/ ILWS Science Workshop1 Solar cycle prediction using dynamos and its implication for the solar cycle Jie Jiang National Astronomical Observatories,
Numerical Simulations of Supergranulation and Solar Oscillations Åke Nordlund Niels Bohr Institute, Univ. of Copenhagen with Bob Stein (MSU) David Benson,
1 The Sun as a whole: Rotation, Meridional circulation, and Convection Michael Thompson High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Probing the Sun in 3D Karen Harvey Prize Lecture Boulder 2009 Laurent Gizon Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, & Goettingen University, Germany.
Braun SHINE July Local Helioseismic Inferences of Sub-surface Magnetism and Dynamics NorthWest Research Associates, Inc. Colorado Research Associates.
Q: How is flux removed from the photosphere? Each 11-year cycle, c active regions, each with c Mx, emerge. What processes remove all this.
Using HMI to Understand Flux Cancellation by Brian Welsch 1, George Fisher 1, Yan Li 1, and Xudong Sun 2 1 Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 2 Stanford.
Can We Determine Electric Fields and Poynting Fluxes from Vector Magnetograms and Doppler Shifts? by George Fisher, Brian Welsch, and Bill Abbett Space.
Simulation of Flux Emergence from the Convection Zone Fang Fang 1, Ward Manchester IV 1, William Abbett 2 and Bart van der Holst 1 1 Department of Atmospheric,
Braun HMI/AIA Feb using helioseismology to probe magnetic structures (some selected topics) NorthWest Research Associates Colorado Research Associates.
Holography & HMI NorthWest Research Associates, Inc. Colorado Research Associates Division D. Braun, C. Lindsey, A. Birch (NWRA/CoRA) collaborators: P.
What Simulations Could Provide for Ring Analysis Estimates of the p-mode line shape in the presence of: magnetism turbulent convection Verification of.
2008/10/21 J. Fontenla, M Haberreiter LASP – Univ. of Colorado NADIR MURI Focus Area.
Braun AIA/HMI Feb Helioseismic holography of Solar Subsurface Flows : progress & prospects NorthWest Research Associates Colorado Research Associates.
Summary. Two directions in modeling Adopting physical (realistic) models Creating artificial data sets with simplified physics.
Stokes profiles Swedish 1m Solar Telescope, perfect seeing.
R. Komm & Friends NSO, Tucson R. Komm & Friends NSO, Tucson Solar Subsurface Flows from Ring-Diagram Analysis.
Résumé du réunion HMI-AIA, fev 2005 (Perspectives héliosismiques) 1 Session H1: Local Helioseismology I: Current Issues 3:15-3:30 Turbulent magnetohydrodynamics.
Time-Distance Helioseismology of the Deep Interior T.L. Duvall Jr. (NASA/GSFC)
Local Helioseismology Laurent Gizon (Stanford). Outline Some background Time-distance helioseismology: Solar-cycle variations of large-scale flows Near.
Using HMI to Understand Flux Cancellation by Brian Welsch 1, George Fisher 1, Yan Li 1, and Xudong Sun 2 1 Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 2 Stanford.
1 July 31, 2007 SHINE 2007 – Heliospheric Plasma Sheet The Unusual Heliospheric Current Sheet at the End of Cycle 23 A Comparison of Cycles 21,22,& 23.
CoRA, NWRA, Inc. 7/18/2005 Time-Distance Inversions and Kernels for Ring Diagrams Aaron Birch Outline: A.TD Inversions B.Kernels for Ring Diagrams.
Braun AIA/HMI Feb helioseismic holography of solar subsurface flows : progress & prospects NorthWest Research Associates Colorado Research Associates.
Helioseismic Holography & some experiments on “field effects” in CR1988 NorthWest Research Associates Colorado Research Associates Division D. Braun.
Detection of Emerging Sunspot Regions in the Solar Interior Stathis Ilonidis, Junwei Zhao, and Alexander Kosovichev Stanford University LoHCo Workshop.
Science Requirements for Helioseismology Frank Hill NSO SPRING Workshop Nov. 26, 2013.
The Asymmetric Polar Field Reversal – Long-Term Observations from WSO J. Todd Hoeksema, Solar Observatories H.E.P.L., Stanford University SH13C-2278.
1 GALEX Angular Correlation Function … or about the Galactic extinction effects.
The CoRA Near-Side Effort Aaron Birch, Graham Barnes, Doug Braun, Ashley Crouch, KD Leka, Charlie Lindsey, Joe Werne with collaborators Bob Stein & Yuhong.
Synchronic Magnetic Maps - the Inner Boundary Condition for the Heliosphere David Hathaway NASA Marshall Space Flight Center 2011 August 2 – Space Weather.
Stochastic Seismic Emission from Acoustic Glories in New Active Regions of cycle 24 Alina Donea Centre for Stellar and Planetary Astrophysics Monash University.
Far-side Imaging of Active Regions: Latest Developments Irene González Hernández and the GONG andHMI far-side teams National Solar Observatory, Tucson,
The multiscale magnetic pattern and the roots of solar activity F. Berrilli, S. Scardigli, D. Del Moro Department of Physics, University of Rome Tor Vergata,
Rabello-Soares, Bogart & Scherrer (2013): Comparison of a quiet tile with a nearby active region (5 o to 8 o away) with a quiet tile with no nearby.
Far-side Imaging and Activity Irene González Hernández and the GONG and MDI far-side teams National Solar Observatory, Tucson, AZ Stanford University,
Techniques for Active Region Seismology Irene González Hernández National Solar Observatory, Tucson, AZ.
The Sun as a whole: activity as seen by helioseismology
Flows in the Solar Convection Zone David Hathaway NASA/MSFC National Space Science and Technology Center 2004 July 21 David Hathaway NASA/MSFC National.
The need for physics-based inversions of sunspot structure and flows D. Braun, A. Birch, A. Crouch NWRA/CoRA M. Rempel NCAR/HAO.
NASA LWS TR&T Focus Topic: “Predict Emergence of Solar Active Regions Before they are Visible”
台灣清華大學, 物理系 Helioseismology (II) Global and Local Helioseismology ( , 北京 ) 周定一 Dean-Yi Chou.
The Sun as whole: activity as seen by helioseismology A.C. Birch (Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research)
Is there any relationship between photospheric flows & flares? Coupling between magnetic fields in the solar photosphere and corona implies that flows.
Tests of the Ring-Diagram Inversions A. Kosovichev.
Observation on Current Helicity and Subsurface Kinetic Helicity in Solar Active Regions Gao Yu Helicity Thinkshop Main Collaborators: Zhang, H.
1 Mei Zhang ( National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences ) Solar cycle variation of kinetic helicity Collaborators: Junwei Zhao (Stanford,
Emerging Flux Simulations & proto Active Regions Bob Stein – Michigan State U. A.Lagerfjärd – Copenhagen U. Å. Nordlund – Niels Bohr Inst. D. Georgobiani.
1. Short Introduction 1.1 Overview of helioseismology results and prospects.
The Current Status of Sunspot Seismology H. Moradi, H. Schunker, L. Gizon (Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany)
Searching for the Magnetic Fields at the Base of the Convection Zone Dean-Yi Chou Institute of Astronomy & Department of Physics Tsing Hua University,
Benjamin A. Schenkel University at Albany, State University of New York, and Robert E. Hart, The Florida State University 4 th.
Prograde patterns in rotating convection and implications for the dynamo Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen  Stockholm) Taylor-Proudman problem Near-surface.
A Subtropical Cyclonic Gyre of Midlatitude Origin John Molinari and David Vollaro.
The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) has continuously measured the vector magnetic field, intensity, and.
WG1-1: Sub-surface Structure and Evolution Motivation: A research program on space weather that ignores the sub-photospheric evolution of magnetic fields.
Holography of solar dynamics Doug Braun CoRA/NWRA.
EAS simulated acceptance skymap Olivier Martineau-Huynh 30/04/2014.
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
Planning for Helioseismology with SO/PHI Birch, Gizon, & Hirzberger Max Planck Institute for Solar System Physics.
Helioseismic Probing of Giant-Cell Flows Nicholas Featherstone Deborah Haber Brad Hindman Juri Toomre JILA / APS University of Colorado at Boulder.
The HMI Instrument. HMI Science Goals Line-of-Sight Observables.
Estimation of acoustic travel-time systematic variations due to observational height difference across the solar disk. Shukur Kholikov 1 and Aleksander.
An update on convection zone modeling with the ASH code
Magnetic Helicity in Emerging Active Regions: A Statistical Study
Carrington Rotation 2106 – Close-up of AR Mr 2106 Bt 2106
Summary of NASA LWS TR&T Focus Team: “Predict Emergence of Solar Active Regions Before they are Visible”
Holography Applied to Artificial Data
holographic measurements of simulated flows
Presentation transcript:

Emergence and Evolution of Active Regions A.C. Birch, H. Schunker (MPS), D. C. Braun (NWRA)

Motivations How does active region emergence work? – Where do AR come from? – How do emerging AR interact with convection? – What are the flows associated with AR? Constrain dynamo models – Potentially rule out certain models (rising flux tubes?) – Converging flows associated with AR play a role in some dynamo models (e.g. Cameron & Schuessler, 2012)

Previous work Pre-emergence case studies: – Braun (1995, Hankel analysis) – Jensen et al. (2001, time-distance) – Hartlep et al. (2011, acoustic power) – Ilonidis et al. (2011, time-distance) – Many others … Statistical studies – Komm et al. (2009, 2011, rings, 100s of regions) – Birch et al. (2013, holography, ~100 regions one day before emergence) Open questions remain

HMI Data selection Presented by Hannah in previous talk Additional constraints: – Less then 40 deg from central meridian – Duty cycle > 90% Result: subsample of about 60 emerging AR

Helioseismic Holography This talk: surface focusing measurements (lower turning point 3 Mm) Strategy: – Carry out holography for disk passage of all emerging AR and quiet Sun control regions – find clear signals first and then think about inversions

Supergranulation is the dominant signal Contours of B: 20, 40, 60 GBlue = divergence; red= convergence

No clear signal in individual maps Next step: ensemble averages (60 regions)

IMPORTANT! Blue = flow towards emergence location Red = flow away from emergence location rms = 15 m/s Average over AR

IMPORTANT! Blue = flow towards emergence location Red = flow away from emergence location rms = 15 m/s Average over QS

QS AR

Average over AR

Converging flow! Note offset. Average over AR

Zoom in t = -13 hr AR Max. flow 100 m/s Inner circle: 30 Mm radius

AR QS

B contours 50, 100, 150 G Average over AR

Zoom in t = 34 hr AR Max. flow 150 m/s Inner circle: 30 Mm radius

EW cut as a function of time: there is a feature before emergence Lowest B contour 40 G Heavy contour 120 G 30 m/s feature Noise ~ 10 m/s m/s

Quiet Sun noise level ~ 10 m/s m/s

NS cut shows converging flow before and during emergence Lowest B contour 40 G Heavy contour 120 G m/s

Quiet Sun: noise ~ 10 m/s m/s

Conclusions There is a clear pre-emergence signature: – Near-surface flows of ~100 m/s – Converging to a location ~15 Mm East – Exists days before emergence Flow pattern during emergence: – ~150 m/s prograde/equatorward flow in leading polarity – ~100 m/s NS converging flow between the polarities

Next steps Refine the meaning of control region – pre-emergence signature dominated by preferential emergence location within the supergranulation pattern? – Control for supergranulation pattern. Comparison with simulations?  Doug’s talk Deep signal?  Doug’s talk

The end

QS11079 and AR11079

A single AR