X The values of all neutrino oscillation parameters in the 3ν scheme can now be extracted from global fits of available data with a precision better than.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trigger issues for KM3NeT the large scale underwater neutrino telescope the project objectives design aspects from the KM3NeT TDR trigger issues outlook.
Advertisements

Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish Bari, Bologna, Boston, Caltech, Drexel, Indiana, Frascati, Gran Sasso, L’Aquila, Lecce, Michigan, Napoli, Pisa, Roma.
A long-baseline experiment with the IHEP neutrino beam Y. Efremenko detector Presented by.
Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.
Linked to ORCA/PINGU J. Brunner. Calibrations Main stream External input Simulation Reconstruction.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
M. Kowalski Search for Neutrino-Induced Cascades in AMANDA II Marek Kowalski DESY-Zeuthen Workshop on Ultra High Energy Neutrino Telescopes Chiba,
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
NuMI Offaxis Near Detector and Backgrounds Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
INDIA-BASED NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY (INO) STATUS REPORT Naba K Mondal Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India NUFACT Scoping Study Meeting at.
MACRO Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish 5 May 00 1.Neutrino oscillations 2.WIMPs 3.Astrophysical point sources.
10/24/2005Zelimir Djurcic-PANIC05-Santa Fe Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Backgrounds in Backgrounds in neutrino appearance signal.
KM3NeT IDM/TeVPA conference 23  28 June 2014, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Maarten de Jong on behalf of the KM3NeT collaboration The next generation neutrino.
Atmospheric Neutrinos
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
PINGU – An IceCube extension for low-energy neutrinos Uli Katz on behalf of the PINGU Collaboration European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation.
Apostolos Tsirigotis Simulation Studies of km3 Architectures KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting April 2007, Pylos, Greece The project is co-funded by the.
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Marseilles, 29June-3 July.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Physics with a very long neutrino factory baseline IDS Meeting CERN March 30, 2007 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg.
KM3NeT International Solvay Institutes 27  29 May 2015, Brussels, Belgium. Maarten de Jong Astro-particle and Oscillations Research with Cosmics in the.
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Erlangen, May 2009.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Ronald Bruijn – 10 th APP Symposium Antares results and status Ronald Bruijn.
Studies on PINGU’s Sensitivity to the Neutrino mass Hierarchy P. Berghaus, H.P. Bretz, A. Groß, A. Kappes, J. Leute, S. Odrowski, E. Resconi, R. Shanidze.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
Counting Electrons to Measure the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy J. Brunner 17/04/2013 APC.
CP violation in the neutrino sector Lecture 3: Matter effects in neutrino oscillations, extrinsic CP violation Walter Winter Nikhef, Amsterdam,
Data collected during the year 2006 by the first 9 strings of IceCube can be used to measure the energy spectrum of the atmospheric muon neutrino flux.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
CEA DSM Irfu Reconstruction and analysis of ANTARES 5 line data Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration XX th Rencontres de Blois 21 / 05.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
MEASUREMENT OF THE NEUTRINO MASS HIERARCHY IN THE DEEP SEA J. Brunner.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
Mass Hierarchy Study with MINOS Far Detector Atmospheric Neutrinos Xinjie Qiu 1, Andy Blake 2, Luke A. Corwin 3, Alec Habig 4, Stuart Mufso 3, Stan Wojcicki.
ORCA simulations - First steps J. Brunner 06/09/2012.
The ORCA Letter of Intent Oscillation Research with Cosmics in the Abyss ORCA Antoine Kouchner University Paris 7 Diderot- AstroParticle and Cosmology.
KM3NeT – ORCA Measuring Neutrino Oscillations and the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy in the Mediterranean Sea J. Brunner CPPM.
Alternative Code to Calculate NMH Sensitivity J. Brunner 16/10/
Sebastian Kuch, Rezo Shanidze Preliminary Studies of the KM3NeT Physics Sensitivity KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting Pylos, Greece, April 2007.
Aart Heijboer ● ORCA * catania workshop sep statistical power of mass hierarchy measurement (with ORCA) Aart Heijboer, Nikhef.
The ORCA option for KM3NeT Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen XV International Workshop on Neutrino Telescopes, Venice 15 March 2013.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
Search for diffuse cosmic neutrino fluxes with the ANTARES detector Vladimir Kulikovskiy The ANTARES Collaboration 3-9 August 2014ANTARES diffuse flux.
ORCA from ANTARES modules J. Brunner 06/10/2012. Detector Hexagonal layout a la IceCube 37 lines, distance 20m 25 ANTARES storeys  z = 4.5m Equipped.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Nearly vertical muons from the lower hemisphere in the Baikal neutrino experiment Zh. Dzhilkibaev - INR (Moscow) for the Baikal Collaboration ( Uppsala,
September 10, 2002M. Fechner1 Energy reconstruction in quasi elastic events unfolding physics and detector effects M. Fechner, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Alternative Code to Calculate NMH Sensitivity J. Brunner 16/10/
Low energy option for KM3NeT Phase 1? KM3NeT-ORCA (Oscillation Research with Cosmics in the Abyss) P. Coyle, Erlangen 23 June 2012.
MIND Systematic Errors EuroNu Meeting, RAL 18 January 2010 Paul Soler.
TTdF – EPS Conference Manchester (UK), July 2007 Neutrino hiererchy from atmospheric and beta beam neutrinos with high density magnetised detectors [1]
Muon Energy reconstruction in IceCube and neutrino flux measurement Dmitry Chirkin, University of Wisconsin at Madison, U.S.A., MANTS meeting, fall 2009.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Shih-Hao Wang 王士豪 Graduate Institute of Astrophysics & Leung Center for Cosmology and Particle Astrophysics (LeCosPA), National Taiwan University 1 This.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
First All-Sky Measurement of Muon Flux with IceCube IceCube REU Summer 2008 Kristin Rosenau Advisor: Teresa Montaruli.
Muons in IceCube PRELIMINARY
SOLAR ATMOSPHERE NEUTRINOS
Measurement of the Neutrino Mass hierarchy in the deep sea
Physics with the ICARUS T1800 detector
KM3NeT Collaboration meeting, Marseille, January 2013
ORCA proposed public plots
SOLAR ATMOSPHERE NEUTRINOS
T2KK sensitivity as a function of L and Dm2
Unfolding performance Data - Monte Carlo comparison
Presentation transcript:

X The values of all neutrino oscillation parameters in the 3ν scheme can now be extracted from global fits of available data with a precision better than 15%, the largest remaining uncertainty being on θ 23 and its octant. The relatively large value of θ 13 (which drives the ν e  ν μ oscillation) is an asset for the determination of the remaining unknown neutrino parameters: the value of the CP-violating phase δ CP, and the ordering of the neutrino masses, aka the neutrino mass hierarchy (NMH: normal or inverted, see plot). Standard strategy for the determination of NMH: probe ν e  ν μ oscillation in presence of matter effects which allow to resolve the sign of Δm 2 13 : X Measuring the neutrino mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos Topical Research Meeting on Prospects in Neutrino Physics London, December 19-20, 2013 ORCA (Oscillation Research with Cosmics in the Abyss): a feasibility study for the measurement of neutrino mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos in the Mediterranean Véronique Van Elewyck (Laboratoire APC & Université Paris 7 Denis Diderot) on behalf of the KM3NeT Collaboration ORCA (Oscillation Research with Cosmics in the Abyss): a feasibility study for the measurement of neutrino mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos in the Mediterranean Véronique Van Elewyck (Laboratoire APC & Université Paris 7 Denis Diderot) on behalf of the KM3NeT Collaboration References Current performances with the reference detector – ν μ CC (track-like) channel Peformance studies have been focusing so far on the ν μ charged-current channel which provides a relatively clear experimental signature (muon track + hadronic shower). Semicontained events (i.e. with the reconstructed vertex inside the instrumented volume) selected with a quality criterium on the track fit provide reasonably good angular accuracy (median Δθ better than 10° for E ν ≥ 5 GeV). The corresponding effective mass of the detector reaches its plateau value of ≈ 1.8 Mton at E ν ≈ 8 GeV. The muon energy estimation is most reliable when an additional containment condition is imposed on the full muon track, ensuring that most of the Cherenkov light is deposited inside the detector. Using the median reconstructed energy as an estimator of the neutrino energy, a resolution of 35% can be reached at 10 GeV. Studies are ongoing to evaluate the energy deposited in the hadronic shower in order to improve the determination of the neutrino energy. Further studies are also conducted to evaluate the possible contribution from the cascade-like channels ( ν e and ν τ CC, all flavours NC); preliminary results suggest a significant enhancement of the mass hierarchy discrimination power (see e.g. Ge & Hagiwara, arXiv ). Δ m 2 13 NORMAL INVERTED The oscillation enhancement is maximal at resonant energy E res ≈ few GeV for Earth matter density: good prospects for atmospheric neutrinos ! atmospheric ν e & ν μ (anti-)neutrino fluxes XX ORCA: an undersea neutrino Cherenkov detector within the KM3NeT framework Simulation chain E, θ smearing (kinematics + detector resolution) First-guess vertex position ORCA is building on the expertise of the KM3NeT Collaboration, which aims at the deployment of a multi-km3 neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean to perform high-energy (TeV-PeV) neutrino astronomy: - same detection principle: Cherenkov light emitted by the secondary particles produced by the neutrino interaction with matter in and around the detector - same technology and detector design (instrumented lines anchored at the seabed and supporting multi-PMT digital optical modules) - denser array to lower the energy threshold to ~GeV neutrino energies - line spacing and length limited by deployment contingencies A reference detector is used for the first stages of the feasibility study: (full optimisation to be performed on basis of an overdense detector with different optical module masking options) - atmospheric ν e + ν μ (+anti) 1  500 GeV (Bartol flux, Agrawal et al. PRD 53, (1996) ) - neutrino interaction: QE+RES+DIS (GENHEN), both charged and neutral current; - For all particles crossing the can volume (size ~3 absorption lengths around the detector): tracking + Cherenkov light emission - down-going atmospheric muon background based on MUPAGE parameterization ( Carminati et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. 179 (2008) ) - optical background (40K decay: flat noise, 5kHz/PMT Hz in-DOM time-correlated Maximal effect at ≈ few GeV for Earth matter densities (depending on the baseline) BUT P(ν μ  ν μ, NH) = P(ν μ  ν μ, IH): other ingredients are needed to create a difference in the number of events IH vs. NH: Distinctive patterns in (E ν, cos θ ν ) oscillograms showing the difference in expected number of events for normal and inverted hierarchies MAIN CHALLENGES: -NH/IH difference intrinsically small - further limited by kinematics and intrinsic fluctuations - oscillograms blurred by limited energy and angular accuracy of the detector References Muon background rejection capabilities Impact of systematics R ν < 75 m (solid) A neutrino beam to ORCA ? NH IH Counting events related to a neutrino beam of given flavour can help increase the sensitivity of ORCA to the mass hierarchy even with a moderate capability of flavour determination in the detector. In the appearance channel ν μ  ν e and for a typical ν μ beam in the energy range 2-8 GeV, an optimal separation between NH and IH is found for cosθ = 0.2, i.e. a baseline of 2600 km. The oscillation probabilities are only marginally affected by the value of δ CP. A beam with a suitable baseline could be built from the IHEP in Protvino (near Moscow, Rus- sia) towards one of the potential sites for ORCA, with a baseline of 2588 km and a moderate (~11.7°) inclination. Assuming N pot ≈1.5*10 21 within a few years, a 7σ measurement of the hierarchy can be achieved (3σ with 3-4% systematic uncertainty on the event rate). Intrinsic detector capabilities are not the only factor that can spoil the measurement of the mass hierarchy. Other sources of uncertainties can lead to biases in the statistical distributions that may result in a degraded discrimination power or in wrong hierarchy determination (false positives). Several independent studies have addressed the impact of systematic errors on the sensitivity and identified the most critical among them.    (deg)     (deg)  m 2 large  (eV 2 )  Earth density profile (PREM model): negligible impact  Atmospheric neutrino fluxes:  moderate impact of the shape uncertainties  large overall normalization uncertainty can be mitigated by anchoring the fit at E ν > 20 GeV  Oscillation parameters: significant impact of uncertainties in atmospheric sector (Δm 2 large, θ 23, θ 13 ), in particular θ 23 octant ; solar sector and δ CP have negligible impact ORCA can improve on the precision of Δm 2 large, θ 23 through global fit procedure ! MSW effect in Earth matter (at different baselines) (anti-)neutrino cross-section: σ νN ≈ 2σ νN The main physical background in the detector comes from the abundant flux of down-going atmospheric muons which can be misreconstructed as upgoing, mimicking a ν μ CC event. Preliminary studies show that the muon contamination (Cμ) can be efficiently reduced by cuts on the reconstructed muon track parameters, while maintaining a high neutrino signal efficiency: -angular error estimate: β < 2° -track fit quality parameter: Λ > (-4)-(-4.5) - reconstructed vertex position: R ν < m (from detector centre) -muon track reconstruction: likelihood maximisation based on the hit time residuals (ANTARES-like) + length estimation on basis of first/last emission points -Identification of hits belonging to the hadronic shower and re-estimation of the vertex position (assuming spherically expanding shower) - full shower reconstruction (for NC and e/τ CC)currently under study Reconstruction strategy PRELIMINARY NH IH instrumented volume Expected number of events The performance of ORCA for the determination of the neutrino mass hierarchy is assessed by means of a likelihood ratio test with nuisance parameters: For each toy dataset generated with a given hierarchy, the mixing parameters are fit with either IH or NH and the log-likelihood ratio is computed. The separation of the two resulting distributions is used to compute the mass hierarchy significance. where Statistical method The sensitivity curves shown hereabove have been obtained from a preliminary study with simplified assumptions: - - perfect muon zenith angle reconstruction - - true neutrino vertex contained - - at least 15 hits (from GEANT4 simulation) - - no reconstruction assumed  2.5  4σ in 5 years with the reference detector  3  5σ in 3 years with 5 Mton with a significant dependence in the reconstruction performance More detailed studies ongoing… Sensitivity study 5 years with 1.75 Mton GeV (50% Probability) PRELIMINARY 3 years with 5 Mton Formaggio, Zeller, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84(3) 1307 (2012) M. Honda et al., Phys. Rev.D 75 (2007), E. Akhmedov et al., JHEP 02 (2013), 082 D. Franco et al., JHEP 04 (2013) 008 W. Winter, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) J. Brunner, arXiv: