Ensiling phases Clostridia! anaerob!..but pH sensitive! L. monocytogenes gram-positive facultative anaerobic IN SPOILED SILAGES! E. coli Toxins! Yeast.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Formulation supplementary feed for milk production Its energy, crude protein, Ca and P content should be identical to those of milk. The nutrient content.
Advertisements

Ridley Block Operations
Institute of Bacteriology and Mycology University of Leipzig Microbiological and immunological results of dairy cows fed one year with Effective Microorganisms.
Biogas production from sugar beet silage
Grassland – Part 5 Silage and Hay.  Grass conservation involves the restricting of bacterial growth and other organisms, which would otherwise cause.
Carbohydrates in Dairy Nutrition L.E. Chase and T.R. Overton Dept. of Animal Science Cornell University.
About myself… 3 rd year Graduate Student at UBC 3 rd year Graduate Student at UBC working towards a Master of Science Degree working towards a Master of.
Danisco A/S FOOD PROTECTION SYMPOSIUM SAO PAULO, BRAZIL JUNE 2005 Natural Food Safety in the DAIRY WORLD Steffen Thun Application Technologist Dairy Applications,
Unit Food Science. Problem Area Processing Animal Products.
By C Kohn, Department of Agricultural Sciences Waterford, WI
RENAISSANCE NUTRITION, INC. Presented By. Overview 1) What is Dairyman’s Edge ® PRO? 2) How it works 3) Proof it works 4) Economic benefits 5) Summation.
Harrigan, Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, MSU Forage Harvesting and Handling.
Harvesting and Storing Quality Alfalfa
BIOTECHNOLOGY Any technological process that uses living things to make or modify products or processes.
Level II Agricultural Business Operations. To gain an understanding of animal nutritional requirements To asses the quality of silage To assess the quantity.
Level II Agricultural Business Operations. Good quality silage is a key factor in profitable milk production  Silage Production  Silage Assessment.
Pricing Corn Silage in 2007 Bill Weiss/Dianne Shoemaker Dept of Animal Sciences OARDC/OSU Extension
FEEDING FOR MILK COMPOSITION
VEN 124 Section IV The Malolactic Fermentation. Lecture 12: The Biology of the Lactic Acid Bacteria.
Evaluation of beef cow-calf nutrition in Yucatan, Mexico: MS thesis progress report Animal Science Kotaro Baba January 2006.
Fermentations are nowadays defined as a processes that do not involve
Using microorganisms in food production
1 2. Cow nutrient requirements and ration formulation ANIM 3028 Tom Cowan Tropical Dairy Research Centre, UQ, Gatton.
Ration formulation –The goal is to offset the animals requirement with an appropriate level of feed nutrients. –There are economic and possibly animal.
The other extreme… Hay Moisture Probe Contacts.
Effects of selenium yeast on rumen fermentation, lactation performance and feed digestibilities in lactating dairy cows C. Wang A, Q. Liu A,, W.Z. Yang.
Ruminal acidosis Part 1 Gabriella Varga Department of Dairy and Animal Science.
Dairy Cow Nutrition Feeding ruminant animals at different life stages Julie Toth.
Lactic Acid Bacteria Hopkins Microbiology Course 2010 Marcus Schicklberger.
Grass conservation. Why do we need to conserve grass?
Increasing dairy farm profit by maximising forage utilization Edith Charbonneau, Ph.D, agr. Collaborators: M.C. Coulombe M.C. Coulombe R. Roy R. Roy D.
COURSE SYNOPSIS Taxonomy, ecology, biochemistry and analytical technology of food microorganisms. Sources of microorganisms in food; distribution, role.
Slide 1 Silage- Preserved Grass for Winter Feed. Factors That Affect Silage Quality  Use of additives  Compaction  Speed of filling & sealing the pit.
FERMENTATION.
Baled Silage and Hay Preservatives Dennis Hancock, PhD. Extension Forage Specialist UGA – Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Dennis Hancock, PhD. Extension.
About myself… 3 rd year Graduate Student at UBC 3 rd year Graduate Student at UBC working towards a Master of Science Degree working towards a Master of.
SILAGE MAKING Assoc. Prof. Dr. István HULLÁR (2010.)
Dairy sheep farming and nutrition U. Bernabucci Department of Animal Production University of Tuscia – Viterbo
Carbon Cycling Production of Greenhouse Gases in Livestock Operations.
Good Microbes Fermentation Process. Goal of Metabolism Utilize food (sugars) in order to store energy in the form of ATP. Differences between prokaryotes.
THREE TYPES OF FOOD FERMENTATION
Harvest & post-harvest Physiology and Preservation.
Forage Conservation. Need for conservation  Feeding during drought or floods  Utilizing surplus forage  Transport of feed.
Making, Storing, and Feeding Round Bale Silage
Regulation of Feed Intake in Transition Cows Barry Bradford Associate Professor Kansas State University 135 Call Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506
Keys to Success with Baleage Dennis Hancock, PhD. Extension Forage Specialist UGA – Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Dennis Hancock, PhD. Extension Forage.
Applications of Biotechnological Processes Silage Production.
Principles of Silage Fermentation and Management L. E. Chase and T. R. Overton Dept. of Animal Science Cornell University.
Baled Silage Storage 4-10% loss Baling 2-5% loss Feeding Minimal loss Feeding Wilting 2-5% loss Fewer Losses Accumulate With Each Step End Result: 90%
Silage and Hay.  Grass conservation involves the restricting of bacterial growth and other organisms, which would otherwise cause spoilage.  This can.
HARVESTED FORAGES Silage
Conserving Whole Crop Cereal Silage
Anaerobic and Aerobic Respiration. What is the difference between aerobic respiration and anaerobic respiration?
Focus on Feeding Jo Crosby Dairy Extension Centre.
24 th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation FERMENTATION CHARACTERISTICS, ENERGY VALUE AND CONCENTRATION OF β CAROTENE IN YARROW (Achillea.
Food Science Ms. McGrath
Module 3 Forage Value/Production. Source of Nutrients -Protein Prebud > Mature Legume > Grasses Quality (amino acid profile) can be hi -Energy Cell contents.
Phosphorus Management for Sustainable Dairy Production International Conference: Steps to Sustainable Livestock John Bailey Sustainable Agri-Food Sciences.
Microbiology of Fermented Foods
Preservation of seaweeds as silage
A review on additives for grain silages
utilization of crop residues by small ruminants in Northern Ghana
Addah, W., Deku, G. and Ayantunde, A. A.
BIOTECHNOLOGY Any technological process that uses living things to make or modify products or processes.
MICROORGANISM AND FERMENTED FOOD PRODUCT
Role of yeast in chocolate production: The initial anaerobic, low ph and high sugar conditions of the pulp favor yeast activity.
Anaerobic respiration
Anaerobic Respiration
ProSil M-100 Silage Additive Incorporating a Unique Combination of Lactic Acid Bacteria for Improving Stability of Whole-Crop Cereal, Maize and Crimped.
Feed Additives Dr. Özge SIZMAZ University of Ankara Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Ankara, Turkey.
Presentation transcript:

Ensiling phases Clostridia! anaerob!..but pH sensitive! L. monocytogenes gram-positive facultative anaerobic IN SPOILED SILAGES! E. coli Toxins! Yeast Aerobic insta- bility! Moulds Myco- toxins!

additives Silage additives Stimulantsinhibitors substrate suppliers anaerobic Inoculant enzymes sugars aerobicacids others Lactic acid cellulasemolasses propionic acidformic Sulphur dioxyde Bacteria amylasesucroses sulfatesmineral formaldehyde hemicellulasesglucoses caproic acidlactic Sodium bisph proteases sorbic acidacetic pectinases ammoniabenzoic acetic acidacrylic propionatescytric sorbic

Biomin ® BioStabil blend of different homofermentative and heterofermentative bacteria for optimal anaerobic and aerobic stability of silages homofermentativeheterofermentative lactic acid acetic acid anaerobic stability aerobic stability

Bacteria Homofermentativeheterofermentative Lactobacillus acidophilusL. Brevis L.CaseiL. Buchnerii L CoryniformisL. cellobiosios L PlanterumL fermentum L salivariusL viridescens Pediococcus acidilatictic P damnosus Enterococcus Faecium e. Faecium lactobacillus

 Isolation and characterization  of bacteria out of silages  Evaluation and selection of most effective strains Production of lactic acid (high amount / very fast) Production of acetic acid Ratio lactic/acetic acid (differentiation homo- and heterofermentative) Good growth in a broad pH range Good efficacy in a broad range of forages and grains  Safety Risk assessment  Stability  Fermentation performance Highest product quality 1. Selection of the best silage strains for the product strain identity Virulenceactivity „ GRAS“ status Antibioticresistance Risk analysis

1. Evaluation and strain selection Range of metabolic end products Production of lactic acid (high amount / very fast) Production of acetic acid Ratio lactic/acetic acid (differentiation homo- and heterofermentative) Good growth in a broad pH range Good efficacy in a broad range of forages and grains

Selected strains: High production of lactic acid (LA) High production of acetic acid (AA) Optimal ratio between LA and AA Appropriate for the registration (GRAS status) Enterococcus faecium Lactobacilus plantarum Lactobacillus brevis Criteria for selection Multistrain for different substrates for different energy sources more stable Biomin ® BioStabil

Enterococcus faecium Lactobacillus plantarum Lactobacillus brevis Biomin ® BioStabil

Energy losses CauseEvaluation Losses (%) RespirationUnavoidable1- 2 FermentationUnavoidable4- 10 FluidsDepending on technique 0- 7 Field lossesDepending on technique 1- 5 Inadequate fermentationAvoidable0- 10 Anaerobic changes (storage)Avoidable0- 10 Aerobic changes (feed out)Avoidable0- 40 Total losses6- 84

Naturally ahead Forage production

DM LOSSES moisture% filling seepage gas Top-spoil Feedout Total Based on Forages: The Science of Grassland Agriculture, 4th ed. See Bickert et al (1997

Silage Average Dairy Farm: 500 cows + young stock. Corn silage :8300 t ( 2900 t R500/ton Hay : 700 t ( 570 t R700/ton Total costs/value: (8300 ton*R500/t)+(700 ton*R700/t)=4,6 mln R

Dry matter losses Losses are; Best case: 17 % 4,6 mln R *17% = R or Worst case: 30% 4,6mln R* 30% = 1,38 mln R

Energy losses CauseEvaluation Losses (%) RespirationUnavoidable1- 2 FermentationUnavoidable4- 10 FluidsDepending on technique 0- 7 Field lossesDepending on technique 1- 5 Inadequate fermentationAvoidable0- 10 Anaerobic changes (storage)Avoidable0- 10 Aerobic changes (feed out)Avoidable0- 40 Total losses6- 84

BioStabil effect on Energy and DM Values that can be expected provided good management practises: BioStabil Plus BioStabil Mays Expected Dry Matter recovery (%) 1,80%2% Expected Energy recovery (NEL/kg DM) 0,23 MJ (0,055 Mcal) 0,18 MJ (0,043 Mcal) 1 Mcal = 4,184 MJ Energy (NEL, Mcal)/kg milk: 0,72511

Energy losses Corn silage 2900 t DM= 18.4 mMj recovery Max Losses 30% = MJ Min Losses 5 % = MJ OR 540 T extra dry corn!

economics Cornsilage 2900 t DM: Energy recovery: 0,18 Mj/kg dm kg*0,18 Mj= Mj. Corn= 8,5 Mj = 61 t Corn= R Without taking the protein quality in consideration

Questions?