12/15MR22B-01 1 Some remarks on seismic wave attenuation and tidal dissipation Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter Eleven - Geophysical Properties of Planet Earth
Advertisements

Lecture 18 Earth's Interior
Seismology and Earth’s Interior. Mass of the Earth Spherical masses behave as if all mass located at central point g = GMe/R 2  Me = gR 2 /G g = 9.8.
Rheological Properties of Super-Earth’s Mantle 1 Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology and Geophysics LEAPS workshop, Pasadena, 2010.
Measurement of Dislocation Creep Based on: Low-Stress High-Temperature Creep in Olivine Single Crystals D.L. Kohlstedt and C. Goetze, 1974 Picture from.
This presentation relies on: 1) 2)
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 10 Oct 2014 Last Time: RHEOLOGY
12/14/2009 MR-14A-06 1 Some remarks on micro-physics of LPO (plastic anisotropy) some tutorials Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology.
Two-phase deformation of peridotite: localization by recrystallization and phase-mixing Robert Farla 1,2*, Shun-ichiro Karato 1 and Zhengyu Cai 1 1 Department.
Earth’s Interior and Geophysical Properties Chapter 17.
Chapter 1: Section 1 Earth’s Interior.
1. 2 Engineering Geology and Seismology Origin and Inferiors of the Earth Instructor: Dr. Attaullah Shah Lecture # 2 Department of Civil Engineering Swedish.
08/09/2007VLab-workshop1 Geophysical Anomalies in the Central Pacific Upper Mantle Implications for Water Transport by a Plume Shun-ichiro Karato Yale.
Deformation of Diopside Single Crystals at Mantle P and T E. AMIGUET 1, P. RATERRON 1, P. CORDIER 1,H. COUVY 2, AND J. CHEN 2 1Laboratoire Structure et.
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
Introductory Nanotechnology ~ Basic Condensed Matter Physics ~
Europa Scenarios: Physical Models Ice-cracks on surface consistent with either “warm-ice” or water beneath the surface Near infrared mapping consistent.
 Understanding Earth’s Interior can be a complicated process.  It’s thick, hot and we don’t have the technology to dig to the core or even through.
Unit 1, Section 3 1.  What are the layers of the Earth?  How do Earth’s internal forces change its surface? 2.
Strength of the lithosphere: Constraints imposed by laboratory experiments David Kohlstedt Brian Evans Stephen Mackwell.
ORBITAL ELEMENTS. LaGrangian Points L2 Earth-Sun.
Lab 2 Seismogram Interpretation
Measureable seismic properties
Diffusion in a multi-component system (1) Diffusion without interaction (2) Diffusion with electrostatic (chemical) interaction.
Hybrid simulations of parallel and oblique electromagnetic alpha/proton instabilities in the solar wind Q. M. Lu School of Earth and Space Science, Univ.
Remote Seismicity following Landers Earthquake Steve Kidder.
Lectures on Rheology of Earth Materials Fundamentals and frontiers in the study of deformation of minerals and rocks (at Tohoku University) Shun-ichiro.
Rheology rheology What is rheology ? From the root work “rheo-” Current: flow Greek: rhein, to flow (river) Like rheostat – flow of current.
F.Nimmo EART162 Spring 10 Francis Nimmo EART162: PLANETARY INTERIORS.
March 2, 2010Global Network Symposium 1 Physics of compression of liquids Implication for the evolution of planets Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department.
June 29, 2009EURISPET1 Strength of the lithosphere Introduction to mantle rheology from laboratory approach Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University New Haven,
Scattering and Attenuation Seismology and the Earth’s Deep Interior Scattering and Attenuation Propagating seismic waves loose energy due to geometrical.
Static & dynamic stresses from beam heating in targets & windows T. Davenne High Power Targets Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Science and Technology.
Travel-time versus Distance Curves
STRUCTURE AND MOTION By Kaila, Chelsey, Corey and Tessie STRUCTURE AND MOTION By Kaila, Chelsey, Corey and Tessie.
Chapter 12 Earth’s Interior
Department of Geology & Geophysics
INFERRED PROPERTIES OF EARTH’S INTERIOR Interpreting and Analyzing the Structure of the Earth.
Sea Ice Ridging and Rafting Structures on Mars and Earth Laboratory for Remote Sensing and Geoinformatics Department of Earth and Environmental Science.
Earth's Internal Structure → Layers core mantle crust These are identified using seismic waves p-waves & s-waves.
Comparison of Theory and Experimental Results on Seismic Wave Attenuation Ian Jackson a, Ulrich Faul a, John Fitz Gerald a, Stephen Morris b, Yoshitaka.
Low Frequency Seismic noise in seismic attenuation problems (and solutions) LIGO-G Kyoto GWADW 2010, May2010 Riccardo De Salvo.
Probing Earth’s deep interior using mantle discontinuities Arwen Deuss University of Cambridge, UK also: Jennifer Andrews, Kit Chambers, Simon Redfern,
Universal Gravitation Any two masses m 1 and m 2 separated by a distance R are attracted by a force given by F = G (m 1 m 2 ) / R 2 G = 6.67 x Nm.
Seismological observations Earth’s deep interior, and their geodynamical and mineral physical interpretation Arwen Deuss, Jennifer Andrews University of.
Geology 5640/6640 Introduction to Seismology 24 Apr 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Last time: Amplitude Effects Multipathing describes the focusing and defocusing.
Reduced-adiabat Isotherms of Metals and Hard Materials at 100 GPa Pressures and Finite Temperatures W. J. Nellis Department of Physics Harvard University.
Beyond Elasticity stress, strain, time Don Weidner Stony Brook.
What is an earthquake? An earthquake is a sudden, rapid shaking of the Earth caused by the breaking and shifting of rock beneath the Earth’s surface. For.
Global Tomography -150 km depth
Internal tides Seim, Edwards, Shay, Werner Some background SAB – generation site? Shelf observations Towards a climatology?
Astronomy 1010 Planetary Astronomy Fall_2015 Day-35.
Geologists have used two main types of evidence to learn about Earth’s interior: Direct evidence from rock samples Indirect evidence from seismic waves.
EARTH’S INTERIOR. Earth’s Interior Geologists have used two main types of evidence to learn about Earth’s interior: –Direct evidence from rock samples.
The Core-Mantle Boundary Region Jeanloz & Williams, 1998 Lower mantle Outer core CMB Heat flow.
I. Layers Defined by Composition 8.4 Earth’s Layered Structure  A) Earth’s interior consists of 3 major zones (chemical composition).
Layers of the Earth The Layers of the Earth are the Inner Core, Outer Core, Mantle and Crust.
Seismic waves Mathilde B. Sørensen and Jens Havskov.
TEMPERATURE  The deeper you go, the hotter it gets. & Celsius 4,000° C 4,000 km 2,000 km & kilometers 5,000° C 6,000 km F F mi.
I.Layers of the Earth II.Plate Tectonics III.Continental Drift.
Elasticity of MgO- Frequency Dependence Hoda Mohseni and Gerd Steinle-Neumann 1. Introduction Fig 2. MgO crystal structure 3. Experimental methods used.
Global Tomography -150 km depth
Earthquakes.
Earth’s Interior.
Misconceptions In Earth Science.
Department of Geology and Geophysics
Earthquakes sturdivant.
Terrestrial Planetary Geology: Basic Processes & Earth
CREEP CREEP Dr. Mohammed Abdulrazzaq Materials Engineering Department.
Shun-ichiro Karato Partial melting, water, rheological properties
Presentation transcript:

12/15MR22B-01 1 Some remarks on seismic wave attenuation and tidal dissipation Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics

12/15MR22B-01 2 Why Q? orbital evolution tidal heatingQ -> internal state T, water, grain-size-----

12/15MR22B-01 3 What is the relation between seismological Q and tidal energy dissipation? –frequency, T-dependence of microscopic Q and tidal energy dissipation (phenomenology) Q and internal structure of a planet –What controls Q? T, water, strain, grain-size, ?? –Why is tidal dissipation of the Moon so large ? –What controls the Q of a giant planet (what controls the tidal evolution of extra-solar planets)?

12/15MR22B-01 4 Conditions of deformation (tele-)seismic wave propagation tidal deformation

12/15MR22B-01 5 Depth variation of tidal dissipation Energy dissipation occurs in most part in the deep interior of a planet. High-temperature non-elastic properties control tidal Q (similar to seismic waves but at lower frequencies and higher strain amplitude). (Peale and Cassen, 1978)

12/15MR22B-01 6 Phenomenology

12/15MR22B-01 7 Absorption band model log  t models of anelasticity

12/15MR22B-01 8 (for small Q )

12/15MR22B-01 9 Most of actual results for minerals, oxides and metals at high-T and low frequencies show weak frequency dependence of Q. (absorption band model) olivine MgO Fe (Jackson et al., 2002)(Getting et al. 1997) (Jackson et al., 2000)) Experimental observations on Q

12/15MR22B “wet” “dry” Aizawa et al. (2008) Tan et al. (2001)

12/15MR22B Non-linear anelasticity Amplitude of anelasticity increases with stress at high T (above a critical stress (strain)). This tendency is stronger at lower frequencies --> enhanced anelasticity for tidal dissipation? (Lakki et al. (1998))

12/15MR22B Non-linear anelasticity? For, energy dissipation increases with strain (stress). Linear anelasticity for seismic wave propagation, but non-linear anelasticity for tidal dissipation?

12/15MR22B Frequency dependence of Q from geophysical/astronomical observations tide (Goldreich and Soter, 1966) seismic waves (+ Chandler wobble, free oscil.) (Karato and Spetzler, 1990)

12/15MR22B Lunar Q model lunar T-z (selenotherm) model (Hood, 1986) Water-rich (Earth-like) deep mantle ? (Saal et al., 2008) Due to non-linear anelasticity ? Williams et al. (2001)

12/15MR22B conclusions Tidal energy dissipation and seismic Q are related but follow different frequency and temperature dependence (for some models). Tidal Q is likely smaller than seismic Q because of low frequency and high strain (no data on strain-dependent Q for Earth materials). Solid part of a planet can have large energy dissipation (low Q) at high temperatures. Influence of grain-size is modest, but the influence of water is likely very large (not confirmed yet). Low tidal Q of the Moon is likely due to high water content (+ high strain amplitude).

12/15MR22B Tidal Q lower Q than seismological Q low frequency, high strain non-linear anelasticity, distant- dependent Q ( )? time-dependent Q (t) (due to cooling of planets)?

12/15MR22B MgO (Getting et al., 1997)

12/15MR22B Deformation (generation of dislocations) enhances anelasticity

12/15MR22B Q in terrestrial planets Liquid portion –Small dissipation (Q~10 5 ) Liquid-solid mixture –Not large because a mixture is not stable under the gravitational field (liquid and solid tend to be separated) Solid portion –Large dissipation (Q~ )

12/15MR22B-01 20

12/15MR22B Laboratory studies of Q (on mantle minerals, olivine)

12/15MR22B Conclusions Significant energy dissipation (Q -1 ) occurs in the solid part of terrestrial planets (due to thermally activated motion of crystalline defects). The degree of energy dissipation depends on temperature (pressure), water content (and grain-size) and frequency. Seismological observations on the distribution of Q can be interpreted by the distribution of temperature (pressure) and water content. Energy dissipation for tidal deformation is larger (smaller Q) than that for seismic waves. The degree of tidal dissipation depends on temperature (T/T m ) and water content of a terrestrial planet.

12/15MR22B-01 23

12/15MR22B Jackson et al. (2002)

12/15MR22B Orbital evolution and Q (Jeffreys, 1976)

12/15MR22B Macroscopic processes causing Q Giant planets –Dynamic, wave-like mode of deformation –Very small energy dissipation (Q~10 5 ) Terrestrial planets –Quasi-static deformation –Elastic deformation, plastic flow, anelasticity –Large energy dissipation (Q~ )

12/15MR22B-01 27

12/15MR22B Depth variation of Q in Earth’s mantle