Tidal Disruption of Globular Clusters in Dwarf Galaxies J. Peñarrubia Santiago 2011 in collaboration with: M.Walker; G. Gilmore & S. Koposov.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
David Cole, University of Leicester Walter Dehnen; Mark Wilkinson – University of Leicester; Justin Read – ETH Zurich 29 June 2012.
Advertisements

Florent Rostagni 1.  Context  Sample  Algorithm for detection and classification  Star formation  X-ray – optical study  Perspectives - Conclusion.
Near-field Cosmology from the Andromeda galaxy and subgroup Scott C. Chapman IoA, University of Cambridge With: R.Ibata, M.Irwin, G.Lewis, A.Ferguson,
Does the Fornax dwarf spheroidal have a central cusp or core? Collaborators: Justin Read, Ben Moore, Joachim Stadel, Marcel Zemp and George Lake Tobias.
Ultra-faint dwarfs as fossils of the First Galaxies Mia S. Bovill Advisor: Massimo Ricotti University of Maryland Mia S. Bovill Advisor: Massimo Ricotti.
Dwarf Galaxies in Group Environments Marla Geha Carnegie Observatories (OCIW)
An introduction to Galaxies. The World of Galaxies Spirals barred unbarred Ellipticals Irregulars.
Formation of Globular Clusters in  CDM Cosmology Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan)
Myung Gyoon LEE (K-GMT SWIG/Seoul National University) GMT2010:Opening New Frontiers with the GMT , Seoul National University, Korea 1.
From the Milky Way to Andromeda: A PAndAS View of Galactic Halos Brendan McMonigal Supervisor - Geraint F. Lewis Sydney Institute for Astronomy School.
Where will supersymmetric dark matter first be seen? Liang Gao National observatories of China, CAS.
P. Miocchi 1,2, R. Capuzzo-Dolcetta 2, P. Di Matteo 2,3 1 INAF - Osserv. Astron. di Teramo (Teramo, Italy) 2 Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Rome “La Sapienza”
Galaxy Formation and Evolution Open Problems Alessandro Spagna Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino Torino, 18 Febbraio 2002.
Clusters & Super Clusters Large Scale Structure Chapter 22.
dSph Masses Matthew Walker – IoA, Cambridge with Mario Mateo - U. Michigan Edward Olszewski - U. Arizona Jorge Peñarrubia - IoA Wyn.
TeV Particle Astrophysics, Venice, August 29, 2007J. Siegal-Gaskins1 Signatures of ΛCDM substructure in tidal debris Jennifer Siegal-Gaskins in collaboration.
Tidal Streams in the Milky Way (and M31) Jorge Peñarrubia (University of Victoria, Canada) & David Martinez Delgado (IAC, Spain) 22th of June 2006 Valencia.
Galaxy alignment within cosmic structures Weipeng Lin Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, CAS, China
Dwarf Galaxies and Their Destruction... Marla Geha Carnegie Observatories (OCIW) Collaborators: P. Guhathakurta (UCSC), R. van der Marel (STScI)
Galactic archaeology Rodrigo Ibata Observatoire de Strasbourg.
Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology SS Chapter 7 Dark Matter.
Breaking tidal stream degeneracies with LAMOST Jorge Peñarrubia (IoA) Cambridge 2nd December 08.
In The Beginning  N-body simulations (~100s particles) – to study Cluster formation  Cold collapse produces too steep a density profile (Peebles 1970)
Testing the Equivalence Principle for Dark Matter Using Tidal Streams Michael Kesden, CITA Collaborator: Marc Kamionkowski, Caltech COSMO ‘06 Tahoe City,
Stellar archaeology in the Milky Way Halo Variable stars and stellar populations in the new Milky Way satellites discovered by the SDSS Variable stars.
Simon Portegies Zwart (Univ. Amsterdam with 2 GRAPE-6 boards)
Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology SS Chapter 8 Structure Formation.
Numerical Modeling of Hierarchical Galaxy Formation Cole, S. et al. 2000, MNRAS 319, Adam Trotter December 4, 2007 Astronomy 704, UNC-Chapel Hill,
THE STRUCTURE OF COLD DARK MATTER HALOS J. Navarro, C. Frenk, S. White 2097 citations to NFW paper to date.
A.Kravtsov (U.Chicago) D. Ceverino (NMSU) O. Valenzuela (U.Washington) G. Rhee (UNLV) F. Governato, T.Quinn, G.Stinson (U.Washington) J.Wadsley (McMaster,
Cosmological structure formation: models confront observations Andrea V. Maccio’ Max Planck Institute for Astronomy Heidelberg A. Boyarsky (EPFL),A. Dutton.
The Dual Origin of a Simulated Milky Way Halo Adi Zolotov (N.Y.U.), Beth Willman (Haverford), Fabio Governato, Chris Brook (University of Washington, Seattle),
Effects of baryons on the structure of massive galaxies and clusters Oleg Gnedin University of Michigan Collisionless N-body simulations predict a nearly.
The remote globular cluster system of M31 LAMOST Workshop, 19 th July 2010 Dougal Mackey (RSAA, ANU)1 The Newly-Discovered Remote Globular Cluster System.
Astrometry & the Yale/WIYN ODI Survey. Potential astrometric projects Local luminosity function (van Altena, et al.) obtain  ≤ 0.10 parallaxes to 150.
Dwarf LSB galaxies in the Virgo cluster Jonathan Davies.
After decoupling, overdense regions collapse IF Collapse timefor all sizes. More small ripples than large waves. --> Universe dominated by globular clusters.
Masses of Galaxy Groups Brent Tully University of Hawaii.
Diaspora in Cercetarea Stiintifica Bucuresti, Sept The Milky Way and its Satellite System in 3D Velocity Space: Its Place in the Current Cosmological.
Telling Tails About Galaxies (Stellar Halos, Satellites and Hierarchical Structure Formation) Kathryn V Johnston (Wesleyan) & James S Bullock (Harvard)
Numerical Simulations of Galaxy Formation in a LCDM Universe Mario G. Abadi Observatorio Astronómico De La Universidad Nacional De Córdoba CONICET, Argentina.
KIAA Lectures Beijing, July 2010 Ken Freeman, RSAA, ANU Lecture 1: Introduction.
Globular Cluster and Satellite Orbits: 2008 Status Dana Casetti-Dinescu - Wesleyan and Yale.
Globular Cluters in Dwarf Galaxies. But first, a digression regarding tides... Leo I.
Spiral Triggering of Star Formation Ian Bonnell, Clare Dobbs Tom Robitaille, University of St Andrews Jim Pringle IoA, Cambridge.
A CDM view of the Local Group dSphs Jorge Peñarrubia In collaboration with Julio F. Navarro & Alan McConnachie Jorge Peñarrubia In collaboration with Julio.
Modelling the Stellar Populations of The Milky Way and Andromeda Collaborators: Theory:Observations: Kathryn Johnston (Columbia) Annette Ferguson (Edinburgh)
E. K. Grebel Globular Clusters: The Dwarf Galaxy Contribution1 Globular Clusters: The Dwarf Galaxy Contribution Eva K. Grebel Astronomisches Rechen-Institut.
The Ultra-Faint Milky Way Satellites
The Gaia-ESO Survey Sofia Randich INAF-Arcetri Survey Co-PIs: Gerry Gilmore & Sofia Randich 350+ Co-Is (mostly from Europe, but not only) 90++ institutes.
Alan McConnachie Mike Irwin, Annette Ferguson, Nial Tanvir, Rodrigo Ibata, Geraint Lewis, Scott Chapman, Avon Huxor Alan McConnachie Mike Irwin, Annette.
The influence of baryons on the matter distribution and shape of dark matter halos Weipeng Lin , Yipeng Jing ( Shanghai Astronomical Observatory , CAS.
Intermediate-mass Black Holes in Star Clusters Holger Baumgardt Astrophysical Computing Laboratory, RIKEN, Tokyo new address:
Probing the dark matter distribution in the Milky Way with tidal streams Monica Valluri Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago.
Semi-analytical model of galaxy formation Xi Kang Purple Mountain Observatory, CAS.
The Evolution of Intracluster Light Craig Rudick Department of Astronomy Case Western Reserve University.
Tuesday Summary Clusters - Galaxy assembly history through cosmological simulations can form bimodal cluster distributions. - Universal shape of the joint.
Galaxies: Our Galaxy: the Milky Way. . The Structure of the Milky Way Galactic Plane Galactic Center The actual structure of our Milky Way is very hard.
Nearby mergers: ellipticals in formation? Thorsten Naab University Observatory, Munich October 4th, 2006 From the Local Universe to the Red Sequence Space.
Galactic Structure and Near-field Cosmology via Astrometry with ODI Dana Casetti, Terry Girard, Bill van Altena - Yale Orbits of MW: satellites satellites.
Simulating the Production of Intra-Cluster Light Craig Rudick Department of Astronomy CERCA - 02/17/05.
Gaia ITNG2013 School, Tenerife Ken Freeman, Lecture 4: the stellar halo September 2013.
The prolate shape of the Galactic halo Amina Helmi Kapteyn Astronomical Institute.
On the Cusp of the Dark Matter Sergey Mashchenko Hugh Couchman James Wadsley McMaster University ( Nature 3/8/06; Science 29/11/07 )
The formation of ultra-compact dwarf galaxies and nucleated dwarf galaxies Collaborators: Ben Moore, Stelios Kazantzidis, Tobias Kaufmann, Andrea V. Macciò.
Towards Realistic Modeling of Massive Star Clusters Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan) graduate student Hui Li.
Pete Kuzma PhD student, Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics
The Origin and Structure of Elliptical Galaxies
Learning about first galaxies using large surveys
Modeling the Extended Structure of Dwarf Spheroidals (Carina, Leo I)
Presentation transcript:

Tidal Disruption of Globular Clusters in Dwarf Galaxies J. Peñarrubia Santiago 2011 in collaboration with: M.Walker; G. Gilmore & S. Koposov

Hierarchical galaxy formation Springel et al. (2008) Aquarius Simulation (10 10 particles)

Hierarchical galaxy formation Mcconnachie+08 Mackey+10

Hierarchical galaxy formation LMC Sgr LMC: 13 GCs (Schommer 91) Sgr : 9 GCs (Law & Majewski 2010) For : 5 GCs (Mackey & Gilmore 2003) For Peng+08 (Virgo Cluster)

Hierarchical galaxy formation LMC LMC: 13 GCs (Schommer 91) Sgr : 9 GCs (Law & Majewski 2010) For : 5 GCs (Mackey & Gilmore 2003) For Sgr Peng+08 (Virgo Cluster) only satellites with L >~ 10 7 L sol contribute to the host GC popul.

CDM simulations Peng+08 GCs formed in the host GCs formed in satellites that survive GCs formed in satellites that merge M halo  L halo  N GC Prieto & Gnedin 2008

Missing key ingredient: Evolution of GCs prior to accretion Peng+08

Tidal evolution of GCs in MW dSphs Use Fornax and Sagittarius systems as a test case of tidal disruption of GCs in satellites GCs have been detected in For (5) and Sgr (4) dSphs (Peñarrubia, Walker & Gilmore 2009)

Dwarf Galaxies CDM potentials  Triaxial NFW DM halo Stellar grav. potential neglected cosmological models

Stellar versus DM densities GCs factor 10 4  * DM haloes factor 3  DM Tidal evolution of GCs similar in all satellites M vir α (V max ) 2 ρ α r -1 DM “cusp”

GC tracing DM ? Mass  Density Efficient dynamical friction & tidal disruption ρ α M 2 Relaxation Gieles+2011

GC tracing DM ? Mass  Density Mass  position Signatures of dynamical evolution ? / 3 > (r) Efficient dynamical friction & tidal disruption ρ α M 2 Relaxation dominated Gieles+2011

Tidal stripping of GCs GCs sink to the dwarf centre in a Hubble time if initial apocentre < 1.5 kpc Only F1 can disrupt in the tidal field of Fornax … but its orbit has to bring it close to the dwarf centre (!) F5, 45, N-body (collisionless) sims of Fornax GCs on loop orbits.

Disruption of GCs in triaxial DM haloes: Orbits Orbits in triaxial potentials: 1.loops 2.boxes 3.resonances 4.irregular (stochastic)

Disruption of GCs in triaxial DM haloes: Orbits Clusters that can be disrupted (e.g F1) will be disrupted after a few dynamical times (dSph: t dyn ~ 30—50 Myr) if they move on box, resonant or irregular orbits The fraction of non-loop orbits depends on (i) triaxiality and (ii) density profile Disruption of GCs may be much more efficient in satellites than in the host

Disruption of GCs in triaxial DM haloes: F1 on an box orbit Evolution of cluster F1 Orb. Plane X-Z r 0 =0.5 kpc  = 0.8 (box orbit)

Disruption of GCs in triaxial DM haloes: Morphological signatures Shells, isolated clumps, elongated over-densities… arise naturally from the disruption of a GC in a triaxial potential They do not have a transient nature

Disruption of GCs in triaxial DM haloes: Kinematical signatures box and resonant orbits dSphs have flat velocity dispersion profiles (e.g. Fornax  =10 km/s ) Tidal debris associated to box and resonant orbits can appear hotter / colder than the underlying Fornax if the line- of-sight projection is aligned / perpendicular to the orbital plane

Coleman+04 Observed substructures in dSphs Photometric + spectroscopic Surveys have revealed substructures (shells, over-densities, clumps, …etc) in several dSphs (UMi, Fornax, CVeI, Scu) Distinct metalicity Distinct velocity dispersion (cold clumps) dSphs have typical crossing times of Myr substructures should quickly disperse and mix within the host dwarf Triaxial potentials? Stetson Ibata+06 Coleman+04 Ibata+06

Summary  Disruption of GCs more efficient in satellites than in the host  Accreted GCs may be dynamically evolved  The surviving GC population of For and Sgr dSphs show signatures of dynamical evolution  If the haloes of dSphs are triaxial, the disruption of a GC leaves morphological signatures such isolated clumps, shells,.., etc that do not dissolve in time  The disruption of a GC on a loop orbit introduces a rotational component  Debris associated to box and resonant orbits can be hotter/colder than the host stellar population depending on the line-of-sight projection

Future  Collisional-Nbody simulations of GCs on triaxial potentials (F. Renaud)  Distribution of cluster masses, densities and orbits in DM haloes with different triaxialities and density profiles  Follow-up of accreted GCs in a MW-like galaxy

Disruption of GCs in triaxial DM haloes: Morphological signatures Evolution of cluster F1 Orb. Plane X-Y r 0 =0.5 kpc  = 0.8 (loop orbit)

Disruption of GCs in triaxial DM haloes: Kinematical signatures loop orbits dSph are non-rotating systems The disruption of a GC on a loop orbit introduces velocity gradients in the host dwarf note: velocity gradients in dSphs are often interepreted as a signature of tidal disruption