Presented by: Detroit International Bridge Company Canadian Transit Company March 27, 2010 Ambassador Bridge U.S plaza of the bridgeCanadian plaza of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michigans Freight System Michigans Freight System MAASTO Committee on Highway Transport October 16, 2012 Larry Karnes Michigan Department of Transportation.
Advertisements

Airport planning.
BI-NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP STUDY Canada-U.S.-Ontario-Michigan Partnership Border Study.
1 Detroit River International Crossing (DRIC) New International Trade Crossing (NITC) Briefing for the Transportation Border Working Group November 8,
Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study -- Benefit Assessment Presented by: Jack Lettiere, Commissioner New Jersey Department of Transportation Presented to:
Beyond the Border Action Plan Border Infrastructure Investment Plan (BIIP) 1.
PUBLIC BORDER OPERATORS ASSOCIATION BORDER INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT UPDATES Canada – United States Transportation Border Working Group Meeting Vancouver,
1 Canada Border Services Agency Transportation Border Working Group - Border Infrastructure Updates Quebec City October, 2010.
Trans. Action Ontario1. 2 Toronto-Detroit Road Trip Quiz Only one entry per person No use of electronic aids Enter travel distance to nearest.
Public Border Operators Association Border Infrastructure Project Updates Canada – United States Transportation Border Working Group Meeting April 19 –
Border Infrastructure Project Updates Transportation Border Working Group – November , Ottawa, Ontario.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
Dan O’Neal, Chairman Washington State Transportation Commission.
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.
Transportation Border Working Group Montreal October 22 and 23, 2013 CBSA Project Update.
Transportation Border Working Group Chicago Plenary - Ottawa Update April 29, 2009 Ted Mackay, Transport Canada.
Annette Gibbons, Director General, Surface Transportation Policy, Transport Canada November 2, 2011 Ottawa Update.
Detroit-Windsor bridge battle: Separating out the truth BY JOHN GALLAGHER AND CHRIS CHRISTOFFJOHN GALLAGHER CHRIS CHRISTOFF
Plaza Shrinks The Times Herald March 24, 2009 By Mike Connell.
Beyond the Border Action Plan Border Infrastructure Investment Plan (BIIP)
Calais, ME-St. Stephen,NB Border Crossing Project A Case Study.
Created by Steven WevodauSteven Wevodau Detroit River International Crossing Study June 29, 2009 Mohammed Alghurabi Senior Project Manager IRWA’s 55th.
Detroit River International Crossing (DRIC) Study 2007 Ohio Conference on Freight Toledo, Ohio September 18, 2007.
Canada Auto industry Part 2. Historical Maps
1 Transportation Border Working Group Calgary, Alberta October 21, 2004 Presented by: Kris Wisniewski Canada-U.S.-Ontario-Michigan Border Transportation.
1 Presentation for Border Transportation Partnership Detroit River International Crossing May 31, 2005.
May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.
Greg Cenac Steve Haik Ross ChapmanRonnie Harris Perry DufreneMarc Mergen Ivan EchegarruaKen Robinson Mike GrayDan Sleker Harold Yeldell TRANSPORT NETWORKS.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
IAIA 2007, Seoul, South Korea Detroit River International Crossing Project Navigating the Multi-Jurisdictional Maze for a Large-Scale Transportation Project.
Page 1 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION Cyrville Road Bridge Replacement at Highway 417 (Ottawa Queensway) Detail Design Study Group Work Project
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Transport Transports Canada Canada Transportation Border Working Group New York State.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION BORDER WAIT TIME WORKING GROUP.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting March 28, 2006 Item No. xx Supp. Meeting.
Federal Government’s Role in Promoting Innovative Financing Northern Border Finance Workshop - May 16, 2007.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
5 th Bi-Annual Border to Border Conference Performance Measures at Commercial Ports of Entry Juan Carlos Villa.
Public Border Operators Association Border Infrastructure Project Updates United States – Canada Transportation Border Working Group Meeting October 27.
WELCOME! July 31, 2012 ODOT District July 31, 2012 PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S MEETING Introduce the project –Reconstruct I-75.
Bridge Expansion Feasibility Group. Purpose Our group is an independent coalition striving to provide objective information on the expansion of the Ambassador.
Southwestern Ontario Border Wait Time Project Update Mike Barnet, P.Eng Intelligent Transportation Systems Program Ministry of Transportation of Ontario.
Tom Norton, Executive Director Colorado Department of Transportation American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials September 9, 2003.
POS Regional Transportation Investments Viaduct/Seawall Discussion September 15, 2004.
The Border, Canada-US Trade and the Post-9/11 Security Regime with implications for Immigration and Diversity.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Policy and Staff Briefing March 14, 2006 Item No. xx Supp.
Trusted Trader Initiatives - Beyond the Border Action Plan Transportation Border Working Group April 17, 2012.
Border Trade Alliance Maria Luisa O’Connell BTA President March 11, 2008.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
CROSS BORDER TRADE October, 2004 M O V I N G F O R W A R D 2004.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Michele Mueller Senior Project Manager Applying Intelligent Transportation Systems to Cross Border Issues TC / FHWA Regional Roundtable Mike Barnet Senior.
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. Livingston Washtenaw Monroe Oakland Wayne Macomb St. Clair SEMCOG Region.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting November 8, 2005?? Item No. xx Supp. Meeting Date:
1 Lacolle/Champlain Border Zone Rehabilitation Project Benoit Cayouette Ministère des transports du Québec and Gerard Cioffi New York State Department.
Public Border Operators Association Border Infrastructure Project Updates United States – Canada Transportation Border Working Group Meeting April 14,
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
Transport Action Ontario Detroit River International Crossing (DRIC): Road Based Infrastructure In the Era of Climate Change.
TRANSPORTATION BORDER WORKING GROUP DATA WORKSHOP June 3, 2008.
TBWG – Ottawa Update Quebec City, October 28, 2010 Ted Mackay, Transport Canada.
US / Canada Border Issues William Cook Senior Manager, Corporate Customs DaimlerChrysler Corporation April 30, 2004.
Trade Transportation Activities Report Bill Frawley, TTI 2012 Border to Border Transportation Conference South Padre Island, TX November 14, 2012.
Objective Transportation Assets Strategic Intermodal/International Points Next Steps & Discussion Critical Issues for Ohio.
Detroit River International Crossing Project March 31, 2010.
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
Transportation Border Working Group - Vancouver October 21 and 22, 2014 CBSA Infrastructure Project Update.
County Road 19(Manning Road) & County Road 22 Improvements Environmental Study/ Preliminary Design Report November 2008.
Rice University – Baker Institute
Presentation transcript:

Presented by: Detroit International Bridge Company Canadian Transit Company March 27, 2010 Ambassador Bridge U.S plaza of the bridgeCanadian plaza of the bridgeAmbassador Bridge SOLVING BORDER CHAOS! SOLVING BORDER CHAOS!

Ambassador Bridge Central Crossing Corridor Ambassador Bridge Central Corridor Crossing: International symbol - #1 international border crossing Accommodates more than 26% of the trade between Canada and the United States Constructed in 1929 with private funds Created by reciprocal legislation to meet the needs of commerce and trade by Canada, Great Britain and the United States 3

Ambassador Bridge Central Crossing Corridor Located in the southeast Michigan and southwest Ontario transportation corridor: Ambassador Bridge, Blue Water Bridges, Windsor-Detroit Tunnel (3 vehicular crossings ) 2 ferry services and 2 rail tunnels all serve the same pool of commercial and passenger traffic Existing traffic data at all vehicular crossings confirm declining trend in border crossing traffic 6

3 Vehicular Border Crossings along Corridor Blue Water Bridge Detroit-Windsor Tunnel Ambassador Bridge located in Port Huron, MI / Sarnia, Ontario original bridge was 4 lanes second span was built in 1994 that created additional lanes capacity beyond 2030 located in Downtown Detroit, MI / Windsor, Ontario tunnel has (1) lane both ways backups common; limited commercial vehicles are allowed to use the tunnel located in Detroit, MI / Windsor, Ontario original bridge with 4 lanes plans for an replacement span underway replacement span provides 2 lanes each way to accommodate FAST and NEXUS 19

Ambassador Bridge Central Crossing Corridor Located in the southeast Michigan and southwest Ontario transportation corridor: Current economic state coupled with world recession means the downward trend in border crossing traffic is accelerating Windsor-Detroit tunnel traffic down 50.4% since % decline in vehicles using the Ambassador Bridge corridor since % decline in traffic at the Blue Water Bridges since twinning in

Ambassador Bridge Central Crossing Corridor Commercial and Passenger Traffic: 1965 – Auto Pact 1989 – Free Trade Agreement 1994 – NAFTA 1994 – Windsor Casino Temporary Location 1998 – Windsor Casino Permanent Location 5

Ambassador Bridge Central Crossing Corridor Traffic Levels: Traffic volumes lower today than in 1999 Total Traffic Ambassador Bridge: 1999 – 12,348, – 11,057,495 (-10.5% since 1999) 2003 – 9,572,456 (-22.5% since 1999) 2005 – 9,295,824 (-24.7% since 1999) 2007 – 8,953,029 (-27.5% since 1999) 2009 – 6,471,999 (-47.6% since 1999) 5

Ambassador Bridge Central Crossing Corridor Total Traffic Blue Water Bridges: 1999 – 5,537, – 5,967, – 5,678,702 (-4.6% since 2000) 2003 – 5,433,534 (-8.7% since 2000) 2005 – 5,509,311 (-7.4% since 2000) 2007 – 5,038,045 (-15.3% since 2000) 2009 – 4,474,566 (-24.8% since 2000) July 1997, the second span opened for service and original span closed for renovations November 1999, both spans operational 5

Ambassador Bridge Central Crossing Corridor Total Traffic Windsor – Detroit Tunnel: 1999 – 9,542, – 7,682,190 (-19.2% since 1999) 2003 – 6,535,971 (-31.5% since 1999) 2005 – 5,922,830 (-37.9% since 1999) 2007 – 4,844,063 (-49.2% since 1999) 2009 – 3,948,982 (-58.6% since 1999) 5

Ambassador Bridge – Gateway Project 11 $230 million funded project on the U.S side of the border Gateway project is 75% completed Direct link of the Ambassador Bridge corridor to U.S interstate system (I-75 / I-96 / I-94) Principle purpose of the AB Gateway Project to accommo- date future border crossing capacity needs and future second span of the Ambassador Bridge

Ambassador Bridge – Gateway Project Ambassador Bridge Gateway Environmental Assessment: Resulted in the issuance of three FONSIs (findings of no significant impact) Approved in 1997 and re-evaluated in 1999 and 2004 FONSI had three objectives – one of those objectives was to accommodate the Ambassador Bridge Second Span 12

Ambassador Bridge – Detroit Plaza New customs plaza constructed in the U.S. doubling inspection capacity Ambassador Bridge Gateway project makes Detroit plaza as accessible as possible Both plazas sized to accommodate future traffic projections Replacement span provides the resource required to continue the flow of traffic with minimal impacts on the community 14

Ambassador Bridge – Windsor Plaza 13 Windsor plaza project expands existing facilities and capable of accommodating Replacement Span January 2006 – 3 new customs booths on Windsor plaza completed 2008 – additional 6 new customs booths on Windsor plaza completed Total of 9 additional customs booths added to the Windsor plaza

Ambassador Bridge – Replacement Span Creates more than 20,000 jobs over the next two decades 4,000 jobs within the first year Entirely privately funded No municipal, provincial or federal funds required Immediate catalyst for economic growth in the Windsor-Detroit area 2

Ambassador Bridge – Replacement Span Replacement of eighty (80) year old structure Use of existing roadways and new highway connections (Ambassador Bridge Gateway Project) Cable-stayed design No piers in the Detroit River 10

Ambassador Bridge – Replacement Span Provides long-term solution for southeast Michigan and southwest Ontario transportation corridor: Significant environmentally sustainable feature includes $60 million water reclama- tion and treatment facility Installation of a model intelligent transportation system to automate customs, toll collecting and other processes to facilitate international trade, as requested by the NAFTA 7

Detroit River International Crossing Failed to look take into consideration existing and expanded capacity: Blue Water Bridge plaza improvements Detroit-Windsor tunnel plaza improvements Windsor Truck Ferry improvements Detroit Intermodal Freight Terminal CP rail tunnel expansion to accommodate international containers 7

Detroit River International Crossing Declining traffic levels / economic climate: DRIC relied on outdated traffic levels and declining trend throughout the corridor US Midwest manufacturing industry has fallen into a depression Effects of NAFTA absorbed Detroit has three casinos with additional casinos scheduled for construction in Ohio 2 of 3 automobile manufacturers went into bankruptcy 7

Detroit River International Crossing Redundancy not proper consideration: Location of DRIC bridge in Central Crossing Corridor in proximity to the Ambassador Bridge does not create redundancy (Department of State conclusion) Any incident impacting the Ambassador Bridge would impact the DRIC bridge 7

Detroit River International Crossing Failure to consider “do nothing” alternative: Ambassador Bridge Gateway Project part of existing infrastructure and represents “do nothing” alternative Environmental and community impacts of DRIC hidden from public scrutiny Information released by DRIC team indicating concern about the “ultimate cost of a new bridge, community disruption and how quickly it can be completed.” 7

Detroit River International Crossing Current infrastructure exceeds capacity needs: 2006 DRIC team acknowledges that traffic was decreasing to such an extent that a new crossing was no longer required Border delays attributed to customs’ requirements and heightened security post 9/11 Failure of customs to man all existing inspection booths At any one time only ½ of the customs’ booths provided at the Ambassador Bridge are operational due to lack of customs’ officers 7

Detroit River International Crossing Current infrastructure exceeds capacity needs: Legislative changes for customs processing at land border crossings Legislative changes will result in decreased crossing times for commercial shipments NEXUS / FAST pre-approved travelers Changes to border processing by Canadian and US customs’ agencies not taken into account 7

Detroit River International Crossing Threatened or Endangered Species: DRIC bridge will negatively impact vegetation and numerous species (special concern, endangered and/or threatened) No consideration of precautionary principle in a manner that protects the environment and human health and prevents environmental degradation and loss of Ontario’s biological diversity 7

Detroit River International Crossing Environmental Effects outside of Canada: US DRIC plaza and bridge located in Delray community of Detroit Delray is a low-income, low-political influence, minority neighbourhood Delray population is 56% Hispanic and 86% minority DRIC bridge coupled with the DIFT results in destruction of Delray 7

Detroit River International Crossing Predetermined Conclusion: Lands purchased for DRIC plaza five months prior to Federal Screening Report being released for comment Failure to incorporate mitigation strategies Planning / Needs Feasibility Study completed outside of the public participation process Neglected to follow terms of reference – only differences between various alternatives assessed 7

Ambassador Bridge – Replacement Span Use of existing infrastructure resulting in negligible to no impacts on natural environment All technical studies and information submitted to the federal government for review and approval in the form of an Environmental Impact Statement Studies and detailed information available at or the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry at

Questions & Answers THANK – YOU Paula Lombardi