State of Michigan Department of Community Health

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
Advertisements

Understanding Basic Components:
Tennessee Department of Health
Long Term Care Provider Associations Meeting Sharon White CMS – Region V August 22, 2007 F314 – Pressure Ulcers.
The Regulatory Perspective
Joint Commission Management of Human Resources Leadership Meeting September 22, 2010.
Accident Incident Policy Changes to Policy September 2007.
Issue Identification, Tracking, Escalation, and Resolution.
SITUATION RESPONSE FLOW CHART SUPERVISORS’S ACTIONS SITUATION OCCURS Direct observation, complainant reports, third party reports Document initial knowledge.
Home Care Agency Home Care Registry Licensing Melia Belonus, Director Bureau of Community Program Licensure & Certification Cindy Boyne, Director Division.
WIA Section 188 Disability Checklist Training Element 9 Corrective Actions and Sanctions.
Methods of Administration MOA Element 9 Corrective Actions and Sanctions.
Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act of 1996 HIPAA for Researchers: IRB Related Issues HSC USC IRB.
Methods of Administration MOA Element 7 Monitoring and Compliance.
How will APHIS Enforce the Retail Pet Store Rule? USDA APHIS Animal Care December 5, 2013.
Administrative Review Requirements September 17, 2014.
Advancing Excellence in America’s Nursing Homes A Review of 2 Clinical Tools: Pressure Ulcer and Restraints.
Nearly 50 American workers are injured every minute of the 40-hour work week and almost 17 die each day (OSHA) In 2003: 111 million workers at 7 million.
Medication Regimen Review Guidance Training CFR § (c)(1)(2) F428.
Indiana Federation of Ambulatory Surgical Centers September 27, 2013 To promote and provide essential public health services.
SELF REPORTED INCIDENTS How to Manage Them Effectively Leigh Grindley, RN, NHA Regional Vice President North Region LaVie Management Services.
ADULT DAY CARE Chapter 605 Survey Overview. Required Documentation When the surveyor(s) come to survey your Adult Day Care Center, they will ask you for.
Ministry of Health and Long Term Care Performance Improvement and Compliance Branch Compliance Management Program Presentation to the North East Family.
MDS 3.0 ACCURACY SURVEY PROCESS
Safety and Health Programs
1.  Incident reports should be written only when you are sure that a persons rights have been violated. True False  Full names of consumers should never.
Home Care Agency Home Care Registry Licensing Darlene Augustine, Health Quality Administrator Department of Health Division of Home Health.
Hospital Patient Safety Initiatives: Discharge Planning
New Staff Orientation 1 CMS Role of the State Agency Role of the Surveyor Stephanie Senior, RN Branch Manager, Survey Region 2. New York.
PERSONAL CARE AND NURSING SERVICES PROVIDER MEETINGS 2014.
Monitoring Requirements Virginia Department of Health Summer Food Service Program (SFSP) 2014.
ELEMENTS OF A PLAN OF CORRECTION AND PAST NON-COMPLIANCE
The Medical Director F Tag-501Guidance* Kurt Hansen MD, CMD Douglas Englebert RPh September 29, 2005.
Xavier Castorena, MSW Social Work Consultant III Children’s Medical Services OVERVIEW OF PARTNERS FOR CHILDREN WAIVER HEALTH AND WELFARE STANDARDS.
NH Telephone conference call NOTE : Rose Helwig retired. Please call the MDS help line and not Rose’s direct line. 2 2.
Unit #4 Establishing Committee Expectations – Safety & Health Programs 1.
Paid Feeding Assistants Guidance Training CFR §483.35(h), F373.
1 State of Michigan Department of Community Health Bureau of Health Systems Division of Operations Roxanne Perry February 28, 2008.
Bureau of Health Systems
1 State of Michigan Department of Community Health Bureau of Health Systems.
COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION UNIT(CIU) Bureau of Health Systems Division of Operations Department of Community Health.
Interim Policy for Reporting Alleged Abuse, Mistreatment, Neglect, Misappropriation and Injuries of Unknown Source.
Incident Management Training
Developing an In-House Air Quality Audit Program March 22, 2006 Judy B. Yorke Yorke Engineering, LLC x25
Michigan Department of Community Health Bureau of Health Systems Mike Pemble Director Joint Provider Surveyor Training September 14, 2010.
Guidance Training CFR §483.75(i) F501 Medical Director.
Long Term Care Certified Nurse Aide Instructor/Coordinator Certification Workshop Oklahoma Dept. of Career & Technology Education October 7, 2015 Nurse.
Guidance Training (F520) §483.75(o) Quality Assessment and Assurance.
Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) Administrative Review Requirements.
Home Health Agencies Melia Belonus, Director Bureau of Community Program Licensure & Certification Cindy Boyne, Director Division of Home Health.
1 State Inspections & Survey Process Regina Casabal & Mary Walsh The Office of Residential Care Facilities U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Family Assessment Service Engagement Event 21 st August 2013 NWCE-9A3GPK.
Health and Wellness for all Arizonans Sample Quality Management Program Note: This document is provided as a courtesy from the Arizona Department of Health.
1 Translating State Inspections: The ORCF Perspective Regina Casabal & Mary Walsh The Office of Residential Care Facilities U.S. Department of Housing.
Adult Day Care Chapter 605 Survey Process OSDH. Introduction  Adult Day Care Facilities/Centers are required to be in compliance with laws established.
NAPA COUNTY Conservation Development and Planning Department Code Compliance Flow Chart Building Code Violations 1 COMPLAINT Written complaint (form, letter,
Complaint Handling Medical Device Reporting May 19, 2016 Rita Harden, Director Customer Relations & Regulatory Reporting.
March 9, Keys to an Effective Internal Audit Function 2 1. Enhance accountability 2. Earn and increase taxpayer confidence and respect for government.
Storage, Labeling, Controlled Medications Guidance Training CFR § (b)(2)(3)(d)(e) F431.
Governing Body QAPI 2013 Update for ASC
Long Term Care Provider
Post Survey Protocol Kenny williamson keith Harbuck keith & holmes llc
2015 Nursing Home Survey and Enforcement Actions
Training Appendix for Adult Protective Services and Employment Supports June 2018.
Administrative Review Requirements
UNUSUAL INCIDENT REPORTS AND MAJOR UNUSUAL INCIDENTS
Administrative Penalties
TALA Annual Conference Surveyor Perspective related to the Licensing Standards for Assisted Living Facilities Galveston, TX April 1, 2019.
Initial Licensure Process, Survey Types & Licensure Action
Presentation transcript:

State of Michigan Department of Community Health Bureau of Health Systems Division of Operations Roxanne Perry April 12, 2011

ELEMENTS OF A PLAN OF CORRECTION, EVIDENCE Of COMPLIANCE IN LIEU OF REVISIT, AND PAST NON-COMPLIANCE Welcome

OBJECTIVES: State the essential elements of an acceptable Plan of Correction Discuss Evidence of Compliance in Lieu of a Revisit Identify the requirements for Past Non-Compliance

General PoC Guidelines Facility should do an in-depth analysis to ascertain why the problem exists and occurred so as to develop solutions necessary to achieve resolution and sustain compliance.

General PoC Guidelines Submission of an acceptable PoC is required for all deficiencies of scope and severity Levels B through L. Commitment to correct each deficiency by a certain date. You may only have one date of compliance per deficiency.

General PoC Guidelines Resident or staff identifiers used by MDCH in the statement of deficiencies may be used in the PoC. The required content of the PoC for each deficiency depends upon whether the deficiency is resident-centered or facility-centered.

General PoC Guidelines A single date of completion (month, day, year) must be entered in the right-hand column of the CMS-2567 or State report for each deficiency. Only one PoC date is allowed for each deficiency. The earliest allowable correction date is one day after the survey completion date shown at the top of the report.

Four Elements of a Plan of Correction 1. How corrective has been or/will be accomplished for those residents that were affected by the deficient practice.

Four Elements of a Plan of Correction 2. How the facility has identified or will identify other residents that have the same potential to be affected by the deficient practice.

Four Elements of a Plan of Correction 3. What measures or systemic changes have been or will be put in place to ensure that the deficient practice will not recur.

Four Elements of a Plan of Correction 4. How the facility will monitor its corrective actions to ensure that the deficient practice is being corrected and will not recur.

Resident-Centered Deficiency Examples include: failure to prevent pressure ulcers, protect dignity of resident. Element #1 - What did you do for the resident involved? Element #2 – What are you doing for like residents? Other examples include: provide notice prior to transfer, adequately assess residents

Resident-Centered Deficiency Element #3 – What systemic changes or measures have been put in place that would provide care and protect everyone? Examples include: In-service training, expansion of staff, physical environment changes, off site training Other examples include: staff supervision and discipline, resident council input, Interdisciplinary, multi-level quality improvement teams, use of consultants

Resident-Centered Deficiency Element #4 – How will you monitor corrective actions? Examples include: Oversight by DON or other management personnel, through quality assurance committee. Other examples include: resident council feedback, interviews with residents and families, surveillance

Facility-Centered Deficiency Examples include: environmental, staffing. Element #1 – How corrective action has been or will be accomplished for the facility deficient practice?

Facility-Centered Deficiency Element #2 – What systemic changes or measures have been put in place that would protect everyone? Examples include: In-service training, expansion of staff, physical environment changes, off site training. Other examples include: staff supervision and discipline, resident council input, Interdisciplinary, multi-level quality improvement teams, use of consultants

Facility-Centered Deficiency Element #3 – How will you monitor corrective actions? Examples include: Oversight by DON or other management personnel, through quality assurance committee. Other examples include: resident council feedback, interviews with residents and families, surveillance

Questions Regarding the PoC Process Facility questions regarding all aspects of the PoC process may be directed to the Licensing Officer/Manager: Detroit Office – Mattie Warren Gaylord Office – Laura Bauer Lansing Officer – Timothy Smith Complaint Investigation Unit – John Rojeski Other options include the survey monitors. As a last resort, Howard Schaefer (Director of NHM) or myself could be contacted.

Revisits Revists may be conducted at any time for any level of non-compliance. Revists are required for: 1) Non-Compliance at F (Substandard Quality of Care) 2) Harm level citations 3) Immediate Jeopardy

Compliance Date Determination The revisit date is the compliance date (when correction is verified), except when: The revisit determines all deficiencies have been corrected, and There are no new deficiencies, and The facility provides acceptable evidence to establish a correction prior to the first or second revisit date

Compliance Date Determination (cont.) 1st Revisit: If the facility is in substantial compliance on the date of the first revisit, the compliance date is automatically the date accepted in the PoC, unless there is evidence that compliance was achieved on either an earlier or later date.

Compliance Date Determination (cont.) 2nd Revisit: CMS allows a date earlier than the exit, if the citation does not require observations. If observations are needed, the exit date will be used. 3rd or 4th Revisit: Compliance (when correction is verified) is certified as of the date of the 3rd or 4th revisit. CMS does not allow a compliance date earlier than the revisit date for the third or subsequent revisits. Life Safety Code (LSC) revisits does not count toward the Health Survey.

Compliance Date Determination (cont.) Where more than one deficiency is involved, the latest correction date is used to determine compliance.

Evidence of Compliance In Lieu of a Revisit (Attestation)

Evidence in Lieu of Revisit In some cases, evidence of compliance may be submitted in lieu of a revisit. Evidence of compliance in lieu of revisit is not acceptable after a second revisit has been conducted. See CMS guidelines.

Evidence in Lieu of Revisit Examples of acceptable evidence are: 1) Invoice or receipt verifying repairs, purchases, etc. 2) Sign-in sheets for in-service training verifying attendance 3) Contact with resident council

Elements of Past Non-Compliance

Criteria for Past Non-Compliance To cite past non-compliance, all three (3) criteria must be met: 1. The facility must not have been in compliance with a regulatory requirement at the time the situation occurred, i.e. the facility must have had a violation; and 2. The situation of non-compliance must have occurred after the exit date of the last survey, and before the current survey (standard, complaint, revisit); and

Criteria for Past Non-Compliance cont’d 3. There must be specific evidence that the facility corrected the non-compliance (at the time of the incident) and is in substantial compliance at the current survey.

Facility Past Non-Compliance Checklist Date of Report: Administrator Name: Facility name: Address: Phone #: Resident Name: Date of Birth: Room #: Diagnosis: Date of event: Was the resident injured? If yes –Describe injury:

Facility Past Non-Compliance Checklist Cont’d Description of deficient practice: (Why and how did it happen?) Plan of Correction: In-depth analysis of how the deficiency occurred. How facility identified resident affected and residents having potential to be affected by the same deficient practice. Corrective action taken for resident affected. Measures or systemic changes made to ensure that deficient practice will not occur and affect others. How facility monitors its corrective actions to ensure deficient practice is corrected and will not recur. Date of completion of plan of correction. Attach documents for evidence of compliance. Name (printed) and Signature of person completing form

Documentation of Past Non-Compliance 1. Past non-compliance that is not Immediate Jeopardy and for which a quality assurance program has corrected the non-compliance, should not be cited. Note: The facility needs to bring this to the attention of the surveyor. The facility must provide the evidence to the surveyor who will contact his/her manager to review the information and make a determination if the evidence meets the criteria for past non-compliance. 2. Past non-compliance identified as immediate jeopardy is entered on CMS 2567 under the specific deficiency tag, scope and severity with supporting documentation. 3. The CMS 2567 should include the appropriate F-tag, date of deficiency, the date of past non-compliance, the evidence of past non-compliance and implementation of a plan of correction so that the civil money penalty can be determined.

Documentation of Past Non-Compliance (cont.) NOTE: The generic F698 has been discontinued Enforcement Action on Immediate Jeopardy Past Non-Compliance 1. Civil money penalty is required for immediate jeopardy. Usually a per instance CMP is imposed. NOTE: Past non-compliance does not apply to State Nursing Home Rules and the Public Health Code. A State of Michigan-tag (M-tag) may be cited.

Documentation of Past Non-Compliance (cont.) IDR 1. Will be allowed for past non-compliance cites. i.e.: To contest whether a deficiency occurred. 2. Can IDR whether a past non-compliance citation is a deficiency. 3. Cannot IDR whether a deficiency (cite) is past non-compliance.

Putting it all together When to give surveyor the PNC packet? If I give the surveyor a PNC packet why do they continue to investigate? Who accepts/rejects the PNC packet? Give packet at the beginning, during or end. Surveyors continue to investigate as the PNC may not be accepted. We are still obligated to complete the investigation – could go before an ALJ to determine if the survey process was followed. A manager decides if the PNC packet is accepted or rejected.

Bureau of Health Systems State Operations Manual (CMS) RESOURCES Bureau of Health Systems http://www.michigan.gov/bhs State Operations Manual (CMS) Appendix P http://cms.gov/manuals/Downloads/som107ap_p_ltcf.pdf Appendix PP http://cms.hhs.gov/manuals/Downloads/som107ap_pp_guidelines_ltcf.pdf

State Operations Manual (CMS) RESOURCES State Operations Manual (CMS) Appendix PP http://cms.hhs.gov/manuals/Downloads/som107ap_pp_guidelines_ltcf.pdf PNC Chapter 7 of SOM http://www.cms.gov/manuals/downloads/som107c07.pdf