Using ARCON96 for Control Room Radiological Habitability Assessments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
21M062007D The Shaw Group Inc. ® An Analytical Screening Technique to Estimate the Effect of Cooling Ponds on Meteorological Measurements – A Case Study.
Advertisements

Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling for Carbon-14 Emissions 14th NUMUG Conference, June 2011, Chicago, IL Theodore A. MessierMark Strum Principal ScientistAdvisory.
Determining a Backup Source of Meteorological Data for Dispersion Characteristics (Wind and Stability) Mark T. Carroll Heather A. McDonald Andrew J. Lotz.
Case Study: Impact of Above Ground Spent Fuel Storage on Nearby Meteorological Systems Jim Holian SAIC NUMUG Meeting Charlotte, NC June 2008.
X/Q for Releases From Area Sources 2008 RETS-REMP and NUMUG Workshop Jim Key Key Solutions, Inc.
1 DG-1247: Design-Basis Hurricane and Hurricane Missiles for Nuclear Power Plants Brad Harvey, CCM Senior Physical Scientist (Meteorology) U.S. Nuclear.
Meteorology Combined License NRC Review Process Meteorology Joseph Hoch Physical Scientist U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission June , 2008 Nuclear.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering and Technology.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
1 ANSI/ANS American National Standard for Determining Meteorological Information at Nuclear Facilities R. Brad Harvey, CCM Physical Scientist.
Temporal Comparison of Atmospheric Stability Classification Methods
Weather and X/Q 1 Impact Of Weather Changes On TVA Nuclear Plant Chi/Q (  /Q) Kenneth G. Wastrack Doyle E. Pittman Jennifer M. Call Tennessee Valley Authority.
2. Dispersion We’re going to move on to the second major step in doing dose assessment.
US NRC Protective Action Recommendation Study National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference April 10, 2008 Las Vegas, NV Randy Sullivan, CHP.
X/Q for Releases From Area Sources 2009 RETS-REMP Workshop Jim Key Key Solutions, Inc.
Revision of NUREG-0654 Supp. 3 RI Scheduling Conference December 11, 2008 Mystic, Ct Randy Sullivan, CHP.
Objectives In this chapter, you will learn about:
Meteorological Measurement Error Analysis based on ANSI/ANS-3.11 (2005) Kenneth G. Wastrack Tennessee Valley Authority NUMUG 2005.
page 0 Prepared by Associate Prof. Dr. Mohamad Wijayanuddin Ali Chemical Engineering Department Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Toxic Release and Dispersion Models
Calculation of wildfire Plume Rise Bo Yan School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology.
Strategies for the Selection of Substitute Meteorological Data Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast – Pilgrim Station Presented at the 14 th Annual RETS-REMP.
Radionuclide dispersion modelling
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
Air Quality Modeling.
Identifying Non-Linear Flow for Modeling of Routine Releases from TVA Nuclear Facilities Toree M. Cook Kenneth G. Wastrack Doyle E. Pittman Tennessee Valley.
Inference for regression - Simple linear regression
Waste Treatment Plant Project Adapting Dispersion Software to DOE Standard 3009 Jorge Schulz Thomas R. McDonnell Bechtel National, Inc EFCOG Safety.
Investigation of Meteorological Tower Siting Criteria Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast – Pilgrim Station Presented at the 15 th Annual RETS-REMP Workshop.
R. Brad Harvey, CCM Physical Scientist Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11th NUMUG Meeting, St. Louis, MO, October.
EFCOG Safety Analysis Working Group May 10, 2012 Jeremy Rishel Bruce Napier Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling in Safety Analyses: GENII.
Session 4, Unit 7 Plume Rise
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
Earth System Sciences, LLC Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases Doug Blewitt, CCM 1.
Cases 1 through 10 above all depend on the specification of a value for the eddy diffusivity, K j. In general, K j changes with position, time, wind velocity,
Tracer Simulation and Analysis of Transport Conditions Leading to Tracer Impacts at Big Bend Bret A. Schichtel ( NPS/CIRA.
An Introduction to Programming and Algorithms. Course Objectives A basic understanding of engineering problem solving process. A basic understanding of.
Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Identifying High Collision Concentration Locations Raghavan Srinivasan 1 Craig Lyon 2 Bhagwant Persaud 2 Carol Martell.
13 th Nuclear Utility Meteorological Data Users Group Meeting Lessons Learned From Establishing Design- and Operating-Basis Regional Meteorological Conditions.
Strengthening Science Supporting Fishery Management  Standards for Best Available Science  Implementation of OMB’s Peer Review Bulletin  Separation.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA) Jimy Dudhia.
1 Control Room Habitability Program James A. Carlson, Omaha Public Power District, Author Deep Ghosh, Southern Nuclear Operating Greg Holbrooks, PE, Duke.
Comparison of the AEOLUS3 Atmospheric Dispersion Computer Code with NRC Codes PAVAN and XOQDOQ 13th NUMUG Conference, October 2009, San Francisco, CA.
Intelligent Database Systems Lab 國立雲林科技大學 National Yunlin University of Science and Technology Extensions of vector quantization for incremental clustering.
1 Impact of Revised 10 CFR 50.46(b) ECCS Acceptance Criteria 2009 Regulatory Information Conference Rockville, MD March 12, 2009 Mitch Nissley Westinghouse.
Physical Database Design Purpose- translate the logical description of data into the technical specifications for storing and retrieving data Goal - create.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
PRACTICAL USER TIPS FOR ARCON96 10 TH NUMUG MEETING Wilmington, NC June 2005 By Y. J. Lin Bechtel Power Corporation Frederick Maryland.
Ship Computer Aided Design
Chronic Atmospheric Releases Using GENII V.2 EXAMPLE Dose Calculation for Chronic Atmospheric Releases Using GENII V.2 FRAMES-2.0 Workshop U.S. Nuclear.
1 NRC Update R. Brad Harvey, Leta Brown US Nuclear Regulatory Commission th NUMUG Meeting, Wilmington, NC.
NUMUG - Oct Atmospheric Stability – Methods & Measurements Robert F. Yewdall PSEG Nuclear LLC.
Various Methodologies for Calculating the Impacts on Delta-T From Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSI) Jim Holian and Steve Mirsky, SAIC.
Consequence Analysis Robert Wu South Coast Air Quality Management District.
Pole attachmentS Joint Accounting Conference may 12, 2017
Recent Developments Regarding Control Room Habitability Assessment
Meteorological Site Representativeness and AERSURFACE Issues
Modeling Iodine Released During a Nuclear Power Plant Accident
CHAPTER 5: PHYSICAL DATABASE DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE
The Role of Meteorology in the Nuclear Power Industry
Martin Piringer, Claudia Flandorfer, Sirma Stenzel, Marlies Hrad
Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases
PURPOSE OF AIR QUALITY MODELING Policy Analysis
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
TRTR Briefing September 2013
XOQDOQ Calculation Method, Tools and Pitfalls
Wind Velocity One of the effects of wind speed is to dilute continuously released pollutants at the point of emission. Whether a source is at the surface.
Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety
Presentation transcript:

Using ARCON96 for Control Room Radiological Habitability Assessments R. Brad Harvey, Steve LaVie, Leta Brown US Nuclear Regulatory Commission RBH@NRC.GOV 301-415-4118

Outline Introduction Executing ARCON96 Experience from Reviewing ARCON96 Analyses Conclusion

Introduction Why licensees are choosing to update their CR Habitability Analyses Alternative Source Term (AST) Implementation Power Uprate Submittals Generic Letter 2003-01 Physical changes to CR ventilation system

ARCON96 Guidance ARCON96 User’s Guide NUREG/CR-6331, Revision 1 (May 1997) Staff does not endorse all of the illustrative examples in the ARCON96 User’s Guide as regulatory positions Subsequent Staff Guidance NRC letter to Westinghouse (July 1997) NRC/NEI Public Meeting (March 2000) Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1111 (December 2001) Regulatory Guide 1.194 (June 2003)

Executing ARCON96 Release Type Ground Vent (don’t use) Stack More than 2½ times the height of adjacent structures, or Outside the zone of influence of adjacent structures

Executing ARCON96 Zone of Influence for Stacks L is the height or width, whichever is less, of the building cluster cross-section perpendicular to the wind. A stack located inside the zone should be 2½ times the height of the structure that causes the building wake.

Executing ARCON96 Release Height Building Area Calculate plume rise separately and add to the vent/stack physical height Plume buoyancy and/or vertical velocity should be maintained throughout the release Building Area Use a value of 0.01 m3 if a building area of zero is desired

Executing ARCON96 Surface Roughness Averaging Sector Width Constant Use 0.2 m in lieu of the default value of 0.1 m Reasonable values range from 0.1 m to 0.5 m Averaging Sector Width Constant Use 4.3 in lieu of the default value of 4.0

Executing ARCON96 Direction to Source Use direction from receptor back to the release point Ensure direction entered has same reference point as the wind directions reported in the meteorological database (i.e., true north versus plant north)

Executing ARCON96 Diffuse Area Sources Initial Diffusion Coefficients (σy and σz) Use one sixth of the cross-sectional area width and height Direction to Source Use line-of-sight from center of cross-sectional area to receptor Distance to Receptor Move cross-sectional area forward along line-of-sight until it intercepts the closest point on the building surface

Executing ARCON96 Diffuse Area Sources

Experience from Reviewing ARCON96 Analyses Multiple ARCON96 Runs Multiple ARCON96 runs were made to handle multiple data files (multiple years of data) Wind Speed Units The default setting of m/sec was used instead of switching to the database units of mph Database units changed from mph to m/sec during analyzed period of record Building Area All release points were assumed to be within the building wake of the containment

Experience from Reviewing ARCON96 Analyses Release Points versus Building Area

Experience from Reviewing ARCON96 Analyses Upper Wind Data Upper wind data not provided nor identified as missing with a field of “9”s Delta-T Data Conversion to Stability Class Conversion from °F/XYZ ft to °C/100 m performed incorrectly Meteorological Data Quantity Less than five years of data provided Annual data recovery rates less than 90%

Experience from Reviewing ARCON96 Analyses Meteorological Data Quality Missing or duplicate hourly records Inconsistent identification of missing data (e.g., using values of zero instead of “9”s) Wind data remaining unchanged for several hours Inconsistent wind speed, wind direction, or stability class frequency distributions from year to year Stable conditions during the day/unstable conditions at night

Experience from Reviewing ARCON96 Analyses Meteorological Data Quality (continued) Extended periods of extremely unstable (stability class A) conditions Upper level wind speeds less than lower level wind speeds Poor correlation between lower level and upper level wind direction frequency distributions Inconsistent joint frequency distributions between ARCON96 input data and PAVAN input data Wind Direction Values Values ranged from 0° to 359° instead of 1° to 360°

Conclusion This presentation is intended to help licensees avoid common mistakes and improve the quality and acceptability of their submittals Staff does not endorse all of the illustrative examples in the ARCON96 User’s Guide as regulatory positions Significant deviations from regulatory guidance can result in delays in obtaining staff approval