Common Building Code Misunderstandings Increasing Your Awareness of the Wisconsin Commercial Building Code Specialists in Post Frame Engineering | www.halbergengineering.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Grimsby Secondary School
Advertisements

Fire-Resistive Construction (2nd part)
Proposed Land Use & Development Regulations Public Hearing Month Day, 2012.
Guidelines and Required Codes That Affect Building Design
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING DIVISION Ronald L. Lynn, Director/Building Official Gregory J. Franklin, Assistant Director Neil Burning, Manager.
FCIA CODE EFFORTS FCIA Spring Conference 2003 By William E. Koffel, P.E. Koffel Associates, Inc.
Oklahoma Uniform Building Code Commission IRC Building Subcommittee Presentation to Commission November 17, 2010.
IBC 2006 Chapter 5 Building Height and Areas After determining occupancies, the code analysis determines what height and areas are allowable for the occupancy.
NFPA Chapter 6 Chapter 6 is used to classify the occupancy and the hazard contents Proper classification is used to guide the implementation of.
Architectural Design Construction of a Wall Section Upon completion of this assignment, you will be able to accurately and neatly draw, to scale and limits,
OBC 2009 CHAPTER FIVE GENERAL BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREAS.
Residential Construction Unit 1 Mr. Todzia.  Definition-Legal requirements designed to protect the public by providing guidelines for structural, electrical,
Governmental Constraints on Construction Chapter 2.
Occupancy Classification Under NFPA 13 Examine the proposed facility and make recommendation on the Occupancy Classification Used to classify fuel loads.
Land Use and Development Regulations © 2010 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Civil Engineering and Architecture Our object in the construction of the state is.
Governmental Constraints on Construction Chapter 2.
© 2006 ITT Educational Services Inc. CD230 Architectural Design & Drafting: Unit 10 Slide 1 Unit 10 Commercial Construction.
Rural Residential Zoning District & Subdivision Exemptions Southampton County Board of Supervisors Presented by Jay Randolph November 28, 2005.
Building Codes. Codes  Building Code –Regional  BOCA, SBCCI, CABO, UBC, CITY OF DALLAS, –National  IBC  Fire Code –NFC, UFC, NFPA, Life Safety 101.
Fire-Related Properties of Materials Chapter 7. Mehta, Scarborough, and Armpriest : Building Construction: Principles, Materials, and Systems © 2008 Pearson.
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting April 18, 2006 Public Hearing: Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Section Regarding Commercial/Industrial Park.
Code Analysis. Identify the relevant codes  Local building code  Local accessibility code (or ADA)  Local fire code (or the NFPA)  Mechanical, electrical.
Subcommittee on Heights, Massing, and Alternate Standards    Third Report – January 20, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission.
Fire Inspection and Code Enforcement, 7 th Edition Chapter 4 — Construction Types and Occupancy Classifications Inspector I.
Building Classifications: Construction Types.  Based on how the building is constructed.  Relates to:  Materials used  Combustibility  Fire-resistance.
Code Officials and the Code Process.  To design the interior of the building in conjunction with codes, standards and federal regulations required in.
Chapter 44 Building Codes and Commercial Design. 2 Links for Chapter 44 Building Codes Design Categories Using the Codes Related Web Sites.
The ABC ’ s of the Development Review Process: Navigating the Bureaucratic Maze 2007 GPA Fall Conference.
Code Analysis: Don’t try this at home. Identify the relevant codes  Local building code  Local accessibility code (or ADA)  Local fire code (or the.
ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING DONATION BIN ORDINANCE Zoning Division June 24, 2014.
Design Development Code analysis Partition types.
Planning Construction Chapter 15. Private Sector  Most buildings and other structures are built for ordinary people. These people make up the private.
© 2010 by Cengage Learning Chapter 25 / Chapter 24 ________________ Zoning/ Land-Use Control.
Construction Types Chapter 3.
Codes.
TOPICS IN LAND SURVEYING: SUBDIVISIONS TREC #7220 TIM HOWELL, RLS TREC INSTRUCTOR #1556.
Code Officials and the Code Process.  Concentrates on the code process as a whole.  Different type of code officials  Various steps that are taken.
Sprinkler Loads on Trusses
MWFRS Method v/s Components and Cladding Method for Truss Uplift Connection Design for Wind Overview.
Fundamentals of Code Compliance AIA Connecticut Presented by.
Sprinkler Loads on Trusses Educational Presentation.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
Guidelines for Land Clearing Presented By: SLC Environmental Resources Department.
Building Construction
Land Use and Development Regulations © 2010 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Civil Engineering and Architecture Our object in the construction of the state is.
Exercise #2 (part 2) Based on what you read in Chapter 4, determine if the corridors and exit doors meet the requirements for egress width, according to.
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT REGULATIONS ZOA Tuesday, October 9, 2012.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Design Commission Land Use Review LU DZ Arthouse.
Building Construction for the Fire Service
Truss Heel Heights and Energy Code Requirements
House Bill 535 : 2016 Florida Legislature
AR-315 BUILDING CODES & BYE LAWS
Impact of C&C loads due to ASCE/SEI 7-16
Chapter 2 Building Occupancy
NFPA 5000 Occupancy Classifications
Common Surveys Used For Commercial Real Estate Transactions
RULES OF ENGAGEMENT.
Land Use and Regulations
Wood Structures Topic 8 Quality Workmanship
Residential Foundations
Residential Foundations
Prepared for Municipal Officials in the Prairie Provinces March 2018
Overdriven Nails in Structural Sheathings
Module 4: Technical Requirements for Prefabricated Buildings – Alberta
Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
Land Use and Development Regulations
City Commission Workshop
UNIT I.
UNIT I.
Denver Fire Depart. License Fire Alarm Practice Test # 12
Presentation transcript:

Common Building Code Misunderstandings Increasing Your Awareness of the Wisconsin Commercial Building Code Specialists in Post Frame Engineering | | P: (866) | F: (866) | | 10335N DUFFY RD | HAYWARD WI | By Aaron Halberg, Professional Engineer

Code Topics to Focus on Today: Areas Frequently Misunderstood Awareness of “Complex” Issues Areas with Large Cost Impacts Areas being revised in the 2011 Code A discussion of Snow

Public or Place of Employment Commercial = As with any law, there are exceptions so be sure to read the fine print!

Wisconsin Commercial Building Code Comm : “The Code” Adopts the IBC and other Standards by reference. Includes specific amendments which “trump” the International Codes and Standards. New version this year using 2009 I-Code and new amendments

Some changes coming in 2011 Live/Work units introduced Storm Shelter design standards defined Compliance required for Envelope Tightness in “R” occupancies Presumptive Soil Loads must be reduced by ½ for soil bearing values. Posting requirement for owners/occupants in Frost Protected Shallow Foundation buildings.

Some changes coming in 2011 Truss Design and bracing requirements… new provisions for trusses spanning over 60’ require a designer to create bracing plans per latest TPI Standard. This requirement is exempted from Commercial buildings in Wisconsin. Should (?) be enforced in buildings that are not Wisconsin Commercial buildings.

Truss Bracing from BCSI Guide

Occupancy Classification “Use” of the building Assembly A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 Business B Education E Factory F-1 F-2 Hazardous H-1 H-2 H-3 H-4 H-5 Institutional I-1 I-2 I-3 I-4 Mercantile M Residential R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 Storage S-1 S-2 Utility U* U

Building Volume Used for Plan Review Threshold (and for some municipalities, who can perform the Review) Includes all space from Roof Deck to Lowest Floor and out-to-out on Walls Neglect volume under overhangs unless they are intentionally large enough for storage, occupancy, or other use of the roof.

Plan Review Thresholds - Current Occupancy Classification Smaller than 25,000 ft 3 25,000 ft 3 to less than 50,000 ft 3 50,000 ft 3 or larger A-2, A-3 Business Factory Mercantile Storage Utility Exempt from Safety & Buildings Review (Still must meet Code & may still require local plan review) May be Registered in Lieu of S&B Plan Review or Plan Review by Delegated Municipalities Plan Review by Safety & Buildings A-1, A-4, A-5 Education High Hazard Residential May be Registered in Lieu of S&B Plan Review or Plan Review by Delegated Municipalities Plan Review by Safety & Buildings or Plan Review by Delegated Municipalities Institutional Plan Review by Safety & Buildings or Plan Review by Delegated Municipalities

Plan Review Thresholds - Current 40’ x 64’ x 14’ at 4/12 with 8” heel = 48,600 ft 3 : Register or Local Review (where available) 40’ x 64’ x 16’ at 4/12 with 8” heel = 51,700 ft 3 : State Plan Review required

Plan Review Thresholds – Proposed Occupancy Classification Smaller than 25,000 ft 3 25,000 ft 3 to less than 50,000 ft 3 50,000 ft 3 or larger A-2, A-3 Business Factory Mercantile Storage Utility Exempt from Safety & Buildings Review (Still must meet Code & may still require local plan review) Plan Review by Safety & Buildings or Plan Review by Delegated Municipalities Plan Review by Safety & Buildings A-1, A-4, A-5 Education High Hazard Institutional Residential Plan Review by Safety & Buildings or Plan Review by Delegated Municipalities

Plan Review Thresholds - Proposed 40’ x 64’ x 14’ at 4/12 with 8” heel = 48,600 ft 3 : State Plan Review or Local Review (where available) 40’ x 64’ x 16’ at 4/12 with 8” heel = 51,700 ft 3 : State Plan Review required

Delegated Municipalities Eau Claire County and Waushara County offer plan review for buildings less than 50,000 ft 3 throughout those 2 counties. Additionally, over 200 individual municipalities (Towns, Villages, or Cities) throughout the state offer similar services. As the participating municipalities change over time, check for the latest information available through the Safety & Buildings website.

Occupancy Classification and Building Size IBC Allowable Size (Base Values, these may be increased) Type IIIB Exterior Noncombustible Interior any Material Type VB Exterior and Interior Using any Material Occupancy StoriesArea per StoryStoriesArea per Story A-3, Assembly 2 9,50016,000 B, Business 4 19,00029,000 E, Education 2 14,50019,500 F-1, Factory 2 12,00018,500 F-2, Factory 3 18,000213,000 M, Mercantile 4 12,50019,000 S-1, Storage 3 17,50019,000 S-2, Storage 4 26,000213,500 U, Agricultural 2 18,000212,000 Only some occupancies shown. All occupancy classifications and construction types have data shown in the code.

Occupancy Classification and Building Size So how big can you make a building? This is where it can get complex quickly! Allowable building area per floor may be increased with credits for: – Frontage Access (up to 75% increase) – Sprinkler Protection (up to 300% increase) There are several options available when more than one occupancy classification exists in the same building. Separation between occupancies may be required, but not necessarily. Legitimate Mezzanine Areas do not add to the building area (they do count as part of fire areas).

Occupancy Classification and Automatic Sprinkler Thresholds Section 903 Sprinkler Requirements All Types of Construction have the Same Sprinkler Threshold Limits (VB, IIB, IIIB, etc.) Occupancy Maximum Fire Area Allowed without Automatic Sprinklers A-3, Assembly 12,000 B, Business none E, Education 20,000 F-1, Factory 12,000* F-2, Factory none M, Mercantile 12,000 S-1, Storage 12,000 S-2, Storage none* U, Agricultural none *Woodworking places, Commercial Truck & Bus parking, and others have lower thresholds.

Occupancy Classification and Automatic Sprinkler Thresholds To build as large as possible without a fire sprinkler requirement, both the Automatic Sprinkler Thresholds and Allowable Building Area Limits must be satisfied. They are not the same!

Building Height Limit No modification of limit and not dependent on Occupancy Classification Defined as distance from Grade Plane to the average height of the Highest Roof Surface Type VB Construction: 40 ft Type IIB and IIIB: 55 ft

Except for High Hazard (H) Occupancies, 10’ of FSD is enough to avoid Fire Rated Exterior Walls Exterior Rated Walls:

Allowable Area of Openings in Exterior Walls: (Doors and Windows) Table Fire Separation Distance Unprotected Openings Allowed Protected Openings Allowed 30’ or more No Limit 25’+, but < 30’ 70%No Limit 20’+, but < 25’ 45%No Limit 15’+, but < 20’ 25%75% 10’+, but < 15’ 15%45% 5’+, but < 10’ 10%25% 3’+, but < 5’ Not Permitted15% 0’ to < 3’ Not Permitted

At least 20’ of space is required to get some credit. This scenario shows NO increase available to the red building. Area Increase for Perimeter Access

With 30’ of space around entire perimeter, the maximum 75% increase may be obtained. Area Increase for Perimeter Access

Building Size and Location Tips “Tight” site: Maintain 20’ building between buildings if possible. Maintain at least 10’ from face of building to property lines. Lot line setback on road side is usually not an issue since IBC measures from building to road centerline. Always confirm local zoning setback requirements in addition to State code requirements. Both can have an impact on project size on “tight” building sites.

Building Size and Location Tips “Flexible” sites: Maintain at least 30’ building between buildings and to lot lines if maximizing allowable area is desirable. If 30’ space must be violated, minimize the amount of violation to maximize remaining credit allowed. Consider future expansion plans in locating the building, even when beyond owner’s current scope. For certain occupancies, “Unlimited Area” may be permitted with 60’ of space around entire building.

Other Complex Code Issues Building Additions - why? – Allowable Area – Fire Wall / Fire Separation – Accessibility and Egress Plans – Structural Issues (Snow Drifts?) New Building close to Existing buildings or to property lines Local code requirements Wetlands

Structural Issues Does wind or snow or gravity affect commercial and code exempt buildings differently? What’s your contingency plan when you find yourself in a Code Exempt building during a “commercial” quality storm?

What are your building standards based on? Would you publish your motto if it is: “This is how we’ve always done it.” “Our design includes as much strength as the owner’s bank can finance.” “This isn’t how we normally do it, but since you’ve got another contractor ready to build it for less, we’ll try it your way.”

Our Current “Pattern” for Ground Snow Loads (ASCE 7 map)

Our Actual Snow Fall received in the Winter of 07-08:

Design Recommendations Don’t ignore developments in standards and codes regarding snow and wind and other design developments that can benefit Code exempt buildings. If you’re not able to custom design each building, consider having your “design system” reviewed by an engineer you can trust (and afford) Use the Minimum Design Loads for Buildings (ASCE 7) as a basis for ALL your building designs. If you decide to go lower than the normal “safety factor” adjustment for “Ag” or unoccupied buildings, be prepared with a good reason for it in case you need it.

This has been ”Common Building Code Misunderstandings” Any content of this presentation which you found to be informative, useful and maybe even entertaining was intended, although it would be surprising if it happened. The WFBA was not responsible for the content of this presentation but they probably wish they were. Specialists in Post Frame Engineering | | P: (866) | F: (866) | | 10335N DUFFY RD | HAYWARD WI | By Aaron Halberg, Professional Engineer