Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

Demand Response Commissioner Suedeen Kelly June 3, 2008.
Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
Demand Response in Connecticut Presented by: Bob Laurita ISO New England December 2, 2004.
1 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs NARUC / FERC Demand Response Collaborative Perspectives of a Large End Use Participant of NYISO Programs.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
1 Generation Adequacy Task Force Report to TAC April 7, 2005.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
MEGA Electric Utility Tariff Measures For Large Industrial Customers James A. Ault, President Michigan Electric & Gas Association 110 W. Michigan Avenue,
1 Presentation to the Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group (WIEG) T. Graham Edwards President & CEO August 9, 2007.
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
1 RELIABILITY AND COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS POWER Research Conference UC Berkeley March 19, 2004 Paul Joskow MIT, CEEPR, CMI and Jean Tirole IDEI,
1 RELIABILITY AND COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS POWER Research Conference UC Berkeley March 19, 2004 Paul Joskow MIT, CEEPR, CMI and Jean Tirole IDEI,
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
Economic Demand Response Sheldon Fulton Executive Director, IPCAA November 4, 2008.
Floyd Trefny Director of Product Development Future of Demand Response In ERCOT A Presentation to the Workshop – September 15, 2006 Project Number
Battling Load Growth in NYC Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
®® QUESTAR GAS Transportation Balancing Susan Davis, Director, Account & Community Relations February 28, 2014 We develop, transport and deliver clean.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
1 Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets 09 February 2007.
Demand Response Products. Discussion Points 1.Setting the scene….. 2.Virtual Power Station 3.Reserves deployment order 4.Demand Response Products.
ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Mary Anne Brelinsky Eagle Energy Partners.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
Ontario Electricity Supply Forum PEO Mississauga Chapter - September 6, 2007 Rhonda Wright-Hilbig, P.Eng Market Analysis - IESO.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Demand Side Products in PJM Joseph BowringCornell University January 17, 2011.
Why Should Retail Customers Care About the MISO Market? WIEG Board Meeting November 8, 2007 WIEG Board Meeting November 8, 2007 Submitted by: Kavita Maini,
ERCOT Emergency Interruptible Load Program Paul Wattles Steve Krein WMS Oct. 13, 2006.
Demand Response: Next Steps OPSI Annual Meeting October 1, 2012 Howard J. Haas.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
Retail Rates Update WIEG Board Meeting May 6, 2010 WIEG Board Meeting May 6, 2010 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting, LLC.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
California’s Summer Outlook and Emerging Electricity Issues Dave Ashuckian, P.E., Manager Electricity Analysis Office Irwindale Energy Forum February 15,
Demand Response Programs: An Emerging Resource for Competitive Electricity Markets Charles Goldman (510) E. O. Lawrence Berkeley.
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. Southwest Connecticut RFP Markets Committee November 14, 2003.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
DSWG Update to WMS 2/9/2011. EILS Procurement Results from 1/31 Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 425 hours.
A Preliminary look at Peak Loads and Resources for 2007 and Policy Issues to Consider David Ashuckian, P.E., Manager Electricity Analysis Office Joint.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 8 th Should all capacity resources be paid the same? -Demand Response operational deployment.
Demand Response as a Distributed Energy Resource presented by: Mark S. Martinez Manager, Program Development PLMA Fall Conference September 2004.
Utility Benefits of Demand Response Trevor Lauer DTE Energy Marketing Executive Conference Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.
Update: 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS) Pilot Project Mark Patterson, ERCOT October 7, 2013.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Demand Response 2010 and Beyond April 28, 2011 Pete Pengilly.
Energy Emergency Alert (EEA) UPDATE F EBRUARY 8, 2011.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Long-term Solution Task Force Ellis Rankin & Bob Wittmeyer Co-Chairs.
1 A Conversation about MISO Paul Spicer November 8, 2007.
Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian.
Wind Management at MISO
Overview of the NYISO Demand Response Programs
Benefits of ICAP Reliability Economics
Presentation transcript:

Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting, LLC

2 Role of Interruptible Load in Wisconsin  Counted towards reserve margin requirements  Utilities use interruptible load in lieu of building a peaking plant – In exchange customers get a capacity based credit  Utilities typically have minimum requirements in the tariff including notification time, maximum hours of interruption, contracted firm demand levels  Used mainly for capacity based interruptions by most Wisconsin utilities

3 Interruptible Load in Wisconsin By Major Utility

4 Participation of Interruptible Load in MISO  Price responsive demand bids  Reserve Margin Requirements  Ancillary Services  Emergency Demand Response

5 Emergency Demand Response Initiative  Main outcome from the August 2006 Energy Emergency Events – To compensate for energy reduction  Retail customers not direct participants in EDR; Utilities are the market participants and eligible to participate  Utilities would need to develop an additional rider or make this an option in the existing rate  Voluntary program  Interruptible load can be counted towards reserve margin requirements and also participate in EDR

6 EDR Requirements  Need to register with MISO 30-days in advance  Static offer for 30 days; MISO does not have the ability accept daily offers Exception – exigent circumstances Penalties for not curtailed amount reflected in the offer (real time market price multiplied by the amount deficient)  Participants can either specify the number of MW to be curtailed or curtailing down to the firm level  Provide notification time needed  Hourly curtailment offer not to exceed a cap of $3500/MWh

7 EDR Compensation  Provided that market participants respond as instructed by MISO, they will be compensated using the higher of the market price or the participants’ curtailment offer multiplied by the amount of energy curtailed  Compensation only if MISO issues deployment request  To the extent that market participants are paid higher than the market price, the costs are collected from the zone where the resource deficiency occurred

8 Energy Emergency Event (EEA) Protocol  EEA-0: Alert – Heads up  EEA-1:Warning  EEA-2: The EVENT Once designated external resources are committed, interruptible load that does not participate in EDR gets initiated first This is followed by interruptible load that is participating in EDR Emergency dispatch ranges of generators Emergency purchases from bordering balancing authorities Firm load shed