1 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. Intermediate Sanctions: Why You Should Be Concerned about Excess Benefit Transactions and How You Can Avoid.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doing Business 2. 0—Starting and Operating a Nonprofit in DC George E
Advertisements

Conflict of Interest, Conflict of Commitment, and Outside Activities UTSA HOP 1.33 Non-covered UTSA staff 1.
Nonprofit Organizations in Maine Maine Office of the Attorney General Linda J. Conti May 21, 2009.
Form – An Overview NATIONAL CONTRACT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS November 13, 2011 Speaker: Patricia A. O’Malley, CPA Rubino & McGeehin,
Legal Responsibilities for Board Members of Nonprofit Organizations Or…all you need to know to stay out of trouble. Presented: July 2007 Prepared by: Elsbeth.
Ethics and Disclosure Act W.S et. seq. Who does the act apply to All public officials, public members and public employees which includes District.
MSRB Proposed Rules and Interpretations NALHFA 2011 Annual Educational Conference May 20, 2011.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of Benefits of Act Three quarters of the financial executives in the Oversight Systems survey said that their company had realized.
September 13, 2012 The Institute for Public Engagement The IRS’ Corporate Governance Regime.
1 AFCEA International Chapter Accounting and Tax Update 3 October 2014.
1 This presentation is not intended to provide legal advice or opinion and should not be relied on as such. Legal advice can only be provided in response.
Plantemoran.com JANUARY 27, (r) Final Regulations.
1 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. FIN 48: What Every Nonprofit Needs to Know Jeffrey S. Tenenbaum, Esq. Matthew T. Journy, Esq. Association of.
1 Social Enterprise Alliance Member Teleconference.
Ethics in Government Rules to Live By as a Nevada Public Official.
Executive Compensation for the Not-for-Profit Entity, BNKJ, September Executive Compensation for the Not-for- Profit Entity Susan Clark, CPA, FHFMA.
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 1 How are they related?
Nonprofit Organizations Class Nine: Public Charities – Corrected 4/16/04 Michael V. Bourland Michelle Coleman-Johnson Bourland, Wall & Wenzel, P.C.
Doing Business 2.0— Starting and Operating a Nonprofit in DC George E. Constantine, III, Esq., Partner Venable, LLP, Washington, DC (202)
Nonprofit Organizations Private Foundations Michael V. Bourland Michelle Coleman-Johnson Bourland, Wall & Wenzel, P.C.
Institutional Memberships November Institutional Memberships New Operational Guideline: Memberships Paid by University Funds can be found at
1 Avoiding Tax Pitfalls in Cyberspace American Chamber of Commerce Executives DIALogue — ACCE’s Executive Speaker Series Presented by George E. Constantine,
1 © 2008 Venable LLP The New Form 990: Defusing Governance, Political Activities, Compensation, and Other Issues JEFFREY S. TENENBAUM RONALD M. JACOBS.
Law 101 for Nonprofits: Key Issues and New Developments June 9, 2015 Joseph E. Miller, Jr. © 2015 Faegre Baker Daniels LLP These materials are intended.
Governing a Tax-Exempt Nonprofit Corporation The Basics MPCC December 16, 2010.
1 Legal Issues of Not-for-Profit Organizations Robert L. Waldman Venable LLP
 Paul Carman  Chapman and Cutler LLP  September, 2010 Issues for HFAs in Low Income Housing Partnerships 1.
What Every Corporate Attorney Should Know About Nonprofit and Tax-Exempt Organizations Utah State Bar Business Law Section December 8, 2010 Christopher.
Charity Care and Tax-Exemption Issues for Healthcare Providers Hospitals Bernard Smith Tucker Ellis & West LLP 925 Euclid Ave., Suite 1150 Cleveland, Ohio.
Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2004 Class Six: Overview of Federal Tax Considerations/Income Tax Rules Relating to Tax-Exempt Organizations Michelle Coleman-Johnson.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Revised August 4, 2008 Potential conflicts of interest A personal financial interest A personal financial interest A business interest.
1 The Top Four Legal Risk Management Issues Facing Nonprofits: What You Can Do to Mitigate Your Exposure December 13, 2010 Presented to the GWSCPA NFPO.
Fort Monroe Considerations regarding a Charitable Foundation.
Copyright 2011 Fennemore Craig, P.C. 1 STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR NONPROFIT LEADERS Laura A. Lo Bianco Fennemore Craig, P.C. May 17, 2011.
The IRS Targets TTOs: Hot Spots for Tax Compliance and Audit Avoidance Strategies September 15, 2009 Lorraine A. Sciarra Senior University Counsel Princeton.
Don’t Be Ambushed By The 2008 IRS Form 990 PCPA 2008 Conference October 7, 2008 Thomas E. Sweeney Tsoules, Sweeney, Martin & Orr, LLC 29 Dowlin Forge Road.
Janet Kleffner ACCT 530 Graduate Presentation.  If you pay management or executives an excessive amount, penalties can be imposed on the board members.
Nonprofit Revitalization Act of 2013 Fred M. LaMarca CPA, CFP® Zoltan Kemeny, CPA.
Financial Accounting Dave Ludwick, P.Eng, MBA, PMP Module 11 Charitable Designation Requirements.
1 © 2008 Venable LLP Avoiding UBIT Pitfalls Matthew Journy, Esq. Kristalyn Loson, Esq. Venable LLP October 18, 2010 Western Association of Chamber Executives.
Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Federal Standard of Care; Charitable Purpose; Social Welfare Organizations Prepared By: Darren.
May 16, 2007 Board of Directors Texas Regional Entity Division Update Sam R. Jones ERCOT President & CEO.
Tax-Exempt Organizations and Lobbying Robert Benton May 8, 2009.
1 AFCEA International Chapter Accounting and Tax Update 23 June 2014 CYBER Symposium.
So you are a non-profit, now what? Best Practices for Non-Profit Corporations Karim A. Ali Ohio Association of International Baccalaureate World Schools.
Form – An Overview December 11, 2010 Speaker: Patricia A. O’Malley, CPA Rubino & McGeehin, Chartered CPA’s and Consultants
Need of AS on Related Party Transactions  There is general presumption that transaction reflected in the financial statements are executed on arm’s-length.
ESOPs: It’s More Than a Matter of Trust Presented by: Dan Reser President; Fiduciary Services, Inc
The IRS Form 990. What is the Form 990 Form 990 is an annual reporting return that certain tax- exempt organizations must file with the IRS. It provides.
“Undistributed Earnings” and Interest Crediting Presentation to the FCERA Board of Retirement June 18, 2008 Harvey L. Leiderman Jeffrey R. Rieger Reed.
NAEYC Affiliate Leadership Day Association Tax and Legal Primer NAEYC Office of General Counsel November 2015 Lakshmi Sarma Ramani, General Counsel.
SMU School of Law Role of the General Counsel Corporate Governance in the Nonprofit Setting Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel, P.C.
Form – An Overview November 7, 2009 Speaker: Patricia A. O’Malley, CPA Rubino & McGeehin, Chartered CPA’s and Consultants Simple.
Executive Compensation in Tax Exempt Organizations: Nonprofit Quick Guide to Navigating Intermediate Sanctions CBIZ Compensation Webcast Series.
DRAFTING AN EFFECTIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY William H. Jordan, Esq. Sowell, Gray, Stepp & Laffitte, LLC (803)
Accounting (Basics) - Lecture 5 Lease. Contents Classification of leases Finance leases - financial statements of lessees and lessors Operating leases.
© 2014 Gray Reed & McGraw, P.C. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice Nonprofit Compensation: Risks, Rules and Best Practices.
Pbwt.com Overview of Tax-Exempt Organizations and Charitable Giving in the U.S. Robin Krause Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP May 11, v1.
Conflicts of Interest: Beyond the Basics March 2016 Greg Moser; John LemmoJulie Umansky Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP California Charter Schools.
© MAP for Nonprofits Nonprofit vs. Tax Exempt Nonprofit status is determined by STATE law, which governs organizing documents. Tax exempt status.
1 NON-PROFIT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE James W. Stevens Kilpatrick Stockton LLP 1100 Peachtree Street Suite 2800 Atlanta, Georgia May 20, 2009 This paper.
1 AFCEA International Chapter Accounting and Tax Update 10 February 2014 WEST 2014.
Conflict of Interest Policy Once the arrows appear, you can move forward or backward through the presentation.
Accounting (Basics) - Lecture 5 Lease
Your Board and the New 990 July 31, 2009
The NYS non-Profit revitalization act
The Legal and Regulatory Framework Governing Foundations
For the Week Ending OCTOBER 14, 2016
Helene S. Jaron Vice Chair, Private Client Services Cozen O’Connor
POST-ISSUANCE COMPLIANCE
Presentation transcript:

1 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. Intermediate Sanctions: Why You Should Be Concerned about Excess Benefit Transactions and How You Can Avoid Them Jeffrey S. Tenenbaum Matthew T. Journy March 9, 2010

2 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. Intermediate Sanctions What are intermediate sanctions? How can they affect me and my organization? What type of transactions give rise to intermediate sanctions? Who may be subject to intermediate sanctions? What are the penalties? Why should I be concerned? What can I do to avoid intermediate sanctions?

3 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. What are Intermediate Sanctions? Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) section 4958 allows the Internal Revenue Service (“Service”) to impose penalties on “disqualified persons” who participate in or approve “excess benefit transactions.” These penalties are commonly referred to as intermediate sanctions. Similar to “private inurement” concept.

4 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. How Can Intermediate Sanctions Affect My Organization? Intermediate Sanctions may be imposed in lieu of revocation: –Prior to implementation of 4958, the sole sanction that the Service could impose on organizations that engaged in private inurement was revocation. –With Code section 4958, the Service now has the ability to penalize each of the individuals who received impermissible benefits while continuing to recognize the organization’s tax-exempt status.

5 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. What Type of Transactions Give Rise to Intermediate Sanctions? Intermediate sanctions may be imposed on “excess benefit transactions” –Code section 4958(c)(1)(A) defines an “excess benefit transaction” as any transaction in which an economic benefit is provided by an applicable tax-exempt organization directly or indirectly to any disqualified person, if the value of the economic benefit provided exceeds the value of the consideration that the organization received for providing the benefit.

6 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. What Type of Transactions Give Rise to Intermediate Sanctions? Common situations that may result in “excess benefit transactions” include: –Compensation; –Payments for services provided to the organization (e.g., back-office service providers); –Purchase of property by the organization or the sale of property to a disqualified person; and –Provision of certain fringe benefits (which may be “automatic” excess benefits).

7 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. Who May be Subject to Intermediate Sanctions? Not all tax-exempt organizations are subject to Code section Section 4958(e) provides that only “applicable tax-exempt organizations” are subject to the provisions of Applicable tax-exempt organizations include: –Organizations exempt from tax under Code sections 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4); and –Organizations that were exempt from tax under Code sections 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) at anytime during the 5-year period ending on the date of the transaction.

8 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. Who May be Subject to Intermediate Sanctions? The Code section 4958 penalties may only be imposed on disqualified persons. Section 4958(f) generally defines the term “disqualified person” to include: –Any person who was, at any time during the 5-year period ending on the date of such transaction, in a position to exercise substantial influence over the affairs of the organization; –Family members of individuals who are in a position to exercise substantial influence; –A 35-percent controlled entity; –Any person who is described above with respect to a supporting organization of the applicable tax- exempt organization; and –Certain donors and donor advisors with respect to donor advised funds.

9 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. Who May be Subject to Intermediate Sanctions? Treas. Reg. Section (c) lists specific persons who are in a position to exercise substantial influence, including: –Voting Members of the organization’s governing body; –President, CEO, COO; and –Treasurer and CFO.

10 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. Who May be Subject to Intermediate Sanctions? Treas. Reg. section (e) provides a facts-and- circumstances test for determining if other individuals who are not listed are in a position to exercise substantial influence. Facts tending to show substantial influence include: –The individual who founded the organization; –The individual is a substantial contributor; –The individual's compensation is based on the organization’s revenues; –The individual has or shares authority to control a substantial portion of the organization’s expenditures; and –The person manages a discrete segment of the organization's activities.

11 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. What are the Penalties? There are two types of penalties for entering into an excess benefit transaction: –Penalties on the disqualified person receiving the benefit; and –Penalties on organization managers who approved the benefit.

12 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. What are the Penalties? Penalty for receipt of an excessive benefit: –Return the value of the excessive benefit to the organization; and –An excise tax of either: 25% of the value of the excessive benefit if the benefit is returned to the organization prior to the issuance of a notice of deficiency by the Service, or 200% of the value of the excessive benefit if the benefit is returned after the Service issues the notice of deficiency.

13 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. What are the Penalties? Penalty on organization managers for approval of an excessive benefit transaction: –Section 4958(a)(2) imposes a 10% tax on any organization manager that knowingly approves an excess benefit transaction.

14 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. What are the Penalties? Example: –Board approves the purchase of property from a disqualified person. The property’s fmv is $2,000 and the purchase price is $6,000. The disqualified person may: –Be required to return $4,000 to the organization, and –Pay either $1,000 or $8,000 to the organization depending on the date that the excessive benefit is returned. –The total penalty would be either $5,000 or $12,000. Each board member who approved the transaction may be required to pay an excise tax of $400.

15 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. Why Do You Need to be Aware of Intermediate Sanctions? For many years the Service has been reluctant to impose intermediate sanctions, though this has changed in the last year. In the last year we have seen the Service assess intermediate sanctions in more examinations than during the previous 5 years combined. During a recent conversation with an attorney from IRS Office of Chief Counsel, we were told that the Service is developing cases for intermediate sanctions and that the Service will pursue these cases aggressively in court.

16 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. What Can You Do to Avoid Intermediate Sanctions? Use caution when entering into transactions with disqualified persons. Develop, implement, and follow a conflict of interest policy that prevents board members and organization executives from participating in decisions that impact them financially. Require board approval and documentation of transactions before any payments are made.

17 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. What Can You Do to Avoid Intermediate Sanctions? Establish the rebuttable presumption of reasonableness. Under section of the regulations, if the organization takes certain precautions in approving a transaction, there is a “rebuttable presumption” that the transaction is at fair market value. To establish the rebuttable presumption: 1.The transaction must be approved in advance by disinterested members of the organization's governing body; 2.The governing body must obtain and rely on valid comparability data in approving the transaction; and 3.The governing body must contemporaneously document its decision and the reason for its decision.

18 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. Questions? Jeffrey S. Tenenbaum th Street NW Washington, DC (202) Matthew T. Journy th Street NW Washington, DC (202)