Pier Village – Phase 3 RAB Financing August 28, 2012

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation to Venture Association of New Jersey 3/16/04.
Advertisements

Financing Housing with New Markets Tax Credits February 21, 2008.
City of North Liberty North Liberty Area Development Corporation University of Iowa Community Credit Union Economic Development Partnership Project October.
RSMo: What’s Changed & What Hasn’t. What’s Changed & What Hasn’t. Writing the report. Writing the report.
Preservation: HUD’s Re-Development Program Can be Part of Your Preservation Plan July 28-30, 2014 Hilton Hotel Austin, TX.
ACMA Conference February 8, 2007 Evaluating Investments in Infrastructure Panel Overview of Public Infrastructure Financing in the City of Phoenix.
Taking the Mystery out of Economic Development Tools Chris Eng, Chisago County HRA-EDA.
GFOAz May 11, 2007 The ABC’s of Municipal Financing.
Tax Increment Financing Town Center Project Midwest City, OK.
Bootstrapping and Financing the closely held company
Tax-Increment Financing Partners for Economic Solutions April 3,
1 Understanding Revenue Allocation Districts (“RADs”) Prepared for the Jersey City Redevelopment Agency Presented by: Glenn F. Scotland, Esq. & Jennifer.
Economic Development Financing Tools 101. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Generic term for using future tax revenue to pay for something today Usually used.
Nebraska Investment Finance Authority © 2007 Tax Credit Basics.
Massachusetts Community & Banking Council Economic Development Committee June 10, 2010.
Creating New Opportunities
MODULE 10 Basic Premises w Risk/Return analysis is critical to establish project feasibility w Financial and ownership structures affect participants’
Finance Structures and Issues in the UAE Financial structure is a mixture of long–term debt and equity that a company uses to finance its operations, it’s.
How to make 4% LIHTC deal work: Case Study from Fairfax County Presented by: Aseem Nigam, Director, Real Estate Finance & Grants Management Division, Fairfax.
Document 51 1 Lansdowne Partnership Plan Business Model Document 5.
Tools for Redevelopment Courtney Knight Managing Director, Redevelopment Revitalizing Atlanta 1.
Innovation Strategies Presented to MODE January 2014.
Convention Center Community Coalition 1. Time Line 2008: Feasibility Study by CS&L May 2009: Follow-Up Data April 2010: Appleton Council/Mayor Appoint.
Financing Tools for Capital Projects Marshall Public Schools School Board Work Session 1 February 2, 2015.
Navigating a Tough Market Financial Incentives and Public- Private Partnerships to Get Across the Goal Line Presented by: Peter J. Wolfson, Esq., Porzio.
Entrepreneurship: Ideas in Action © Cengage Learning/South-Western ChapterChapter Plan and Track Your Finances 9.1 Finance Your Business 9.2 Pro Forma.
Municipal Tax Increment Financing
Proposed ASU-Scottsdale Center for New Technology and Innovation Presentation to Scottsdale City Council June 21, 2004 Economic Vitality Dept.
University Heights One University Place TIF Plan City Council Meeting July 14, 2015.
Beech Grove, Indiana TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Heather R. James, Ice Miller LLP April 18, 2013.
Tax Increment Thomas Chapman Raymond James John Repsholdt Ehlers Steven Langert Consolidated High School District 230.
Public Sector Incentives The Missing Piece of the Retail Development Puzzle? Jim M. Page, CCE, IOM President and CEO Chamber of Commerce of West Alabama.
Wisconsin Business Incubation Association Annual Conference Financial Tools for Creating and Sustaining Entrepreneurship Bill Chaudoir, Executive Director.
Urban Land Institute FEBRUARY 26, 2013 Property Tax Appeals and Financial Opportunities Presented by a Challenging Market: Using the Tax Appeal Process.
Author name here for Edited books chapter 11 Finance and Budgeting 11 Finance and Budgeting chapter.
Mueller Redevelopment
Entrepreneurship: Ideas in Action 5e © 2011 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
 Finance Your Business  Pro Forma Financial Statements  Record Keeping for Businesses.
1 MidTown Office Tower former Red Carpet Inn Site Presentation February 12, 2011.
Chapter 7 Commercial bank financial statement Salwa Elshorafa 2009 © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
The Dollars Side of the CAF Equation Alliance for Housing Solutions (AHS) 2012 Leckey Forum November 9, 2012 Presented By: Kathleen McSweeney.
Chapter 7 Commercial bank financial statement Salwa Elshorafa 2009 © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3TB Project Review Tax Increment Financing (“TIF”) Overview January 25, 2013.
City of Tallahassee Community Redevelopment Agency Success Stories January 11, 2012 Michael Parker, Executive Director, Tallahassee Community Redevelopment.
10-2 The Financial Plan McGraw-Hill/Irwin Entrepreneurship, 7/e Copyright © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 10.
A Public–Private Partnership with the Harrisburg Public Parking System LAZ Parking / Harrisburg Parking Authority / North American Strategic Infrastructure.
Sansone/Wal-Mart TIF Redevelopment Project Council Presentation April 18, 2012.
Revenue-Based Development Incentives Property Tax Revenues Bob Rychlicki Kane, McKenna and Associates, Inc.
Financial Markets, Instruments, and Market Makers Chapter 3 © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning.
1 Convention Center Authority Republican Policy Group Presentation March 23 rd 2015.
Single Family Housing Development Program A Briefing to the Housing Committee Housing/Community Services Department November 2, 2015.
Library Block Project CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION. Community Vision “Downtown Platteville is a vibrant place and the cultural heart and identity of the.
Revenue-Based Development Incentives September 2010.
WHITE FLINT SECTOR PLAN Financial Analysis, Infrastructure Financing & Economic Benefits.
CHAPTER 7 ACCOUNTING FOR AND PRESENTATION OF LIABILITIES McGraw-Hill/Irwin©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002.
Lonni Steven Wilson, Medaille College chapter 8 Obtaining Funding.
But-For Determination Report & Cost-Benefit Analysis May 11, 2016 Thomas Denaway, Assistant Vice President Springsted Incorporated 9229 Ward Parkway, Suite.
SBA 504 Loan Program Long Term Fixed Asset Financing For Small Businesses.
Proposed Hotel and Convention Center City Council Meeting December 10, 2013.
But-For Determination Report & Cost-Benefit Analysis October 14, 2015 Tom Denaway – Assistant Vice President Springsted Incorporated 9229 Ward Parkway,
Mobile Home Park Investment Fund
Community Dialogue about The NuCLEus Project
Community Improvement Districts County Counselors Association of Kansas Annual Meeting November 15, 2010 Janet S. Garms
Financial Plans, Accounting and Start Up costs
Financing Project Development
Tax Abatement Bonds Presentation City of Marshall, Minnesota
Valley & Third Streets Redevelopment
Getting the Most Out of Alternative Financing Sources
COMMUNITIES A PARTNER TO 2020 Levy Request County Board Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Pier Village – Phase 3 RAB Financing August 28, 2012 City of Long Branch Pier Village – Phase 3 RAB Financing August 28, 2012

Project Description Pier Village Phase 3 (the “Project”) will be completed in two phases with construction commencing in 2012 for Phase 3A and 2014 for Phase 3B Phase 3A will consist of: 60 condominium units A 59,810 sq. ft. hotel (includes 11,861 sq. ft. of leasable retail space and 68 hotel rooms) 27,905 sq. ft. of leasable retail space A 42’ diameter carousel Boardwalk improvements and infrastructure, kids play area, and stage Phase 3B will consist of: 240 condominium units 21,360 sq. ft. of leasable retail space A 286 space self parking garage (with capacity for at least 600 valet/stacker parking spaces) The acquisition of land to be used for additional public parking

Need for Financial Assistance The redeveloper requests $19.95 million in “net” Redevelopment Area Bond (RAB) proceeds to ensure project feasibility and that investors achieve an adequate rate of return The NJ EDA awarded an ERG grant for this project. NJ EDA requires that a project pass its net benefits test and demonstrate that the project faces a funding gap. The RAB request is in addition to the ERG grant provided by the State. Based on HR&A’s review of the redeveloper pro forma*, the project faces a funding gap between $21 and $26 million, confirming the redeveloper’s request for financial assistance of $19.95 million. *Results based on proforma provided by the developer on July 18, 2012

Redevelopment Area Bonds (RABs) A tool to provide “gap financing” secured by PILOTs in order to encourage a project that “but for” the municipal participation would not be feasible Payments will be made from incremental municipal revenues that occurs as a result of the redevelopment: PILOTs and additional hotel occupancy taxes PILOT revenues in this transaction are NOT formally dedicated to pay debt service General Obligation Bonds of the City, supported by municipal taxes and the City’s credit, are utilized to create a cost of funds that allows the project to proceed and the City to generate revenues in excess of its costs

Project Financing Type of Financing – 3A Amount Percent of Total Redeveloper Bank Loan $44,060,000 58.53% Redeveloper Equity 24,200,000 32.12% City RAB Proceeds 7,040,000 9.35% Total $75,300,000 100.00% Type of Financing – 3B Amount Percent of Total Redeveloper Bank Loan $73,630,000 61.08% Redeveloper Equity 34,010,000 28.21% City RAB Proceeds 12,910,000 10.71% Total $120,550,000 100.00% The RAB proceeds and Redeveloper funding will be used proportionally to fund project costs. Repayment of the Redeveloper debt and equity is subordinate to the repayment of the PILOT due to the function of the PILOT as a tax lien.

Uses of Funds Phase 3A Public Infrastructure and Site Work Carousel Boardwalk, pavilions, etc Carousel Financing Costs Phase 3B Off-Site Parking Acquisition and Construction On-Site Parking Retail Space

Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOTs) An amount that a property owner pays to the City instead of real estate taxes on the improvement portion of their property All property owners still pay conventional taxes on the land portion of their property The amounts due are a municipal lien and collected in the same manner as property taxes Term of 30 years from the date of completion of the project or 35 years from execution of the Financial Agreement PILOT has been calculated to approximate full conventional taxes Even though a portion of the PILOTs will be available to make payments on the Bonds, the City will still receive more revenue than it currently receives from property taxes in the entire redevelopment area Neither the issuance of the Bonds nor the PILOT put any additional tax burden on the residents of the City

Obligations of the Redeveloper Ironstate Holdings, LLC, the Redeveloper’s parent company, will guarantee the payments required to be made by the URE, up to two years after completion Construct/install a surface parking lot on the Phase III Offsite Parking Parcel and convey ownership to the City Construct the Carousel and then convey ownership of it to the City while retaining the obligation to operate it Make various other improvements including the boardwalk, concession stands, stage, kids play area, beach access, beach shower, and convey ownership to the City Use commercially reasonable efforts to lease a certain percentage of the retail space in the Project to Family Friendly Tenants Conditions that must be met by the Redeveloper before the City is obligated to proceed: the City receiving LFB approval the Redeveloper simultaneously closing a construction financing and funding equity the existence of market conditions that will allow the RABs to be sold

Financial Benefit Excess PILOT Revenue Local Hotel Occupancy Tax Approximately $160,000 annually from Phase 3A Approximately $430,000 annually from Phase 3B These figures are net of County share, Land Taxes and Debt Service Expected to generate approximately $17,000,000 in revenue over the term of the 30-year PILOT Local Hotel Occupancy Tax Estimated to be $130,000 in the first year and increase at the same rate as the PILOTs Expected to generate approximately $5,000,000 in revenue over the term of the 30-year PILOT Parking Revenues Estimated to be $50,000 - $75,000 per year Expected to generate approximately $1,500,000 in revenue over the term of the 30-year PILOT Additional revenues achieved from the carousel, beach use, and other miscellaneous items Total Expected Financial Benefit Approximately $23.5 million in new tax revenue, net of debt service, over the life of the 30 year PILOT

Non-Financial Benefit Public improvements and infrastructure $14 million of the total Project Job creation Approximately 700 temporary jobs during construction Approximately 355 permanent jobs 25% of which are expected to be filled by City residents Improved City aesthetics and branding Beachfront attractions and improvements Increased public parking capacity Potential link to future Broadway redevelopment

Municipal Costs After completion, the Project is expected to generate: 539 new people (using data from a Rutgers University housing study) 6 new school children (using actual data from Pier Village 1 & 2) Each additional resident is expected cost taxpayers approximately $651 per year Each additional school age child is expected cost taxpayers approximately $9,472 per year As evidenced on the next slide, the excess PILOT revenues are anticipated to be sufficient to cover these added municipal costs *These municipal cost estimates are conservative based on the fact that the study does not account for seasonality of the units.

Net Benefit to City After Municipal Costs Phase 3A PILOT Revenue $160,000 Hotel Occupancy Tax 195,000 Total $355,000 Costs Municipal $85,000 School 8,000 $93,000 Annual Net Benefit $262,000 Phase 3 Aggregate PILOT Revenue $590,000 Hotel Occupancy Tax 195,000 Total $785,000 Costs Municipal $430,000 School 40,000 $470,000 Annual Net Benefit $315,000 Project is designed to provide a level annual net benefit to the City in the approximate amounts detailed above.

Net Present Value Benefit Costs Gross RAB $24,505,000 Municipal Costs (PV) 5,410,000 School Costs (PV) 480,000 Total $30,395,000 Benefit Gross PILOT revenue (PV) $32,370,000 Public Improvements 13,690,000 $46,060,000 Net Benefit $15,665,000

Tax Revenue Impact of Pier Village Phases 1 & 2 Block Current Annual Tax Revenue Pre-Pier Village Annual Tax Revenue Tax Revenue Benefit 292.01 $649,736.65 $33,550.61 $616,186.04 225.01 & 225.03 369,343.21 39,613.16 329,730.05 224.01 508,246.44 32,934.10 475,312.34 223 124,861.84 20,852.00 104,009.84 298 99,675.40 13,384.00 86,291.40 290.01 259,141.53 2,357.03 256,784.50 $2,011,005.07 $142,690.90 $1,868,314.17

Applied Development Company Applied Development Company, a subsidiary of Ironstate Holdings, LLC, based in Hoboken, NJ, is one of the largest privately held real estate development companies in the Northeast Engages in the development and management of large-scale mixed-use projects The Company’s diverse portfolio consists of an extensive range of apartments, condominiums, hotels, and retail and recreational spaces Continues to own and manage a majority of their portfolio Currently engaged in the development of over $1 billion of residential and commercial real estate Some of the more notable current projects include: Stapleton Waterfront Development (Stapleton, Staten Island) Liberty Harbor (Jersey City, NJ) Liberty National Golf Course (Jersey City, NJ) Residences at Liberty National (Jersey City, NJ) Harrison Station (Harrison, NJ) Pier Village 1 & 2 The Shipyard (Hoboken, NJ) Harborside Financial Center (Jersey City, NJ)