South Boston Energy Project South Boston, VA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PSC Update: Wind Energy Issues James W. Ellars, P.E. Chief Utilities Manager, Engineering Division Public Service Commission of West Virginia.
Advertisements

New Base Load Generation in RTOs-- Time to Get Real Susan N. Kelly VP, Policy Analysis and General Counsel American Public Power Association NARUC Summer.
General Information on Permitting Electric Transmission Projects at the California Public Utilities Commission June 2009 Presentation created by the Transmission.
Does owning a solar array make you a utility?...and other questions A presentation to the Kentucky Environmental Quality Commission Andrew Melnykovych.
Marcy Mealy Procurement Specialist CDBG Program
LOCAL REGULATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE QUICK TELECONFERENCE American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Climate Change, Sustainable.
1.  Purpose  To present Staff’s Preliminary Findings on the 2012 Integrated Resource Plans of:  APS – Arizona Public Service Company  TEP – Tucson.
Economic Criteria for Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Region Public Utility Law Seminar DeAnn Walker August 3, 2012.
Ontario Electricity Industry : Planning Ahead Amir Shalaby VP, Power System Planning Ontario Power Authority Presentation to Canadian Nuclear Society The.
BIOMASS POWER PLANT Jo-Carroll Energy, Inc. (NFP).
Implementation of Pinyon-Juniper Woodland Treatment Elements of the BLM’s Ely RMP/EIS: Opportunities for Public-Private Partnerships to Secure Environmental.
Prospero LLC December 2, 2004 Connecticut’s Energy Future Financing Sustainable Energy.
BIOENERGY SYMPOSIUM 2013 ANAEROBIC DIGESTION Regulations Ollie Frazier, P.E., MBA.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Proposed Rule on Small Generator Interconnection RM July 23, 2003.
DOE OFFICE OF INDIAN ENERGY Renewable Energy Project Development and Finance Framework: The 5 Step Process 1.
Engineering Technology Division
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Large Generator Interconnection Final Rule RM July 23, 2003.
Biomass Energy and its future in Wisconsin David Donovan Manager, Regulatory Policy David Donovan Manager, Regulatory Policy.
Resource Planning Georgia Power’s Diverse Plan to Meet Georgia’s Energy Needs AWMA Fall 2010 Conference October 7, 2010 Jeff Burleson Director of Resource.
SIPs RECs & RPS Ann Elsen Energy Planner Montgomery County.
Results of Geothermal Power Survey of Electric G&T Cooperatives Robert Putnam, CH2M HILL Bob Gibson, NRECA Steve Lindenberg, Lindenberg Consulting.
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
Oregon Renewable Energy Action Plan April 2005 with Geothermal Energy highlights by Carel DeWinkel Senior Policy Analyst.
CLEANER ENERGY for a Greener future CLEANER ENERGY for a Greener future Laidlaw Energy Group, Inc. 90 John St 4 th Fl New York, NY
An Energy Conversion: Making Renewable Energy America’s Energy Sponsored by: U.S. Congressman Jeff Fortenberry and the University of Nebraska - Lincoln.
Town Of Douglas A Review of the Town’s Proposed Tax Incentive Financing (TIF) Agreement With American Pro Wind, LLC Presented To The Douglas Finance Committee.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Performance Targets for the Customer Interconnection Process January, 2008.
State Permitting Issues for Wind Developments Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Wind Summit 19 September 2005 Jennifer A. DeCesaro Energy Policy Specialist.
Small Renewable Generators Tony Marciano Public Utility Commission of Texas May 2, 2007 (512)
Political Factors Affecting the Renewables and Energy Efficiency Remarks of Ron Binz, Chairman Colorado Public Utilities Commission October 15, 2010 IPPAI.
WINDPOWER 2003 Austin, TX May 18-21, 2003 Session 4A: Regulatory Issues Monday May 19, :40-5:00 pm Wind Generation Interconnection to Transmission.
Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act 2002 (PPEA) Joe Damico.
Washington State Energy Policy Trends in OPALCO Speaker Pro Tem Jeff Morris.
Discussion of Market Participant Choice for Transmission Connections Stakeholder Session October 14, 2011.
Talbot County Project Sunburst Talbot County Department of Parks & Recreation Private/Public Partnership July 12,
Renewables Integration Development Project North West of the Island of Ireland Louis Fisher, EirGrid.
Plant Parameter Envelope for Early Site Permits
Discussion Forum 2004 APPA National Conference June 19 – 23, 2004 Seattle, Washington Issues for Green Power Programs Designing Marketing and Pricing.
Regulatory Planning for Supply to GTA & Toronto Areas Presentation to Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee May 14, 2003.
MPSC Licensing Issues Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Presented by Robert W. Kehres.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Shasta County Board of Supervisors March 4, 2008.
ENERGY STAR® WORKSHOP Riffe Center Columbus, Ohio April 26, 2007.
Contractor Alternate Design Serving the Public’s Best Interest.
Southwest Renewable Energy Transmission Conference May 21, 2010 This report contains transmission planning data that may be conceptual in nature and is.
Vogtle Nuclear Plant Update Moderator: Honorable Greg White, Michigan Panelists: Honorable Lauren “Bubba” McDonald, Georgia Public Service Commission Buzz.
Utah Geothermal Power Generation Workshop Regulatory Issues August 17, 2005 Presented by Becky Wilson Utility Economist Utah Public Service Commission.
Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission.
2015 Fall PR-MR & Marketing Meeting October 16, 2015 Fairo Mitchell Energy Policy Director, Public Utility Division Oklahoma Corporation Commission.
Renewable Energy Act of 2008
North America Energy Standards Board Craig L. Williams, Specialist Ld./Sr. ISAS Meeting April 20, 2016 Salt Lake City, UT W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING.
Town of Bethlehem DG Bethlehem Solar, LLC Zoning Board of Appeals Wednesday, October 1, 2014 David Albrecht, P.E., PV Engineers, D.P.C. Virginia Cook,
Kansas City Power & Light and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations – Suggestions for Chapter 22 Revisions Missouri Public Service Commission Meeting Aug 31,
Community Choice Aggregation Demonstration Project Marin County Base Case Feasibility Analyses Overview April 5, 2005.
RTO WEST Summary of RTO West 9/18/02 Declaratory Order Presentation to The Committee on Regional Electrical Power Cooperation (CREPC) by John Carr 10/1/02.
June 22, 2006 Development of the Marin County Community Choice Aggregation Project Agenda Background Project Overview Schedule.
Build a Professional Team Site Selection / Market Analysis Preliminary Feasibility Option to Purchase Land Feasibility Study Financing and Ownership Entity.
Plainfield Renewable Energy
Fort Stanwix National Monument Energy Audit Contract
Who Is Southern Power? Stephen Gowland Business Development Manager
Affordable Energy Production from Renewable Fuel
Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable
Financing Land Development Projects
SunZia Project Description
Dominion Investments in Virginia
Municipal Electric Power Association of Virginia
SB 807 Implementation Status Update October 2018
Mostafa El-Asiry Nuclear Power Plants Authority (NPPA), Cairo, Egypt
North America Energy Standards Board
Solar Energy Commercialization Utility Scale Business:
How Small Developers and EPC Contractors Can Add PPA Financing to their Arsenals John Langhus, VP Business Development Midwest Solar Expo 2019 New Energy.
Presentation transcript:

South Boston Energy Project South Boston, VA

Who is NOVEC? NOVEC stands for Northern Virginia Electric Cooperative NOVEC was formed in 1983 by the consolidation of Prince William and Tri-County Electric Cooperatives. NOVEC serves more than 150,000 customers located in the counties of Clarke, Loudon, Fairfax, Fauquier, Prince William and Stafford all located in northern Virginia. Prior to 2009, NOVEC received all of its power supply through an all requirements contract via an alternate wholesale power supplier. Starting in 2009, NOVEC began providing for its own power supply requirements.

Power Supply Portfolio With this new responsibility, NOVEC embarked on evaluating various options for meeting the power supply requirements. The following were the initial main sources: Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) with existing resources Bilateral Contracts and PJM Market Purchases While these sources allowed us to sufficiently meet our load requirements; NOVEC continued to consider other opportunities given the dynamic nature of its on-going load responsibilities. As part of its on-going resource consideration, NOVEC investigated numerous resource alternatives. Included were PPAs with new and existing resources, slice of system options, partnering arrangements and self-build options.

Other Factors At the same time NOVEC was evaluating these opportunities, the federal legislators were working on language for a federal renewable energy program. The metric that was being discussed as to which utilities would be under this federal requirement was any utility who had sales of 4 terawatts or greater. Based upon NOVEC’s forecast over the next few years, NOVEC would meet that metric in short order. Due to this potential requirement, NOVEC included in its evaluation renewable energy projects. A developer from Michigan, NOVI Energy, brought forth a proposal for a wood-burning biomass plant located in South Boston, VA.

Decision to Move Forward With the potential of a federally mandated renewable energy standard, and the evaluation of a multitude of other offers, NOVEC decided to move forward with a renewable project. NOVEC evaluated PPAs with existing biomass and wind projects, new biomass projects, the opportunities of buying an existing renewable project and the South Boston project. The results of these preliminary evaluations showed that NOVEC could construct the South Boston project at a cost equal to or lower than all of the other offerings whether they were renewable energy projects or not. As decision was made to move forward and perform a detailed review of the South Boston Project.

Due Diligence Undertaken A forest industry expert, the Parton Group, was hired to conduct a detailed review of the wood basket in and around the South Boston region. Parton met with the local loggers in this area as part of their evaluation and came to the conclusion that the local wood basket would be sufficient to fuel the plant. A PJM Feasibility Study was filed to determine what upgrades would be necessary to connect to the power grid in the area. Air permit requirements were developed and filed with the VDEQ. Public meetings were scheduled and held and no opposition was present. Sargent & Lundy was hired as the Owner’s Engineer to begin development of specifications and costs for construction.

Final Decision Once NOVEC received all of the results from the various studies and design, we analyzed the cost impacts and the societal impacts and the finding suggested that the project should be moved forward. One of the remarkable outcomes that we discovered was how much support was received from the local public for this project. We did not have any opposition filed by any member of the public through the various meetings and/or regulatory proceedings. VDEQ worked with us in an expeditious manner to finalize and approve the necessary air permit. The towns of South Boston, Halifax and the County of Halifax stood solidly behind this project and provided significant support as we moved through the final regulatory requirements for approval. In the fall of 2010, NOVEC began preliminary construction of the South Boston Energy project and South Boston Energy, LLC filed an Application for approval to construct, own and operate a 49.9MW biomass facility.

Next Steps South Boston Energy, LLC requested a waiver from the VSCC to begin construction in December 2010 even though the approval of CPCN application was is process. This was necessitated due to the requirements of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Grant provisions . Under the then rules of the ARRA, a cash grant in lieu of taxes was available for certain renewable projects as long as construction was started in 2010. The VSCC issued a Certificate for Public Necessity and Convenience on April 28, 2011. Negotiations for selecting the EPC contractor were completed and a contract to proceed was approved in May 2011. Fagen, Inc was selected as the EPC contractor. The facility is now nearing completion going through final commissioning and performance tests.

Clearing of Site

Civil Work in Progress

Piling Support for Structures

Boiler Structure

Sept 2012

Receiving Wood Chips

Conveyor

Today