Introduction to Reinsurance Reserving Peter A. Royek Toa Reinsurance Company of America Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Scottsdale, Arizona September 13,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 CHANGES TO SSAP #62 PROPERTY & CASULTY REINSURANCE NAIC Property and Casualty Reinsurance Study Group Chicago, IL May 10, 2005 Michael Moriarty Director,
Advertisements

Unearned Premium Reserves Change is in the Wind
Reinsurance Structures, Pro Rata Pricing, & When Good Pricing Goes Bad August 8, 2007.
1 Math 479/568 Casualty Actuarial Mathematics Fall 2014 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Professor Rick Gorvett Session 12: Reinsurance I October.
Agenda Introduction to Credibility Difference between Policy Year, Accident Year, and Calendar Year Relationship Between Accident Year and Calendar Year.
Non-life insurance mathematics
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Risk Transfer Accounting.
Reserve Variability Modeling: Correlation 2007 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar San Diego, California September 10-11, 2007 Mark R. Shapland, FCAS, ASA, MAAA.
1 Ken Fikes, FCAS, MAAA Introduction to Casualty Actuarial Science November 2005.
8-1 Statutory Accounting 1.NAIC Annual Statement Blank 2.Differences between Statutory Accounting and GAAP admitted and non-admitted assets valuation of.
Chapter 4: Insurance Company Operations
Page 1 Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited. ARM 56 – Risk Financing Exam Review Session RIMS 2014 – Denver, CO Presented.
Reinsurance Structures and Pricing Pro-Rata Treaties CARe Pricing Boot Camp August 10, 2009 Daniel Kamen, FCAS, MAAA Vice President Allied World Reinsurance.
Industry Reserve Adequacy 1998 CLRS, Philadelphia Todd Hess, FCAS, MAAA Underwriters Reinsurance Company.
Loss Reserving in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico Eduardo Esteva New Orleans, Louisiana September 11, 2001.
Reinsurance By Roar Rasten Gard AS
Introduction to Reinsurance Reserving Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Washington, D.C. September 23, 2002 Bruce D. Fell, FCAS, MAAA Am-Re Consultants, Inc.
RI Accounting for Non Proportional Treaties
Reinsurance Structures and On Level Loss Ratios Reinsurance Boot Camp July 2005.
Philadelphia CARe Meeting European Pricing Approaches Experience Rating May 7-8, 2007 Steve White Seattle.
1 Actuarial and Accounting Issues Surrounding FASB Statement No. 113 Accounting and Reporting for Reinsurance of Short- Duration and Long-Duration Contracts.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Insurance Company Operations.
The Reserving Actuary’s Role in Risk Assessment: Value Added by the Reserving Actuary in Identifying and Helping Mitigate Financial Risk Both on the Balance.
Non-Life Loss Reserving Practices and Documentation IAIS – ASSAL Training Seminar April 29, 2009 David Oakden.
Pegasus Advisors - Towers Perrin Reinsurance CAS 2003 Seminar on Reinsurance Pricing Techniques - Casualty Lines Given by: Peter W. Wildman June 2003.
1 Practical ERM Midwestern Actuarial Forum Fall 2005 Meeting Chris Suchar, FCAS.
© 2005 Towers Perrin September 12, 2005 Michael Angelina, ACAS, MAAA – Endurance Specialty Holdings Kevin Downs, FCAS, MAAA – Towers Perrin Bruce D. Fell,
Ab Rate Monitoring Steven Petlick Seminar on Reinsurance May 20, 2008.
Intensive Actuarial Training for Bulgaria January 2007 Lecture 11 – Reinsurance By Michael Sze, PhD, FSA, CFA.
1999 CASUALTY LOSS RESERVE SEMINAR Intermediate Track II - Techniques
Z Swiss Re 0 Using Dynamic Financial Analysis to Structure Reinsurance Session: Using DFA to Optimize the Value of Reinsurance 2001 CAS Special Interest.
©2015 : OneBeacon Insurance Group LLC | 1 SUSAN WITCRAFT Building an Economic Capital Model
Asbestos Valuation CLRS – Chicago; September 8, 2003 Kevin M. Madigan, PhD, ACAS, MAAA Vice President, Platinum Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd. Claus S. Metzner,
Milliman Asbestos Valuation 2004 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Las Vegas, Nevada September 13, 2004 Claus S. Metzner, FSA, FCAS, MAAA, Aktuar – SAV Actuary,
Ab Rate Monitoring Steven Petlick CAS Underwriting Cycle Seminar October 5, 2009.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Insurance Company Operations.
Finance 431: Property-Liability Insurance Lecture 8: Reinsurance.
Atlanta, Georgia September 11, 2006 Anita Sathe, ACAS, ASA – Deloitte Consulting LLP Christopher Bozman, FCAS, MAAA – Towers Perrin Tillinghast Michael.
Kpmg 2002 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Surety Reserving Mike Rozema, ACAS, MAAA KPMG LLP.
Accounting Implications of Finite Reinsurance Contracts 2003 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Chicago, IL Session 4 – Recent Developments in Finite Reinsurance.
Risk Transfer In The Real World Presentedby Jane C. Taylor, FCAS, MAAA Junction Consulting, Inc. Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Boston, MA September 12,
Pitfalls in Common Pricing/Reserving Methodologies David Skurnick St. Paul Re 2001 Seminar on Ratemaking.
1 A Stochastic Approach to Recognizing Profits of Finite Products Jeffrey W. Davis, FCAS, MAAA Casualty Actuarial Society Reinsurance Seminar July 2001.
1 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Claudette Cantin, FCIA, FCAS, MAAA Munich Reinsurance Company of Canada September 14, 2004 Las Vegas Session 7 Loss Reserve.
JLT RE SOLUTIONS, INC. Introduction to Reinsurance Reserving Las Vegas, Nevada September 13, 2004 Bruce D. Fell, FCAS, MAAA, CFA Casualty Loss Reserve.
©Towers Perrin Introduction to Reinsurance Reserving Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Atlanta, Georgia September 11, 2006 Christopher K. Bozman, FCAS, MAAA.
CLRS Intermediate Track II September 2006 Atlanta, Georgia Investigating and Detecting Change.
Introduction to Reinsurance Reserving Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Chicago, Illinois September 9, 2003 Christopher K. Bozman, FCAS, MAAA.
Spencer M. Gluck, FCAS New York CAS Seminar on Reinsurance 2007 Hidden Risks in (Re)Insurance Systemic Risks and Accumulation: May 7, 2007.
2005 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Loss Reserve Analysis and Statements of Actuarial Opinion Robert E. Farnam Senior Financial Analyst and Actuary A.M.
Basic Principles of Insurance Finance Investment Income (Income) Intt-Shareholders Fund (Income) Intt-PolicyholdersFund (Income) Underwriting Profits.
1998 CASUALTY LOSS RESERVE SEMINAR Intermediate Track II - Techniques
CARe Seminar on Reinsurance Marriott Inner Harbor, Baltimore, MD
Loss Reserving in Mexico
Presented by Henriott Group
Reserving in Mergers and Acquisitions
Reinsurance Reserving Methods
Excess Loss Insurance.
Reinsurance Introduction Types of Reinsurance Types of Reinsurers
Reinsurance Insurers purchase reinsurance largely for the same reasons that people and organizations purchase insurance “Insurance for insurers” Functions.
September 2008 Washington, DC
Developing the Coverage Chart and Determining Financial Exposures
Introduction to Reinsurance Reserving
1999 CLRS September 1999 Scottsdale, Arizona
2001 CLRS September 2001 New Orleans, Louisiana
Timothy L. Wisecarver FCAS, FCA, MAAA September 8, 2003
“Our promise and bond is your security”
Non-Life Loss Reserving Practices and Documentation
6 questions = 8% of the exam
Establish the Price: Rating
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Reinsurance Reserving Peter A. Royek Toa Reinsurance Company of America Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Scottsdale, Arizona September 13, 1999

Agenda Reinsurance Contract Types Data Grouping Dimensions Differences Between Reinsurance and Primary that affect Loss Reserving Applications, Complications, and Considerations

Reinsurance Contract Types What Policies Are Insured? Mechanics of the Cover

Reinsurance Contract Types What Policies Are Insured? –Facultative Reinsurance Generally covers one insured/policy The one insured/policy is known to the reinsurer at inception –Treaty Reinsurance Covers multiple insured/policies which fit treaty specifications These multiple insured/policies are unknown at inception but become known to the reinsurer during the treaty term

Reinsurance Contract Types Mechanics of the Cover –Proportional Reinsurance “Follows the Fortunes” of the reinsured company –First-dollar sharing of premium and loss between the parties Reinsurer’s relative participation is pre-determined Examples:Quota Share, Surplus Share –Excess Reinsurance Responds when a loss, group of losses, or a loss ratio exceeds a set figure Reinsurer’s relative participation is NOT pre-determined, but depends on the size of the loss or loss ratio Examples:Per Risk, Per Occurrence, Aggregate –Others

Data Grouping Dimensions Accident Year vs Underwriting Year (or “Losses Occurring” vs “Risks Attaching” or “Policies Incepting”) Casualty vs Property Treaty vs Facultative Excess vs Proportional Broker vs Direct

Data Grouping Dimensions Accident Year vs Underwriting Year (or “Losses Occurring” vs “Risks Attaching” or “Policies Incepting”) –Accident Year allows for easiest application of standard techniques Premium fixed as of December 31 Population of claims fixed at December 31 as well, though many may be unknown May not always be an option for reinsurance

Data Grouping Dimensions Accident Year vs Underwriting Year (or “Losses Occurring” vs “Risks Attaching” or “Policies Incepting”) –Underwriting Year is often used in reinsurance, especially for proportional contracts –This is problematic as an UY can cover two policy years and three calendar years for losses The current UY as of 12 months is “incomplete”

Data Grouping Dimensions Casualty vs Property –Casualty business generally has a longer development tail –Line of business detail is often not available to the reinsurer, but if it is you might want to further subdivide by LOB as different LOBs may develop differently

Data Grouping Dimensions Treaty vs Facultative –These display different development patterns, all else equal

Data Grouping Dimensions Excess vs Proportional –Should be separated from each other Different development patterns Possible reserve adequacy mix –Excess case reserves are generally reviewed by reinsurer’s claim department, which may use ACRs to make case reserve adequacy more consistent among the claims –Proportional case reserves are generally booked as reported by the reinsured company without review –Subdivide Excess further, if possible by type of layer - low, high, catastrophe, etc, as these exhibit different development patterns as well

Data Grouping Dimensions Broker vs Direct –Reinsurers obtain business from ceding companies either directly from that company or though a broker –In the case of “broker” business, the data flows through the broker as well - reports are submitted to the reinsurer periodically (monthly, quarterly, or some other increment) –Because of this, there should be less of a reporting lag for “direct” business than for “broker” business - all else equal –Therefore, it should be expected that the development patterns differ

Differences Between Reinsurance and Primary that affect Loss Reserving Reporting Lag/Development Lag Data Increased Variability Tailor-Made or Atypical Contracts or Features “Accumulation of Issues”

Differences Between Reinsurance and Primary that affect Loss Reserving Reporting Lag/Development Lag –Primary losses develop faster than reinsurance losses if only due to the time it takes for information to reach the reinsurer –Proportional business (“broker”): Accounts are often not due to the reinsurer until days after the close of the quarter It is then possible that losses that the ceding company books in calendar year “X” will be realized and booked by the reinsurer in calendar year “X+1”. The same loss will be in two different triangle “cells”

Differences Between Reinsurance and Primary that affect Loss Reserving Reporting Lag/Development Lag –Excess business: Reporting lag compounds with development lag The reinsurer is not notified immediately of the loss The losses do not “hit” the reinsurer’s data until they exceed the threshold established in the Excess reinsurance contract Example: –Primary company has $400,000 excess of $100,000 per risk reinsurance cover –Loss occurs in Year 1, reserved for $25,000 –Year 3, reserve increased to $50,000, reinsurer is verbally notified that this loss MAY eventually reach their contract –Year 5, reserve increased to $150,000, reinsurer incurs loss, loss “hits” triangles 4 years after it did for the primary company

Differences Between Reinsurance and Primary that affect Loss Reserving Reporting Lag/Development Lag –Premium Estimates Premium estimates are needed in reinsurance more than for primary insurance Reserves must be set against premium earned/exposed as of the accounting date Reporting lag can cause large earned premium amounts to be unreported to the reinsurer as of the accounting date This creates a need for premium to be estimated

Differences Between Reinsurance and Primary that affect Loss Reserving Data –Quantity The “infinite” detail of primary company data is often lost when reported to reinsurers as data gets “collapsed” along several dimensions –Accident dates not reported –Lines of business not reported Industry benchmarks by line of business or accident year can thus be difficult to use

Differences Between Reinsurance and Primary that affect Loss Reserving Data –Quality Quality of data affected by “varied quantity”: –Some ceding companies report more detail to reinsurers than do others –As reinsurance data for reserving is organized along the greatest common denominator in terms of reported data fields, this has an impact on the quality of the analysis

Differences Between Reinsurance and Primary that affect Loss Reserving Increased Variability –Primary insurers purchase reinsurance (among other reasons) to make their results less variable (ie from catastrophes) –Reinsurer data is subject to this reinsured variation –Depending on the type of reinsurance cover, reinsurer data may BE this variation

Primary Experience Gross of Reinsurance

Primary Experience Net of Reinsurance

Reinsurance Experience

Differences Between Reinsurance and Primary that affect Loss Reserving Tailor-Made or Atypical Contracts or Features –Many (possibly large) reinsurance contracts have features that affect the way their experience will develop vis-à-vis other contracts with which they would otherwise be grouped Examples: Stop loss arrangements, loss corridors, sunset clauses, etc

Differences Between Reinsurance and Primary that affect Loss Reserving “Accumulation of Issues” –Each primary insurer faces issues such as changing reserve adequacy, changing settlement patterns, etc –These issues affect that company’s loss reserving data, and the primary company reserving analyst has tools to neutralize the effects of these on the reserving data –Reinsurance loss reserving data is an accumulation of the data of primary companies each of which may have these issues –This adds a further complication to the reinsurance loss reserving process