ACCIDENT REVIEW PROCESS. OBJECTIVES After completing this lesson the participants will be able to: Understand the role of an Accident Review Board/Board.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review of the Incident Command System
Advertisements

MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
1 SAFETY ORGANISATION. 2 Safety Organisation 3 Safety Organisation - Regulator.
Standards Development and Approval Process Steve Rueckert Director of Standards Joint Guidance Committee WECC Leadership Annual Training Session Salt Lake.
European COoperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research Role and rules of procedure for Management Committee Carine Petit Science Officer.
 To facilitate the implementation of employment equity and the communication to employees of matters relating to employment equity and diversity.
Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B5AStandards & Certification Project Management.
The key steps in an annual cycle Produce the annual work programme Create an annual Internal Audit plan for approval by the Audit Committee, typically.
1. Renewing Your Agency’s Contract 2 FY 2013 CACFP Application Late August an will be sent to the Authorized Representative regarding FY2013 contract.
AUDITS Process and Corrective Actions OIG RolesGAO ROLES – OIG –OIG Lead Auditor –OCFO – owner of MATS and Agency Audit Process –OEI AA – Designated OEI.
Occupational Health and Safety Part 2 - Committees, Worker’s Rights, Worker’s Compensation.
Incident Command System Basic Course
Operations Section.
1 Dissertation Process 4 process overview 4 specifics –dates, policies, etc.
Purpose of the Standards
SEMINAR NAIC/ASSAL/SVS REGULATION & SUPERVISION OF MARKET CONDUCT © 2014 National Association of Insurance Commissioners Complaint Handling.
Chapter 11: Follow-up Reviews and Audit Evaluation ACCT620 Internal Auditing Otto Chang Professor of Accounting.
USC Health and Safety Supervisor Training November 24 th and 25 th, 2011 Health & Safety Refresher PART 3.
United States Fire Administration Chief Officer Training Curriculum Human Resource Development Module 6: Managing the Workforce.
Change Advisory Board COIN v1.ppt Change Advisory Board ITIL COIN June 20, 2007.
OH&S Management System
Your Name Agency Where are you from Position on Team Your Course Expectations.
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
PMP® Exam Preparation Course
The Campaign for McMaster University Environmental & Occupational Health Support Services and Central Joint Health and Safety Committee Developed from.
POD 101 Introduction to Point of Dispensing Emergency Preparedness and Response Program & Community Health Services Version 1.1.
Independent School Process Agency of Education State Board of Education Presentation March 25, 2014.
Wetlands Reserve Program Case Study An Overview of the External Audit Process Helping People Help The Land.
Radio Communication Problems in 2005 Related to Narrow Banding, and Resulting NMAC Strategy Martin Maricle AK-Division of Forestry Originally presented.
Serious Accident Investigation REPORTS. Lesson 12 Objectives Use a template to correctly fill out a 24-Hour Preliminary Report and list all the steps.
Emergency Planning Steps 5 steps in emergency planning Step 1: Establish a team Step 2: Analyze capabilities and hazards Step 3: Conduct vulnerability.
Conservation Districts Supervisor Accreditation Module 9: Employer/Employee Relations.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 3—Emergency Operations Coordination What Is It And How Will We Measure It? For sound, click on the megaphone.
Important acronyms AO = authorizing official ISO = information system owner CA = certification agent.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Post On-Scene Investigation and Report Preparation.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
Party Process The Party Process The Safety Board investigates more than 2,000 aviation accidents and incidents a year and about 500 rail, highway, marine.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
Accountability Presented by Mollie Schaffer August 13 th, 2014.
THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF ADVISORY COMMITTEES Development of Work-Based Learning Programs Unit 6-- Developing and Maintaining Community and Business Partnerships.
SMS Planning.  Safety management addresses all of the operational activities of the entire organization.  The four (4) components of an SMS are: 1)
Welcome 2011 California Statewide Medical and Health Exercise.
Erv Gasser Natural Resource Specialist nps Baer Field Manager National Interagency BAER Team Leader - North team National Park Service, Seattle, Wa BAER.
Program Implementation MM.DD.YY. To comply with the OHSA and regulations To demonstrate management's commitment to health and safety To show employees.
MODULE 3 Composition & Roles. TAT TEAM APPROACH UPON COMPLETION OF THIS MODULE, PARTICIPANTS SHOULD UNDERSTAND: 3 – 2  Composition of the Threat Assessment.
1 Developing Fire Department Safety Programs Fire Officer 3 Program.
School Site Council (SSC) Essentials in brief An overview of SSC roles and responsibilities Prepared and Presented by Wanda Chang Shironaka San Juan Unified.
Operations 104 Class 7—Finance Policy. Class 6—Financial Policy Most churches have some sort of collection of policies on Finances. Often these come from.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Curriculum Development at KCC Prepared by Edward Martin Amanda Kalin ChairDirector College Council Curriculum CommitteeCurriculum Development and Program.
1 Crisis Management and Communication Dr. Joy Smith and Ms. Robin Denny.
“Inspiring our students to reach their full potential.”
Visual 4.1 Incident Commander and Command Staff Functions Unit 4: Incident Commander and Command Staff Functions.
Fire Prevention Education Team Organization 1A-01-P310-EP.
Week 4 Seminar Investigating Significant Injuries and Lessons Learned.
Revision N° 11ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course01/01/08 Module N° 9 – SMS operation.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
1 1 Effective Administration of Commercial Contracts Breakout Session # Session D06 Name: Holly Walker, CPCM Corporate Learning Solutions and Contract.
EMS Seminar #4 – Disaster Preparedness Joseph Ip BSc (Hon), MSc, MD VGH Emergency May 28, 2002.
Important acronyms AO = authorizing official ISO = information system owner CA = certification agent.
DoD Lead Agent: Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Training Appendix Revised January 2018.
Training Appendix for Adult Protective Services and Employment Supports June 2018.
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure
What are the Major Changes to the IRB under the Final Common Rule?
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Presentation transcript:

ACCIDENT REVIEW PROCESS

OBJECTIVES After completing this lesson the participants will be able to: Understand the role of an Accident Review Board/Board of Review. Understand the membership of an Accident Review Board/ Board of Review. Understand how the Accident Review Board/Board of Review affects the SAIT’s final reports.

PURPOSE  The purpose of the review boards is to examine and evaluate the SAIT Factual Report and the Management Evaluation Report, validate the causes of the accident and to seek corrective actions to preventive further occurrences.  The Forest Service uses an Accident Review Board (ARB) and the Park Service a Board of Review (BOR) to finalize the SAIT’s report.

How Different Agencies do it  NPS  FOREST SERVICE  BLM  FWS  Wildland Fire

National Park Service  A Board of Review is appointed for all SAI category accidents.  The Board has a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of seven (7) voting members.  The Board is tasked to accept, reject, or request additional information for the factual and management reports; finalize and implement a corrective actions plan and identify key elements of a communications plan.

National Park Service  The corrective action plan:  outlines prevention and mitigation measures, and  develops timelines, and assigns responsibility for completion of each action item.  Progress of the corrective actions plan will be tracked through completion by the appropriate management official at the park/center and region, and the Chief of Risk Management or other assigned management officials at WASO.

National Park Service Typical Members  Chairperson - Associate Regional Director-Operations (of Region experiencing the incident) (voting).  Park Superintendent/Center Director/Operating Unit Manager (voting).  Occupational Safety and Health Program Manager (voting).  National Fire Director NPS NIFC (wildland fire related investigations only) or National or Regional Program Manager (of the functional area associated with the accident (voting).  Interagency Representative (fire related investigations) (voting).  SAIT Team Leader (non-voting).  Chief Investigator (non-voting).  Attendance by non-board members is at the discretion of the Chairperson with the concurrence of the Chief of Risk Management.

Board of Review Proceedings (NPS)  Visit site (where practical).  Review and analyze SAIT Factual Report and Root Cause Analysis.  Finalize the Management Evaluation Report  Finalize Corrective Action Plan from the SAIT recommendations (must be identified clearly and assigned to the appropriate level at the Park, Region, or National Levels).  Develop a Communications Plan for the Park commensurate with the complexity of the incident.  Evaluate the SAIT and BOR Process.

Final Approval  The Board of Review Management Report will be signed by all members of the BOR. If consensus cannot be achieved, the majority will rule with dissenting opinions recorded allowing all members to sign the reports.  All reports are considered “draft” until they are accepted by the National Park Service DASHO.

Forest Service  An Accident Review Board is appointed for all accidents and/or high visibility incident safety investigations.  The Board requires concurrence from the delegating authority for membership.  The Board will consists of an odd number of Federal employees (including the Chairperson) where the majority of the members are independent from the operation or activity in which the incident occurred.  The Board will have a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of seven (7) voting members.  And the Board is tasked to accept, reject, or request modification of the safety investigation report; create and implement a Safety Action Plan (SAP).

Safety Action Plan A plan developed by the Accident Review Board (ARB) that outlines prevention and mitigation measures, develops timelines, and assigns responsibility for the completion of each action item. Progress of the SAP will be tracked through completion by the appropriate safety official.

Forest Service Typical Members Include  Chairperson (voting)  Management official(s) (voting)  Safety & Health Manager (non voting)  Team Leader (non voting)  Chief Investigator (non voting)  Technical specialists (non voting)  Recorder (non voting)

When the Board is Convened  The SAIT Team Leader and Chief Investigator present the Factual/Management Evaluation Reports to the board members.  The Board will then meet in closed session to decide whether to accept or request modification of the reports.  The Board may ask the SAIT to obtain additional information and resubmit the reports.

Final Approval  Once the reports are approved the Accident Review Board (ARB) prepares the Safety Action Plan. This plan outlines the prevention measures, assigns responsibility for completion of action items and establishes timelines for completion.  Progress of the plan will be tracked through completion by the appropriate Agency Safety Official.

Final Approval  Once the reports are approved the Accident Review Board (ARB) prepares the Safety Action Plan. This plan outlines the prevention measures, assigns responsibility for completion of action items and establishes timelines for completion.  Progress of the plan will be tracked through completion by the appropriate Agency Safety Official.

Final Approval  The chairperson will forward to the Forest Service Chief the following for approval:  Final Accident Investigation Report.  Draft Safety Action Plan and Transmittal Letter.  When the Washington Office DASHO assigns the Accident Review Board responsibilities to a Region, the final investigation report and the draft accident prevention action plan will be forwarded to the Washington Office, Office of Safety and Occupational Health for review and approval.

Fire-Related SAI Review Process  The Serious Accident Investigation Team (SAIT) Leader will present the final draft report to:  Assistant Director, Fire & Aviation (or acting)  Deputy Assistance Directors (WO & NIFC), Fire & Aviation (or their acting’s)  Chief, Fire Operations  Deputy Chief, Fire Operations  Safety Manager, Fire & Aviation  Chief, Safety & Health (WO740)

Fire-Related Final Report Approval/Briefing  Once the review is complete and any follow-up actions are addressed, the final report will be formally submitted to the Assistant Director, Fire & Aviation.  Upon receipt of the Final Report the Assistant Director, Fire & Aviation will determine which recommendations are accepted and then approve the Final Report (per cover memo).  Assistant Director, Fire & Aviation and SAIT Leader will present Final Report to:  Bureau Director  Bureau DASHO (WO-700)  Any other pre-identified staff  (FA staff members and SAIT members maybe asked to participate in Director briefing)  Bureau Director will approve the report with a formal memorandum and all formal correspondence will be kept with accident investigation file at the national safety office, office of record.

Fire-Related Final Report Approval/Briefing The approved SAI Final Report recommendations will be coordinated through Division of Operations (FA300) to ensure appropriate organizational actions are taken and establish corrective action plan and timeline.

Interagency SAIT  The agency which had the accident may use a Review Board process to approve or modify your factual and management reports.  If this is the case, you will be asked to:  Send the requested drafts of the Factual and Management Evaluation Reports to the agency safety manager/agency official for the Review Board.  Present the Factual and Management Evaluation Report’s findings to the Review Board.

Board of Inquiry or Board of Survey  The Accident Review Board/ Board of Review process is not the same as a Board of Inquiry or Board of Survey that may be convened.  Boards of Inquiry/ Board of Survey are used to follow-up on serious accident situations and determine responsibility and accountability. Only the Bureau Director or the Deputy Director may request a Board of Inquiry  While this is not one of your responsibilities as a member on a SAIT assignment it is important for you to know that these types of reviews can take place during or after your investigation

Objectives Review  Understand the purpose of an Accident Review Board/ Board of Review.  Understand the membership of an Accident Review Board/ Board of Review.  Understand how the Accident Review Board/Board of Review affects the SAIT’s final reports.